Releasing Individually Identifiable Microdata with Privacy Protection Against Stochastic Threat: An Application to Health Information

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0112

References

  • Adam N. R., Wortmann J. C. Security-control methods for statistical databases: A comparative study. ACM Comput. Surveys (1989) 21:515–556CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aggarwal C. On k-anonymity and the curse of dimensionality. Proc. 31st Internat. Conf. Very Large Databases (VLDB’05) (2005) Trondheim, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  • Aggarwal C., Feder T., Kenthapadi K., Motwani R., Panigrahy R., Thomas D., Zhu A. Approximation algorithms for k-anonymity. J. Privacy Tech. (2005) Google Scholar
  • Carvalho F. D., Dellaert N., Osorio M. S. Statistical disclosure in two-dimensional tables: General tables. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1994) 89:1547–1557CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Causey B. D., Cox L. H., Ernst L. R. Application of transportation thoery to statistical problems. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1985) 80:909CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • CDC HIPAA privacy rule and public health: Guidance from CDC and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2005) . http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/m2e411a1.htmGoogle Scholar
  • Chowdhury S. D., Duncan G. T., Krishnan R., Roehrig S. F., Mukherjee S. Disclosure detection in multivariate categorical databases: Auditing confidentiality protection through two new matrix operators. Management Sci. (1999) 45:1710–1723LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cox L. H. Suppression methodology and statistical disclosure control. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1980) 75:377–385CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cox L. H. Solving confidentiality protection problems in tabulations using network optimization: A network model for cell suppression in U.S. economic censuses. Internat. Sem. Statist. Confidentiality (1992) (Eurostat, Dublin, Ireland) 229–245Google Scholar
  • Dobra A., Fienberg S. E., Trottini M., Bernardo J. M., Bayarri M. J., Berger J. O., Dawid A. P., Heckerman D., Smith A. F. M., West M. Assessing the risk of disclosure of confidential categorical data. Bayesian Statistics 7 (2003) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) 125–144Google Scholar
  • Domingo-Ferrer J., Mateo-Sanz J. M. Practical data-oriented microaggregation for statistical disclosure control. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. (2002) 14(1):189–201CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Domingo-Ferrer D., Torra V. Ordinal, continuous, and heterogeneous k-anonymity through microaggregation. Data Mining Knowledge Discovery (2005) 11(2):195–212CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duncan G. T., Fienberg S., Domingo-Ferrer J. Obtaining information while preserving privacy: A Markov perturbation method for tabular data. Statist. Data Protection (SDP 1998) Proc. (1999) (IDS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
  • Duncan G., Krishnan R., Padman R., Reuther P., Roehrig S. Exact and heuristic methods for cell suppression in multi-dimensional linked tables. (2003a) . Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
  • Duncan G. T., Keller-McNulty S., Stokes S. L. Disclosure risk vs. data utility: The R-U confidentiality map. (2003b) . Technical Report 2003-6, Heinz School of Public Policy and Management, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
  • Fischetti M., Salazar J. Solving the cell suppression on tabular data with linear constraints. Management Sci. (2001) 47:1008–1027LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Garfinkel R., Gopal R. D., Goes P. B. Privacy protection of binary confidential data against deterministic, stochastic, and insider threat. Management Sci. (2002) 48:749–764LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gedik B., Liu L. A customizable k-anonymity model for protecting location privacy. Proc. 25th Internat. Conf. Distributed Comput. Systems (IEEE ICDCS) (2005) Columbus, OHGoogle Scholar
  • Geurts J. Heuristics for cell suppression in tables. (1992) . Working paper, Central Bureau of Statistics, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  • Gopal R. D., Goes P. B., Garfinkel R. Interval protection of confidential information in a database. INFORMS J. Comput. (1998) 10:309–322LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) (1996) Google Scholar
  • Hundepool A., Willenborg L. μ- and τ-ARGUS: Software for statistical disclosure control. Proc. 3rd Internat. Seminar Statist. Confidentiality (1996) Bled, SloveniaGoogle Scholar
  • Jiang W., Clifton C. Privacy-preserving distributed k-anonymity. Proc. 19th Annual IFIP WG 11.3 Working Conf. Data Appl. Security (2005) Storrs, CTCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelly J. P. Confidentiality protection in two and three-dimensional tables. (1990) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park, MDGoogle Scholar
  • Li X., Sarkar S. Privacy protection in data mining: A perturbation approach for categorical data. Inform. Systems Res. (2006a) 17(3):254–270LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Li X., Sarkar S. A tree-based perturbation approach for privacy-preserving data mining. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. (2006b) 18(9):1278–1283CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Menon S., Sarkar S., Mukherjee S. Maximizing accuracy of shared databases when concealing sensitive patterns. Inform. Systems Res. (2005) 16(3):256–270LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Meyerson A., Williams R. On the complexity of optimal k-anonymity. Proc. 23rd ACM-SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART Sympos. Principles Database Systems (2004) Paris, France:223–228CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Muralidhar K., Batra D., Kirs P. J. Accessibility, security, and accuracy in statistical databases: The case for the multiplicative fixed data perturbation approach. Management Sci. (1995) 41:1549–1564LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Newton E., Sweeney L., Malin B. Preserving privacy by de-identifying facial images. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. (2005) 17(2):232–243CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sweeney L. Guaranteeing anonymity when sharing medical data. Proc. J. Amer. Medical Inform. Assoc. (2002a) (Hanley & Belfus, Inc., Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
  • Sweeney L. Achieving k-anonymity privacy protection using generalization and suppression. Internat. J. Uncertainty, Fuzziness Knowledge-Based Systems (2002b) 10(5):571–588CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • United States General Accounting Office Report to congressional requesters: Medical records privacy. (1999) FebruaryGoogle Scholar
  • Willenborg L., De Waal A.Statistical Disclosure Control in Practice (1996) (Springer-Verlag, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Willenborg L., Hundepool A., Domingo-Ferrer J. ARGUS for statistical disclosure control. Statist. Data Protection (SDP 1998) Proc. (1998) (IDS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
  • Zayatz L. Using linear programming methodology for disclosure avoidance purposes. (1992) . Research report, Statistical Research Division, Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.