Leveraging Standard Electronic Business Interfaces to Enable Adaptive Supply Chain Partnerships

References

• Austin T. A., Lee H. L., Kopczak L.Unlocking Hidden Value in the Personal Computer Supply-Chain (1997) (Andersen Consulting)Google Scholar
• Barclay D., Higgins C., Thomson R. The partial least squares approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Stud. (1995) 2(2):285–324Google Scholar
• Bensaou M., Venkatraman N. Configurations of interorganizational relationships: A comparison between U.S. and Japanese automakers. Management Sci. (1995) 41(9):1471–1492Link, Google Scholar
• Boeker W., Goodstein J. Organizational performance adaptation: Effects of environment and performance on board composition. Acad. Management J. (1991) 34:805–826Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowker G., Star S.Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences (1999) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brennan D. R., Turnbull P. W., Wilson D. T. Dyadic adaptation in business-to-business markets. Eur. J. Marketing (2003) 37(11/12):1636–1667Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown J. S., Duguid P. Organizational learning and communities of practice: Towards a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organ. Sci. (1991) 1:40–57Link, Google Scholar
• Brown J. S., Duguid P. Organizing knowledge. California Management Rev. (1998) 40(1):90–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(1):1–33Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brusoni S., Prencipe A. Making design rules: A multidomain perspective. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(2):179–189Link, Google Scholar
• Burns T., Stalker G. M.The Management of Innovation (1961) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• Burt R. S.Toward a Structural Theory of Action (1982) (Academic Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cannon J. P., Perreault W. D. Buyer-seller relationships in business markets. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36(4):439–460Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlile P. R. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(4):442–455Link, Google Scholar
• Carlile P. R. Transferring, translating, transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(5):555–568Link, Google Scholar
• Chandler A. D.Strategy and Structure (1962) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Chin W. W., Marcolin B. L., Newstead P. R. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(2):189–217Link, Google Scholar
• Choo C. W.The Knowing Organizations: How Organizations Use Information to Construct Meaning (1998) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper R. G. The dimensions of industrial new product success and failure. J. Marketing (1979) 43(3):93–103Crossref, Google Scholar
• D'Aveni R. A.Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering (1994) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Day G. S. The capabilities of market-driven organizations. J. Marketing (1994) 58(4):37–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dent C. Transnational capital, the state and foreign economic policy: Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan. Rev. Internat. Political Econom. (2003) 10(2):246–277Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dill W. R., Milick S., Van Ness E. H. The impact of environment on organizational development. Concepts and Issues in Administrative Behavior (1962) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) 94–109Google Scholar
• Dougherty D. Understanding new markets for new products. Strategic Management J. (1990) 11:59–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duysters G. M., Heimeriks K. H. Alliance capabilities—How can firms improve their alliance performance? 6th Internat. Conf. Competence-Based Management (2002) (IMD, Lausanne, Switzerland) Google Scholar
• Dyer J. H. Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage: Evidence from the auto industry. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:271–292Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. H. Effective inter-firm collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):535–556Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. H., Singh H. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of inter-organizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(4):660–679Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Galunic D. C. Coevolving: At last, a way to make synergies work. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2000) 78(1):91–101Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Martin J. A. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:1105–1121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Schoonhoven C. B. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organ. Sci. (1996) 22(6):136–150Link, Google Scholar
• El Sawy O. A., Malhotra A., Gosain S., Young K. IT-enabled value innovation in the electronic economy: Insights from Marshall industry. MIS Quart. (1999) 23(3):305–335Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fiol C. M., Lyles M. A. Organizational learning. Acad. Management Rev. (1985) 10(4):803–813Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fites D. V. Make your dealers your partners. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1996) 74(2):84–97Google Scholar
