Issues and Opinions—Publication Opportunities in Premier Business Outlets: How Level Is the Playing Field?

References

• Adams J. S. Toward an understanding of inequity. J. Abnormal Social Psych. (1963) 67:422–436Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adams J. S., Berkowitz L. Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Psychology (1965) Vol. 2(Academic Press, San Diego, CA) 267–299Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athey S., Plotnicki J. An evaluation of researcher productivity in academic IT. Comm. Association Inform. System (2000) 3:1–20Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bandura A.Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory (1986) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Baskerville R. L., Myers M. D. Information systems as a reference discipline. Management Inform. Systems Quart. (2002) 26(1):1–14Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beatty V., Goodacre A. Publishing patterns within the UK accounting and finance academic community. Brit. Accounting Rev. (2004) 36(1):7–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benbasat I. Editorial notes. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(3):i–iiLink, Google Scholar
• Benbasat I. Editorial notes. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(2):iii–ivLink, Google Scholar
• Benbasat I., Weber R. Research commentary: Rethinking “diversity” in information systems. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(4):389–399Link, Google Scholar
• Benbasat I., Zmud R. W. Empirical research in information systems: The practice of relevance. Management Inform. Systems Quart. (1999) 23(1):3–16Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benbasat I., Zmud R. W. The identity crisis within the IS discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline’s core properties. Management Inform. Systems Quart. (2003) 27(2):183–194Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carnegie FoundationCarnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education: Category Definitions (2000) . http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/Classification/CIHE2000/defNotes/Definitions.htmGoogle Scholar
• Chua C., Cao L., Cousins C., Straub D. W. Measuring researcher-productivity in information systems. J. Association Inform. System (2002) 3:145–215Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crosby F. A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psych. Rev. (1976) 83(2):85–113Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davenport T. H., Markus M. L. Rigor vs. relevance revisited: Response to Benbasat and Zmud. Management Inform. Systems Quart. (1999) 23(1):19–23Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis M. ISSI-2001 in Australia, July 2001: A report of the 8th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics. Library Hi Tech News (2001) 18(10):3–4Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis A. R., Valacich J. S. Conducting research in information systems. Comm. Association Inform. System (2001) 7:1–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis A. R., Valacich J. S., Fuller M. A., Schneider C. Research standards for promotion and tenure in information systems. Management Inform. Systems Quart. (2006) 30(1):1–12Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G. The social life of information systems research: A response to Benbasat and Zmud’s call for returning to the IT artifact. J. Association Inform. System (2003) 4(7):360–376Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellison G. Evolving standards for academic publishing: A q-r theory. J. Political Econom. (2002) 110(5):994–1034Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishe R. P. H. What are the research standards for a full professor of finance? J. Finance (1998) 53(3):1053–1079Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galliers R. D. Change as crisis or growth? Toward a trans-disciplinary view of information systems as a field of study: A response to Benbasat and Zmud’s call for returning to the IT artifact. J. Association Inform. System (2003) 4(6):337–351Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gomez-Mejia L. R., Balkin D. B. Determinants of faculty pay: An agency theory perspective. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35(5):921–955Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson G., Ganesh K., Chandy P. R. Across-discipline journal awareness and evaluation: Implications for the promotion and tenure process. J. Econom. Bus. (1990) 42(4):325–351Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huang H.-H., Hsu J. S.-C. An evaluation of publication productivity in information systems: 1999 to 2003. Comm. Association Inform. System (2005) 15:555–564Crossref, Google Scholar
• Im K. S., Kim K. Y., Kim J. S. An assessment of individual and institutional research productivity in MIS. Decision Line (1998) 29(1):8–12Google Scholar
• Ives B., Parks M. S., Porra J., Silva L. Phylogeny and power in the IS domain: A response to Benbasat and Zmud’s call for returning to the IT artifact. J. Association Inform. System (2004) 5(3):108–124Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee A. S. Rigor and relevance in MIS research: Beyond the approach of positivism alone. Management Inform. Systems Quart. (1999) 23(1):29–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lowry P. B., Romans D., Curtis A. Global journal prestige and supporting disciplines: A scientometric study of information systems journals. J. Association Inform. System (2004) 5(2):29–77Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lytras M. D. Prof. Robert Zmud Interview. Official Quart. Bull. Association Inform. System Special Interest Group Semantic Web Inform. Systems (2005a) 2(2):1–7 http://www.sigsemis.org/columns/interviews/Interview_Robert_Zmud.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Lytras M. D. Prof. William R. King Interview. Official Quart. Bull. Association Inform. System Special Interest Group Semantic Web Inform. Systems (2005b) 2(1):9–13 http://www.sigsemis.org/newsletter/March2005/sigsemis_bulletin_March.2005.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Lyytinen K. Empirical research in information systems: On the relevance of practice in thinking of IS research. Management Inform. Systems Quart. (1999) 23(1):25–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath J. E., McGrath J. E., Martin J., Kulka R. A. Dilemmatics: The study of research choices and dilemmas. Judgment Calls in Research (1982) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) 69–101Google Scholar
• Peffers K., Ya T. Identifying and evaluating the universe of outlets for information systems research: Ranking the journals. J. Inform. Tech. Theory Appl. (2003) 5(1):63–84Google Scholar
• Piccoli G., Ives B. Trust and the unintended consequences of behavior control in virtual teams. Management Inform. Systems Quart. (2003) 27(3):365–395Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robey D. Research commentary: Diversity in information systems research: Threat, promise, and responsibility. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(4):400–408Link, Google Scholar
• Robey D. Identity, legitimacy and the dominant research paradigm: An alternative prescription for the IS discipline. A response to Benbasat and Zmud’s call for returning to the IT artifact. J. Association Inform. System (2003) 4(7):352–359Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V. Editorial notes. Inform. Systems Res. (2005) 16(1):1–5Link, Google Scholar
• Saunders C. Editor’s comments: From the trenches: Thoughts on developmental reviewing. Management Inform. Systems Quart. (2005a) 29(2):iii–xiiCrossref, Google Scholar
• Saunders C. Editor’s comments: Looking for diamond cutters. Management Inform. Systems Quart. (2005b) 29(1):iii–viiCrossref, Google Scholar
• Saunders C. Editor’s comments: Necessary changes. Management Inform. Systems Quart. (2006) 30(1):iii–viCrossref, Google Scholar
• Starbuck W. H. Turning lemons into lemonade: Where is the value in the peer reviews? J. Management Inquiry (2003) 12(4):344–351Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starbuck W. H. How much better are the most-prestigious journals? The statistics of academic publication. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(2):180–200Link, Google Scholar
• Swanson E. P. Publishing in the majors: A comparison of accounting, finance, management, and marketing. Contemporary Accounting Res. (2004) 21(1):223–255Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sweeney P. D., McFarlin D. B., Inderrieden E. J. Using relative deprivation theory to explain satisfaction with income and pay level: A multistudy examination. Acad. Management J. (1990) 33(2):423–436Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swidler S., Goldreyer E. The value of a finance journal publication. J. Finance (1998) 53(1):351–363Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trieschmann J. S., Dennis A. R., Northcraft G. B., Niemi A. W. Serving multiple constituencies in business schools: M.B.A. program versus research performance. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43(6):1130–1141Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vroom V.Work and Motivation (1964) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Weber R. Editor’s comments: The parable of the golf balls. Management Inform. Systems Quart. (2002) 26(1):iii–viiiGoogle Scholar