Research Note—A Model of Conflict, Leadership, and Performance in Virtual Teams

References

• Armstrong D. J., Cole P., Hinds P. J., Kiesler S. Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 167–186Crossref, Google Scholar
• Armstrong J. S., Overton T. S. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J. Marketing Res. (1977) 14:396–402Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ashby W. R.Design for a Brain (1952) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Bachmann D. P., Elfrink J., Vazzana G. E-mail and snail mail face off in rematch. Marketing Res. (2000) 11:11–15Google Scholar
• Bagozzi R. Advances in factor analysis and structural equation models. J. Marketing Res. (1980) 17(1):133–135Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagozzi R., Yi Y., Phillips L. Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36(3):421–458Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bass B. M.Stogdill's Handbook of Leadership: A Survey of Theory in Research (1981) (Harper, New York) Google Scholar
• Bell B. S., Kozlowski S. W. J. A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group Organ. Management (2002) 27(1):14–49Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bollen K. A.Structural Equations with Latent Variables (1989) (Wiley, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bollen K. A. Overall fit in covariance structural models: Two types of sample size effects. Psych. Bull. (1990) 107(2):256–259Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown S. P., Chin W. W. Satisfying and retaining customers through independent service representatives. Decision Sci. (2004) 35(3):527–550Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byrne B. M.Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS (2001) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
• Carlson J. R., Zmud R. W. Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42(2):153–171Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carmel E., Agarwal R. Tactical approaches for alleviating distance in global software development. IEEE Software (2001) 22–29Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cassel C. M., Hackl P., Westlund A. H. On measurement of intangible assets: A study of the robustness of partial least squares. Total Quality Management (2000) 11(7):897–907Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chao G. T., Walz P. M., Gardner P. D. Formal and informal mentorships: A comparison on mentoring functions and contrast with nonmentored counterparts. Personnel Psych. (1992) 45:619–636Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin W. W. Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quart. (1998) 22(1):7–16Google Scholar
• Chin W. W., Marcolin B. L., Newsted P. R. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(2):189–217Link, Google Scholar
• Cohen S. G., Bailey D. E. What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. J. Management (1997) 23(3):239–290Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen A., Doveh E., Eick U. Statistical properties of the rwg(j) index of agreement. Psych. Methods (2001) 6(3):297–310Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper C. D., Kurland N. B. Telecommuting, professional isolation, and employee development in public and private organizations. J. Organ. Behav. (2002) 23(4):511–533Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cramton C. D. The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(3):346–371Link, Google Scholar
• Curral L. A., Forrester R. H., Dawson J. F., West M. A. It's what you do and the way you do it: Team task, team size and innovation-related group processes. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psych. (2001) 10:187–204Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis-Blake A., Pfeffer J. Just a mirage: The search for dispositional effects in organizational research. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14:385–400Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu C. K. W., Van Vianen A. E. M. Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of organizational teams. J. Organ. Behav. (2001) 22(3):309–328Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Dreu C. K. W., Weingart L. R. Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(4):741–749Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denison D. R., Hooijberg R., Quinn R. E. Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(4):524–540Link, Google Scholar
• Drury D., Farhoomand A. Innovation diffusion and implementation. Internat. J. Innovation Management (1999) 3(2):133–157Crossref, Google Scholar
• Earley P. C., Ang S.Cultural Intelligence: Individual Interactions Across Cultures (2003) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) Google Scholar
• Eby L. T., Dobbins G. H. Collectivistic orientation in teams: An individual- and group-level analysis. J. Organ. Behav. (1997) 18:275–295Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fichman R., Kemerer C. The assimilation of software process innovations: An organizational learning perspective. Management Sci. (1997) 43(10):1345–1363Link, Google Scholar
