The Performance Effects of Complementarities Between Information Systems, Marketing, Manufacturing, and Supply Chain Processes

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0148

References

  • Argyres N. The impact of information technology on coordination: Evidence from the B-2 “Stealth” Bomber. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(2):162–180LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Athey S., Stern S. An empirical framework for testing theories about complementarity in organizational design. (2007) . NBER Working Paper 6600, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Ayers D., Dahlstrom R., Skinner S. J. An exploratory investigation of organizational antecedents to new product success. J. Marketing Res. (1997) 34(1):107–116CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aviv Y. The effect of collaborative forecasting on supply chain performance. Management Sci. (2001) 17(3):181–195Google Scholar
  • Bancroft N. H., Seip H., Sprengel A.Implementing SAP R/3 (1998) 2nd ed.(Manning Publications Co., Greenwich, MA) Google Scholar
  • Banker R. D., Kauffman R. J. The evolution of research on information systems: A fiftieth year survey of the literature in management science. Management Sci. (2004) 50(3):281–298LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Banker R. D., Bardhan I., Chang H., Lin S. Plant information systems, manufacturing capabilities, and plant performance. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(2):315–337CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barron R. M., Kenny D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 51(6):1173–1182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barua A., Lee S. C., Whinston A. B. The calculus of reengineering. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(4):409–428LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Barua A., Konana P., Whinston A. B., Fang Y. Driving e-business excellence. MIT Sloan Management Rev. (2001) 43(1):36–44Google Scholar
  • Baum C. F., Schaffer M. E., Stillman S. Instrumental variables and GMM: Estimation and testing. Stata J. (2003) 3(1):1–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Benton W. C., Shin H. Manufacturing planning and control: The evolution of MRP and JIT integration. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1998) 110:411–440CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bozarth C., Edwards S. The impact of market requirements focus and manufacturing characteristics focus on plant performance. J. Oper. Management (1997) 15:161–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. M. Beyond the productivity paradox. Comm. ACM (1998) 41(8):49–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. M. Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. J. Econom. Perspect. (2000) 14(4):23–48CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen L., Liaw S., Lee T. Using an HRM pattern approach to examine the productivity of manufacturing firms—An empirical study. Internat. J. Manpower (2003) 24(3):299–320CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cheung K. L., Lee H. L. The inventory benefit of shipment coordination and stock rebalancing in a supply chain. Management Sci. (2002) 48(2):300–307LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Clark C. E., Cavanaugh N. C., Brown C. V., Sambamurthy V. Building change-readiness capabilities in the IS organization: Insights from the Bell Atlantic experience. MIS Quart. (1997) 21(4):425–455CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clark T. H., McKenney J. L. Campbell soup: A leader in continuous replenishment innovations. (1994) . Harvard Business School Case, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen J., Cohen P., West S. G., Aiken L. S.Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2003) 3rd ed.(Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Cotteleer M. J., Bendoly E. Order lead-time improvement following enterprise-IT implementation: An empirical study. MIS Quart. (2006) . ForthcomingCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crittenden V. L. Close the marketing/manufacturing gap. Sloan Management Rev. (1992) 33(3):41–53Google Scholar
  • Cua K. O., McKone K. E., Schroeder R. G. Relationships between implementation of TQM, JIT, and TPM and manufacturing performance. J. Oper. Management (2001) 19(6):675–694CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davenport T. H. Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1998) 76(4):121–131Google Scholar
  • Davenport T. H.Mission Critical (2000) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • David J. S., Hwang Y., Pei B. K. W., Renaue J. H. The performance effects of congruence between product competitive strategies and purchasing management design. Management Sci. (2002) 48(7):866–885LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer J. H., Singh H. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23:660–679CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ettlie J. E. Product-process development integration in manufacturing. Management Sci. (1995) 41(7):1224–1237LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ettlie J. E. The ERP challenge. Automotive Manufacturing Production (1998) 6:16–17Google Scholar
  • Fisher R. J., Maltz E., Jaworski B. J. Enhancing communication between marketing and engineering: The moderating role of relative functional identification. J. Marketing (1997) 61:54–70CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flynn B. B., Flynn E. J. Information-processing alternatives for coping with manufacturing environment complexity. Decision Sci. (1999) 30(4):1021–1052CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Flynn B. B., Schroeder R. G., Sakakibara S. A framework for quality management research and an associated measurement instrument. J. Oper. Management (1994) 11(4):339–356CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fornell C., Larcker D. F. Evaluating structural equations models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18:39–51CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frie F. X., Kalakota R., Leone A. J., Marx L. M. Process variation as a determinant of bank performance. Management Sci. (1999) 45(9):1210–1220LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Frohlich M., Westbrook R. Arcs of integration: An international study of supply chain strategies. J. Oper. Management (2001) 19:185–200CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fullerton R. R., McWatters C. S. The production performance benefits from JIT implementation. J. Oper. Management (2001) 19:81–96CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galbraith J.Organization Design (1977) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Gattiker T., Goodhue D. What happens after ERP implementation: Understanding the impact of interdependence and differentiation on plant-level outcomes. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(3):559–585CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gefen D., Riddings C. Implementation team responsiveness and user evaluation of customer relationship management. J. Management Inform. Systems (2002) 19(1):47–69CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gimenez C., Ventura E. Logistics-production, logistics-marketing and external integration. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management (2005) 25(1):20–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldratt E., Schragenheim E., Ptak C. A.Necessary But Not Sufficient (2000) (North River Press, Great Barrington, MA) Google Scholar
  • Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (2003) 5th ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Gupta A. K., Raj S. P., Wilemon D. A model for studying R&D-marketing interface in the product innovation process. J. Marketing (1986) 50(2):7–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hauser J. R., Clausing D. The house of quality. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1988) 66(3):63–73Google Scholar
  • Hausman W. H., Montgomery D. B., Roth A. V. Why should marketing and manufacturing work together? Some exploratory empirical results. J. Oper. Management (2002) 20(3):241–257CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hayes R., Pisano G., Upton D., Wheelwright S.Pursuing the Competitive Edge (2005) (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Heckman J. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica (1979) 47:253–261CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hendricks K. B., Singhal V. R. Association between supply chain glitches and operating performance. Management Sci. (2005) 51(5):695–712LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hinds P. J., Kiesler S.Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hitt L., Wu D. J., Zhou X. Investment in enterprise resource planning: Business impact and productivity measures. J. Management Inform. Systems (2002) 19(1):71–98CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ho T. H., Tang C. S. Introduction to the special issue on marketing and operations management interfaces and coordination. Management Sci. (2004) 50(4):429–430LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huson M., Nanda D. The impact of just-in-time manufacturing on firm performance in the US. J. Oper. Management (1995) 12:297–310CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Irwin J. R., McClelland G. H. Misleading heuristics and moderated multiple regression models. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38:100–109CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaccard J., Wan C. K., Turrisi R. The detection and interpretation of interaction effects between continuous variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Res. (1990) 25:467–478CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jack E. R., Raturi A. S. Measuring and comparing volume flexibility in the capital goods industry. Production Oper. Management (2003) 12(4):480–501CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • James L. R., Demaree R. G., Wolf G. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J. Appl. Psych. (1984) 69(1):85–97CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • John G., Reve T. The reliability and validity of key informant data from dyadic relationships in marketing channels. J. Marketing Res. (1982) 19(4):517–524CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kennedy P.A Guide to Econometrics (1998) (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Kettinger W. J., Lee C. C. Perceived service quality and user satisfaction with the information services function. Decision Sci. (1995) 25:737–765CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kohli A. K., Jaworski B. J. Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. J. Marketing (1990) 54(2):1–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kulp S. C., Lee H. L., Ofek E. Manufacturer benefits from information integration with retail customers. Management Sci. (2004) 50(4):431–441LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kumar N., Stern L. W., Anderson J. C. Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36:1633–1651CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawrence P., Lorsch J.Organization and Environment (1967) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Lee H. L., Padmanabhan V., Whang S. The bullwhip effect in supply chains. Sloan Management Rev. (1997a) 38:93–102Google Scholar
  • Lee H. L., Padmanabhan V., Whang S. Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Sci. (1997b) 43:546–558LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee J. Y. How to make financial and nonfinancial data add up. J. Accountancy (1992) 174(3):62–65Google Scholar
  • Lieberman M. B., Helper S., Demeester L. The empirical determinants of inventory levels in high-volume manufacturing. Production Oper. Management (1999) 8(1):44–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malhotra M. K., Sharma S. Spanning the continuum between marketing and operations. J. Oper. Management (2002) 20:209–219CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malone T. W., Crowston K. The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Comput. Surveys (1994) 26(1):87–119CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maltz E., Kohli A. K. Market intelligence dissemination across functional boundaries. J. Marketing Res. (1996) 33(1):47–61CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maltz E., Kohli A. K. Reducing marketing's conflict with other functions: The differential effects of integrating mechanisms. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2000) 28(4):479–492CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markus M. L., Tanis C., Van Fenema P. C. Multisite ERP implementation. Comm. ACM (2000) 43(4):42–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McAfee A. The impact of enterprise technology adoption on operations performance: An empirical investigation. Production Oper. Management (2002) 11(1):33–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKinely J. M. Planning for success after “go-live”. Strategic Finance (2000) 81(10):54–58Google Scholar
