Understanding the Adoption of Multipurpose Information Appliances: The Case of Mobile Data Services

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0088

References

  • Agarwal R., Lucas H. The information systems identity crisis: Focusing on high-visibility and high-impact research. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(3):381–398CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R., Prasad J. A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(2):204–215LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (1991) 50:179–211CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Areni C. S., Kiecker P., Costa J. A. Gender differences in motivation. Gender and Consumer Behavior (1993) (University of Utah Printing Service, Salt Lake City, UT) 30–43Google Scholar
  • Bearden W. O., Etzel M. Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions. J. Consumer Res. (1982) 9(2):183–194CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Belk R. Possessions and the extended self. J. Consumer Res. (1988) 15:139–168CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benbasat I., Zmud R. The identity crisis within the IS discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline’s core properties. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):183–194CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bentler P., Bonnett D. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psych. Bull. (1980) 88(3):588–606CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bergman E.Information Appliances and Beyond (2000) (Morgan Kauffman, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
  • Brancheau J., Wetherbe J. The adoption of spreadsheet software: Testing innovation diffusion theory in the context of end-user computing. Inform. Systems Res. (1990) 1:115–143LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brislin R., Triandis H., Berry J. Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. Handbook of Cross-Cultural Psychology: Methodology (1980) Vol. 2(Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Carr N.Does IT Matter? (2004) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Carroll J. M. Human-computer interaction: Psychology as a science of design. Annual Rev. Psych. (1997) 48:61–83CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll J., Howard S., Vetere F., Peck J., Murphy J. Just what do the youth of today want? Technology appropriation by young people. Proc. 35th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (2002) Big Island, HI(IEEE Computer Society Press)CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chau P. Y. K. Reexamining a model for evaluating information center success using a structural equation modeling approach. Decision Sci. (1997) 28(2):309–334CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Childers T. L., Rao A. The influence of familial and peer-based reference groups on consumer decisions. J. Consumer Res. (1992) 19(2):198–211CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Comrey A. L.A First Course in Factor Analysis (1973) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Cronin J. J., Brady M., Hult T. Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intention in service environments. J. Retailing (2000) 76(2):193–218CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. (1989) 13:319–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis F. D., Bagozzi R. P., Warshaw P. R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Sci. (1989) 35:982–1003LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Davis F. D., Bagozzi R. P., Warshaw P. R. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (1992) 22(14):1111–1132CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dodds W. B., Monroe K., Grewal D. Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluation. J. Marketing Res. (1991) 28:307–319CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Engel J., Blackwell R., Miniard P.Consumer Behavior (2001) 9th ed.(Dryden Press, Orlando, FL) Google Scholar
  • Fisher R. J., Price L. An investigation into the social context of early adoption behavior. J. Consumer Res. (1992) 19:477–486CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fornell C., Larcker D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18(1):39–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forrester ResearchSegmenting Europe’s Mobile Consumers (2002) Google Scholar
  • Gefen D., Straub D. Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail. MIS Quart. (1997) 21(4):389–400CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ha J. Popular ring-back tone service. Joongang Daily (2002) August 22Google Scholar
  • Hair J., Anderson R., Tatham R., Black W.Multivariate Data Analysis (1998) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Hoyer W., MacInnis D.Consumer Behavior (2004) 3rd ed.(Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Islam N., Fayad M. Toward ubiquitous acceptance of ubiquitous computing. Comm. ACM (2003) 46(2):89–92CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • ITU The portable Internet, International Telecommunication Union. (2004) . ITU Internet reportsGoogle Scholar
  • ITU The Internet of things, International Telecommunication Union. (2005) . ITU Internet reportsGoogle Scholar
  • Jacoby J. R., Olson J., Wind T., Greenberg P. Consumer response to price: An attitudinal, information processing perspective. Moving Ahead with Attitude Research (1977) (American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL) 73–86Google Scholar
  • Joreskog K. G., Sorbom D. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. (1993) . Scientific Software, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  • Jung T., Youn H. Individual motivations and self-presentation strategies on hosting weblog format homepage. Proc. 5th Annual Conf. Association Internet Researchers (AOIR) (2004) University of Sussex, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  • Kim N., Han J., Srivastava R. A dynamic IT adoption model for the SOHO market: PC generational decisions with technological expectations. Management Sci. (2002) 48(2):222–240LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Korea Chamber of Comerce Expected buzz words in do-mes-tic consumption market in 2005. (2005) . http://www.english.korcham.net/bbsllist.asp?code=reportsGoogle Scholar
