Casting the Net: A Multimodal Network Perspective on User-System Interactions

References

• Adler P. S., Kwon S. W. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27(1):17–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja M. K., Carley K. M. Network structure in virtual organizations. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(6):741–757Link, Google Scholar
• Ahuja M. K., Galletta D. F., Carley K. M. Individual centrality and performance in virtual R&D groups: An empirical study. Management Sci. (2003) 49(1):21–38Link, Google Scholar
• Alavi M., Leidner D. E. Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(1):107–136Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alavi M., Tiwana A., Easterby-Smith M., Lyles M. Knowledge management: The information technology dimension. The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management (2003) (Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA) 104–121Google Scholar
• Bonacich P. Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. J. Math. Sociol. (1972) 2:113–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti S. P., Cross R. A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):432–445Link, Google Scholar
• Borgatti S. P., Foster P. C. The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. J. Management (2003) 29(6):991–1013Google Scholar
• Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G., Freeman L. C.Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis (2002) (Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA) Google Scholar
• Borgatti S. P. Centrality and network flow. Soc. Networks (2005) 27:55–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brass D. J. Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Admin. Sci. Q. (1984) 29(4):518–539Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brass D. J. A social network perspective on human resources management. Res. Personnel and Human Resources Management (1995) 13:39–79Google Scholar
• Burt R. S.Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton-Jones A., Straub D. W. Reconceptualizing system usage: An approach and empirical test. Inform. Systems Res. (2006) 17(3, September):228–246Link, Google Scholar
• Callon M., Law J., Rip A.Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World (1986) (Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carley K. M., Lievrouw L., Livingstone S. Smart agents and organizations of the future. Handbook of New Media (2002) (Sage, London) 206–220Google Scholar
• Carlile P. R., Rebentisch E. S. Into the black box: The knowledge transformation cycle. Management Sci. (2003) 49(9):1180–1195Link, Google Scholar
• Carlson J. R., Zmud R. W. Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42(2):153–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choudhury V., Sampler J. L. Information specificity and environmental scanning: An economic perspective. MIS Quart. (1997) 21(1):25–53Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman J. S. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociol. (1988) 94:95–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Constant D., Sproull L., Kiesler S. The kindness of strangers: The usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(2):119–135Link, Google Scholar
• Davenport T. H., Grover V. Special issue: Knowledge management. J. Management Inform. Systems (2001) 18(1):3–4Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(3):319–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeLone W. H., McLean E. R. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Inform. Systems Res. (1992) 3(1):60–95Link, Google Scholar
• Desanctis G., Poole M. S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use—Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(2):121–147Link, Google Scholar
• Devaraj S., Kohli R. Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link? Management Sci. (2003) 49(3):273–289Link, Google Scholar
• Doll W. J., Torkzadeh G. Developing a multidimensional measure of system-use in an organizational context. Inform. Management (1998) 33(4):171–185Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodman P. S., Darr E. D. Computer-aided systems and communities: Mechanisms for organizational learning in distributed environments. MIS Quart. (1998) 22(4):417–440Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. (1973) 78(6):1360–1380Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant R. M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:109–122Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffith T. L. Technology features as triggers for sensemaking. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(3):472–488Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1):82–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T. Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):232–248Link, Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T., Haas M. R. Competing for attention in knowledge markets: Electronic document dissemination in a management consulting company. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46(1):1–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T., Nohria N., Tierney T. What's your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Bus. Rev. (1999) 77(2):106–116Google Scholar