• Fiol C. M., O'Connor E. J. Identification in face-to-face, hybrid, and pure virtual teams: Untangling the contradictions. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(1):19–33Link, Google Scholar
• Fjermestad J., Hiltz S. R. An assessment of group support systems experiment research: Methodology and results. J. Management Inform. Systems (1999) 15(3):7–149Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fleishman E. A., Mumford M. D., Zaccaro S. J., Levin K. Y., Korotkin A. L., Hein M. B. Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behavior: A synthesis and functional interpretation. Leadership Quart. (1991) 2(4):245–287Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelfand M. J., Nishii L. H., Holcombe K. M., Dyer N., Ohbuchi K. I., Fukuno M. Cultural influences on cognitive representations of conflict: Interpretations of conflict episodes in the United States and Japan. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86:1059–1074Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gelfand M. J., Erez M., Aycan Z. Cross-cultural organizational behavior. Annual Rev. Psych. (2007) 58:479–514Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffith T. L., Mannix E. A., Neale M. A., Cohen S. G., Gibson C. B. Conflict in distributed teams. Distributed Teams That Work (2003) (Jossey Bass, San Francisco) Google Scholar
• Grinter R. E., Herbsleb J. D., Perry D. E. The geography of coordination: Dealing with distance in R&D work. Proc. Internat ACM SIGGROUP Conf. on Supporting Group Work, 1999 (1999) (ACM Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hackman J. R., Walton R. E., Goodman P. S. Leading groups in organizations. Designing Effective Work Groups (1986) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) Google Scholar
• Hair J., Anderson R., Tatham R., Black W.Multivariate Data Analysis (1998) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Hart S. L., Quinn R. E. Roles executives play: CEOs, behavioral complexity, and firm performance. Human Relations (1993) 46(5):543–575Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hertel G., Geister S., Konradt U. Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Rev. (2005) 15:69–95Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hertel G., Konradt U., Orlikowski B. Managing distance by interdependence: Goal setting, task interdependence, and team-based rewards in virtual teams. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psych. (2004) 19(1):1–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinds P. J., Bailey D. E. Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(6):615–632Link, Google Scholar
• Hinds P. J., Kiesler S. Communication across boundaries: Work, structure, and use of communication technologies in large organization. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(4):373–393Link, Google Scholar
• Hinds P. J., Mortensen M. Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(3):290–307Link, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead A. B. Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2001) 81(6):1080–1089Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hooijberg R. A multidirectional approach toward leadership: An extension of the concept of behavior complexity. Human Relations (1996) 49(7):19–146Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howell J. M., Hall-Merenda K. E. The ties that bind: The impact of leader-member exchange, transformational and transactional leadership, and distance on predicting follower performance. J. Appl. Psych. (1999) 84(5):680–698Crossref, Google Scholar
• Igbaria M., Zinatelli N., Cragg P., Cavaye A. Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation model. MIS Quart. (1997) 21(3):279–305Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iyengar S. S., Lepper M. R. Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1999) 76:349–366Crossref, Google Scholar
• James R. J., Demaree R. G., Wolf G. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. J. Appl. Psych. (1984) 69(1):85–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa S., Leidner D. Communication and trust in global distributed teams. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(6):791–815Link, Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A. A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(2):256–282Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A. A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(3):530–557Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jehn K. A., Northcraft G. B., Neale M. A. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:741–763Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahai S. S., Sosik J. J., Avolio B. J. Effects of leadership style and problem structure on work group process and outcomes in an electronic meeting system enviornment. Personnel Psych. (1997) 50(1):121–137Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanter R. The new managerial work. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1989) 67(6):85–93Google Scholar
• Katz D., Kahn R. L.The Social Psychology of Organizations (1978) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Katzenbach J. R., Smith D. K. The discipline of teams. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1993) 71(2):111–121Google Scholar
