Understanding the Impact of Collaboration Software on Product Design and Development

References

• Achen C.Interpreting and Using Regression (1982) (Sage Publications, New Delhi, India) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adler P. S. Interdepartmental interdependence and coordination: The case of the design–manufacturing interface. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(2):147–167Link, Google Scholar
• Ancona D. G., Caldwell D. F., Galegher J., Kraut R., Egido C. Information technology and work groups: The case of new product teams. Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work (1990) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 173–190Google Scholar
• Ancona D. G., Caldwell D. F. Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37:634–665Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson J. C., Gerbing D. W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psych. Bull. (1988) 103:411–423Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aram J. D., Morgan C. P. The role of project team collaboration in R&D performance. Management Sci. (1976) 22(10):1127–1137Link, Google Scholar
• Baba Y., Nobeoka K. Toward knowledge-based product development: The 3-D CAD model of knowledge creation. Res. Policy (1998) 26:643–659Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bajorski P., Petkau J. Nonparametric two-sample comparisons of changes on ordinal responses. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1999) 94(447):970–978Theory and MethodsCrossref, Google Scholar
• Bardhan I. R. Toward a theory to study the use of collaborative product commerce for product development. Inform. Tech. Management (2007) 8(2Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonate P.Analysis of Pretest-Posttest Designs (2000) (Chapman & Hall, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown S., Eisenhardt K. M. Product development: Past research, present findings and future directions. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(2):343–378Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carroll M. Collaborative commerce: The next big thing in global manufacturing. eAI Journal (2001) July):20–24Google Scholar
• Clark K. B., Fujimoto T.Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization and Management in the World Auto Industry (1991) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Conover W. J., Iman R. L. Rank transformations as a bridge between parametric and nonparametric statistics. Amer. Statistician (1981) 35(3):124–129Google Scholar
• Daft R. L., Lengel R. H. Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Sci. (1986) 32(5):554–571Link, Google Scholar
• Davis J., Subramanian E., Konda S., Granger H., Collins M., Westerberg A. Creating shared information spaces to support collaborative design work. Inform. Systems Frontiers (2001) 3(3):377–392Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Meyer A. Tech talk: How managers are stimulating global R&D communication. Sloan Management Rev. (1991) Spring):49–58Google Scholar
• Dennis A. R., Kinney S. T. Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(3):256–274Link, Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G., Jackson B. M. Coordination of information technology management: Team-based structures and computer-based communication systems. J. Management Inform. Systems (1994) 10(4):85–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Easley R. F., Devaraj S., Crant M. Relating collaborative technology use to teamwork quality and performance: An empirical analysis. J. Management Inform. Systems (2003) 19(4):247–268Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(4):532–550Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Tabrizi B. Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40:84–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornell C., Larcker D. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errors. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18(1):39–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gefen D., Straub D. W., Boudreau M.-C. Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2000) 4(7):2–77Google Scholar
• Gerwin D., Moffat L. Authorizing processes changing team autonomy during new product development. J. Engrg. Tech. Management (1997) 14:291–313Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene W.Econometric Analysis (1997) 3rd ed.(MacMillan Publishing Company, New York) Google Scholar
• Griffin A. The effect of project and process characteristics on product development cycle time. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34:24–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gupta R., Wilemon D. Accelerating the development of technology-based new products. California Management Rev. (1990) 32(2):24–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harter D. E., Slaughter S. Quality improvement and infrastructure activity costs in software development: A longitudinal analysis. Management Sci. (2003) 49(6):84–800Link, Google Scholar
• Harter D. E., Krishnan M. S., Slaughter S. Effects of process maturity on quality, cycle time, and effort in software product development. Management Sci. (2000) 46(4):451–466Link, Google Scholar
• Hausman J., Griliches Z., Intriligator M. Specification and estimation of simultaneous equation models. Handbook of Econometrics (1983) 1(North Holland Publishers, New York) 403–426Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hennig C., Mullensiefen D., Bargmann J. Comparison of changes in a pretest-posttest design with Likert scales. (2003) . Research Report 113, Eidgenossische Technische Hoschschule, Zurich, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
• Hinds P., Kiesler S. Communication across boundaries: Work, structure, and use of communication technologies in a large organization. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(4):373–393Link, Google Scholar
• Hitt L. M., Wu D. J., Zhou X. Investment in enterprise resource planning: Business impact and productivity measures. J. Management Inform. Systems (2002) 19(1):71–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoegl M. M., Gemuenden H. G. Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(4):435–449Link, Google Scholar
• Hoegl M. M., Weinkauf K., Gemuenden H. G. Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam R&D projects: A longitudinal study. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(1):38–55Link, Google Scholar
• Holman R., Kaas H.-W., Keeling D. The future of product development. McKinsey Quart. (2003) 3):28–39Google Scholar
