Assimilation of Interorganizational Business Process Standards

References

• Barringer B. R., Harrison J. S. Walking a tightrope: Creating value through interorganizational relationships. J. Management (2000) 26(3):367–403Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barua A., Konana P., Whinston A. B., Yin F. Assessing net-enabled business value: An exploratory analysis. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(4):585–620Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bensaou M. Portfolio of buyer-supplier relationships. Sloan Management Rev. (1999) 40(4):35–44Google Scholar
• Bensaou M., Anderson E. Buyer-supplier relations in industrial markets: When do buyers risk making idiosyncratic investments? Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(4):460–481Link, Google Scholar
• Cartwright J., Hahn-Steichen J., He J., Miller T. RosettaNet for Intel's trading entity automation. Intel Tech. J. (2005) 9(3):239–246Google Scholar
• Chabrow E., Sullivan L. Billions to save. InformationWeek (2004) July 12Google Scholar
• Chandy R. K., Prabhu J. P., Antia K. D. What will the future bring? Dominance, technology expectations, and radical innovation. J. Marketing (2003) 67(3):1–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choudhury V. Strategic choices in development of inter-organizational information systems. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(1):1–24Link, Google Scholar
• Christensen C. M., Bower J. L. Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:197–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chwelos P., Benbasat I., Dexter A. S. Research report: Empirical test of an EDI adoption model. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(3):305–321Link, Google Scholar
• Corsten D., Kumar N. Do suppliers benefit from collaborative relationships with large retailers? An empirical investigation of efficient consumer response adoption. J. Marketing (2005) 69(3):80–94Crossref, Google Scholar
• Damodaran S. RosettaNet: Adoption brings new problems, new solutions. XML 2005 Conf. Exhibition Proc. (2005) (IDE Alliance, Alexandria, VA) 1–14Google Scholar
• David P. A., Greenstein S. The economics of compatibility standards: An introduction to recent research. Econom. Innovations New Tech. (1990) 1(1/2):3–41Crossref, Google Scholar
• David P. A., Steinmueller W. E. Economics of compatibility standards and competition in telecommunication networks. Inform. Econom. Policy (1994) 6:217–241Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P., Powell W. W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1983) 48(2):147–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dubé L., Paré G. Rigor in information systems positivist case research: Current practices, trends, and recommendations. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(4):597–636Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dyer J. H., Singh H. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(4):660–679Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(4):532–550Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman M. S., Pentland B. T. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48:94–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fichman R. G. The role of aggregation in the measurement of IT-related organizational innovation. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(4):201–429Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fichman R. G., Kemerer C. F. The assimilation of software process innovations: An organizational learning perspective. Management Sci. (1997) 43(11):1345–1363Link, Google Scholar
• Fichman R. G., Kemerer C. F. The illusory diffusion of innovation: An examination of assimilation gaps. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(3):255–275Link, Google Scholar
• Gilbert C. G. Unbundling the structure of inertia: Resource vs. routine rigidity. Acad. Management J. (2005) 48(5):741–763Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gosain S., Malhotra A., El Sawy O. A. Coordinating for flexibility in e-business supply chains. J. Management Inform. Systems (2004–2005) 21(3):7–46Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gosain S., Malhotra A., El Sawy O. A., Chehade F. Towards frictionless e-Business: The impact of common electronic business interfaces. Comm. ACM (2003) 46(12):186–195Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gulati R. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19(4):293–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hart P., Saunders C. Power and trust: Critical factors in the adoption and use of electronic data interchange. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(1):23–42Link, Google Scholar
• Henderson R. M., Clark K. G. Architectural innovation: Reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):61–82Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jakcobs K.Standardization Processes in IT—Impact, Problems and Benefits of User Participation (2000) (Vieweg Publishers, Wiesbaden, Germany) Google Scholar
• Jap S. D., Ganesan S. Control mechanisms and the relationship life cycle: Implications for safeguarding specific investments and developing commitment. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37(May):227–245Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karpinski R. Cisco attempts to boost B-to-B sales. InternetWeek (2001) March 16Google Scholar
• Krippendorff K.Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (1980) (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. Surviving Schumpeterian environments: An evolutionary perspective. Indust. Corporate Change (1992) 1:427–443Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinthal D. A., March J. G. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:95–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madhok A., Tallman S. B. Resources, transactions and rents: Managing value through interfirm collaborative relationships. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(3):326–339Link, Google Scholar
• Magretta J. Why business models matter. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2002) 80(5):3–8Google Scholar
