The Choice of Sourcing Mechanisms for Business Processes

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0129

References

  • Amemiya T.Advanced Econometrics (1985) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Anderson E. The salesperson as outside agent or employee: A transaction cost analysis. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(3):234–254LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson E., Schmittlein D. C. Integration of the sales force—An empirical-examination. Rand J. Econom. (1984) 15(3):385–395CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson C. R., Zeithaml C. P. Stage of the product life-cycle, business strategy, and business performance. Acad. Management J. (1984) 27(1):5–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ang S., Straub D. W. Production and transaction economies and is outsourcing: A study of the U.S. banking industry. MIS Quart. (1998) 22(4):535–552CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Artz K. W., Brush T. H. Asset specificity, uncertainty and relational norms: An examination of coordination costs in collaborative strategic alliances. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2000) 41(4):337–362CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Augier M., Simon H. A., Garud R., Kumaraswamy A., Langlois R. N. The architecture of complexity: Background and central idea. Managing in the Modular Age: Architectures, Networks, and Organizations (2003) (Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA) 38–44Google Scholar
  • Bagozzi R. P., Yi Y., Phillips L. W. Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36:421–458CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin C. Y., Clark K. B. Managing in an age of modularity. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1997) 75(5):84–93Google Scholar
  • Baldwin C. Y., Clark K. B.Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin C. Y., Clark K. B. Where do transactions come from? A network design perspective on the theory of the firm. (2006) . Harvard NOM Working Paper 06-12. http://ssrn.com/abstract=901790Google Scholar
  • Barki H., Rivard S. Toward an assessment of software development risk. J. Management Inform. Systems (1993) 10(2):203–225CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barki H., Rivard S., Talbot J. An integrative contingency model of software project risk management. J. Management Inform. Systems (2001) 17(4):37–69CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management (1991) 17(1):99–120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benner M. J. Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47(4):676–706CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clemons E. K., Hitt L. M. Poaching and the misappropriation of information: Transaction risks of information exchange. J. Management Inform. Systems (2004) 21(2):87–107CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • CMMI Capability maturity model integration version 1.1. (2002) . Carnegie Mellon Software Institute, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
  • Dillman D. A.Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (2000) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • DiRomualdo A., Gurbaxani V. Strategic intent for IT outsourcing. Sloan Management Rev. (1998) 39(4):67–80Google Scholar
  • Ethiraj S. K., Levinthal D. Modularity and innovation in complex systems. Management Sci. (2004) 50(2):159–173LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ethiraj S. K., Kale P., Krishnan M. S., Singh J. V. Where do capabilities come from and how do they matter? A study in the software services industry. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(1):25–45CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Evans D. S., Hagiu A., Schmalensee R.Invisible Engines: How Software Platforms Drive Innovation and Transform Industries (2006) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farrell J., Saloner G. Converters, compatibility, and the control of interfaces. J. Indust. Econom. (1992) 40(1):9–35CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gailbraith J. R.Designing Complex Organization (1973) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Goo J., Kishore R., Rao H. R., Ang S., Krcmar H., Orlikowski W. J., Weill P., DeGross J. A content-analytic longitudinal study of the drivers for information technology and systems outsourcing. Proc. 21st Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (2000) (Association of Information Systems, Atlanta, GA) 601–611Google Scholar
  • Greene M. H.Econometric Analysis (2000) 4th ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Hagel J., Brown J. S.The Only Sustainable Edge: Why Business Strategy Depends on Productive Friction and Dynamic Specialization (2005) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Harter D. E., Krishnan M. S., Slaughter S. A. Effects of process maturity on quality, cycle time, and effort in software product development. Management Sci. (2000) 46(4):451–466LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Infosys Global delivery model. (2007) . http://www.infosys.com/gdm/default.aspGoogle Scholar
  • Keller R. T. Technology information-processing fit and the performance of R-and-D project groups: A test of contingency theory. Acad. Management J. (1994) 37(1):167–179CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Langlois R. N. Modularity in technology and organization. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2002) 49(1):19–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Langlois R. N. The secret life of mundane transaction costs. Organ. Stud. (2006) 27(9):1389–1410CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leclere M. J. The interpretation of coefficients in models with n-qualitative or ordered dependent variables. Contemporary Accounting Res. (1999) 16(4):711–747CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leiblein M. J., Miller D. J. An empirical examination of transaction- and firm-level influences on the vertical boundaries of the firm. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(9):839–859CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levina N., Ross J. W. From the vendor's perspective: Exploring the value proposition in information technology outsourcing. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(3):331–364CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Long S.Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables (1997) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Malhotra A., Gosain S., El Sawy O. A. Absorptive capacity configurations in supply chains: Gearing for partner-enabled market knowledge creation. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(1):145–187CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malone T. W., Crowston K. The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Comput. Surveys (1994) 26(1):87–119CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer K. J., Salomon R. M. Capabilities, contractual hazards, and governance: Integrating resource-based and transaction cost perspectives. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(5):942–959CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Messerschmitt D. G., Szyperski C.Software Ecosystem: Understanding an Indispensable Technology and Industry (2003) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Mitchell V. L., Zmud R. W. The effects of coupling IT and work process strategies in redesign projects. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(4):424–438LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Newman K. L. Organizational transformation during institutional upheaval. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25(3):602–619CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nunnally J. C.Psychometric Theory (1978) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Orton J. D., Weick K. E. Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Acad. Management Rev. (1990) 15(2):203–223CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parnas D. L. On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules. Comm. ACM (1972) 15(12):1053–1058CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter M. E. Strategy and the Internet. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2001) 79(3):62–78Google Scholar
  • Prahalad C. K., Krishnan M. S. The building blocks of global competitiveness. Optimize (2004) 35(SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  • Quinn J. B. Strategic outsourcing: Leveraging knowledge capabilities. Sloan Management Rev. (1999) 40(4):9–22Google Scholar
  • Quinn J. B. The intelligent enterprise a new paradigm. Acad. Management Executive (2005) 19(4):109–121CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ross J. W., Weill P., Robertson D.Enterprise Architecture as Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution (2006) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Sambamurthy V., Bharadwaj A., Grover V. Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):237–263CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sanchez R., Mahoney J. T. Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:63–76CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schilling M. A. Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25(2):312–334CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schilling M. A., Steensma H. K. The use of modular organizational forms: An industry-level analysis. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(6):1149–1168CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simester D., Knez M. Direct and indirect bargaining costs and the scope of the firm. J. Bus. (2002) 75(2):283–304CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H. A. The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. (1962) 106:467–482Google Scholar
  • Stump R. L., Heide J. B. Controlling supplier opportunism in industrial relationships. J. Marketing Res. (1996) 33(4):431–441CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Subramani M. R., Venkatraman N. Safeguarding investments in asymmetric interorganizational relationships: Theory and evidence. Acad. Management J. (2003) 46(1):46–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Train K. E.Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (2003) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uhlenbruck K., Meyer K. E., Hitt M. A. Organizational transformation in transition economies: Resource-based and organizational learning perspectives. J. Management Stud. (2003) 40(2):257–282CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesan R. Strategic sourcing: To make or not to make. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1992) 70(6):98–107Google Scholar
  • Wighton D. Companies question benefits of outsourcing. Financial Times (2005) April 19):6Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. Transaction-cost economics: Governance of contractual relations. J. Law Econom. (1979) 22(2):233–261CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (1985) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Wipro Enterprise management. (2007) . http://www.wipro.com/webpages/itservices/industries/utilities/enterprise_mgmt.htmGoogle Scholar
  • Zander U., Kogut B. Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(1):76–92LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.