• Kayworth T. R., Leidner D. The global virtual manager: A prescription for success. Eur. Management J. (2000) 18(2):183–208Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kayworth T. R., Leidner D. E. Leadership effectiveness in global distributed teams. J. Management Inform. Systems (2001) 18(3):7–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kenny D. A., Zaccaro S. J. An estimate of variance due to traits in leadership. J. Appl. Psych. (1983) 68(4):678–686Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kiesler S., Cummings J. N., Hinds P. J., Kiesler S. What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups: A legacy of research. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 57–80Google Scholar
• Kipnis D., Schmidt S. M., Wilkinson I. Intraorganizational influence tactics: Explorations in getting one's way. J. Appl. Psych. (1980) 65(4):440–452Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirkman B. L., Mathieu J. E. The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. J. Management (2005) 31(5):700–718Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koh C., Ang S., Straub D. W. IT outsourcing success: A psychological contract perspective. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(4):356–373Link, Google Scholar
• Konradt U., Schmook R., Malecke M., Cooper C. L., Robertson I. T. Impacts of telework on individuals, organizations and families: A critical review. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2000) 14(Wiley, Chichester, UK) 63–99Google Scholar
• Kozlowski S. W., Cannon-Bowers J. A., Salas E. Training and developing adaptive teams: Theory, principles, and research. Decision Making Under Stress: Implications for Training and Simulation (1998) (APA Books, Washington, D.C.) 115–153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kozlowski S. W., Gully S. M., McHugh P. P., Salas E., Cannon-Bowers J. A., Ferris G. R. A dynamic theory of leadership and team effectiveness: Developmental and task contingent leader roles. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management (1996) 14(JAI, Greenwich, CT) 253–305Google Scholar
• Kram K. E.Mentoring at Work: Developmental Relationships in Organizational Life (1985) (Scott Foresman, Glenview, IL) Google Scholar
• Kraut R. E., Fussel S. R., Brennan S. E., Seigel J., Hinds P. J., Kiesler S. Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 137–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levinson D. J., Darrow C. N., Klein E. B., Levinson M. H., McKee B.Seasons of a Man's Life (1978) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Lewis M. W., Welsh M. A., Dehler G. E., Green S. G. Product development tensions: Exploring contrasting styles of product management. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45:546–564Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ma M., Agarwal R. Through a glass darkly: Information technology design, identity verification, and knowledge contribution in online communities. Inform. Systems Res. (2007) 18(1):42–67Link, Google Scholar
• Mannix E. A., Griffith T. L., Neale M. A., Hinds P. J., Kiesler S. The phenomenology of conflict in distributed work teams. Distributed Work (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 213–233Google Scholar
• Martins L. L., Gilson L. L., Maynard M. T. Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here? J. Management (2004) 30:805–835Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maruyama M., Jantsch E., Waddington C. H. Toward cultural symbiosis. Evolution and Consciousness, Human Systems in Transition (1976) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) 198–213Google Scholar
• McDonough E., Kahn K., Barczak G. An investigation of the use of global, virtual, and collocated new product development teams. J. Product Innovation Management (2001) 18(2):110–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGraw K. O., Wong S. P. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psych. Methods (1996) 1(1):30–46Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H.The Nature of Managerial Work (1973) (Harper and Row, New York) Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H. The manager's job: Folklore, and fact. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1975) 53:49–61Google Scholar
