Adoption of Information Technology Under Network Effects

References

• Aggarwal N., Walden E. A. Monopoly power in standards is a myth. MIS Quarterly Special Issue Workshop on Standard Making: A Critical Research Frontier for Information Systems (2003) December 12–14 www.si.umich.edu/misq-stds/proceedings/128_49-61.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Aggarwal N., Dai Q., Walden E. A. Do markets prefer open or proprietary standards for XML standardization? An event study. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce (2006) 11(1):117–136Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arthur B. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Econom. J. (1989) 99(March):116–131Google Scholar
• Axelrod R., Mitchell W., Thomas R. E., Bennett D. S., Bruderer E. Coalition formation in standard-setting alliances. Management Sci. (1995) 41(9, September):1493–1508Link, Google Scholar
• Bartels A., Rymer J. The future of enterprise software. Forrester Res. (2006) June 29Google Scholar
• Besen S. M., Farrell J. Choosing how to compete: Strategies and tactics in standardization. J. Econom. Perspectives (1994) 8(2, Spring):117–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E., Kemerer C. F. Network externalities in microcomputer software: An econometric analysis of the spreadsheet market. Management Sci. (1996) 42(12, December):1627–1647Link, Google Scholar
• Choi J. P. Network externality, compatibility choice, and planned obsolescence. J. Indust. Econom. (1994) 42(2, June):167–182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cusumano M. A., Mylonadis Y., Rosenbloom R. S. Strategic maneuvering and mass-market dynamics: The triumph of VHS over beta. Bus. Hist. Rev. (1992) 66(1, Spring):51–94Crossref, Google Scholar
• David P. Clio and the economics of qwerty. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1985) 75(2, May):332–337Google Scholar
• Dedrick J., West J. Innovation and control in standards architectures: The rise and fall of Japan's PC-98. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(2, June):197–216Google Scholar
• Economides N. The economics of networks. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (1996) 14(6, October):673–699Crossref, Google Scholar
• eWeek Database price wars, eweek.com special report. (2007) . http://www.eweek.com/category2/0,1738,1543596,00.aspGoogle Scholar
• Farrell J., Klemperer P., Schmalensee R. Coordination and lock-in: Competition with switching costs and network effects. Handbook of Industrial Organization (2007) 3(Elsevier Science Ltd., Bridgewater, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J., Saloner G. Installed base and compatibility: Innovation, product preannouncements, and predation. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986a) 75(5, December):940–955Google Scholar
• Farrell J., Saloner G. Standardization and variety. Econom. Lett. (1986b) 20(1):71–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J., Saloner G. Converters, compatibility, and the control of interfaces. J. Indust. Econom. (1992) XL(1):9–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell J., Shapiro C. Dynamic competition with switching costs. Rand J. Econom. (1988) 19(1, Spring):123–137Crossref, Google Scholar
• Felli L., Roberts K. W. S. Competition and hold-ups. (1999) June). http://ssrn.com/abstract=171920Google Scholar
• Foray D. Users, standards and the economics of coalitions and committees. Inform. Econom. Policy (1994) 6(3–4, December):269–294Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallaugher J. M., Wang Y.-M. Understanding network effects in software markets: Evidence from web server pricing. MIS Quart. (2002) 26(4, December):303–327Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gandal N. Hedonic price indexes for spreadsheets and an empirical-test for network externalities. Rand J. Econom. (1994) 25(1, Spring):160–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gerson B. Digital driving 2006–07 sales. TWICE: This Week in Consumer Electronics (2007) 22(3, January 29):14Google Scholar
• Guerrero I. Interoperability—Why it makes good business sense for our industry. Directions Magazine (2004) February 13). http://www.directionsmag.com/article.php?article_id=520&trv=/Google Scholar
• Hagland M. Interoperability conundrum. Healthcare Informatics (2005) MayGoogle Scholar
• Harsanyi J. C., Selten R.A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games (1988) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Hoppe H. C. The timing of new technology adoption: Theoretical models and empirical evidence. Manchester School (2002) 70(1):56–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jakobs K., Procter R., Williams R. User participation in standards setting—The panacea? ACM StandardView (1998) 6(2, June):85–89Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson M. Standards stupidity. CIO (2003) May 13Google Scholar
• Katz M., Shapiro C. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1985) 75(3, JuneGoogle Scholar
• Katz M., Shapiro C. Product compatibility choice in a market with technological progress. Oxford Econom. Papers—New Series (1986a) 38(November):146–165Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz M., Shapiro C. Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. J. Political Econom. (1986b) 94(4, August):822–841Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz M., Shapiro C. Product introduction with network externalities. J. Indust. Econom. (1992) XL(1, MarchGoogle Scholar
• Katz M., Shapiro C. Systems competition and network effects. J. Econom. Perspectives (1994) 8(2, Spring):93–115Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kauffman R. J., McAndrews J., Wang Y.-M. Opening the “black box” of network externalities in network adoption. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(1, March):61–82Link, Google Scholar
• Koch C. The battle for web services. CIO (2003) October 1Google Scholar
• Lee D., Mendelson H. Divide and conquer: Competing with free technology under network effects. Production Oper. Management (2008) . ForthcomingCrossref, Google Scholar
• Liebowitz S. J., Margolis S. E. The fable of the keys. J. Law Econom. (1990) XXXIII(April):1–25Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liebowitz S. J., Margolis S. E. Path dependence, lock-in, and history. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (1995) 11(1, April):205–226Google Scholar
• Mantena R., Sundararajan A. Competing in markets with digital convergence. (2004) . Stern School of Business Working Paper EC-04-12. New York University, New York. http://ssrn.com/abstract=556463Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus L., Steinfield C. W., Wigand R. T., Minton G. Industry-wide information systems standardization as collective action: The case of the US residential mortgage industry. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(Special Issue):439–465Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matutes C., Regibeau P. Compatibility and bundling of complementary goods in a duopoly. J. Indust. Econom. (1992) XL(1, March):37–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore L. K. Public safety communications: Policy proposals, legislation, and progress. Congressional Report for Congress (2005) 068(Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C.) . http://stinet.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA453736&Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Olofson C. W. Vendor shares: Preliminary results for the top 5 vendors show continued growth. Competitive Analysis: Worldwide RDBMS 2005, IDC (2005) May(International Data Corporation, Framingham, MA) . http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=206061Google Scholar
• Osborne M. J., Rubinstein A.A Course in Game Theory (1994) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Regibeau P., Rockett K. E. The timing of product introduction and the credibility of compatibility decisions. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (1996) 14:801–823Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robb D. In search of interoperability nirvana. Enterprise Storage (2005) February 18Google Scholar
• Rohlfs J. Theory of interdependent demand for a communications service. Bell J. Econom. (1974) 5(1):16–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shapiro C., Varian H.Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy (1999) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Weitzel T., Beimborn D., Konig W. A unified economic model of standard diffusion: The impact of standardization cost, network effects and network topology. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(Special Issue):489–514Crossref, Google Scholar
• West J. The role of standards in the creation and use of information systems. Proc. ICIS Workshop—Standard Making: A Critical Research Frontier for Information Systems (2003) December 12 and 13(ICIS, Seattle, WA) Google Scholar
• Zhu K., Kraemer K. L., Gurbaxani V., Xu S. X. Migration to open-standard interorganizational systems: Network effects, switching costs, and path dependency. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(Special Issue):515–539Crossref, Google Scholar