• Malhotra A., Gosain S., El Sawy O. A. Absorptive capacity configurations in supply chains: Gearing for partner-enabled market knowledge creation. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(1):145–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus M. L., Steinfield C. W., Wigand R. T., Minton G. Industry-wide information systems standardization as collective action: The case of the U.S. residential mortgage industry. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(Special Issue):439–465Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles M. B., Huberman A. M.Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods (1984) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay T., Kekre S., Kalathur S. Business value of information technology: A study of electronic data interchange. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(2):137–157Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson M., Shaw M., Qualls W. Interorganizational system standards development in vertical industries. Electronic Markets (2005) 15(4):378–392Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R., Winter S.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Nohria N., Gulati R. Is slack good or bad for innovation? Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(5):1245–1264Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver C. Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad. Management Rev. (1991) 16(1):145–179Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver C. Sustainable competitive advantage: Combining institutional and resource-based views. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(9):697–713Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R.The External Control of Organizations (1978) (Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
• Porter P. Deciphering RosettaNet. CIO Insight (2001) July 1Google Scholar
• Premkumar G., Ramamurthy K., Sree N. Implementation of electronic data interchange: An innovation diffusion perspective. J. Management Inform. Systems (1994) 11(2):157–186Crossref, Google Scholar
• Purvis R. L., Sambamurthy V., Zmud R. W. The assimilation of knowledge platforms in organizations: An empirical investigation. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(2):117–135Link, Google Scholar
• Rai A., Patnayakuni R., Patnayakuni N. Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(2):225–246Crossref, Google Scholar
• Riggins F. J., Kriebel C. H., Mukhopadhyay T. The growth of interorganizational systems in the presence of network externalities. Management Sci. (1994) 40(8):894–998Link, Google Scholar
• Rogers E.Diffusion of Innovations (1995) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Rokkan A. I., Heide J. B., Wathne K. H. Specific investments in marketing relationships: Expropriation and bonding effects. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(May):210–224Crossref, Google Scholar
• RosettaNet (2007) . www.rosettanet.orgGoogle Scholar
• Sambamurthy V., Zmud R. W. Arrangements for information technology governance: A theory of multiple contingencies. MIS Quart. (1999) 23(2):261–290Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V., Bharadwaj A., Grover V. Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of it in contemporary firms. MIS Quart. (2003) 27:237–263Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sherif K., Zmud R. W., Brown G. J. Managing peer-to-peer conflicts in disruptive information technology innovations: The case of software reuse. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(2):339–356Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sorescu A. B., Chandy R. K., Prabhu J. C. Sources and financial consequences of radical innovation: Insights from pharmaceuticals. J. Marketing (2003) 67(4):82–102Crossref, Google Scholar
• Subramani M. How do suppliers benefit from information technology use in supply chain relationships? MIS Quart. (2004) 28(1):45–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sullivan L. Supply-chain inefficiencies exact huge toll. InformationWeek (2004) July 12Google Scholar
• Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategy management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):509–553Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teo H. H., Wei K. K., Benbasat I. Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: An institutional perspective. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(1):19–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., O'Reilly C. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Rev. (1996) 38(4):8–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Romanelli E., Cummings L. L., Staw B. M. Organizational evolution. Research in Organizational Behaviour (1985) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 171–222Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V., Bala H. Adoption of interorganizational business process standards in business-to-business integration: An exploratory study. Systemes d'Information et Management (2007) 12(2):53–78Google Scholar
• Wailgum T. Supply chain management: Integration liberation. CIO Magazine (2006) October 15Google Scholar
• Webster J. Networks of collaboration or conflict? Electronic data interchange and power in the supply chain. J. Strategic Inform. Systems (1995) 4(1):31–42Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whiting R. What drives business-technology innovation? Look to large companies' supply chains, not just tech vendors. InformationWeek (2003) August 4Google Scholar
• Wigand R. T., Steinfield C. W., Markus M. L. Information technology standards choices and industry structure outcomes: The case of the U.S. home mortgage industry. J. Management Inform. Systems (2005) 22(2):165–192Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E., Williamson O. E. Transaction cost economics and organization theory. Organization Theory: From Chester Barnard to the Present and Beyond (1995) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Yin R. K.Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1994) 2nd ed.(Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Zhao K., Xia M., Shaw M. Vertical e-business standards and standards developing organizations: A conceptual framework. Electronic Markets (2005) 15(4):289–300Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhu K., Kraemer K. L., Gurbaxani V., Xu S. Migration to open-standard interorganizational systems: Network effects, switching costs, and path dependency. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(Special Issue):515–539Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zmud R. An examination of “push-pull” theory applied to process innovation in knowledge work. Management Sci. (1984) 30(6):727–738Link, Google Scholar
• Zollo M., Reuer J. J., Singh H. Interorganizational routines and performance in strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(6):701–713Link, Google Scholar