Using Self-Regulatory Learning to Enhance E-Learning-Based Information Technology Training

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0141

References

  • Agarwal R., Ferratt T. W. Crafting an HR strategy to meet the need for IT workers. Comm. ACM (2001) 44(7):59–64CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R., Sambamurthy V., Stair R. Research report: The evolving relationship between general and specific computer self-efficacy – An empirical assessment. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(4):418–430LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Alavi M. Computer-mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation. MIS Quart. (1994) 18(2):150–174CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alavi M., Leidner D. Research commentary: Technology mediated learning – A call for greater depth and breadth of research. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(1):1–10LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Alavi M., Wheeler B., Valacich J. Using IT to reengineer business education: An exploratory investigation of collaborative tele-learning. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(3):293–312CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alavi M., Marakas G. M., Yoo Y. A comparative study of distributed learning environments on learning outcomes. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(4):404–415LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Allen I., Seaman J.Growing by Degrees: Online Education in the United States, 2005 (2005) (The Sloan Consortium, Needham, MA) Google Scholar
  • Anohina A. Analysis of the terminology used in the field of virtual learning. Educational Tech. Soc. (2005) 8(3):91–102Google Scholar
  • Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organ. Behav. Human-Decision Processes (1991) 50(2):248–287CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A.Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control (1997) (W. H. Freeman, New York) Google Scholar
  • Beaubien J. M., Payne S. C. Individual goal-orientation as a predictor of job and academic performance: A meta analytic review and integration. Proc. 14th Annual Meeting of The Society for Indust. and Organ. Psych. (1999) (SIOP, Bowling Green, OH) Google Scholar
  • Bell B. S., Kozlowski S. W. Adaptive guidance: Enhancing self-regulation, knowledge, and performance in technology-based training. Personnel Psych. (2002) 55(2):267–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benbunan-Fich R. Improving education and training with IT. Comm. ACM (2002) 45(6):94–99CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benbunan-Fich R., Hiltz S. R. Mediators of the effectiveness of online courses. IEEE Trans. Professional Comm. (2003) 46(4):298–312CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berge Z. L., Mrozowski S. Review of research in distance education: 1990 to 1999. Amer. J. Distance Ed. (2001) 15(3):5–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernard R. M., Abrami P. C., Lou Y., Borokhowski E., Wade A., Woznoy L., Wallet P. A., Fiset M., Huang B. How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Rev. Educational Res. (2004) 74(3):379–439CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boekaerts M., Pintrich P. R., Zeidner M.Handbook of Self-Regulation (2000) (Academic Press, San Diego, CA) Google Scholar
  • Bostrom R. Facilitating learning through technology. Proc. 9th Americas Conf. Inform. Systems (2003) (Assoc. Inform. Systems, Atlanta) Google Scholar
  • Bostrom R., Olfman L., Sein M. K. The importance of learning style in end-user training. MIS Quart. (1990) 14(1):101–119CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brett J., VandeWalle D. Goal orientation and goal content as predictors of performance in a training program. J. Appl. Psych. (1999) 84(6):863–873CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brown K. Using computers to deliver training: Which employees learn and why? Personnel Psych. (2001) 54(2):271–296CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics BLS releases 2002–2012 employment projections. (2004) . http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecopro.t04.htmGoogle Scholar
  • Chen G., Gully S. M., Whiteman J., Kilcullen R. N. Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance. J. Appl. Psych. (2000) 85(6):835–847CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen E. G. Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Rev. Educational Res. (1994) 64(1):1–35CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colquitt J., LePine J., Noe R. Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. J. Appl. Psych. (2000) 85(5):678–707CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Compeau D., Higgins C. A. Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Inform. Systems Res. (1995a) 6(2):118–143LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Compeau D., Higgins C. A. Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quart. (1995b) 19(2):189–211CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Compeau D., Olfman L., Sein M. K., Webster J. End-user training and learning. Comm. ACM (1995) 38(7):24–26CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coppola N., Hiltz S., Rotter N. Becoming a virtual professor: Pedagogical roles and asynchronous learning networks. J. Management Inform. Systems (2002) 18(4):169–189CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis S., Wiedenbeck S. The effect of interaction style and training method on end-user learning of software packages. Interacting with Comput. (1998) 11(2):147–172CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher S., Ford J. K. Differential effects of learner effort and goal orientation on two learning outcomes. Personnel Psych. (1998) 51(2):397–420CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ford J. K., Smith E. M., Weissbein D. A., Gully S. M., Salas E. Relationships of goal orientation, metacognitive activity, and practice strategies with learning outcomes and transfer. J. Appl. Psych. (1998) 83(2):218–233CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gagne R. M.The Conditions of Learning (1977) (Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York) Google Scholar
