The Nature and Role of Feedback Text Comments in Online Marketplaces: Implications for Trust Building, Price Premiums, and Seller Differentiation

References

• Agarwal R., Karahanna E. Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(4):665–694Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof G. The market for “lemons”: Quality under uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quart. J. Econom. (1970) 84:488–500Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson E., Narus J. A. A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnership. J. Marketing (1990) 54(1):42–58Crossref, Google Scholar
• Annett J.Feedback and Human Behavior (1969) (Penguin, Middlesex, UK) Google Scholar
• Armstrong J. S., Overton T. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail survey. J. Marketing Res. (1977) 14:396–402Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ba S., Pavlou P. A. Evidence of the effect of trust in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quart. (2002) 26(3):243–267Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bajari P., Hortaçsu A. Winner’s curse, reserve prices, and endogenous entry: Empirical insights from eBay. RAND J. Econom. (2003) 34:329–356Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee A. V. A simple model of herd behavior. Quart. J. Econom. (1992) 107(3):797–817Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barber B.The Logic and Limits of Trust (1983) (Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ) Google Scholar
• Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and stastical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 51(6):1173–1182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berelson B.Content Analysis in Communication Research (1952) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee A. Individual trust in online firms: Scale development and initial test. J. Management Inform. Systems (2002) 19(1):211–241Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bikhchandandi S., Hirshleifer D., Welch I. A theory of fads, fashion, custom and cultural change as information cascades. J. Political Econom. (1992) 100(5):992–1026Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cabral L., Hortaçsu A. The dynamics of seller reputation: Theory and evidence from eBay. (2006) . Working paper, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Carte T. A., Russell C. J. In pursuit of moderation: Nine common errors and their solutions. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(3):479–501Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin W. W. A permutation procedure for multi-group comparison of PLS models. Proc. 2003 PLS Internat. Sympos. PLS Related Methods (2003) Lisbon, PortugalGoogle Scholar
• Chin W., Marcolin B. L., Newsted P. R. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic mail emotion/adoption study. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(2):189–217Link, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C. The digitization of word-of-mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Sci. (2003) 49(10):1407–1424Link, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C., Hendershott T. Reputation mechanisms. Handbook on Economics and Information Systems (2005a) (Elsevier, Australia) Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C. Reputation mechanism design in online trading environments with pure moral hazard. Inform. Systems Res. (2005b) 16(2):209–230Link, Google Scholar
• Dewan S., Hsu V. Adverse selection in electronic markets: Evidence from online stamp auctions. J. Indust. Econom. (2004) 52(4):497–516Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doney P. M., Cannon J. P. An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. J. Marketing (1997) 61(1):35–51Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eaton D. Valuing information: Evidence from guitar auctions on eBay. (2002) . Working paper, Murray State University, Murray, KSGoogle Scholar
• Fombrum C., Shanley M. What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Acad. Management J. (1990) 33(2):233–258Crossref, Google Scholar
• Friedman E., Resnick P. The social cost of cheap pseudonyms. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2001) 10(1):173–199Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ganesan S. Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. J. Marketing (1994) 58(1):1–19Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gefen D. Reflections on the dimensions of trust and trustworthiness among online consumers. The DATA BASE Adv. Inform. Systems (2002) 33(3):38–53Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gefen D., Karahanna E., Straub D. Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(1):51–90Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghose A., Ipeirotis P. G., Sundarajan A. Reputation premiums in electronic peer-to-peer markets: Analyzing textual feedback and network structure. Proc. SIGCOMM’05 Workshop (2005) Philadelphia, PACrossref, Google Scholar
• Ghose A., Ipeirotis P. G., Sundarajan A. The dimensions of reputation in electronic markets. (2006) . Working paper, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
• Holsti O.Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities (1969) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Houser D., Wooders J. Reputation in auctions: Theory and evidence from eBay. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2006) 15(2):353–369Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. (1976) 3(4):305–360Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kalyanam K., McIntyre S. Return on reputation in online auction market. (2001) . Working paper, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CAGoogle Scholar
• Kamins M. A., Folkes V. S., Perner L. Consumer responses to rumors: Good news, bad news. J. Consumer Psych. (1997) 6(2):165–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kassarjian H. Content analysis in consumer research. J. Consumer Res. (1977) 4(2):8–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keser C. Experimental games for the design of reputation management systems. IBM Systems J. (2003) 42:498–506Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim D., Benbasat I. Trust-related arguments in Internet stores: A framework for evaluation. J. Electronic Commerce Res. (2003) 4(2):49–64Google Scholar
• Kim D., Benbasat I. The effects of trust-assuring arguments on consumer trust in Internet stores: Application of Toulmin’s model of argumentation. (2005) . Working paper, The University of British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
