Research Note—Investigating the Influence of the Functional Mechanisms of Online Product Presentations

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0124

References

  • Ajzen I. Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Rev. Psych. (2001) 52:27–58CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ariely D. Controlling the information flow: Effects on consumers decision making and preferences. J. Consumer Res. (2000) 27(2):233–248CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Babin B. J., Darden W. R., Griffin M. Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. J. Consumer Res. (1994) 20(4):644–656CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barclay D., Thompson R., Higgins C. The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Techn. Stud. (1995) 2(2):285–309Google Scholar
  • Bodur H. O., Brinberg D., Coupey E. Belief, affect, and attitude: Alternative models of the determinants of attitude. J. Consumer Psych. (2000) 9(1):17–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burke R. R. Technology and the customer interface: What consumers want in the physical and virtual store. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2002) 30(4):411–432CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carey J., Galletta D., Kim J., Te'eni D., Wildemuth B., Zhang P. The role of human-computer interaction in management information systems curricula: A call to action. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2004) 13:357–379Google Scholar
  • Chin W. W., Marcoulides G. A. The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research (1998) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ) 295–336Google Scholar
  • Chin W. W., Marcolin B. L., Newsted P. R. A partial least squares latent variables modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Res. (2003) 14(2):189–217LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Coyle J. R., Thorson E. The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in web marketing sites. J. Advertising (2001) 30(3):65–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daft R. L., Lengel R. H. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Sci. (1986) 32(5):554–571LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Daft R. L., Lengel R. H., Trevino L. K. Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quart. (1987) 11(3):355–367CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(3):319–339CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dennis A. R., Kinney S. T. Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(3):256–274LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eagly A. H., Mladinic A., Otto S. Cognitive and affective base of attitudes toward social groups and social policies. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1994) 30(2):113–137CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eroglu S. A., Machleit K. A., Davis L. M. Atmospheric qualities of online retailing: A conceptual model and implications. J. Bus. Res. (2001) 54:177–184CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eroglu S. A., Machleit K. A., Davis L. M. Empirical testing of a model of online store atmospherics and shopper responses. Psych. Marketing (2003) 20(2):139–150CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fiore A. M., Jin H.-J., Kim J. For fun and profit: Hedonic value from image interactivity and responses toward an online store. Psych. Marketing (2005) 22(8):669–694CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fishbein M., Ajzen I.Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (1975) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Grazioli S., Jarvenpaa S. L. Perils of Internet fraud: An empirical investigation of deception and trust with experienced Internet consumers. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, Cybernetics (2000) 30(4):395–410CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heijden H. v. d., Verhagen T., Creemers M. Understanding online purchase intentions: Contributions from technology and trust perspectives. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (2003) 12:41–48CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hevner A. R., March S. T., Park J., Ram S. Design science in information systems research. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(1):75–105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hutchins E. L., Hollan J. D., Norman D. A., Norman D. A., Draper S. Direct manipulation interface. User Centered Design: New Perspectives on Human Computer Interaction (1986) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 87–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarvenpaa S. L., Todd P. A. Consumer reactions to electronic shopping on the world wide web. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce (1996–1997) 1(2):59–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarvenpaa S. L., Tractinsky N., Vitale M. Consumer trust in an Internet store. Inform. Tech. Management (2000) 1(1–2):45–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jiang Z., Benbasat I. Virtual product experience: Effects of visual and functional control of products on perceived diagnosticity and flow in electronic shopping. J. Management Inform. Systems (2005) 21(3):111–148CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahai S. S., Cooper R. B. Exploring the core concepts of media richness theory: The impact of cue multiplicity and feedback immediacy on decision quality. J. Management Inform. Systems (2003) 20(1):263–299CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kempf D. S. Attitude formation from product trial: Distinct roles of cognition and affect for hedonic and functional products. Psych. Marketing (1999) 16(1):35–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kempf D. S., Smith R. E. Consumer processing of product trial and the influence of prior advertising: A structural modeling approach. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35:325–337CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kettanurak V. N., Ramamurthy K., Haseman W. D. User attitude as a mediator of learning performance improvement in an interactive multimedia environment: An empirical investigation of the degree of interactivity and learning styles. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Stud. (2001) 54(4):541–583CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kisielius J., Sternthal B. Detecting and explaining vividness effects in attitudinal judgments. J. Marketing Res. (1984) XXI:54–64CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kisielius J., Sternthal B. Examining the vividness controversy: An availability-valence interpretation. J. Consumer Res. (1986) 12(4):418–431CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koufaris M. Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(2):205–223LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Li H., Daugherty T., Biocca F. Characteristics of virtual experience in electronic commerce: A protocol analysis. J. Interactive Marketing (2001) 15(3):13–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li H., Daugherty T., Biocca F. Impact of 3-D advertising on product knowledge, brand attitude, and purchase intention: The mediating role of presence. J. Advertising (2002) 31(3):43–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Li H., Daugherty T., Biocca F. The role of virtual experience in consumer learning. J. Consumer Psych. (2003) 13(4):395–407CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lightner N. J., Eastman C. User preference for product information in remote purchase environments. J. Electronic Commerce Res. (2002) 3(3):174–185Google Scholar