  • Gagne R. M., Briggs L. J., Wager W. W.Principles of Instructional Design (1992) 4th ed.(Hartcourt Brace Jovanich, Fort Worth, TX) Google Scholar
  • George J. M. State or trait: Effects of positive mood on prosocial behaviors at work. J. Appl. Psych. (1991) 76(2):299–307CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta S., Bostrom R. Research framework for collaborative e-learning in an end-user training context. Proc. 11th Americas Conf. Inform. Systems (2005) (Assoc. Inform. Systems, Atlanta) Google Scholar
  • Hardaway D. E., Scamell R. W. Use of a technology-mediated learning instructional approach for teaching an introduction to information technology course. J. Inform. Systems Ed. (2005) 16(2):137–147Google Scholar
  • Hasson J. E-learning: A progress report. Federal Computer Week (2005) August 29(FCW Media Group, Falls Church, VA) . http://www.fcw.com/print/11_34/news/90465-1htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Hicks W. D., Klimoski R. J. Entry into training programs and its effects on training outcome: A field experiment. Acad. Management J. (1987) 30(3):542–552CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Homer J., Povar D. The 2004 state of the industry report: Press release from the American Society for Training and Development. Training and Development (2004) March). http://www.astd.org/Google Scholar
  • Johnson R. D., Marakas G. M. The role of behavioral modeling in computer skills acquisition: Toward refinement of the model. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(4):402–417LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jonassen D. H.Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (2004) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Jonassen D. H., Reeves T. C., Jonassen D. H. Learning with technology: Using computers as cognitive tools. Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology (2001) (Macmillan, New York) 693–719Google Scholar
  • Jones T. H., Paolucci R. Research framework and dimensions for evaluating the effectiveness of educational technology systems on learning. J. Res. Comput. Ed. (1999) 32(1):17–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kanfer R. A., Philip L., Murtha T. C., Dugdale B., Nelson L. Goal setting, conditions of practice, and task performance: A resource allocation perspective. J. Appl. Psych. (1994) 79(6):826–835CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kauffman D. Self-regulated learning in web-based environments: Instructional tools designed to facilitate self-regulated learning. J. Educating Comput. Res. (2004) 30(1/2):139–162CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keegan D.Foundations of Distance Education (1996) 3rd ed.(Routledge, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Learning Steps Online computer training courses and distance learning tutorials. (2007) . http://www.learningsteps.com/courses.phpGoogle Scholar
  • Leidner D., Fuller M. Improving student processing and assimilation of conceptual information: GSS supported collaborative learning vs. individual constructive learning. Decision Support Systems (1997) 20(2):149–163CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leidner D., Jarvenpaa S. The use of information technology to enhance management school education: A theoretical view. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(3):265–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lim K. H., Ward L. M., Benbasat I. An empirical study of computer system learning: Comparison of co-discovery and self-discovery methods. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(3):254–272LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lou Y., Abrami P. C., D'Apollonia S. Small group and individual learning with technology: A meta-analysis. Rev. Educational Res. (2001) 71(3):449–521CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markus L. M. Innovations in information systems education. Proc. 11th Americas Conf. Inform. Systems (2005) (Assoc. Inform. Systems, Atlanta) . Paper presented as part of the Special Interest Group on EducationGoogle Scholar
  • Martocchio J. J., Webster J. Effects of feedback and cognitive playfulness on performance in microcomputer software training. Personnel Psych. (1992) 45:553–578CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Middleton M. J., Midgley C. Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. J. Educational Psych. (1997) 89(4):710–718CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moller L. Introduction to the special issue of online training in an online world. Quart. Rev. Distance Ed. (2002) 3(1):7–8Google Scholar
  • Noffsinger J. S.Correspondence Schools, Lyceums, Chautauquas (1926) (Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
  • Olfman L., Mandviwalla M. Conceptual vs. procedural software training for graphical user interfaces: A longitudinal field experiment. MIS Quart. (1994a) 18(4):405–426CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olfman L., Mandviwalla M. An experimental analysis of software training manuals. Inform. Systems J. (1994b) 5(1):19–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olfman L., Bostrom R. P., Sein M. K., Galletta D., Zhang P. S. Developing training strategies with an HCI perspective. Human-Computer Interaction and Management Information Systems: Applications (2006) (M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY) 258–283Google Scholar
  • Piccoli G., Ahmad R., Ives B. Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(4):401–426CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pintrich P., DeGroot E. Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. J. Educational Psych. (1990) 82(1):33–40CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Richardson J. C., Swan K. Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction. J. Asynchronous Learn. Networks (2003) 7(1):68–88Google Scholar