• Klein B., Leffler K. The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance. J. Political Econom. (1981) 89(4):615–641Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolbe R. H., Burnett M. S. Content analysis research: An examination of applications with directives for improving research reliability and objectivity. J. Consumer Res. (1991) 18(3):243–250Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kreps D., Wilson R. Reputation and imperfect information. J. Econom. Theory (1982) 27:253–279Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kreps D., Milgrom P., Roberts J., Wilson R. Rational cooperation in the finitely repeated prisoners’ dilemma. J. Econom. Theory (1982) 27:214–233Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krippendorff K.Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (1980) (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
• Lewicki R. J., Bunker B. B., Bunker B. B., Rubin J. Z. Trust in relationships: A model of development and decline. Conflict, Cooperation, and Justice (1995) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA) Google Scholar
• Lim K. H., Sia C. L., Lee M. K. O., Benbasat I. How do I trust you online, and if so, will I buy? An empirical study on designing Web contents to develop online trust. J. Management Inform. Systems (2007) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Livingston J. How valuable is a good reputation? A sample selection model of Internet auctions. The Rev. Econom. Statist. (2005) 87(5):453–465Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lucking-Reiley D., Bryan D., Prasad N., Reeves D. Pennies from eBay: The determinants of price in online auctions. J. Indust. Econom. (2006) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Mayer R. C., Davis J. H., Schoorman F. D. An integrative model of organizational trust. The Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(3):709–734Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKnight D. H., Chervany N. L. What trust means in e-commerce customer relationships: An interdisciplinary conceptual typology. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce (2002) 6(2):35–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKnight D. H., Choudhury V., Kacmar C. Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(3):334–359Link, Google Scholar
• Melnick M. I., Alm J. Does a seller eCommerce reputation matter? Evidence from eBay auctions. J. Indust. Econom. (2002) 50:337–350Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P., Roberts J. Predation, reputation and entry deterrence. J. Econom. Theory (1982) 27(2):280–312Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P., North D., Weingast B. R. The role of institutions in the revival of trade: The law merchant, private judges, and the champagne fairs. Econom. Politics (1990) 2(1):1–23Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mingers J. Combining IS research methods: Towards a pluralist methodology. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(3):240–259Link, Google Scholar
• Nooteboom B. Trust, opportunism, and governance: A process and control model. Organ. Stud. (1996) 17(6):985–1010Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Keefe D. J.Persuasion: Theory and Research (2002) 2nd ed.(Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Pavlou P. A. Institutional trust in interorganizational exchange relationships: The role of electronic B2B marketplaces. J. Strategic Inform. Systems (2002) 11(3/4):215–243Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavlou P. A. Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce (2003) 7(3):69–103Google Scholar
• Pavlou P. A., Fygenson M. Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(1):115–143Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavlou P. A., Gefen D. Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(1):35–53Link, Google Scholar
• Pavlou P. A., Gefen D. Psychological contract violation in online marketplaces: Antecedents, consequences, and moderating role. Inform. Systems Res. (2005) 16(4):372–399Link, Google Scholar
• Pavlou P. A., Liang H., Xue Y. Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal-agent perspective. MIS Quart. (2007) . ForthcomingCrossref, Google Scholar
• Perrault W., Leigh L. Reliability of nominal data based on qualitative judgments. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26(2):135–148Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P., Organ D. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Management (1986) 12(4):531–544Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., Mackenzie S. B., Lee J., Podsakoff N. P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(5):879–903Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rao A. R., Bergen M. E. Price premium variations as a consequence of buyers’ lack of information. J. Consumer Res. (1992) 19:412–423Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reichheld F. The one number you need to grow. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2003) 81(12):46–54Google Scholar
• Resnick P., Zeckhauser R., Baye M. R. Trust among strangers in Internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay’s reputation system. The Economics of the Internet and E-Commerce (2002) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Resnick P., Zeckhauser R., Friedman E., Kuwabara K. Reputation systems. Comm. ACM (2000) 43(12):45–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• Resnick P., Zeckhauser R., Swanson J., Lockwood K. The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment. Experiment. Econom. (2006) 9(2):79–101Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro C. Premiums for high quality products as returns to reputations. Quart. J. Econom. (1983) 98:659–679Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sinclair J. T.eBay: The Smart Way (2005) (AMACOM, AMA Publications, New York) Google Scholar
• Singh J., Sirdeshmukh D. Agency and trust mechanisms in consumer satisfaction and loyalty judgments. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2000) 28(1):150–167Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sirdeshmukh D., Singh J., Sabol B. Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges. J. Marketing (2002) 66(1):367–392Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sitkin S., Roth N. L. Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic “remedies” for trust/distrust. Organ. Sci. (1993) 4(3):367–392Link, Google Scholar
• Steiner D. Survey: How do users feel about eBay’s feedback system. Auctionbytes (2003) 87(1Google Scholar
• Stewart K. L. Trust transfer on the World Wide Web. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(1):5–17Link, Google Scholar
• Weber R. P.Basic Content Analysis (1990) (Sage Publications, London, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (1985) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Wilson R., Roth A. Reputations in games and markets. Game Theoretic Models of Bargaining (1985) (Cambridge University Press, New York) 65–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yamagishi T., Yamagishi M. Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion (1994) 18(2):129–166Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zucker L. G. Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure. Res. Organ. Behav. (1986) 8(1):53–111Google Scholar