Antecedents and Consequences of Internet Use in Procurement: An Empirical Investigation of U.S. Manufacturing Firms

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0115

References

  • Anderson J. C., Gerbing D. W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psych. Bull. (1988) 103(3):411–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aragon-Correa J. A., Sharma S. A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28(1):71–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Armstrong C. P., Sambamurthy V. Information technology assimilation in firms: The influence of senior leadership and IT infrastructure. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(4):304–327LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Arrow K. J. The economic implication of learning by doing. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1962) 29:155–173CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Attewell P. Technology diffusion and organizational learning: The case of business computing. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(1):1–19LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bandalos D. The effect of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Model. (2002) 9:78–102CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barney J. B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management (1991) 17(1):99–120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barua A., Konana P., Whinston A. B., Yin F. Assessing Internet-enabled business value: An exploratory investigation. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(4):585–620CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bensaou M., Anderson E. Buyer-supplier relations in industrial markets: When do buyers risk making idiosyncratic investments? Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(4):460–481LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bhardwaj A. S. A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(1):169–196CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhardwaj A. S., Bhardwaj S. G., Konsynski B. R. Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin’s q. Management Sci. (1999) 45(7):1008–1024LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chau P. Y. K., Tam K. Y. Factors affecting the adoption of open systems: An exploratory study. MIS Quart. (1997) 21(1):1–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chwelos P., Benbasat I., Dexter A. S. Research report: Empirical test of an EDI adoption model. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(3):304–321LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:128–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper R. B., Zmud R. W. Information technology implementation research: A technological diffusion approach. Management Sci. (1990) 36(2):123–139LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Crampton S. M., Wagner J. A. Percept-percept inflation in microorganizational research: An investigation of prevalence and effect. J. Appl. Psych. (1994) 79:67–76CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Damanpour F. Organizational innovation: A meta analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad. Management J. (1992) 34(3):555–590CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Day G. S. The capability of market-driven organizations. J. Marketing (1994) 58:37–52CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeLone W. H., McLean E. R. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Inform. Systems Res. (1992) 3(1):60–95LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DePietro R., Wiarda E., Fleischer M., Tornatzky L. G., Fleischer M. The context for change: Organization, technology and environment. The Process of Technological Innovation (1990) (Lexington Books, Lexington, MA) 151–175Google Scholar
  • Devaraj S., Kohli R. Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link? Management Sci. (2003) 49(3):273–289LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Downey H. K., Hellriegel D., Slocum J. W. Environmental uncertainty: The construct and its application. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1975) 20:613–629CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fichman R. G., Kemerer C. F. The assimilation of software process innovations: An organizational learning perspective. Management Sci. (1997) 43(10):1345–1363LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gerloff E. A., Muir N. K., Bodensteiner W. D. Three components of perceived environmental uncertainty: An exploratory analysis of the effects of aggregation. J. Management (1991) 17(4):749–768CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant R. M. Prospering in dynamically competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(4):375–387LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huber G. P. A theory of the effects of advanced information technologies on organizational design, intelligence, and decision making. Acad. Management Rev. (1990) 15(1):47–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson M. E., Whang S. E-business and supply chain management: An overview and framework. (2002) . Working Paper 03-06, Tuck SchoolGoogle Scholar
  • Kirsch L. J., Beath C. M. The enactments and consequences of token, shared, and compliant participation in information systems development. Accounting, Management Inform. Tech. (1996) 6(4):221–254CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Massetti B., Zmud R. W. Measuring the extent of EDI usage in complex organizations: Strategies and illustrative examples. MIS Quart. (1996) 20(3):331–345CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mata F. J., Fuerst W. L., Barney J. B. Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based view. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(4):487–504CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Melville N., Kraemer K., Gurbaxani V. Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(2):283–322CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller D., Shamsie J. The resource-based view of the firm in two environments: The Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(3):519–543CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milliken F. J. Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect, and response uncertainty. Acad. Management Rev. (1987) 12:133–143CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Monczka R., Trent R., Handfield R.Purchasing and Supply Chain Management (2002) (South-Western, Cincinnati, OH) Google Scholar
  • Mooney J. G., Gurbaxani V., Kraemer K. A process oriented framework for assessing the business value of information technology. Proc. 16th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1995) The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  • Mukhopadhyay T., Kekre S., Kalathur S. Business value of information technology: A study of electronic data interchange. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(2):137–156CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R. R., Winter S.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (The Belknap Press of Harvard University, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Nunnally J. C.Psychometric Theory (1978) (McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Penrose E. T.The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (1959) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Piccoli G., Ives B. IT-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: A review and synthesis of the literature. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(4):747–776CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podsakoff P. M., Organ D. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. J. Management (1986) 12:531–543CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Prabhu J., Chandy R., Ellis M. Acquisition and innovation in high-tech firms: Poison pill, placebo, or tonic? J. Marketing (2005) 69(1):114–130CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rai A., Patnayakuni R., Seth N. Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(2):225–246CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ray G., Barney J. B., Muhanna W. A. Capabilities, business processes, and competitive advantage: Choosing the dependent variable in empirical tests of resource-based view. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25:23–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ray G., Muhanna W. A., Barney J. B. Information technology and the performance of the customer service process: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(4):625–652CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers E.Diffusion of Innovations (1995) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Sambamurthy V., Bhardwaj A., Grover V. Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of IT in contemporary firms. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):237–263CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schroeder R. G., Bates K. A., Junttila M. A. A resource-based view of manufacturing strategy and the relationship to manufacturing performance. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23:105–117CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sharma S. Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43:681–697CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swaminathan J. M., Tayur S. R. Models for supply chains in e-business. Management Sci. (2003) 49(10):1387–1406LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):509–533CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wade M., Hulland J. Review: The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quart. (2004) 23(1):107–142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wernerfelt B. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1984) 5:171–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wiggins R. R., Ruefli T. W. Sustained competitive advantage: Temporal dynamics and the incidence and persistence of superior economic performance. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(1):82–105LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yu S., Mukhopadhyay T., Slaughter S. Organizational capabilities and the assimilation of electronic procurement in service industries. Proc. 24th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (2003) Seattle, WA:975–981Google Scholar
  • Zahra S. A., George G. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27(2):185–203CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zenz G., Thompson G. H.Purchasing and the Management of Materials (1994) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Zhu K., Kraemer K. Post-adoption variations in usage and value of e-business by organizations: Cross-country evidence from the retail industry. Inform. Systems Res. (2005) 16(1):61–84LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.