  • Korea Times, The Cyworld storm heads for Asian countries. (2005) Feb. 23Google Scholar
  • Kraut R. E., Mukhopadhyay T., Szczypula J., Kiesler S., Scherlis W. Information and communication: Alternative uses of the Internet in households. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(4):287–303LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee A. Inaugural editor’s comments. MIS Quart. (1999) 23(1):v–xiCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee J. An end-user perspective on file-sharing systems. Comm. ACM (2003) 46(2):49–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lynn H., Harris J. The desire for unique consumer products: A new individual differences scale. Psych. Marketing (1997) 14:601–616CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lyytinen K., Yoo Y. The next wave of nomadic computing. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(4):377–388LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mathieson K. Predicting user intention: Competing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2(3):173–191LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mitchell V., Walsh G. Gender differences in German consumer decision-making styles. J. Consumer Behaviour (2004) 3(4):331–346CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Monroe K. B.Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions (1990) 2nd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Monroe K. B., Krishnan R., Jacoby J., Olson J. The effect of price on subjective product evaluations. Perceived Quality (1985) (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) 209–232Google Scholar
  • Morris M., Venkatesh V. Age differences in technology adoption decisions: Implications for a changing work force. Personnel Psych. (2000) 53:375–403CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nielsen J.Usability Engineering (1993) (Academic Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pepinsky P., Berg I., Bass B. Social exceptions that prove the rule. Conformity and Deviation (1961) (Harper, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podsakoff P., Mackenzie S., Podsakoff N. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(5):879–903CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Preece J., Rogers Y., Sharp H.Interaction Design (2002) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Rogers E.Diffusion of Innovations (1995) 4th ed.(Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Rokeach M.The Nature of Human Values (1973) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Schiffman L., Kanuk L.Consumer Behavior (2004) 8th ed.(Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Sheppard B. H., Hartwick J., Warshaw P. R. The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. J. Consumer Res. (1988) 15(3):325–343CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simonson I., Nowlis S. The role of explanations and need for uniqueness in consumer decision making: Unconventional choices based on reasons. J. Consumer Res. (2000) 27:49–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Slyke C., Comunale C., Belanger F. Gender differences in perceptions of web-based shopping. Comm. ACM (2002) 45(7):82–86CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Snyder C., Fromkin H. Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness. J. Abnormal Psych. (1977) 86:518–527CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Starbuck W., Webster J. When is play productive? Accounting, Management Inform. Tech. (1991) 1(1):71–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tepper K., Belk R. Categories, contexts, and conflicts of consumers’ nonconformity experiences. Research in Consumer Behavior (1997) (JAI, Greenwich, CT) 209–245Google Scholar
  • Tepper K., Bearden W., Hunter G. Consumers’ need for uniqueness: Scale development and validation. J. Consumer Res. (2001) 28:50–66CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson C., Haytko D. Speaking of fashion: Consumers’ uses of fashion discourses and the appropriation of countervailing cultural meanings. J. Consumer Res. (1997) 24:15–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van der Heijden H. User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(4):695–704CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(4):342–365LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V., Brown S. A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: Adoption determinants and emerging challenges. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(1):71–102CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V., Davis F. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Sci. (2000) 46(2):186–204LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V., Morris M. Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and user behavior. MIS Quart. (2000) 24:115–139CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V., Vitalari N. An emerging distributed work arrangement: An investigation of computer-based supplemental work at home. Management Sci. (1992) 38(12):1687–1706LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V., Morris M., Ackerman P. A longitudinal field investigation of gender differences in individual technology adoption decision making processes. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 83(1):33–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V., Ramesh V., Massey A. Understanding usability in mobile commerce. Comm. ACM (2003a) 46(12):53–56CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V., Morris M., Davis G., Davis F. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. (2003b) 27(3):425–478CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Whitley B. Gender differences in computer related attitudes and behaviour: A meta-analysis. Comput. Human Behav. (1997) 13(1):1–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yankee Group Research Mobile user survey results Part 1: Will next generation data services close the value gap? (2002) Google Scholar
  • Zeithaml V. Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J. Marketing (1988) 52:2–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zmud R. Individual differences and MIS success. Management Sci. (1979) 25(10):966–979LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.