Research Note—How Does Personality Matter? Relating the Five-Factor Model to Technology Acceptance and Use

References

• Agarwal R., Karahanna E. Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(4):665–694Crossref, Google Scholar
• Agarwal R., Prasad J. Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decision Sci. (1999) 30(2):361–391Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ajzen I.Attitudes, Personality, and Behavior (1988) (The Dorsey Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Ajzen I., Fishbein M.Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (1980) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Bandura A.Social Foundations of Though and Action (1986) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Barrick M. R., Mount M. K. The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psych. (1991) 44(1):1–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrick M. R., Mount M. K., Locke E. A. Select on conscientiousness and emotional stability. Handbook of Principles of Organizational Behavior (2000) (Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA) Google Scholar
• Barrick M. R., Mount M. K., Judge T. A. Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? Internat. J. Selection Assessment (2001) 9(1/2):9–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barrick M. R., Stewart G. L., Piotrowski M. Personality and job performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives. J. Appl. Psych. (2002) 87(1):43–51Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bazerman M. H.Judgment in Managerial Decision Making (1994) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Bentler P. M., Bonnet D. G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psych. Bull. (1980) 88(3):588–606Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bono J. E., Judge T. A. Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. (2004) 89(5):901–910Crossref, Google Scholar
• Briggs S. R. Assessing the five-factor model of personality description. J. Personality (1992) 60(2):253–293Crossref, Google Scholar
• Compeau D. R., Higgins C. A. Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(2):189–211Crossref, Google Scholar
• Compeau D., Higgins C. A., Huff S. Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quart. (1999) 23(2):145–158Crossref, Google Scholar
• Connor M., Abraham C. Conscientiousness and the theory of planned behavior: Toward a more complete model of the antecedents of intentions and behavior. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (2001) 27(11):1547–1561Crossref, Google Scholar
• Costa P. T., McCrae R. R., Barnes P. B., Brim O. G. Still stable after all these years: Personality as a key to some issues in adulthood and old age. Life Span Development and Behavior (1980) 3(Academic Press, New York) 65–102Google Scholar
• Costa P. T., McCrae R. R.Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual (1992) (Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL) Google Scholar
• Costa P. T., McCrae R. R., Dye D. A. Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: A revision of the NEO personality inventory. Personality Individual Differences (1991) 12(9):887–898Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis F. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(3):319–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Digman J. M. Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Rev. Psych. (1990) 41(1):417–440Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishbein M., Ajzen I.Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (1975) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Fredrickson J. W., Mitchell T. R. Strategic decision processes: Comprehensiveness and performance in an industry with an unstable environment. Acad. Management J. (1984) 27(2):399–423Crossref, Google Scholar
• George J. M., Zhou J. When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86(3):513–524Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graziano W. G., Eisenberg N. H., Hogan R., Johnson J., Briggs S. Agreeableness: A dimension of personality. Handbook of Personality Psychology (1997) (Academic Press, San Diego) 795–824Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hampson S. E., Andrews J. A., Barckley M., Severson H. H. Personality predictors of the development of elementary school children's intentions to drink alcohol: The mediating effects of attitudes and subjective norms. Psych. Addictive Behav. (2006) 20(3):288–297Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hough L. M., Furnham A., Borman W. C., Ilgen D. R., Klimoski R. J. Importance and use of personality variables in work settings. Comprehensive Handbook of Psychology (2002) 12(Wiley, New York) 131–169Google Scholar
• Huber G. P. Cognitive style as a basis for MIS and DSS designs: Much ado about nothing? Management Sci. (1983) 29(5):567–579Link, Google Scholar
• Igbaria M., Iivari J. The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. Omega (1995) 23(6):587–605Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jasperson J., Carte T., Saunders C. S., Butler B. S., Croes H. J. P., Zheng W. J. Review: Power and Information Technology Research. A Metratriangulation Review. MIS Quart. (2002) 26(4):397–459Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jöreskog K. G., Sörbom D.LISREL 7: Guide to the Program and Applications (1989) (SPSS, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Judge T. A., Higgins C. A., Thresen C. J., Barrick M. R. The big five personality traits and career success across the life span. Personnel Psych. (1999) 52(3):621–652Crossref, Google Scholar
• Judge T. A., Heller D., Mount M. K. Five-factor model of personality and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psych. (2002) 87(3):530–541Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee Y., Kozar K. A., Larsen K. R. T. The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2003) 12(50):752–780Google Scholar
• LePine J. A., Van Dyne L. Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: Evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86(2):326–336Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malhotra Y., Galletta D. F. A multidimensional commitment model of volitional systems adoption and usage behavior. J. Management Inform. Systems. (2005) 22(1):117–151Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marakas G. M., Yi M. Y., Johnson R. D. The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(2):126–163Link, Google Scholar
• March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):71–87Link, Google Scholar
• McCrae R. R., Costa P. T., Hogan R., Johnson J., Briggs S. Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. Handbook of Personality Psychology (1997) (Academic Press, San Diego) 825–847Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore G. C., Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2(3):192–222Link, Google Scholar
• Robey D. Cognitive style and DSS designs: A comment on Huber's paper. Management Sci. (1983) 29(5):580–582Link, Google Scholar
• Rogers E. M.Diffusion of Innovations (1983) 3rd ed.(The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Siebert S. E., Kraimer M. L. The five factor model of personality. J. Vocational Behav. (2001) 58(1):1–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith C. A., Organ D. W., Near J. P. Organizational citizenship behavior: It's nature and antecedents. J. Appl. Psych. (1983) 68(4):653–663Crossref, Google Scholar
• Srite M., Karahanna E. The role of espoused national cultural values in technology acceptance. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(3):679–704Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steers R. M., Porter L. W.Motivation and Work Behavior (1991) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Straub D., Limayen M., Karahanna-Evaristo E. Measuring system usage: Implications for IS theory testing. Management Sci. (1995) 41(8):1328–1342Link, Google Scholar
• Szajna B. Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management Sci. (1996) 42(1):85–92Link, Google Scholar
• Taylor S., Todd P. A. Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(4):561–570Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tepper B. J., Duffy M. K., Shaw J. D. Personality moderators of the relationship between abusive supervision and subordinates' resistance. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86(5):974–983Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V., Davis F. A. Theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Sci. (2000) 46(2):186–204Link, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V., Morris M. G. Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(1):115–139Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V., Morris M. G., Davis G. B., Davis F. D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(3):425–478Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watson D., Clark L. A., Hogan R., Johnson J., Briggs S. Extraversion and its positive emotional core. Handbook of Personality Psychology (1997) (Academic Press, San Diego) 767–793Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zmud R. W. Individual differences and MIS success: A review of the empirical literature. Management Sci. (1979) 25(10):966–979Link, Google Scholar