• Montoya-Weiss M. M., Massey A. P., Song M. Getting it together: Temporal coordination and conflict management in global distributed teams. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44:1251–1262Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mortensen M., Hinds P. J. Conflict and shared identity in geographically distributed teams. Internat. J. Conflict Management (2001) 12(3):212–238Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murninghan J. K., Conlon D. The dynamics of intense workgroups: A study of British string quartets. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36(2):165–186Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy A. J. A study of the leadership process. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1941) 6:674–687Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niles S. Achievement goals and means: A cultural comparison. J. Cross-Cultural Psych. (1998) 29:656–667Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nunnally J.Psychometric Theory (1978) (McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York) Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(4):404–429Link, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Lee J.-Y., Podsakoff N. P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(5):879–903Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell A., Piccoli G., Ives B. Virtual teams: A review of current literature and directions for future research. DATA BASE Adv. Inform. Systems (2004) 35(1):6–36Crossref, Google Scholar
• Purdy J. M., Nye P., Balakrishnan P. V. The impact of communication media on negotiation outcomes. Internat. J. Conflict (2000) 11:162–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quinn R. E., Hunt J. G., Stewart R., Schriesheim C., Hosking D. Applying the competing values approach to leadership: Toward an integrative model. Managers and Leaders: An International Perspective (1984) (Pergamon, New York) 10–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Quinn R. E.Beyond Rational Management: Mastering the Paradoxes and Competing Demands of High Performance (1988) (Jossey-Bass, Inc., San Francisco) Google Scholar
• Sagie A., Zaidman N., Amichai-Hamberger Y., Te'eni D., Schwartz D. G. An empirical assessment of the loose-tight leadership model: Quantitative and qualitative analyses. J. Organ. Behav. (2002) 23:303–320Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarin S., McDermott C. The effect of team leader characteristics on learning, knowledge application, and performance of cross-functional new product development teams. Decision Sci. (2003) 34(4):707–739Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shah P., Jehn K. Do friends perform better than acquaintances? The interaction of friendship, conflict, and task. Group Decision Negotiation (1993) 2:149–166Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shrout P. E., Fleiss J. L. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing reliability. Psych. Bull. (1979) 86:420–428Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simons T., Pelled L. H., Smith K. A. Making use of difference: Diversity, debate and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42:662–673Crossref, Google Scholar
• Somech A. The effects of leadership style and team process on performance and innovation in functionally heterogeneous teams. J. Management (2006) 32(1):132–157Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stott K., Walker A.Teams, Teamwork, and Teambuilding (1995) (Prentice Hall, Singapore) Google Scholar
• Tenenhaus M.La Regression PLS (1998) (Publi-Union, Paris, France) Google Scholar
• Tinsley C. Models of conflict resolution in Japanese, German, and American cultures. J. Appl. Sci. (1998) 83:316–323Google Scholar
• Tjosvold D.Team Organization: An Enduring Competitive Advantage (1990) (Wiley, Chichester, UK) Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg D., Hogg M. A., Kramer R. M., Staw B. M. A social identity model of leadership effectiveness in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior (2003) 25(Elsevier, Amsterdam) 245–297Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg D., van Knippenberg B., De Cremer D., Hogg M. A. Leadership, self, and identity: A review and research agenda. Leadership Quart. (2004) 15(6):825–856Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walther J. B., Burgoon J. K. Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Comm. Res. (1992) 19(1):50–88Crossref, Google Scholar
• Webster J., Staples D. S., Martocchio J. Comparing virtual teams to traditional teams: An identification of new research opportunities. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (2006) 25(JAI Press, Elsevier) Google Scholar
• West M. A. Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Appl. Psych. Internat. Rev. (2002) 51:355–424Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams L., Cote J. A., Buckley M. R. Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Reality or artifact? J. Appl. Psych. (1989) 74(3):462–468Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yukl G.Leadership in Organizations (1981) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Yukl G.Leadership in Organizations (2002) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Yukl G., Falbe C. M. Influence tactics and objectives in upward, downward, and lateral influence attempts. J. Appl. Psych. (1990) 75(2):132–141Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yukl G., Tracey J. B. Consequences of influence tactics used with subordinates, peers, and the boss. J. Appl. Psych. (1992) 77(4):525–536Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zaccaro S. J., Burke C. S. Team versus crew leadership: Differences and similarities. When Is a Work Team a Crew and Does It Matter? Sympos. 13th Annual Conf. Soc. Indust. Organ. Psych. (1998) Dallas, TX(SIOP, Bowling Green, OH) . R. J. Klimoski, ChairGoogle Scholar