  • Lim K. H., Benbasat I., Ward L. M. The role of multimedia in changing first impression bias. Inform. Systems Res. (2000a) 22(2):449–471Google Scholar
  • Lim K. H., Sia C. L., Lee M. K. O., Benbasat I. How do I trust you online, and if so, will I buy?: An empirical study of two trust-building strategies. J. Management Inform. Systems (2000b) 23(2):233–266CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mackenzie S. B., Spreng R. A. How does motivation moderate the impact of central and peripheral processing on brand attitudes and intentions? J. Consumer Res. (1992) 18(4):519–529CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mathwick C., Rigdon E. Play, flow, and the online search experience. J. Consumer Res. (2004) 31(2):324–332CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKinney V., Yoon K., Zahedi F. M. The measurement of web-customer satisfaction: An expectation and disconfirmation approach. Inform. Res. J. (2002) 13(3):296–315LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miller D. W., Marks L. J. The effects of imagery-evoking radio advertising strategies on affective responses. Psych. Marketing (1997) 14(4):337–360CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moore G. C., Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2(3):192–222LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson P. Advertising as information. J. Political Econom. (1974) 83(3):729–754CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nisbett R., Ross L., Nisbett R., Ross L. Assigning weights to data: The “vividness criterion”. Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment (1980) (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Nunnally J.Psychometric Theory (1978) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • O'Keefe R. M., McEachern T. Web-based customer decision support systems. Comm. ACM (1998) 41(3):71–78CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Palmer J. W. Web site usability, design, and performance metrics. Inform. System Res. (2002) 13(2):151–167LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Peterson R. A., Balasubramanian S., Bronnenberg B. J. Exploring the implications of the Internet for consumer marketing. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1997) 25(4):329–346CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raney A. A., Arpan L. M., Pashupati K., Brill D. A. At the movies, on the web: An investigation of the effects of entertaining and interactive web content on site and brand evaluation. J. Interactive Marketing (2003) 17(4):38–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schlosser A. E. Experiencing products in the virtual world: The role of goal and imagery in influencing attitudes versus purchase intentions. J. Consumer Res. (2003) 30(2):184–198CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith P. W., Feinberg R. A., Burns D. J. An examination of classical conditioning principles in an ecologically valid advertising context. J. Marketing Theory Practice; Statesboro (1998) 6(1):63–72CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith R. E. Integrating information from advertising and trial: Processes and effects on consumer response to product information. J. Marketing Res. (1993) 30(2):204–219CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steuer J. Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. J. Comm. (1992) 42(4):73–93CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Suh K.-S., Lee Y. E. Effects of virtual reality on consumer learning: An empirical investigation in web-based electronic commerce. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(4):673–697CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Szymanski D. M., Hise R. J. e-Satisfaction: An initial examination. J. Retailing (2000) 76(3):309–322CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor S. E., Thompson S. C. Stalking the elusive “vividness” effect. Psych. Rev. (1982) 89(2):155–181CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teo H., Oh L., Liu C., Wei K. An empirical study of the effects of interactivity on web user attitude. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Stud. (2003) 58:281–305CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Urban G. L., Weinberg B. D., Hauser J. R. Premarket forecasting of really-new products. J. Marketing (1996) 60(1):47–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Urban G. L., Hauser J. R., Qualls W. J., Weinberg B. D., Bohlmann J. D., Chicos R. A. Information acceleration: Validation and lessons from the field. J. Marketing Res. (1997) XXXIV(1):143–153CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V., Davis F. D. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Sci. (2000) 46:186–204LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V., Morris M. G., Davis G. B., Davis F. D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(3):425–478CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walls J. G., Widmeyer G. R., Sawy O. A. E. Assessing information systems design theory in perspective: How useful was our 1992 initial rendition? J. Inform. Tech. Theory Appl. (2004) 6(2):43–57Google Scholar
  • Wang W., Benbasat I. Trust in and adoption of online recommendation agents. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems (AIS) (2005) 6(3):72–101Google Scholar
  • Wolfinbarger M., Gilly M. Shopping online for freedom, control and fun. California Management Rev. (2001) 43(2):34–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang P., Benbasat I., Carey J., Davis F., Galletta D., Strong D. AMCIS 2002 panels and workships I: Human-computer interaction research in the MIS discipline. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2002) 9:334–355Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.