  • Milgrom P., Roberts J. Complementarities and fit: Strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. J. Accounting Econom. (1995) 19(2, 3):179–208CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Miller J. G., Roth A. V. A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies. Management Sci. (1994) 40(3):285–304LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Montoya-Torres J. R. Manufacturing performance evaluation in wafer semiconductor factories. Internat. J. Productivity Performance Management (2006) 55(3/4):300–310CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Montoya-Weiss M., Calantone R. Determinants of new product performance: A review and meta-analysis. J. Product Innovation Management (1994) 11:397–417CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moorman C. Organizational market information processes: Cultural antecedents and new product outcomes. J. Marketing Res. (1995) 32(3):318–335CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Narasimhan R., Das A. The impact of purchasing integration and practices on manufacturing performance. J. Oper. Management (2001) 19(5):593–611CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Neter J., Wasserman W., Kutner H.Applied Linear Statistical Models: Regression, Analysis of Variance and Experimental Design (1995) (Irwin, Homewood, IL) Google Scholar
  • O'Leary D.Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: Systems, Life Cycle, Electronic Commerce, and Risk (2000) (Cambridge University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parente D. H. Across the manufacturing-marketing interface. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management (1998) 18(12):1205–1222CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J.Organizational Design (1978) (AHM Publishing Co., Arlington Heights, IL) Google Scholar
  • Phillips L. W. Assessing measurement error in key informant reports: A methodological note on organizational analysis in marketing. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18:395–415CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pitt L. F., Watson R. T., Kavan C. B. Service quality: A measure of information system effectiveness. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(2):173–188CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ragowsky A., Stern M., Adams D. Relating benefits from using IS to an organization's operating characteristics: Interpreting results from two countries. J. Management Inform. Systems (2000) 16(4):175–194CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rai A., Patnayakuni R., Seth N. Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(2):225–246CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robey D., Ross J. W., Boudreau M. Learning to implement enterprise systems: An exploratory study of the dialectics of change. J. Management Inform. Systems (2002) 19(1):17–46CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ross A. A multi-dimensional empirical exploration of technology investment, coordination and firm performance. Internat. J. Physical Distribution Logist. Management (2002) 32(7):591–609CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sambamurthy V., Zmud R. W. Research commentary: The organizing logic for an enterprise's IT activities in the digital era—A prognosis of practice and a call for research. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(2):105–114LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sawhney R., Piper C. Value creation through enriched marketing-operations interfaces: An empirical study in the printed circuit board industry. J. Oper. Management (2002) 20:259–272CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schelling T.Micromotives and Macrobehavior (1978) (W. W. Norton & Co., New York) Google Scholar
  • Schmenner R. M., Vollmann T. M. Performance measures: Gaps, false alarms, and the usual suspects. (1993) (International Institute for Management Development (IMD), Lausanne, Switzerland) . Manufacturing Executive Report Number 7Google Scholar
  • Schroeder R. G., Bates K. A., Junttila M. A. A resource-based view of manufacturing strategy and the relationship to manufacturing performance. Strategic Management J. (2002) 23:105–117CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Segars A. H., Grover V., Teng J. T. C. Strategic information systems planning: Planning system dimensions, internal coalignment, and implications for planning effectiveness. Decision Sci. (1998) 29(2):303–345CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sethi R. New product quality and new product development teams. J. Marketing (2000) 64:1–14CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shapiro B. P. Can marketing and manufacturing coexist? Harvard Bus. Rev. (1977) 55(5):104–114Google Scholar
  • Shaver J. M. Accounting for endogeneity when assessing strategy performance: Does entry mode choice affect FDI survival? Management Sci. (1998) 44(4):571–586LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Steckel J. H., Gupta S., Banerji A. Supply chain decision making: Will shorter cycle times and shared point-of-sale information necessarily help? Management Sci. (2004) 50(4):458–465LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stock G. N., Greis N. P., Kasarda J. D. Enterprise logistics and supply chain structure: The role of fit. J. Oper. Management (2000) 18:531–547CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stratman J., Roth A. Enterprise resource planning (ERP) competence constructs: Two-stage multi-item scale development and validation. Decision Sci. (2002) 33(4):601–628CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swink M., Narasimhan R., Wang C. Managing beyond the factory walls: Effects of four types of strategic integration on manufacturing plant performance. J. Oper. Management (2007) 25:148–164CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tanriverdi H., Ruefli T. Managing business complementarities for superior performance: The role of information systems capability. (2006) . Working paper, University of Texas, Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
  • Tatikonda M. V., Montoya-Weiss M. M. Integrating operations and marketing perspectives of product innovation: The influence of organizational process factors and capabilities on development performance. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):151–172LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tippins M. J., Sohi R. S. IT competency and firm performance: Is organizational learning a missing link? Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(8):745–772CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Bruggen G. H., Lilien G., Kacker M. Informants in organizational marketing research: Why use multiple informants and how to aggregate responses. J. Marketing Res. (2002) 39:469–478CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vastag G., Whybark D. C. Inventory management: Is there a knock-on effect? Internat. J. Production Econom. (2005) 93:129–138CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Whang S. Coordination in operations: A taxonomy. J. Oper. Management (1995) 12:413–422CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Youngdahl W. E. An investigation of service-based manufacturing performance relationships. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management (1996) 16(8):29–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.