• Fjeldstad O. D., Haanaes K. Strategy tradeoffs in the knowledge and network economy. Bus. Strategy Rev. (2001) 12(1):1–10Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornell C., Larcker D. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18(1):39–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbraith J.Designing Complex Organization (1973) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Garud R., Kumaraswamy A. Technological and organizational designs to achieve economies of substitution. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16:93–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gosain S., Malhotra A., El Sawy O. A., Chehade F. Towards frictionless e-business: The impact of common electronic business interfaces. Comm. ACM (2003) 46(12):186–194Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gosain S., Malhotra A., El Sawy O. A., Chehade F. Coordinating for flexibility in e-business supply-chains. J. Management Inform. Systems (2004) 21(3):39–45Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. (1973) 78(6):1360–1380Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. S., Marsden P. V., Lin N. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Social Structure and Network Analysis (1982) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) 105–130Google Scholar
• Gupta A. K., Govindarajan V. Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations. Acad. Management Rev. (1991) 16(4):768–792Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hage J., Aiken M.Social Change in Complex Organizations (1970) (Random House, New York) Google Scholar
• Hagel J., Singer M. Unbundling the corporation. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1999) 77(5):133–141Google Scholar
• Hair J. F., Anderson R. E., Tatham R. L.Multivariate Data Analysis (1987) 4th ed.(Prentice Hall, Engelwood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Hallén L., Johanson J., Seyed-Mohamed N. Interfirm adaptation in business relationships. J. Marketing (1991) 55:29–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamel G. Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12(Winter Special Issue):83–104Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haveman H. A. Between a rock and a hard place: Organizational change and performance under conditions of fundamental environmental transformation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 37(1):48–75Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heide J. B., John G. Do norms matter in marketing relationships? J. Marketing (1992) 56(2):32–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heide J. B., Miner A. S. The shadow of the future: Effects of anticipated interaction and frequency of contact on buyer-seller cooperation. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35(2):265–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heppard K. A. Inter-organizational strategies, and firm performance. (1998) . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado at BoulderGoogle Scholar
• Hoyle R. H., Kenny D. A., Kenny D. A. Statistical power and tests of mediation. Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research (1999) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) 195–222Google Scholar
• Huber G. P. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):88–115Link, Google Scholar
• Ingram P., Baum J. A. Opportunity and constraint: Organizations' learning from the experience of industries. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:75–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvis C. B., Mackenzie S. B., Podsakoff P. M. A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. J. Consumer Res. (2003) 30(2):199–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joreskog K. G., Wold H., Joreskog K. G., Wold H. The ML and PLS techniques for modeling with latent variables: Historical and comparative aspects. Systems under Indirect Observation: Causality Structure and Prediction (1982) 1(North Holland, Amsterdam) 263–270Google Scholar
• Karahanna E., Straub D. W., Chervany N. L. Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quart. (1999) 23(2):183–213Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kellogg K. C., Orlikowski W. J., Yates J. Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(1):22–46Link, Google Scholar
• King A. A., Tucci C. L. Incumbent entries into market niches: The role of experience and managerial choice in the creation of dynamic capabilities. Management Sci. (2002) 48(2):171–186Link, Google Scholar
• Koberg C. S. Resource scarcity, environmental uncertainty, and adaptive organizational behavior. Acad. Management J. (1987) 30(4):798–807Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kopczak L. R., Johnson M. E. The supply-chain management effect. Sloan Management Rev. (2003) 44(3):27–34Google Scholar
• Kraatz M. S. Learning by association? Inter-organizational networks and adaptation to environmental change. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 41(6):621–643Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraatz M. S., Zajac E. Exploring the limits of the new institutionalism: The causes and consequences of illegitimate organizational change. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1996) 61(5):812–836Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D., Nohria N., Eccles R. G. The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in enterprises. Networks and Enterprises: Structure, Form and Action (1992) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) 216–239Google Scholar
• Lawrence P. R., Lorsch J. W.Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration (1967) (Harvard University, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Leana C. R., Van Buren H. J. Organizational social capital and employment practices. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(3):538–555Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levina N. Collaborating on multiparty information systems development projects: A collective reflection-in-action view. Inform. Systems Res. (2005) 16(2):109–133Link, Google Scholar
