Impacts of License Choice and Organizational Sponsorship on User Interest and Development Activity in Open Source Software Projects

References

• Agarwal R., Prasad J. Are individual difference germane to the acceptance of information technologies? Decision Sci. (1999) 30(2):361–391Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R., Teas R. K. Perceived value: Mediating role of perceived risk. J. Marketing Theory Practice (2001) 9(4):1–14Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergquist M., Ljungberg J. The power of gifts: Organizing social relationships in open source communities. Inform. Systems J. (2001) 11(4):305–320Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berndt E.The Practice of Econometrics, Classic and Contemporary (1991) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Bollinger T.Use of Open Source Software in the U.S. Department of Defense (2002) . Mitre Mitre-OSD-OSS v1.0Google Scholar
• Box G. E. P., Cox D. R. An analysis of transformations. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Series B (1964) 26(2):211–252Google Scholar
• Casile M., Davis-Blake A. When accreditation standards change: Factors affecting differential responsiveness of public and private organizations. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45(1):180–195Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chengalur-Smith S., Sidorova A. Survival of open-source projects: A population ecology perspective. Proc. 24th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (2003) Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
• Crowston K., Scozzi B. Open source software projects as virtual organizations: Competency rallying for software development. IEE Proc. Software (2002) 149(1):3–17Google Scholar
• Crowston K., Annabi H., Howison J. Defining open source software project success. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (2003) Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
• Davis F. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(3):319–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis F., Bagozzi R., Warshaw P. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Sci. (1989) 35:982–1003Link, Google Scholar
• Davis F. D., Bagozzi R. P., Warshaw P. R. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J. Appl. Social Psych. (1992) 22(14):1111–1132Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dempsey B. J., Weiss D., Jones P., Greenberg J. Who is an open source software developer? Comm. ACM (2002) 45(2):67–72Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiBona C., Ockman S., Stone M.Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution (1999) (O’Reilly, Sebastopol, CA) Google Scholar
• Dodds W. B., Monroe K. B., Grewal D. Effects of price, brand, and store informations on buyers’ product evaluation. J. Marketing Res. (1991) 28:307–319Crossref, Google Scholar
• Downs A.Inside Bureaucracy (1967) (Little, Brown, Boston, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feller J., Fitzgerald B.Understanding Open Source Software Development (2002) (Addison-Wesley, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Fershtman C., Gandal N. The determinants of output per contributor in open source projects: An empirical examination. (2004) . http://ssrn.com/abstract=515282Google Scholar
• Gacek C., Arief B. The many meanings of open source. IEEE Software (2004) 21(1):34–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghosh R. A., Prakash V. V. The Orbiten Free Software Survey. First Monday (2000) 5(7). http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue5_7/ghosh/index/htmlCrossref, Google Scholar
• Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (1993) (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Hann I.-H., Roberts J., Slaughter S. A., Fielding R. Economic incentives for participating in open source software projects. Proc. 23rd Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (2002) Association for Information Systems, Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
• Hars A., Ou S. Working for free? Motivations for participating in open source projects. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce (2002) 6(3):25–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harter D. E., Krishnan M. S., Slaughter S. A. Effects of process maturity on quality, cycle time, and effort in software product development. Management Sci. (2000) 46(4):451–466Link, Google Scholar
• Koch C. Your open source plan. CIO Magazine (2003) 16(11):52Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthy S. Cave or community? An empirical examination of 100 mature open source projects. First Monday (2002) 7(4). http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue7_6/Krishnamurthy/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Lerner J., Tirole J. Some simple economics of open source. J. Indust. Econom. (2002) 50(2):197–234Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J., Tirole J. The scope of open source licensing. J. Law, Econom. Organ. (2005) 21(1):20–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leventhal T. Federal CIOs tout benefits of “open source” software. Government Executive Magazine (2004) March 15). http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0304/03/504td1.htmGoogle Scholar
• Markus M. L., Manville B., Agres C. E. What makes a virtual organization work? Sloan Management Rev. (2000) 42(1):13–26Google Scholar
• Mockus A., Fielding R. T., Herbsleb J. D. Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla. ACM Trans. Software Engrg. Methodology (2002) 11(3):309–346Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parker G., Van Alstyne M. Innovation through optimal licensing in free markets and free software. (2004) . http://ssrn.com/abstract=639165Google Scholar
• Pierce C. A., Block R. A., Aguinis H. Cautionary note on reporting eta-squared values from multifactor ANOVA designs. Educ. Psych. Measurement (2004) 64(6):916–924Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prahalad C. K., Krishnan M. S. The new meaning of quality in the information age. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1999) 77(5):109–118Google Scholar
• Raghunathan S., Prasad A., Mishra B., Birendra K., Hsihui C. Open source versus closed source: Software quality in monopoly and competitive markets. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man Cybernetics: Part A (2005) 35(6):903–918Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raymond E. S.The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musing on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary (2001) (O’Reilly, Sebastopol, CA) Google Scholar
• Raymond E. S., Landley R. (2003) . OSI position paper on the SCO-vs.-IBM complaint, rev. 2.4. http://www.opensource.org/sco-vs-ibm.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Rosen L.Open Source Licensing: Software Freedom and Intellectual Property Law (2005) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Scacchi W. Understanding the requirements for developing open source software systems. IEE Proc. Software (2002) 149(1):24–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scacchi W. Free and open source development practices in the game community. IEEE Software (2004) 21(1):59–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott W. R.Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems (1998) (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Smith T. Open source: Enterprise ready—With qualifiers. (2002) . www.theopenenterprise.com/story/TOE2002092650002Google Scholar
• SPSSSPSS Advanced Models 11.5 (2002) . SPSS, Inc.Google Scholar
• Stewart K. J., Gosain S. The impact of ideology on effectiveness in open source software development teams. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(2):291–314Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sweeney J., Soutar G. N., Johnson L. W. The role of perceived risk in the quality-value relationship: A study in a retail environment. J. Retailing (1999) 75(1):77–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szajna B. Software evaluation and choice: Predictive validation of the technology acceptance instrument. MIS Quart. (1994) 18(3):319–324Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor S., Todd P. A. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) 6(2):144–176Link, Google Scholar
• Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Tiemann M. On “Shared-Source.” Transcript of a speech delivered to the O’Reilly Open Source Convention. (2001) . http://www.opensource.org/docs/sharedsource.phpGoogle Scholar
• Venkatesh V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(4):342–365Link, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V., Morris M. G., Davis G. B., Davis F. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(3):425–478Crossref, Google Scholar
• von Hippel E. Innovation by user communities: Learning from open source software. Sloan Management Rev. (2001) 42(4):82–86Google Scholar
• West J. How open is open enough? Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Res. Policy (2003) 32(7):1259–1285Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wright P. L. Consumer choice strategies: Simplifying vs. optimizing. J. Marketing Res. (1975) 11:60–67Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeithaml V. A. Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J. Marketing (1988) 52:2–22Crossref, Google Scholar