Perceived Information Quality in Data Exchanges: Effects on Risk, Trust, and Intention to Use

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1060.0103

References

  • Agarwal R., Karahanna E. Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(4):665–694CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R., Venkatesh V. Assessing a firm’s Web presence: A heuristic evaluation procedure for the measurement of usability. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13:168–186LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ba S., Pavlou P. A. Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quart. (2002) 26(September):243–268CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bailey J. E., Pearson S. W. Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Sci. (1983) 29(May):530–545LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bakos J. Y., Brynjolfsson E. Information technology, incentives, and optimal number of suppliers. J. Management Inform. Systems (1993) 10(Fall):37–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barnes S. J., Vidgen R. T. An evaluation of cyber-bookshops: The WebQual method. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce (2001) 6:6–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. The moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 51(December):1173–1182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bensaou M. Interorganizational cooperation: The role of information technology—An empirical comparison of U.S. and Japanese supplier relations. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(June):107–124LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bensaou M., Venkatraman N. Configurations of interorganizational relationships: A comparison between U.S. and Japanese automakers. Management Sci. (1995) 41(September):1471–1492LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bhattacherjee A. Individual trust in online firms: Scale development and initial test. J. Management Inform. Systems (2002) 19(1):211–241CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boritz E.Managing Enterprise Information Integrity: Security, Control and Audit Issues (2004) (IT Governance Institute, Rolling Meadows, IL) Google Scholar
  • Boudreau M., Gefen D., Straub D. W. Validation in information systems research: A state-of-the-art assessment. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(March):1–16CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bovee M. W. Information quality: A conceptual framework and empirical validation. (2004) . Ph.D. dissertation, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KSGoogle Scholar
  • Carr A. S., Smeltzer L. R. The relationship between information technology use and buyer-supplier relationships: An exploratory analysis of the buying firm’s perspective. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2002) 49(3):293–304CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carte T. A., Russell C. J. In pursuit of moderation: Nine common errors and their solutions. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(September):479–501CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chin W., Marcoulides G. A. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research (1998) 10(Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ) 295–336Google Scholar
  • Churchill G. A. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J. Marketing Res. (1979) 16(1):64–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chwelos P., Benbasat I., Dexter A. S. Research report: Empirical test of an EDI adoption model. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(3):304–321LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen J.Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (1988) 2nd ed.(Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Damsgaard J., Truex D. Binary trading relations and the limits of EDI standards: The Procrustean bed of standards. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (2000) 9(3):173–188CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(3):319–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis F. D., Bagozzi R. P., Warshaw P. R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Sci. (1989) 35(8):982–1003LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DeLone W. H., McLean E. R. Information system success: The quest for the dependent variable. Inform. Systems Res. (1992) 3(March):60–95LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DeLone W. H., McLean E. R. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A 10-year update. J. Management Inform. Systems (2003) 19(4):9–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doll W. J., Torkzadeh G. The measurement of end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Quart. (1988) 12(June):259–274CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Early P. C. Trust, perceived importance of praise and criticism, and work performance: An examination of feedback in the United States and England. J. Management (1986) 12(4):457–473CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Finel B. I., Lord K. M. The surprising logic of transparency. Internat. Stud. Quart. (1999) 43:315–339CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fishbein M., Ajzen A. I.Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (1975) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Fornell C., Bookstein F. Two structural equation approaches: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. J. Marketing Res. (1982) 19:440–452CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fornell C., Larcker D. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18:39–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fung R. K. K., Lee M. K. O., Haseman W. D., Nazareth D. L. EC-trust (trust in electronic commerce): Exploring the antecedent factors. Proc. 5th Amer. Conf. Inform. Systems (1999) August 13–15:517–519Google Scholar
  • Garicano L., Kaplan S. N. The effects of business-to-business e-commerce on transaction costs. J. Indust. Econom. (2001) 49(4):463–485CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gefen D. E-commerce: The role of familiarity and trust. Omega (2000) 28:725–737CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gefen D. What makes an ERP implementation relationship worthwhile: Linking trust mechanisms and ERP usefulness. J. Management Inform. Systems (2004) 21(1):275–301CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gefen D., Govindaraiulu C. ERP customer loyalty: An exploratory investigation into the importance of a trust relationship. J. Inform. Tech. Theory Appl. (JITTA) (2000) 3(1):1–10Google Scholar
