From IT Leveraging Competence to Competitive Advantage in Turbulent Environments: The Case of New Product Development

References

• Alavi M., Leidner D. E. Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(1):107–136Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atuahene-Gima K., Li H. Strategic decision comprehensiveness and new product development outcomes in new technology ventures. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(4):583–597Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagozzi R., Yi Y., Phillips L. Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36:421–458Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barua A., Kriebel H. C., Mukhopadhyay T. Information technologies and business value: An analytic and empirical investigation. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) 6(1):3–23Link, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj A. A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(1):169–196Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj A., Sambamurthy V., Zmud R. W. IT capabilities: Theoretical perspectives and empirical operationalization. Proc. 20th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1999) Charlotte, NC:378–385Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj A., Sambamurthy V., Zmud R. Firmwide IT capability: An empirical examination of the construct and its links to performance. (2002) . Working paper, Department of Decision and Information Analysis, Emory University, Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
• Boland R. J., Tenkashi R. V. Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(4):350–372Link, Google Scholar
• Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M. Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(2):343–378Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carr N. G. IT doesn't matter. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2003) 81(5):5–12Google Scholar
• Carte T. A., Russell C. J. In pursuit of moderation: Nine common errors and their solutions. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(3):479–501Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin W. W. Issues and opinions on structural equation modeling. MIS Quart. (1998) 22(1):7–16Google Scholar
• Chin W. W., Marcolin B. L., Newsted P. R. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(2):189–217Link, Google Scholar
• Chow G. Tests of equality between sets of coefficients in two linear regressions. Econometrica (1960) 28:591–605Crossref, Google Scholar
• Churchill G. A. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J. Marketing Res. (1979) 16(1):64–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clark K. B., Fujimoto T.Product Development Performance (1991) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Clemons E. Corporate strategies for information technology: A resource-based approach. Computer (1991) 24(1):23–32Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Danneels E. The dynamic of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23(4):1095–1121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Day G. S. The capabilities of market-driven organization. J. Marketing (1994) 58(1):37–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Devaraj S., Kohli R. Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link? Management Sci. (2003) 49(3):273–289Link, Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos A., Winklhofer H. M. Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38(2):269–277Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards J. R. Multidimensional constructs in organizational behavior research: An integrative analytical framework. Organ. Res. Methods (2001) 4(2):144–192Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Martin J. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:1105–1121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feeny D. F., Willcocks L. P. Core IS capabilities for exploiting information technology. Sloan Management Rev. (1998) 39(1):9–21Google Scholar
• Grant R. M.Contemporary Strategy Analysis (1995) (Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Grant R. M. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(3):375–387Link, Google Scholar
• Henard D., Szymanski D. M. Why some new products are more successful than other. J. Marketing (2001) 38(3):362–375Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson J., Cockburn I. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management J. (1994) 42(1):63–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt M. A., Keats B., DeMarie S. Navigating in the new competitive landscape: Building strategic flexibility and competitive advantage in the 21st century. Acad. Management Executive (1998) 12(4):22–42Google Scholar
• Iansiti M., Clark K. B. Integration and dynamic capability: Evidence from product development in automobiles and mainframe computers. Indust. Corporate Change (1994) 3(3):557–605Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jap S. D. Perspectives on joint competitive advantage in buyer-supplier relationships. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2001) 18(1):19–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaworski B., Kohli A. Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. J. Marketing (1993) 57(3):53–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ketchen D. J., Shook C. L. The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research. Strategic Management J. (1996) 14(6):441–458Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Zander U. What do firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(4):502–518Link, Google Scholar
• Kohli R., Devaraj S. Measuring information technology pay-off: A meta-analysis of structural variables in firm-level empirical research. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(2):127–145Link, Google Scholar
• Kohli A., Jaworski B. Marketing orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. J. Marketing (1990) 54(1):1–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V., Ulrich K. T. Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):1–21Link, Google Scholar
• Kusunoki K., Nonaka I., Nagata A. Organizational capabilities in product development of Japanese firms: A conceptual framework and empirical findings. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(6):699–718Link, Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D. Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13(2):111–125Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lindell M. K., Whitney D. J. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86(1):114–121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madhaven R., Grover R. From embedded knowledge to embodied knowledge: New product development as knowledge management. J. Marketing (1998) 62(1):1–12Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malone T., Crowston K. The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Comput. Surveys (1994) 26(1):87–119Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mata F. J., Fuerst W. L., Barney J. B. Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(4):487–505Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath J., Iansiti M. Envisioning IT-enabled innovation. Insight Magazine (1998) 1(1):2–10Google Scholar
• Mendelson H., Pillai R. R. Clockspeed and informational response: Evidence from the information technology industry. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(4):415–433Link, Google Scholar
• Nambisan S. Information systems as a reference discipline for new product development. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(1):1–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R. R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Bellknap, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Nerkar A., Roberts P. W. Technological and product-market experience and the success of new product introductions in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(7/8):779–799Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavlou P. A., El Sawy O. A. Decomposing and leveraging dynamic capabilities. (2006) . Working paper, Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California, Riverside, CAGoogle Scholar
• Pavlou P. A., Gefen D. Psychological contract violation in online marketplaces: Antecedents, consequences, and moderating role. Inform. Systems Res. (2005) 16(4):272–299Link, Google Scholar
• Pissano G. Knowledge, integration, and the locus of learning: An empirical analysis of process development. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15(1):85–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., Organ D. W. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Management (1986) 12(4):531–544Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., Mackenzie S. B., Lee J., Podsakoff N. P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(5):879–903Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M. E.Competitive Advantage (1985) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Powell T. C., Dent-Micallef A. Information technology as competitive advantage: The role of human, business, and technology resources. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(5):375–405Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rangaswamy A., Lilien G. L. Software tools for new product development. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34(1):177–184Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ray G., Barney J. B., Muhanna W. A. Capabilities, business processes, and competitive advantage: Choosing the dependent variable in empirical tests of the resource based view. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(1):23–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ray G., Muhanna W. A., Barney J. B. Information technology and the performance of the customer service process: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(4):625–642Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ross J., Beath C., Vitale M. Develop long-term competitiveness through IT assets. Sloan Management Rev. (1996) 38(1):31–45Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V., Bharadwaj A., Grover V. Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of IT in contemporary firms. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):237–263Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sethi R., Smith D. C., Park W. Cross-functional product development teams, creativity, and the innovativeness of new consumer products. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38(1):73–85Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sivadas E., Dwyer F. B. An examination of organizational factors influencing new product success in internal and alliance-based processes. J. Marketing (2000) 64(1):31–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Soh C., Markus M. L. How IT creates business value: A process theory synthesis. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1995) Amsterdam, Netherlands:29–41Google Scholar
• Song M., Parry M. The determinants of Japanese new product success. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34(1):64–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):509–533Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tippins M. J., Sohi R. S. IT competency and firm performance: Is organizational learning a missing link? Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(6):745–761Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urban G., Hauser J.Design and Marketing of New Products (1993) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Wade M., Hulland J. Review: The resource-based view and information systems research: Review extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(1):107–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick K. E., Roberts K. H. Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38(3):357–381Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wheeler B. C., Dennis A. R., Press L. I. Groupware comes to the Internet: Charting a new world. DATABASE Adv. Inform. Systems (1999) 30(3/4):8–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zahra S. A., George G. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27(2):185–203Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zammuto R. Organizational adaptation: Some implications of organizational ecology for strategic choice. J. Management Stud. (1988) 25(2):105–120Crossref, Google Scholar