Research Note: Individual Cognition and Dual-Task Interference in Group Support Systems

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0102

References

  • Aldrich J. H., Nelson F. D.Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models (1984) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson J.The Architecture of Cognition (1983) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Ariely D. Controlling the information flow: Effects on consumers’ decision making and preferences. J. Consumer Res. (2000) 27(2):233–248CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beach L. R., Mitchell T. R. A contingency model for the selection of decision strategies. Acad. Management Rev. (1978) 3(3):439–449CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burnstein E., Vinokur A. Testing two classes of theories about group-induced shifts in individual choice. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1973) 9(2):123–137CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cacioppo J. T., Petty R. E., Morris K. Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1983) 45(4):805–818CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chewning E. G., Harrell A. M. The effect of information load on decision makers’ cue utilization levels and decision quality in a financial distress decision task. Accounting, Organ., Soc. (1990) 15(6):527–542CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Connolly T., Jessup L. M., Valacich J. S. Effects of anonymity and evaluative tone on idea generation in computer-mediated groups. Management Sci. (1990) 36(6):689–703LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dabbish L., Kraut R. Awareness displays and interruption in teams. (2003) . Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
  • Dennis A. R. Information exchange and use in group decision making: You can lead a group to information, but you can’t make it think. MIS Quart. (1996) 20(4):433–455CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dennis A. R., Hilmer K. M., Taylor N. J. Information exchange and use in GSS and verbal group decision making: Effects of minority influence. J. Management Inform. Systems (1997/1998) 14(3):61–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dhaliwal J. S., Tung L. L. Using group support systems for developing a knowledge-based explanation facility. Internat. J. Inform. Management (2000) 20(2):131–149CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diehl M., Stroebe W. Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1987) 53(3):497–509CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Driver M. J., Streufert S. Integrative complexity: An approach to individuals and groups as information-processing systems. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1969) 14(2):272–285CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garcia-Larrea L., Perchet C., Perrin F., Amenedo E. Interference of cellular phone conversations with visuomotor tasks: An ERP study. J. Psychophysiology (2001) 15(1):14–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garfield M. J., Taylor N. J., Dennis A. R., Satzinger J. W. Modifying paradigms: Individual differences, creativity techniques and exposure to ideas in group idea generation. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(3):322–333LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gopher D., Bickner M., Navon D. Different difficulty manipulations interact differently with task emphasis: Evidence for multiple resources. J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception and Performance (1982) 8(1):146–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gouran D. S.Making Decision in Groups: Choices and Consequences (1982) (Scott, Foresman, Glenview, IL) Google Scholar
  • Grise M. L., Gallupe B. Information overload: Addressing the productivity paradox in face-to-face electronic meetings. J. Management Inform. Systems (1999/2000) 16(3):157–185CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guzzo R. A., Guzzo R. A. The study of group decision making: Approaches and applications. Improving Group Decision Making in Organizations (1982) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hancock P. A., Lesch M., Simmons L. The distraction effects of phone use during a crucial driving maneuver. Accident Anal. Prevention (2003) 35(4):501–514CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harkins S. G., Petty R. E. Information utility and the multiple source effect. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1987) 52(2):260–268CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herring S. Interactional coherence in CMC. J. Comput. Mediated Comm. (1999) 4(4CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hightower R., Sayeed L. Effects of communication mode and pre-discussion information distribution characteristics on information exchange in groups. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(4):451–465LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hilmer K. M., Dennis A. R. Stimulating thinking in decision making: Cultivating better decisions with groupware one individual at a time. J. Management Inform. Systems (2001) 17(3):93–114Google Scholar