  • Rossett A., Schafer L. What to do about e-dropouts: What if it's not e-learning but the e-learner? Training and Development (2003) June):40–46Google Scholar
  • Salas E., Canon-Bowers J. A. The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Rev. Psych. (2001) 52(10):471–499CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Santhanam R., Sein M. Improving end-user proficiency: Effects of conceptual training and task variation. Inform. Systems Res. (1994) 5(4):378–399LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sasidharan S., Santhanam R., Galletta D., Zhang P. Technology-based training: Toward a learner centric research agenda. Human-Computer Interaction and Management Information Systems: Applications (2006) (M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY) 247–257Google Scholar
  • Schmidt A. M., Ford J. K. Learning within a learner control training environment: The interactive effects of goal orientation and meta-cognitive instruction on learning outcomes. Personnel Psych. (2003) 56(2):405–429CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schunk D. H., Zimmerman B., Schunk D. Social cognitive theory and self-regulated learning. Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives (2001) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 125–151Google Scholar
  • Schunk D. H., Ertmer P. A. Self-regulatory processes during computer skill acquisition: Goal and self-evaluative influences. J. Educational Psych. (1999) 91(2):251–260CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schunk D. H., Ertmer P. A., Boekaerts M., Pintrich P. R., Zeidner M. Self-efficacy and academic learning: Self-efficacy enhancing interventions. Handbook of Self-Regulation (2000) (Academic Press, San Diego, CA) 631–650CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schunk D., Zimmerman B. Social origins of self-regulatory competence. Educational Psychologist (1997) 32(4):195–208CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schunk D., Zimmerman B.Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance: Issues and Educational Applications (1998) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Skill Soft About us. (2007) . http://www.skillsoft.com/about/default.aspGoogle Scholar
  • Thomson Course Technology Teach with technology. (2006) . http://www.course.com/technology/Google Scholar
  • VandeWalle D. Development of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational Psych. Measurement (1997) 57(6):995–1015CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Venkatesh V. Creation of favorable user perceptions: Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Quart. (1999) 23(2):239–260CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Webster J., Martocchio J. J. Microcomputer playfulness: Development of a measure with workplace implications. MIS Quart. (1992) 16(2):201–226CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Webster J., Martocchio J. J. The differential effects of software training previews on training outcomes. J. Management (1995) 21(4):757–787CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Winnie P. H. Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist (1995) 30(4):173–187CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Winnie P. H., Perry N. E., Boekarts M., Pintrich P., Zeidner M. Measuring self-regulated learning. Handbook of Self-Regulation (2000) (Academic Press, San Diego, CA) 532–564CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yi M. Y., Davis F. D. Developing and validating an observational learning model of computer software training and skill acquisition. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(2):146–169LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang D., Zhao J. L., Zhou L., Nunamaker J. F. Can e-learning replace classroom learning? Comm. ACM (2004) 47(5):75–79CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zimmerman B. J. A social cognitive perspective of self-regulated academic learning. J. Educational Psych. (1989) 81(3):329–339CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zimmerman B. J., Schunk D., Zimmerman B. J. Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance, Issues and Educational Applications (1994) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 3–21Google Scholar
  • Zimmerman B. J. Self-regulation involves more than metacognition: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist (1995) 30(4):217–221CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zimmerman B., Boekarts M., Pintrich P., Zeidner M. Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. Handbook of Self-Regulation (2000) (Academic Press, San Diego, CA) 13–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zimmerman B. J., Kitsantas A. Developmental phases in self-regulation: Shifting from process goals to outcome goals. J. Educational Psych. (1997) 89(1):29–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zimmerman B. J., Martinez-Pons M. Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. Amer. Educational Res. J. (1986) 23(4):614–628CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zimmerman B. J., Martinez-Pons M. Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. J. Educational Psych. (1988) 80(3):284–290CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zimmerman B. J., Martinez-Pons M. Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. J. Educational Psych. (1990) 82(1):51–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zimmerman B. J., Schunk D. H., Zimmerman B. J., Schunk D. H. Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives (2001) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 1–37Google Scholar
  • Zimmerman B. J., Bandura A., Martinez-Pons M. Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. Amer. Educational Res. J. (1992) 29(3):663–676CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zweig D., Webster J. Validation of a multidimensional measure of goal orientation. Canadian J. Behavioral Sci. (2004) 36(3):232–243CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.