Impact of International Information Technology Transfer on National Productivity

References

• Bresnahan T. F., Trajtenberg M. General purpose technologies: Engines of growth? J. Econometrics (1995) 65(1):83–108Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Sci. (1996) 42(4):541–558Link, Google Scholar
• Carr D. C., Markusen J. R., Maskus K. E. Estimating the knowledge-capital model of the multinational enterprise. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2001) 91(3):693–708Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caselli F., Coleman W. J. I. Cross-country technology diffusion: The case of computers. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2001) 91(2):328–335Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chan Y. E. IT value: The great divide between qualitative and quantitative and individual and organizational measures. J. Management Inform. Systems (2000) 16(4):225–261Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coe D. T., Helpman E. International R&D spillovers. Eur. Econom. Rev. (1995) 39(5):859–887Crossref, Google Scholar
• Connolly M. The dual nature of trade: Measuring its impact on imitation and growth. J. Development Econom. (2003) 72(1):31–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Curley K. F., Pyburn P. J. “Intellectual” technologies: The key to improving white-collar productivity. Sloan Management Rev. (1982) 24(1):31–39Google Scholar
• Davidson R., MacKinnon J. G.Estimation and Inference in Econometrics (1993) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Dewan S., Kraemer K. L. International dimensions of the productivity paradox. Comm. ACM (1998) 41(8):56–62Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dewan S., Kraemer K. L. Information technology and productivity: Evidence from country-level data. Management Sci. (2000) 46(4):548–562Link, Google Scholar
• Eaton J., Kortum S. International technology diffusion: Theory and measurement. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1999) 40(3):537–570Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engelbrecht H.-J. International R&D spillovers, human capital and productivity in OECD economies: An empirical investigation. Eur. Econom. Rev. (1997) 41(8):1479–1488Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engle R. F., Granger C. W. J. Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica (1987) 55(2):251–276Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feenstra R. C., Lipsey R. E. National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) United Nations trade data, 1962–2000. (2005) . http://www.econ.ucdavis.edu/tradedata/undata/undata.cfmGoogle Scholar
• Furman J. L., Porter M. E., Stern S. The determinants of national innovative capacity. Res. Policy (2002) 31(6):899–933Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glass A. J., Saggi K. International technology transfer and the technology gap. J. Development Econom. (1998) 55(2):369–398Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gong G., Keller W. Convergence and polarization in the global income levels: A review of recent results on the role of international technology diffusion. Res. Policy (2003) 32(6):1055–1079Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granger C. W. J., Newbold P. Spurious regressions in econometrics. J. Econometrics (1974) 2(2):111–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (2000) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Griliches Z. Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. J. Econom. Literature (1990) 28(4):1661–1707Google Scholar
• Griliches Z.R&D and Productivity. The Econometric Evidence (1998) (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grossman G. M., Helpman E.Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy (1991a) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Grossman G. M., Helpman E. Trade, knowledge spillovers, and growth. Eur. Econom. Rev. (1991b) 35(2, 3):517–526Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gustavsson P., Hansson P., Lundberg L. Technology, resource endowments and international competitiveness. Eur. Econom. Rev. (1999) 43(8):1501–1530Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris S. E., Katz J. L. Firm size and the information technology investment intensity of life insurers. MIS Quart. (1991) 15(3):333–352Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heston A., Summers R., Aten B. Penn World Table Version 6.1. Center for International Comparisons at the University of Pennsylvania (CICUP). (2002) (Philadelphia, PA)Google Scholar
• Hitt L. M. Information technology and firm boundaries: Evidence from panel data. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(2):134–149Link, Google Scholar
• Hu M.-C., Mathews J. A. National innovative capacity in East Asia. Res. Policy (2005) 34(9):1322–1349Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johansen S. Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegrated vectors in Gaussian VAR models. Econometrica (1991) 59(6):1551–1580Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kedia B. L., Bhagat R. S. Cultural constraints on transfer of technology across nations: Implications for research in international and comparative management. Acad. Management Rev. (1988) 13(4):559–571Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keller R. T., Chinta R. R. International technology transfer: Strategies for success. Acad. Management Executive (1990) 4(2):33–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keller W. Absorptive capacity: On the creation and acquisition of technology in development. J. Development Econom. (1996) 49(1):199–227Crossref, Google Scholar
• Keller W. Are international R&D spillovers trade-related? Analyzing spillovers among randomly matched trade partners. Eur. Econom. Rev. (1998) 42(8):1469–1481Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):383–397Link, Google Scholar
• Landauer T. K.The Trouble with Computers: Usefulness, Usability, and Productivity (1995) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Lau L. J., Tokutsu I. The impact of computer technology on the aggregate productivity of the United States: An indirect approach. (1992) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Lehr B., Lichtenberg F. Information technology and its impact on productivity: Firm-level evidence from government and private data sources, 1977–1993. Canad. J. Econom. (1999) 32(2):335–362Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lichtenberg F. R. The output contributions of computer equipment and personnel: A firm-level analysis. (1993) . National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper 4540, Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Lichtenberg F. R., de la Potterie B. v. P. International R&D spillovers: A comment. Eur. Econom. Rev. (1998) 42(8):1483–1491Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mahajan V., Peterson R. A.Models for Innovation Diffusion (1985) (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mansfield E. Patents and innovation: An empirical study. Management Sci. (1985) 32(2):173–181Link, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I., Nishiguchi T.Knowledge Emergence: Social, Technical, and Evolutionary Dimensions of Knowledge Creation (2001) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Okabe M. International R&D spillovers and trade expansion: Evidence from East Asian economies. ASEAN Econom. Bull. (2002) 19(2):141–154Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park J. International and intersectoral R&D spillovers in the OECD and East Asian economies. Econom. Inquiry (2004) 42(4):739–757Crossref, Google Scholar
• Park J., Shin H.-H., Shin S. K. The intensity and externality effects of information technology investments on national productivity growth. IEEE Trans Engrg. ManagementForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Pedroni P. Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bull. Econom. Statist. (1999) 61:653–670Crossref, Google Scholar
• Phillips P. C. B. Understanding spurious regressions in econometrics. J. Econometrics (1986) 33(3):331–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pugel T. A. Endogenous technological change and international technology transfer in a Ricardian trade model. J. Internat. Econom. (1982) 13(3–4):321–335Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivera-Batiz L. A., Romer P. M. Economic integration and endogenous growth. Quart. J. Econom. (1991) 106(2):531–555Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson R. D.The International Transfer of Technology: Theory, Issues, and Practice (1988) (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Romer P. M. Idea gaps and object gaps in economic development. J. Monetary Econom. (1993) 32(3):543–573Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saggi K. Trade, foreign direct investment, and international technology transfer: A survey. The World Bank Res. Observer (2002) 17(2):191–235Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro C., Varian H. R.Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (1999) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Sichel D. E.The Computer Revolution: An Economic Perspective (1997) (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
• Siegel D. The impact of computers on manufacturing productivity growth: A multiple-indicators multiple-causes approach. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1997) 79(1):68–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stern S., Porter M. E., Furman J. L. The determinants of national innovative capacity. (2000) . Working paper, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), Cambridge, MACrossref, Google Scholar
• Stock J., Watson M. Testing for common trends. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1988) 83:1097–1107Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suarez-Villa L. Invention, inventive learning, and innovative capacity. Behavioral Sci. (1990) 35(4):290–310Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. Technology transfer by multinational firms: The resource cost of transferring technological know-how. Econom. J. (1977) 87(346):242–261Google Scholar
• World BankThe 2002 World Development Indicators (2002) (World Bank, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
• World Trade Organization International trade in IT products. Proc. WTO Inform. Tech. Sympos. (1999) Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
• Xu B., Wang J. Capital goods trade and R&D spillovers in the OECD. Canad. J. Econom. (1999) 32(5):1258–1274Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu K., Kraemer K. L. E-commerce metrics for net-enhanced organizations: Assessing the value e-commerce to firm performance in the manufacturing sector. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(3):275–295Link, Google Scholar