• Madhok A. Reassessing the Fundamentals and Beyond: Ronald Coase, The transaction cost and resource-based theories of the firm and the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23(6):535–550Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra A., Gosain S., El Sawy O. A. Absorptive capacity configurations in supply chains: Gearing for partner-enabled market knowledge creation. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(1):145–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra A., Majchrzak A., Carman R., Lott V. Radical innovation without collocation: A case study at Boeing-Rocketdyne. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(2):229–249Crossref, Google Scholar
• Masten S. E., Meehan J. W., Snyder E. A. The costs of organization. J. Law Econom. Organ. (1991) 7(1):1–25Google Scholar
• Medlin C. J. Interactions in business relationships: A time perspective. Indust. Marketing Management (2004) 33(3):185–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller H. E. The multiple dimensions of information quality. Inform. Systems Management (1996) 13(2):62–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neumann L. J., Star S. L., Blomberg J., Kensing F., Dykstra E. A. Making infrastructure: The dream of a common language. PDC96 Proc. Participatory Design Conf. (1996) Cambridge, MA:231–240Google Scholar
• Nonaka I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(1):14–37Link, Google Scholar
• Noordweir T. G., George J., Nevin J. R. Performance outcomes of purchasing arrangements in industrial buyer-vendor relationships. J. Marketing (1990) 54:80–93Crossref, Google Scholar
• Overby E., Bharadwaj A., Sambamurthy V. Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (2006) 15:120–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patnayakuni R., Rai A., Seth N. Relational antecedents of information flow integration for supply chain coordination. J. Management Inform. Systems (2006) 23(1):13–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Peleg B. STMicroelectronics e-chain optimization project: Achieving streamlined operations through collaborative forecasting and inventory management. (2004) . Stanford University Case Study, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
• Petter S., Straub D., Rai A. Specifications and validation of formative constructs in IS research. (2007) . Working paper, Georgia State University, GAGoogle Scholar
• Premkumar G. P. Inter-organizational systems and supply chain management: An information processing perspective. Inform. Systems Management (2000) 77(3):57–69Google Scholar
• Rai A., Patnayakuni R., Seth N. Firm performance impacts of digitally-enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(2):225–246Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rindova V. P., Kotha S. Continuous “morphing”: Competing through dynamic capabilities, form, and function. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(6):1263–1280Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ring P. S., Van de Ven A. H. Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management J. (1994) 13(7):483–498Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rozeboom W. W. Sensitivity of a linear composite predictor items to differential item weighting. Psychometrica (1979) 44(3):289–296Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharfman M. P., Dean J. W. Flexibility in strategic decision making: Informational and ideological perspective. J. Management Stud. (1997) 34(2):191–217Crossref, Google Scholar
• Star S. L.Regions of the Mind: Brain Research and the Quest for Scientific Certainty (1989) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Google Scholar
• Straub D. W., Rai A., Klein R. Measuring firm performance at the network level: A nomology of the business impact of digital supply networks. J. Management Inform. Systems (2004) 21(1):83–114Crossref, Google Scholar
• Subramani M. R. How do suppliers benefit from information technology use in supply chain relationships? MIS Quart. (2004) 28(1):45–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tang D. Partnership development between product customer and tool and die supplier. (2005) 219(4):365–376Google Scholar
• Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):509–533Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Acad. Management Rev. (1978) 3(3):613–624Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B., Lancaster R. Relational embeddedness and learning: The case of bank loan managers and their clients. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):383–399Link, Google Scholar
• Van Den Bosch Frans A. J., Volberda H. W., De Boer M. Coevolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: Organizational forms and combinative capabilities. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(5):551–568Link, Google Scholar
• Wigand R. T., Steinfield C. W., Markus M. L. Information technology standards choices and industry structure outcomes: The case of the U.S. home mortgage industry. J. Management Inform. Systems (2005) 22(2):165–192Crossref, Google Scholar
• Young-Ybarra C., Wiersma M. Strategic flexibility in information technology alliances: The influence of transaction cost economics and social exchange theory. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(4):439–459Link, Google Scholar
• Zaheer A., Venkatraman N. Determinants of electronic integration in the insurance industry: An empirical test. Management Sci. (1994) 40(5):449–566Link, Google Scholar
• Zahra S. A., George G. The net-enabled business innovation cycle and the evolution of dynamic capabilities. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(2):147–150Link, Google Scholar
• Zhao K., Xia M., Shaw M. J. Vertical e-business standards and standards developing organizations: A conceptual framework. Electronic Markets (2005) 5(4):289–300Crossref, Google Scholar