Understanding Conceptual Schemas: Exploring the Role of Application and IS Domain Knowledge

References

• Agarwal R., Sinha A. P., Tanniru M. The role of prior experience and task characteristics in object-oriented modeling: An empirical study. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Stud. (1996) 45:639–667Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alexander P. A. Domain knowledge: Evolving themes and emerging concerns. Ed. Psych. (1992) 27(1):33–51Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alexander P. A., Judy J. E. The interaction of domain-specific and strategic knowledge in academic performance. Rev. Ed. Res. (1988) 58(4):375–404Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson J. R.The Architecture of Cognition (1983) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
• Batra D., Davis J. G. Conceptual data modelling in database design: Similarities and differences between expert and novice designers. Internat. J. Man-Machine Stud. (1992) 37:83–101Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blum Bruce I. A paradigm for the 1990s validated in the 1980s. Seventh AIAA Comput. Aerospace Conf. (1989) Washington, D.C.(American Insititue of Aeronautics and Astronautics)502–511Technical paperCrossref, Google Scholar
• Bodart F., Patel A., Sim M., Weber R. Should optional properties be used in conceptual modelling? A theory and three empirical tests. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(4):384–405Link, Google Scholar
• Borthick A. F., Bowen P. L., Jones D. R., Tse M. H. K. The effects of information request ambiguity and construct incongruence on query development. Decision Support Systems (2001) 32(1):3–25Google Scholar
• Burkhardt J.-M., Détienne F., Wiedenbeck S. Object-oriented program comprehension: Effect of expertise, task and phase. Empirical Software Engrg. (2002) 7(2):115–156Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones A., Weber R., De P., DeGross J. Understanding relationships with attributes in entity-relationship diagrams. Proc. 20th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1999) Atlanta, GA(Association for Information Systems)214–228Google Scholar
• Chen P. P. The entity-relationship model—Toward a unified view of data. ACM Trans. Database Systems (1976) 1(1):9–36Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Ed. Psych. Measurement (1960) 20:37–46Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curtis B., Krasner H., Iscoe N. A field study of the software design process for large scale systems. Comm. ACM (1988) 31(11):1268–1287Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davies I., Green P., Rosemann M., Indulska M., Gallo S. How do practitioners use conceptual modeling in practice? Data Knowledge Engrg.ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Elmasri R., Navathe S. B.Fundamentals of Database Systems (1994) 2nd ed(Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co., Redwood City, CA) Google Scholar
• Gemino A. Empirical methods for comparing system analysis modelling techniques. (1999) . Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., CanadaGoogle Scholar
• Gemino A., Wand Y. Evaluating modeling techniques based on models of learning. Comm. ACM (2003) 46(10):79–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glass R. L., Vessey I. Toward a taxonomy of application domains: History. J. Systems Software (1992) 17(2):189–199Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gugerty L., Olson G. Debugging by skilled and novice programmers. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (1986) New York(ACM Press)171–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffer J. A., Prescott M. B., McFadden F. R.Modern Database Management (2005) (Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Hubbard R., Armstrong J. S. Publication bias against null results. Psych. Reports (1997) 80:337–338Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kazdin A. E. Artifact, bias and complexity of assessment: The ABCs of reliability. J. Appl. Behavior Anal. (1977) 10(1):141–150Crossref, Google Scholar
• Khatri V., Vessey I., Ramesh V., Clay P., Park S.-J. Online supplement to “Understanding Conceptual Schemas: Exploring the Role of Application and IS Domain Knowledge. Inform. Systems Res. (2006) 17(1):81–99 http://www.informs.org/Pubs/supplements/ISR/1526-5536-2006-17-01-0081-app.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Kim Y.-G., March S. T. Comparing data modeling formalisms. Comm. ACM (1995) 38(6):103–115Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landis J. R., Koch G. G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics (1977) 36:159–174Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee H., Choi B. G. A comparative study of conceptual data modeling techniques. J. Database Management (1998) 9:26–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer R. E. Different problem-solving competencies established in learning computer programming with and without meaningful models. J. Ed. Psych. (1975) 67(6):725–734Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mayer R. E.Thinking, Problem Solving, Cognition (1991) (W.H. Freeman and Company, New York) 560–578Google Scholar
