Competition Among Virtual Communities and User Valuation: The Case of Investing-Related Communities

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0114

References

  • Adar L., Huberman B. Free riding on Gnutella. (2000) . Technical report, Xerox ARC (August)Google Scholar
  • Amit R., Zott C. Value creation in e-business. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:493–520CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Antweiler W., Frank M. Is all that talk just noise? The information content of Internet stock discussion boards. J. Finance (2004) 59(3):1259–1295CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Asvanund A., Clay K., Krishnan R., Smith M. An empirical analysis of network externalities in peer-to-peer music sharing networks. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(2):155–174LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bagozzi R., Dholakia U. M. Intentional social action in virtual communities. J. Interactive Marketing (2002) 16(2):2–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Balasubramanian S., Mahajan V. The economic leverage of the virtual community. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce (2001) 5(3):103–138CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burnett G. Information exchange in virtual communities: A typology. Inform. Res. (2000) 5(4). http://informationr.net/ir/5-4/paper82.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Butler B. S. Membership size: Communication activity, and sustainability: A resource-based model of online social structures. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(4):346–362LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Butler B., Sproull L., Kiesler S., Kraut R., Weisband S., Atwater L. Community effort in online groups: Who does the work and why? Leadership at a Distance: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (2005) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Chen P., Hitt L. Measuring switching costs and the determinants of customer retention in Internet-enabled businesses: A study of the online brokerage industry. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(3):255–274LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chevalier J. A., Mayzlin D. The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. (2006) 43(3):345–354CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cummings J. N., Butler B., Kraut R. The quality of online social relationships. Comm. ACM (2002) 45(7):103–108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Das S. R., Chen M. Y. Yahoo! for Amazon: Sentiment parsing from small talk on the Web. Proc. 8th Asia Pacific Finance Assoc. Annual Conf. (2001) (July 22–25)Bangkok, ThailandCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Das S. S., Martinez-Jerez A., Tufano P. e-information: A clinical study of investor discussion and sentiment. Financial Management (2005) 34(3):103–137CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Economides N. The economics of networks. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (1996) 16(4):673–699CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farrell J., Saloner G. Installed base and compatibility: Innovations, product pre-announcements, and predation. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76:940–955Google Scholar
  • Fischer G., Stevens C., Robertson S. P., Olson G. M., Olsen J. S. Information access in complex, poorly structured information spaces. Reaching Through Tech.: CHI 91 Conf. Proc. (1991) (ACM Press, New York) 63–70CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foltz P. W., Laham D., Landauer T. K. Automated essay scoring: Applications to educational technology. Proc. EdMedia ‘99 (1999) June 19–24Seattle, WAGoogle Scholar
  • Fournier J. Information overload and technology education. Proc. 7th Internat. Conf. Soc. Inform. Tech. Teacher Educ. (1996) Phoenix, AZ:380–385Google Scholar
  • Gamon M., Aue A. Automatic identification of sentiment vocabulary: Exploiting low association with known sentiment terms. Proc. ACL Workshop Feature Engrg. Machine Learn. NLP (2005) June 29–30Ann Arbor, MI:57–64CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gensch D. H., Recker W. W. The multinomial, multiattribute logit choice model. J. Marketing Res. (1979) 16(1):124–132CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hof R. The power of us: Mass collaboration of the Internet is shaking up business. Business Week (2005) June 20):74–82Google Scholar
  • Holland J. Building blocks, cohort genetic algorithms, and hyperplane-defined functions. Evolutionary Comput. (2000) 8(4):373–391CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Honeycutt C. Hazing as a process of boundary maintenance in an online community. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. (2005) 10(2CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hu M., Liu B. Mining and summarizing customer reviews. Proc. 10 ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2004) Aug. 22–25Seattle, WA:168–177CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones Q., Ravid G., Rafaeli S. Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: A theoretical model and empirical exploration. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(2):194–210LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Katz M. L., Shapiro C. Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. J. Political Econom. (1986) 94(4):822–41CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Katz M. L., Shapiro C. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1995) 75:424–440Google Scholar
  • Kauffman R., McAndrews J., Wang Y.-M. Opening the “black box” of network externalities in network adoption. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(1):61–82LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Konana P., Balasubramanian S. The social-economic-psychological model of technology adoption and usage: An application to online investing. Decision Support Systems (2005) 39(3):505–524CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kraut R. E., Scherlis W., Mukhopadhyay T., Manning J., Kiesler S. Homenet: A field trial of residential Internet services. Comm. ACM (1996) 39(12):55–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krishnan R., Smith M., Tang Z., Telang R. The virtual commons: Why free-riding can be tolerated in peer-to-peer networks. Workshop Inform. Systems Econom. (2003) May 29–30College Park, MDGoogle Scholar
  • Kuk G. Strategic interaction and knowledge sharing in the KDE mailing list. Management Sci. (2006) 52:1031–1042LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lindsay P., Norman D. A.Human Information Processing (1977) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • MacKie-Mason J. K., Varian H. The economic FAQs about the Internet. J. Econom. Perspectives (1994) 8(Summer):75–96CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McFadden D. Regression-based specification tests for the multinomial logit model. J. Econometrics (1987) 34:63–82CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moreland R. L., Levine J. M., Turner M. E. Socialization in organizations and work groups. Groups at Work: Theory and Research (2001) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 69–112Google Scholar
  • Moreland R. L., Argote L., Krishnan R., Nye J., Brower A. Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. What’s Social About Social Cognition? Research on Socially Shared Cognition in Small Groups (1996) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pang B., Lee L., Vaithyanathan S. Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. Proc. Conf. Empirical Methods Natural Assoc. Computational Linguistics Language Processing (EMNLP) (2002) July 6–7Philadelphia, PA:79–86Google Scholar
  • Prentice D. A., Miller D. T., Lightdale J. R. Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1994) 20(5):484–493CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rajagopalan B., Konana P., Lee C., Wimble M. Extracting relevance from virtual investing-related community postings. Proc. 10th Americas Conf. Inform. Systems (2004) Aug. 5–8New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Rheingold H.The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier (1993) (Harper Collins, New York) Google Scholar
  • Roberts J., Hann I. H., Slaughter S. Understanding the motivations, participation, and performance of open source software developers: A longitudinal study of the Apache projects. Management Sci. (2006) 52(7):984–999LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sassenberg K. Common bond and common identity groups on the Internet: Attachment and normative behavior in on-topic and off-topic chats. Group Dynam. (2002) 6(1):27–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shaked A., Sutton J. Natural oligopolies. Econometrica (1983) 51:1469–1483CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shankar V., Bayus B. L. Network effects and competition: An empirical analysis of the home videogame industry. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24:375–384CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shenk D.Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut (1997) (HarperEdge, New York) Google Scholar
  • Sproull L., Kiesler S.Connections, New Ways of Working in the Networked Organization (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Strahilevitz L. J. Charismatic code, social norms, and the emergence of cooperation on the file-swapping networks. Virginia Law Rev. (2003) 89(3):505–595CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vandenbosch M., Weinberg C. B. Product and price competition in a two-dimensional vertical differentiation model. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(2):224–249LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wysocki P. D. Cheap talk on the Web: The determinants of postings on stock discussion boards. (1999) . Working Paper 98025, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.