  • Gefen D., Karahanna E., Straub D. W. Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quart. (2003a) 27(March):51–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gefen D., Rao V. S., Tractinsky N. The conceptualization of trust, risk and their relationship in electronic commerce: The need for clarifications. Proc. 36th Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (2003b) January 6–9IEEEGoogle Scholar
  • Giffin K. The contribution of studies of source credibility to a theory of interpersonal trust in the communication process. Psych. Bull. (1967) 68(August):104–120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodhue D. L. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quart. (1995a) 19(June):213–236CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodhue D. L. Understanding user evaluations of information systems. Management Sci. (1995b) 41(December):1827–1844LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goodhue D. L. Development and measurement validity of a task-technology fit instrument for user evaluations of information systems. Decision Sci. (1998) 29(Winter):105–138CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gordon M. E., Slade L. A., Schmitt N. The “science of the sophomore” revisited: From conjecture to empiricism. Acad. Management Rev. (1986) 11(1):191–207Google Scholar
  • Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91:481–510CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Gargiulo M. Where do interorganizational networks come from? Amer. J. Sociol. (1999) 104(March):1439–1493CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gurbaxani V., Whang S. The impact of information systems on organizations and markets. Comm. ACM (1991) 34(1):59–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hamilton S., Chervany N. L. Evaluating information system effectiveness—Part I: Comparing evaluation approaches. MIS Quart. (1981) 5(September):55–69CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hart P., Saunders C. S. Emerging electronic partnerships: Antecedents and dimensions of EDI use from the supplier’s perspective. J. Management Inform. Systems (1998) 14(4):87–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmes J. G., Jones W. H., Perlman D. Trust and the appraisal process in close relationships. Advances in Personal Relationships (1991) 2(Jessica Kingsley, London, UK) 57–104Google Scholar
  • Ives B., Olson M. H., Baroudi J. J. The measurement of user information satisfaction. Comm. ACM (1983) 26(October):785–793CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarvenpaa S. L., Tractinsky N., Vitale M. Consumer trust in an Internet store. Inform. Tech. Management (2000) 1:45–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keen P. G. W., Ballance C., Chan S., Schrump S.Electronic Commerce Relationships: Trust by Design (2000) (Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Keil M., Tan B. C. Y., Wei K., Saarinen T., Tuunainen V., Wassenaar A. A cross-cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software projects. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(June):299–325CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kettinger W. J., Lee C. C. Pragmatic perspectives on the measurement of information systems service quality. MIS Quart. (1997) 21(June):223–240CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kinney W. R.Information Quality Assurance and Internal Control for Management Decision Making (2000) (Irwin McGraw Hill, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Kirch W., Kutschker M., Irle M. Marketing and buying decisions in industrial markets. Studies in Decision Making (1982) (Walter de Gruyter, New York) 443–488CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kirsch L. J. Portfolios of control modes and IS project management. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(3):215–239LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Koller M. Risk as a determinant of trust. Basic Appl. Soc. Psych. (1988) 9(4):265–276CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lamming R. C.Beyond Partnership: Strategies for Innovation and Lean Supply (1993) (Prentice Hall, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Lee M. K. O., Turban E. A trust model for consumer Internet shopping. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce (2001) 6(1):75–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee Y. W., Strong D. M., Kahn B. K., Wang R. Y. AIMQ: A methodology for information quality assessment. Inform. Management (2002) 40(December):133–146CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu C., Marchewka J. T., Lu J. C., Yu S. Beyond concern: A privacy-trust-behavioral intention model of electronic commerce. Inform. Management (2004) 42:127–141CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lucas H. C. J., Spitler V. K. Technology use and performance: A field study of broker workstations. Decision Sci. (1999) 30(2):291–311CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luhmann N.Trust and Power (1979) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Lynch J. G. Theory and external validity. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1999) 27(Summer):367–376CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malone T. W. Modeling coordination in organizations and markets. Management Sci. (1987) 33(10):1317–1332LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Malone T. W., Yates J., Benjamin R. I. Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Comm. ACM (1987) 30(June):484–497CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mauldin E. G., Nicolaou A. I., Kovar S. E. The influence of scope and timing of reliability assurance in B2B E-Commerce. Internat. J. Accounting Inform. Systems (2006) 7(2):115–129CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer R. C., Davis J. H., Schoorman F. D. An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(3):709–734CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKinney V., Yoon K., Zahedi F. M. The measurement of Web-customer satisfaction: An expectation and disconfirmation approach. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(3):296–315LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McKnight D. H., Chervany N. L. What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: An interdisciplinary conceptual typology. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce (2001–2002) 6(Winter):35–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKnight D. H., Choudhury V., Kacmar C. Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Inform. Systems Res. (2002a) 13(September):334–359LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McKnight D. H., Choudhury V., Kacmar C. The impact of initial consumer trust on intentions to transact with a web site: A trust building model. J. Strategic Inform. Systems (2002b) 11(3–4):297–323CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKnight D. H., Cummings L. L., Chervany N. L. Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(July):473–490CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKnight D. H., Kacmar C., Choudhury V. Shifting factors and the ineffectiveness of third party assurance seals: A two-stage model of initial trust in a Web business. Electronic Markets (2004) 14(3):252–266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McQuiston D. H. Novelty, complexity, and importance as causal determinants of industrial buyer behavior. J. Marketing (1989) 53(April):66–79CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morgan R. M., Hunt S. D. The commitment–trust theory of relationship marketing. J. Marketing (1994) 58(July):20–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nielsen J.Designing Web Usability (2000) (New Riders, Indianapolis, IN) Google Scholar
  • Oliver C. Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Integration and future directions. Acad. Management Rev. (1990) 15(2):241–265CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ouchi W. G. A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Sci. (1979) 25:833–848LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pant S., Hsu C. Business on the Web: Strategies and economics. Comput. Networks ISDN Systems (1996) 28(May):7–11Google Scholar
  • Patnayakuni R., Rai A., Seth N. Relational antecedents of information flow integration for supply chain coordination. J. Management Inform. Systems (2006) 23(1):13–49CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pavlou P. Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce (2003) 7(3):101–134CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pavlou P., Gefen D. Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(1):37–59LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Podsakoff P. M., Organ D. W. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Management (1986) 12(4):531–544CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Riggins F. J., Kriebel C. H., Mukhopadhyay T. The growth of interorganizational systems in the presence of network externalities. Management Sci. (1994) 40(8):984–998LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rindfleisch A., Heide K. B. Transaction cost analysis: Past, present, and future applications. J. Marketing (1997) 61(October):30–54CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ring P. S., Van de Ven A. H. Developmental processes of cooperative interoraganizational relationships. Acad. Management Rev. (1994) 19(1):90–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rotter J. B. Generalized expectancies for interpersonal trust. Amer. Psychologist (1971) 26(5):443–452CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sitkin S. B., Pablo A. L. Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. Acad. Management Rev. (1992) 17:9–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sitkin S. B., Weingart L. R. Determinants of risky decision-making behavior: A test of the mediating role of risk perceptions and propensity. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38:1573–1592CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smitka M. J.Competitive Ties: Subcontracting in the Japanese Automotive Industry (1991) (Columbia University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Straub D. W. Validating instruments in MIS research. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(June):147–169CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tseng S., Fogg B. J. Credibility and computing technology. Comm. ACM (1999) 42(5):39–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tsiros M., Mittal V. Regret: A model of its antecedents and consequences in consumer decision making. J. Consumer Res. (2000) 26(March):401–417CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Soc. Rev. (1996) 61(4):674–698CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van de Ven A. H. On the nature, formation and maintenance of relations among organizations. Acad. Management Rev. (1976) 1:24–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang E. T. G., Seidmann A. Electronic data interchange: Competitive externalities and strategic implementation policies. Management Sci. (1995) 41(3):401–418LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang R. Y., Strong D. M. Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. J. Management Inform. Systems (1996) 12(Spring):5–34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wang Y., Wang R. Y. Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations. Comm. ACM (1996) 39(11):86–95CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Webster J., Trevino L. K. Rational and social theories as complementary explanations of communication media choices: Two policy-capturing studies. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(6):1544–1572CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Whetten D. A. Interorganizational relations. A review of the field. J. Higher Ed. (1981) 52:1–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams C. C. Trust diffusion: The effects of interpersonal trust on structure, function, and organizational transparency. Bus. Soc. (2005) 44(3):357–368CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yoo Y., Alavi M. Media and group cohesion: Relative influences on social presence, task participation, and group consensus. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(3):371–390CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zaheer A., Venkatraman N. Determinants of electronic integration in the insurance industry: An empirical test. Management Sci. (1994) 40(5):549–566LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zaheer A., McEvily B., Perrone V. Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of I-O and interpersonal trust on performance. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(March–April):141–159LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zmud R. An empirical investigation of the dimensionality of the concept of information. Decision Sci. (1978) 9(2):187–195CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.