• Jarvis C. B., Mackenzie S. B., Podsakoff P. M. A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. J. Consumer Res. (2003) 30(2):199–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joglekar N., Yassine A. A., Eppinger S. D., Whitney D. E. Performance of coupled product development activities with a deadline. Management Sci. (2001) 47(12):1605–1620Link, Google Scholar
• Krishnan M. S., Kriebel C., Kekre S., Mukhopadhyay T. An empirical analysis of productivity and quality in software products. Management Sci. (2000) 46(6):745–759Link, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V., Ulrich K. Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):1–21Link, Google Scholar
• Labovitz S. The assignment of numbers to rank order categories. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1970) 35(2):515–524Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lahiri K., Schmidt P. On the estimation of triangular structural systems. Econometrica (1978) 46:1217–1221Crossref, Google Scholar
• Laird N. Further comparative analyses of pretest-posttest research designs. Amer. Statistician (1983) 37:329Google Scholar
• Liker J. K., Fleischer M., Arnsdorf D. Fulfilling the promised of CAD. Sloan Management Rev. (1992) Spring):74–86Google Scholar
• Loch C., Terwiesch C. Communication and uncertainty in concurrent engineering. Management Sci. (1998) 44(8):1032–1048Link, Google Scholar
• Maznevski M. L., Chudoba K. L. Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(5):473–492Link, Google Scholar
• McGrath M., Iansiti M. Envisioning IT-enabled innovation. Insight Magazine (1998) 2–10Google Scholar
• Mendelson H. Organizational architecture and success in the information technology industry. Management Sci. (2000) 46(4):513–529Link, Google Scholar
• Mitchell V. L., Nault B. R. Cooperative planning, uncertainty, and managerial control in concurrent design. Management Sci. (2007) . ForthcomingLink, Google Scholar
• Moenaert R. K., Souder W. E. Context and antecedents of information utility at the R&D/marketing interface. Management Sci. (1996) 42(11):1592–1610Link, Google Scholar
• Mulani N., Lee H. New business models for supply chain excellence. Achieving Supply Chain Excellence Through Technology (2001) 4(Montgomery Research, San Francisco, CA) 14–18Google Scholar
• Mulani N., Matchette J. Lifecycle collaboration: Linking strategy and execution to sustain superior performance. Achieving Supply Chain Excellence Through Technology (2001) 4(Montgomery Research, San Francisco, CA) 206–208Google Scholar
• Nambisan S. Designing virtual customer environments for new product development: Toward a theory. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27(3):392–413Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nambisan S. Information systems as a reference discipline for new product development. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(1):1–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I. Dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(1):14–37Link, Google Scholar
• Novak S., Eppinger S. Sourcing by design: Product complexity and the supply chain. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):189–204Link, Google Scholar
• Nunnally J. C., Bernstein I. H.Psychometric Theory (1994) (McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• O’Marah K. Make to desire: How new technologies are revolutionizing life cycle management. Achieving Supply Chain Excellence Through Technology (2001) (Montgomery Research, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Phillips L., Bagozzi R. Assessing measurement error in key informant reports: A methodological note on organizational analysis in marketing. J. Marketing Res. (1986) 18:395–415Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., Organ D. W. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Management (1986) 12(4):531–544Crossref, Google Scholar
• Port O. Design tools move into the fast lane: New software turns ideas into reality in record time. BusinessWeek (2003) June 2Google Scholar
• Shapiro S. L., Schwartz G. E., Bonner G. Effects of mindfulness-based stress reduction on medical and pre-medical students. J. Behav. Medicine (1998) 21(6):581–598Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sosa M. E., Eppinger S., Pich M., McKendrick D., Stout S. Factors that influence technical communication in distributed product development: An empirical study in the telecommunications industry. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2002) 49(1):45–58Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swanson K., McComb D., Smith J., McCubbrey D. The application software factory: Applying total quality techniques to systems development. MIS Quart. (1991) 5(4):566–580Google Scholar
• Terwiesch T., Loch C., De Meyer A. Exchanging preliminary information in concurrent engineering. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(4):402–419Link, Google Scholar
• Thatcher M. E., Pingry D. An economic model of product quality and IT value. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(3):268–286Link, Google Scholar
• Thomke S. Capturing the real value of innovation tools. Sloan Management Rev. (2006) 47(2):24–32Google Scholar
• Thomke S., Reinertsen D. Agile product development: Managing development flexibility in uncertain environments. California Management Rev. (1998) 41(1):8–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L. Special boundary roles in the innovation process. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1977) 22:587–605Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ulrich K. The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy (1995) 24:419–440Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vickery S., Droge C., Stank T. P., Goldsby T. J., Markland R. E. The performance implications of media richness in a business-to-business service environment: Direct versus indirect effects. Management Sci. (2004) 50(8):1106–1119Link, Google Scholar
• Welty B., Becerra-Fernandez I. Managing trust and commitment in collaborative supply chain relationships. Comm. ACM (2001) 44(6):67–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yassine A., Kim K. C., Roemer T., Holweg M. Investigating the role of IT in customized product design. Production Planning and Control (2004) 15(4):422–434Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zirger B. J., Hartley J. L. The effect of acceleration techniques on product development time. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1996) 43(2):143–152Crossref, Google Scholar