The Effectiveness of Knowledge Transfer Portfolios in Software Process Improvement: A Field Study

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0098

References

  • Adler P. Shared learning. Management Sci. (1990) 36(8):938–957LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Aiken L., West S.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1991) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Alavi M., Zmud R. W. Managing organizational knowledge. Framing the Domains of IT Management (2000) (Pinnaflex Educational Resources, Cincinnati, OH) 15–28Google Scholar
  • Allen T.Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information within the R&D Organization (1977) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Argote L. Group and organizational learning curves: Individual, system and environmental components. British J. Soc. Psych. (1993) 32:31–51CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L.Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge (1999) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Argote L., Ingram P. Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 82(1):150–169CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Birkinshaw J., Nobel R., Ridderstråle J. Knowledge as a contingency variable: Do the characteristics of knowledge predict organization structure? Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):274–289LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Box G., Cox D. An analysis of transformations. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B (1964) 26:211–243Google Scholar
  • Carlile P. Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(5):555–568LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Contu A., Willmott H. Re-embedding situatedness: The importance of power relations in learning theory. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(3):283–296LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Crampton S., Wagner J. Percept-percept inflation in microorganizational research: An investigation of prevalence and effect. J. Appl. Psych. (1994) 79(1):67–76CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crowston K., Kammerer E. Coordination and collective mind in software requirements development. IBM Systems J. (1998) 37(2):227–245CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Darr E., Argote L., Epple D. The acquisition, transfer, and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations. Management Sci. (1995) 41(11):1750–1762LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Demsetz H., Williamson O., Winter S. The theory of the firm revisited. The Nature of the Firm (1991) (Oxford University Press, New York) 159–178Google Scholar
  • Epple D., Argote L., Devadas R. Organizational learning curves: A method for investigating intra-plant transfer of knowledge acquired through learning by doing. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):58–70LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Galbraith C. Transferring core manufacturing technologies in high technology firms. California Management Rev. (1990) 32(4):56–70CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gaudin S. Study: Many major IT projects still fail. Datamation (2003) June 16). http://www.itmanagement.earthweb.com/it_res/article.php/2222391Google Scholar
  • Grady R.Successful Software Process Improvement (1997) (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Grant R. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(4):375–387LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greene W.Econometric Analysis (2003) 3rd ed.(Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Grover V., Davenport T. General perspectives on knowledge management: Fostering a research agenda. J. MIS (2001) 18(1):5–21Google Scholar
  • Hansen M. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1):82–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hardgrave W., Armstrong D. Software process improvement: It's a journey, not a destination. Comm. ACM (2005) 48(11):93–96CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harter D., Krishnan M., Slaughter S. Effects of process maturity on quality, cost and cycle time in software product development. Management Sci. (2000) 46(4):451–466LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Herbsleb J., Zubrow D., Goldenson D., Hayes W., Paulk M. Software quality and the capability maturity model. Comm. ACM (1997) 40(6):30–40CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hinds P., Kiesler S. Communication across boundaries: Work, structure, and use of communication technologies in a large organization. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(4):373–393LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ko D., Kirsch L., King W. Antecedents of knowledge transfer from consultants to clients in enterprise system implementation. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(1):59–85CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kraut R., Streeter L. Coordination in software development. Comm. ACM (1995) 38(3):69–81CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malhotra A., Majchrzak A., Carman R., Lott V. Radical innovation without collocation: A case study at Boeing-Rocketdyne. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(2):229–249CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mathiassen L., Pourkomeylian P. Managing knowledge in a software organization. J. Knowledge Management (2003) 7(2):63–80CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGrath J., Argote L., Hogg M., Tindale R. Group processes in organizational contexts. Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes (2001) (Blackwell Publishers, Malden, MA) 603–627CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mitki Y., Shani A., Meiri Z. Organizational learning mechanisms and continuous improvement: A longitudinal study. J. Organ. Change Management (1997) 10(5):426–446CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson K., Cooprider J. The contribution of shared knowledge to IS group performance. MIS Quart. (1996) 20(4):409–432CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nonaka I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(1):14–37LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nonaka I., Konno N. The concept of “ba”: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Rev. (1998) 40(3):40–54CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olson G., Olson J. Distance matters. Human-Comput. Interaction (2000) 15(2/3):139–178CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paulus P., Yang H.-C. Idea generation in groups: A basis for creativity in organizations. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 82(1):76–87CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ravichandran T., Rai A. Quality management in systems development: An organizational system perspective. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(3):381–415CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ravichandran T., Rai A. Structural analysis of the impact of knowledge creation and knowledge embedding on software process capability. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2003) 50(3):270–284CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rulke D., Zaheer S., Anderson M. Sources of managers' knowledge of organizational capabilities. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2000) 82(1):134–149CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schulz M. The uncertain relevance of newness: Organizational learning and knowledge flows. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(4):661–681CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spencer B. A. Models of organization and total quality management: A comparison and critical evaluation. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19(3):446–471CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swanson E., Beath C. Departmentalization in software development and maintenance. Comm. ACM (1990) 33(6):658–667CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tashakkori A., Teddlie C.Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (1998) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Teasley S., Covi L., Krishnan M., Olson J. Rapid software development through team collocation. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. (2002) 28(7):671–691CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomas-Hunt M., Ogden T., Neale M. Who's really sharing? Effects of social and expert status on knowledge exchange within groups. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):464–477LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.