• Hiltz S. R., Turoff M. The evolution of user behavior in a computerized conferencing center. Comm. ACM (1981) 24(11):739–751Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hox J., Balderjahn I., Mathar R., Schader M. Multilevel analysis: When and why? Classification, Data Analysis, and Data Highways (1998) (Springer-Verlag, New York) 147–154Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H. Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement—Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(3):471–501Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jasperson J. S., Carter P. E., Zmud R. W. A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(3):525–557Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kane G. C., Alavi M. Information technology and organizational learning: An investigation of exploration and exploitation processes. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(5):796–812Link, Google Scholar
• Kay J., Thomas R. C. Studying long-term system use. Comm. ACM (1995) 38(7):61–69Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim S. S., Malhotra N. K. A longitudinal model of continued IS use: An integrative view of four mechanisms underlying postadoption phenomena. Management Sci. (2005) 51(5):741–755Link, Google Scholar
• Kim S. S., Malhotra N. K., Narasimhan S. Two competing perspectives on automatic use: A theoretical and empirical comparison. Inform. Systems Res. (2005) 16(4):418–432Link, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D., Nohria N., Eccles R. G. The strength of strong ties: The importance of philios in organizations. Networks and Organizations (1992) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) 216–239Google Scholar
• Kraemer K. L., Danziger J. N., Dunkle D. E., King J. L. The usefulness of computer-based information to public managers. MIS Quart. (1993) 17(2):129–148Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lamb R., Kling R. Reconceptualizing users as social actors in information systems research. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):197–235Crossref, Google Scholar
• Latour B.Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society (1987) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Majchrzak A., Cooper L. P., Neece O. E. Knowledge reuse for innovation. Management Sci. (2004) 50(2):174–188Link, Google Scholar
• March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):71–87Link, Google Scholar
• Mardsen P. V., Campbell K. E. Measuring tie strength. Soc. Forces (1984) 63:482–501Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus M. L. Toward a theory of knowledge reuse: Types of knowledge reuse situations and factors in reuse success. J. Management Inform. Systems (2001) 18(1):57–93Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKnight D. H., Choudhury V., Kacmar C. Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(3):334–359Link, Google Scholar
• Monge P. R., Contractor N. S.Theories of Communication Networks (2003) (Oxford University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(2):242–266Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neter J., Wasserman W., Kutner M. H.Applied Linear Statistical Models: Regression, Analysis of Variance, and Experimental Designs (1990) (Irwin, Homewood, IL) Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J. The duality of technology—Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):398–427Link, Google Scholar
• Ortiz E., Clancy C. M. Use of information technology to improve the quality of health care in the United States. HSR: Health Services Res. (2003) 38(2):1–12Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith J. E., Shalley C. E. The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28(1):89–106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pickering J. M., King J. L. Hardwiring weak ties—Interorganizational computer-mediated communication, occupational communities, and organizational change. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(4):479–486Link, Google Scholar
• Podolny J. M., Baron J. N. Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1997) 62(5):673–693Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M. E., Teisberg E. O. Redefining competition in health care. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2004) 82(6):64–76Google Scholar
• Raider H., Krackhardt D. J., Baum J. A. C. Intraorganizational networks. The Blackwell Companion to Organizations (2002) (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, UK) 58–74Google Scholar
• Reagans R., McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(2):240–267Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R., Zuckerman E. W. Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(4):502–517Link, Google Scholar
• Robey D., Boudreau M.-C., Rose G. M. Information technology and organizational learning: A review and assessment of research. Accounting, Management Inform. Technologies (2000) 10:125–155Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rowley T., Behrens D., Krackhardt D. Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(3):369–386Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V., Subramani M. Special issue on information technologies and knowledge management. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(1):1–7Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sparrowe R. T., Liden R. C., Wayneand S. J., Kraimer M. L. Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(2):316–325Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thorpe K. E., Florence C. S., Joski P. Which medical conditions account for the rise in health care spending? Health Affairs (2004) . Web Exclusive Offering, DOI 10.1377/hlthaff.w4.437. Retrieved August 25, 2004Google Scholar
• Vertegaal R. Attentive user interfaces. Comm. ACM (2003) 46(3):30–33Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walker G., Kogut B., Shan W. J. Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(2):109–125Link, Google Scholar
• Wasko M. M., Faraj S. Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(1):35–57Crossref, Google Scholar