• McPeck H. Critical thinking and subject specificity: A reply to Ennis. Ed. Res. (1990) 19(4):10–12Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moody D. L., Ling Tok Wang, Ram Sudha, Lee Mong-Li. Metrics for evaluating the quality of entity relationship models. Proc. 17th Internat. Conf. Conceptual Modeling (ER 1998) (1998) (Springer)211–225Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moody D. L., Shanks G. G., Darke P., Ling Tok Wang, Ram Sudha, Lee Mong-Li. Improving the quality of entity relationship models—Experience in research and practice. Proc. 17th Internat. Conf. Conceptual Modeling (ER 1998) (1998) (Springer)255–276Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nickerson R. S. Null hypothesis significance testing: A review of an old and continuing controversy. Psych. Methods (2000) 5(2):241–301Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orwin R. G., Cooper H., Hedges L. V. Evaluating coding decisions. The Handbook of Research Synthesis (1994) (Russell Sage Foundation, New York) 139–162Google Scholar
• Parsons J. Effects of local versus global schema diagrams on verification and communication in conceptual data modeling. J. Management Inform. Systems (2002) 19(3):155–183Crossref, Google Scholar
• Purao S., Rossi M., Bush A. Toward an understanding of the use of problem and design spaces during object-oriented system development. Inform. Organ. (2002) 12:249–281Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmidt F. L., Hunter J. E., Harlow L. L., Mulaik S. A., Steiger J. H. Eight common but false objections to the discontinuation of significance testing in the analysis of research data. What If There Were No Significance Tests? (1997) (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) 37–64Google Scholar
• Schneiderman B., Mayer R. E. Syntactic/semantic interactions in programmer behavior: A model and experimental results. Internat. J. Comput. Inform. Sci. (1979) 8:219–238Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaft T., Vessey I. The relevance of application domain knowledge: The case of computer program comprehension. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) 6(3):286–299Link, Google Scholar
• Shaft T., Vessey I. The relevance of application domain knowledge: Characterizing the computer program comprehension process. J. Management Inform. Systems (1998) 15(1):51–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shanks G., Nuredini J., Tobin D., Moody D., Weber R. Representing things and properties in conceptual modeling: An empirical investigation. Proc. 11th Eur. Conf. Inform. Systems (2003) Naples, Italy(June 16–21Google Scholar
• Shanks G., Tansley E., Nuredini J., Tobin D., Moody D., Weber R. Representing part-whole relationships in conceptual modeling: An empirical evaluation. Proc. 23rd Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (2002) Seattle, WA(Association of Information Systems)89–100Google Scholar
• Siau K., Wand Y., Benbasat I. A psychological study on the use of relationship concept—Some preliminary findings. Proc. 7th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems Engrg. (CAiSE) (1995) Jyvaskyla, Finland(Springer-Verlag)341–354Crossref, Google Scholar
• Topi H., Ramesh V. Human factors research on data modeling: A review of prior research, an extended framework and future research directions. J. Database Management (2002) 13(2):3–19Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vessey I. Cognitive fit: A theory-based analysis of the graphs versus tables literature. Decision Sci. (1991) 22(Spring):219–240Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vessey I., Zhang P., Galletta D. The theory of cognitive fit: One aspect of a general theory of problem solving? Human-Computer Interaction and Management Information Systems: Foundations, Advances in Management Information Systems Series (2006) (M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY) Google Scholar
• Vessey I., Conger S. Learning to specify information requirements: The relationship between application and methodology. J. Management Inform. Systems (1993) 10(2):177–201Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weber R. Are attributes entities? A study of database designers’ memory structures. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7:137–162Link, Google Scholar
• Whetten D. A. What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(4):490–495Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiedenbeck S., Soloway E., Iyengar S. Processes in computer program comprehension. Empirical Studies of Programmers (1986) (Alex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ) 48–57Google Scholar
• Witt G. C., Simsion G. C.Data Modeling Essentials: Analysis, Design and Innovation (2004) 3rd ed.(Morgan Kauffman, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar