Information System Use–Related Activity: An Expanded Behavioral Conceptualization of Individual-Level Information System Use

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0122

References

  • Agarwal R., Zmud R. W. Individual acceptance of information technologies. Framing the Domains of IT Management (2000) (Pinnaflex, Cincinnati, OH) 105–127Google Scholar
  • Agarwal R., Karahanna E. Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(4):665–694CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beaudry A., Pinsonneault A. Understanding user responses to IT: A user adaptation coping acts model. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(3):493–524CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bentler P. M., Chou C. P. Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociol. Methods Res. (1987) 16(1):78–117CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bollen K., Lennox R. Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psych. Bull. (1991) 110(2):305–314CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brancheau J. C., Wetherbe J. C. The adoption of spreadsheet software: Testing innovation diffusion theory in the context of end-user computing. Inform. Systems Res. (1990) 1(2):115–144LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burton-Jones A., Straub D. W. Reconceptualizing system usage: An approach and empirical test. Inform. Systems Res. (2006) 17(3):228–246LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Byrne B. M.Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming (1998) (Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Chin W. W., Marcolin B. L., Newsted P. R. Supplemental material. Inform. System Res. (2003) 14(2):18 http://www2.informs.org/Pubs/Supplements/ISR/1526-5536-2003-02-SupplA.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Compeau D. R., Higgins C. A. Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(2):189–211CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conger J. A., Kanungo R. N., Menon S. T. Charismatic leadership and follower effects. J. Organ. Behav. (2000) 21:747–767CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeLone W. H., McLean E. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Inform. Systems Res. (1992) 3(1):60–95LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DeLone W. H., McLean E. The Delone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. J. Management Inform. Systems (2003) 19(4):9–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Devaraj S., Kohli R. Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link? Management Sci. (2003) 49(3):273–289LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Diamantopoulos A., Siguaw J. A. Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British J. Management (2006) 17:263–282CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diamantopoulos A., Winklhofer H. Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38(2):269–277CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doll W. J., Torkzadeh G. Developing a multidimensional measure of system-use in an organizational context. Inform. Management (1998) 33:171–185CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edwards J. R. Multidimensional constructs in organizational behavior research: An integrative analytical framework. Organ. Res. Methods (2001) 4(2):144–192CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elangovan A. R., Xie J. L. Effects of perceived power of supervisor on subordinate stress and motivation: The moderating role of subordinate characteristics. J. Organ. Behav. (1999) 20:359–373CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gasser L. The integration of computing and routine work. ACM Trans. Office Inform. Systems (1986) 4(3):205–225CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gatian A. W. Is user satisfaction a valid measure of system effectiveness? Inform. Management (1994) 26(3):119–131CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gefen D., Karahanna E., Straub D. W. Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(1):51–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodhue D. L. Understanding user evaluations of information systems. Management Sci. (1995) 41(12):1827–1844LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goodhue D. L., Thompson R. L. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(2):213–236CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hartwick J., Barki H. Explaining the role of user participation in information system use. Management Sci. (1994) 40(4):440–465LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Im K. S., Grover V., Whitman M. E., Woszczynski A. B. The use of structural equation modeling in IS research: Review and recommendations. The Handbook of Information Systems Research (2004) (Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, PA) 44–65CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarvis C. B., Mackenzie S. B., Podsakoff P. M. A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. J. Consumer Res. (2003) 30(2):199–218CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jasperson J., Carter P. E., Zmud R. W. A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology–enabled work systems. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(3):525–557CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jiang J. J., Klein G., Carr C. L. Measuring information system service quality: SERVQUAL from the other side. MIS Quart. (2002) 26(2):145–161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson B. M., Rice R. E.Managing Organizational Innovation: The Evolution From Word Processing to Office Information Systems (1987) (Columbia University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Jöreskog K. G., Sörbom A. S.Interactive LISREL (2005) (Scientific Software International, Chicago, IL) Google Scholar
  • Kaptelinin V., Nardi B. A. Activity theory: Basic concepts and applications. CHI 97 Electronic Publications (1997) . www.acm.org/sigchi/chi97/proceedings/tutotial/bn.htmGoogle Scholar
  • Kerlinger F. N., Lee H. B.Foundations of Behavioral Research (2000) 4th ed.(Wadsworth, Thomson Learning, Stamford, CT) Google Scholar
  • Kuutti K. Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human Computer Interaction (1995) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 17–44Google Scholar
  • Lamb R., Kling R. Reconceptualizing users as social actors in information systems research. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):197–235CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lassila K. S., Brancheau J. C. Adoption and utilization of commercial software packages: Exploring utilization equilibria, transitions, triggers, and tracks. J. Management Inform. Systems (1999) 16(2):63–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Law K. S., Wong C. S., Mobley W. H. Toward a taxonomy of multidimensional constructs. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(4):741–755CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis L. K., Seibold D. R. Innovation modification during intraorganizational adoption. Acad. Management Rev. (1993) 18(2):322–354CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lucas H. C., Spitler V. K. Technology use and performance: A field study of broker workstations. Decision Sci. (1999) 30(2):291–311CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. Continuity and change in theories of organizational action. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41(2):278–287CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Marcolin B. L., Compeau D. R., Munro M. C., Huff S. L. Assessing user competence: Conceptualization and measurement. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(1):37–60LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moore G. C., Benbasat I., Kautz K., Pries-Heje J. Integrating diffusion of innovations and theory of reasoned action models to predict utilization of information technology by end users. Diffusion and Adoption of Information Technology (1996) (Chapman and Hall Publishers, London, UK) 132–146CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nambisan S., Agarwal R., Tanniru M. Organizational mechanisms for enhancing user innovation in information technology. MIS Quart. (1999) 23(3):365–395CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nardi B. A., Nardi B. A. Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human Computer Interaction (1995a) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 7–16CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nardi B. A.Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human Computer Interaction (1995b) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):398–427LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J. Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(1):63–92LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(4):404–429LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Papa W. H., Papa M. J. Communication network patterns and the re-invention of new technology. J. Bus. Comm. (1992) 29(1):41–61CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Lee J. Y., Podsakoff N. P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(5):879–903CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Poole M. S., DeSanctis G., Fulk J., Steinfeld C. Understanding the use of group decision systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. Organizations and Communication Technology (1990) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) 173–193CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rice R. E., Rogers E. M. Reinvention in the innovation process. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization (1980) 1(4):499–514Google Scholar
  • Saga V. L., Zmud R. W., Levine L. The nature and determinants of IT acceptance, routinization, and infusion. Diffusion, Transfer, and Implementation of Information Technology (1994) (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 67–86Google Scholar
  • Seddon P. B. A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(3):240–253LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Staples S. D., Wong I., Seddon P. B. Having expectations of information systems benefits that match received benefits: Does it really matter? Inform. Management (2002) 40:115–131CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Straub D. W., Limayem M., Karahanna-Evaristo E. Measuring system usage: Implications for IS theory testing. Management Sci. (1995) 41(8):1328–1342LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Szajna B. Determining information system usage: Some issues and examples. Inform. Management (1993) 25:147–154CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tyre M. J., Orlikowski W. J. Windows of opportunity: Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(1):98–118LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vandenbosch B., Higgins C. H. Information acquisition and mental models: An investigation into the relationship between behavior and learning. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(2):198–214LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Winklhofer H. M., Diamantopoulos A. Managerial evaluation of sales forecasting effectiveness: A MIMIC modeling approach. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2002) 19:151–166CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wixom B. H., Todd P. A. A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Inform. Systems Res. (2005) 16(1):85–102LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.