  • Jablin F. M., Seibold D. R. Implications for problem solving groups of empirical research on “brainstorming”: A critical review of the literature. Southern States Speech Comm. J. (1978) 43(Summer):327–356CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson E. J., Payne J. W. Effort and accuracy in choice. Management Sci. (1995) 31(4):395–414LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kleindorfer P. R., Kunreuther H. C., Schoemaker P. J. H.Decision Sciences (1993) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lam S. K., Schaubroeck J. Improving group decisions by better pooling information: A comparative advantage of group decision support systems. J. Appl. Psych. (2000) 85(4):565–573CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lamm H., Trommsdorff G. Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming): A review. Eur. J. Soc. Psych. (1973) 3(4):361–387CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer D. E., Kieras D. E. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanism. Psych. Rev. (1997a) 104(1):3–65CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer D. E., Kieras D. E. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple task performance: Part 2. Accounts of psychological refractory-period phenomena. Psych. Rev. (1997b) 104(4):749–791CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nagasundaram M., Dennis A. R. When a group is not a group: The cognitive foundation of group idea generation. Small Group Res. (1993) 24(4):463–489CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nunamaker J. F., Dennis A. R., Valacich J. S., Vogel D. R., George J. F. Electronic meeting systems to support group work. Comm. ACM (1991) 34(7):40–61CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pashler H. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psych. Bull. (1994) 116(2):220–244CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Patton B. R., Griffin K., Patton E. N.Decision Making Group Interaction (1989) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
  • Paulus P. B. Groups, teams, and creativity: The creative potential of idea-generating groups. Appl. Psych. (2000) 49(2):237–262CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pinsonneault A., Barki H., Gallupe R. B., Hoppen N. The illusion of electronic brainstorming productivity: Theoretical and empirical issues. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(2):378–380LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rithruff E., Johnston J. C., Van Selst M., Whitsell S., Remington R. Vanishing dual-task interference after practice: Has the bottleneck been eliminated or is it merely latent? J. Experiment. Psych.: Human Perception Performance (2003) 29(2):280–289CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robert L., Dennis A. R. The paradox of richness: A cognitive model of media choice. IEEE Trans. Professional Comm. (2005) 48(1):10–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sarno K. J., Wickens C. D. Role of multiple resources in predicting time-sharing efficiency: Evaluation of three workload models in a multiple-task setting. Internat. J. Aviation Psych. (1995) 5(1):105–130CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Satzinger J. W., Garfield M. J., Nagasundaram M. The creative process: The effects of group memory on individual idea generation. J. Management Inform. Systems (1999) 14(4):143–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schultze U., Vandenbosch B. Information overload in a groupware environment: Now you see it, now you don’t. J. Organ. Comput. Electronic Commerce (1998) 8(2):127–148CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaft T. M., Vessey I. The role of cognitive fit in the relationship between software comprehension and modification. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(1):29–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Speier C., Morris M. G. The influence of query interface design on decision performance. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(3):397–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stasser G., Stewart D. Discovery of hidden profiles by decision making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1992) 62(3):426–434CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stasser G., Titus W. Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1987) 53(1):81–93CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stasser G., Taylor L. A., Hanna C. Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1989) 57(1):67–78CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Straus S. Getting a clue: The effects of communication media and information distribution on participation and performance in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Res. (1996) 27(1):115–142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Streufert S. C. Effects of information relevance on decision making in complex environments. Memory Cognition (1973) 1(3):389–403CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Streufert S., Streufert S.Behavior in the Complex Environment (1978) (V. H. Winston and Sons, Oxford, United Kingdom) Google Scholar
  • Tombu M., Jolicoeur P. All-or-none bottleneck versus capacity sharing accounts of the psychological refractory period phenomenon. Psych. Res. (2002) 66(4):274–286CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Treisman A., Davies A., Kornblum S.Divided Attention to Ear and Eye (1973) 4(Academic Press, London, UK) 101–107Attention PerformanceGoogle Scholar
  • Tyran C. K., Dennis A. R., Vogel D. R., Nunamaker J. F. The application of electronic meeting technology to support strategic management. MIS Quart. (1992) 16(3):313–334CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wegner D. M., Mullen B., Goethals G. R. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Theories of Group Behaviour (1987) 9(Springer-Verlag, New York) 185–208CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weick K.Sensemaking in Organizations (1995) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Weick K., Roberts K. H. Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1993) 38(3):357–382CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wickens C. D., Seidler K. S. Information access in a dual-task context: Testing a model of optimal strategy selection. J. Experiment. Psych.: Appl. (1997) 3(3):196–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams S. R., Wilson R. L. Group support systems, power, and influence in an organization: A field study. Decision Sci. (1997) 28(4):911–937CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.