Does Fit Matter? The Impact of Task-Technology Fit and Appropriation on Team Performance in Repeated Tasks

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0167

References

  • Ancona D. G., Goodman P. S., Lawrence B. S., Tushman M. L. Time: A new research lens. Acad. Management Rev. (2001) 26(4):645–663CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barkhi R. The effects of decision guidance and problem modeling on group decision making. J. Management Inform. Systems (2001) 18(3):259–282Google Scholar
  • Bleise P., Klein K., Kozlowski J. Within group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analyses. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions and New Directions (2000) (Josey-Bass, San Francisco) 349–381Google Scholar
  • Bobko P., Stone-Romero E., Ferris G. Meta-analysis is another useful research tool but it is not a Panacea. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (1998) 16(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 359–397Google Scholar
  • Brown S. A., Fuller R. M., Vician C. Who's afraid of the virtual world? Anxiety and computer-mediated communication. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2004) 5(3):79–107Google Scholar
  • Carlson J. R., Zmud R. W. Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42(2):153–170CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chidambaram L., Jones B. Impact of communication medium and computer support on group perceptions and performance: A comparison of face-to-face and dispersed meetings. MIS Quart. (1993) 17(4, December):465–491CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chudoba K. M. Appropriations and patterns in the use of group support systems. Database Adv. Inform. Systems (1999) 30(3):131–148CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Connolly T., Thorn B. K. Predecisional information acquisition—Effects of task variables on suboptimal search strategies. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1987) 39(3):397–416CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daft R. L., Lengel R. H., Trevino L. K. Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance—Implications for information-systems. MIS Quart. (1987) 11(3):355–366CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dennis A. R. Information exchange and use in small group decision making. Small Group Res. (1996) 27(4):532–550CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dennis A. R., Garfield M. J. The adoption and use of GSS in project teams: Toward more participative processes and outcomes. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):167–193CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dennis A. R., Kinney S. T. Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback and task equivocality. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(3, September):256–274LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dennis A. R., Valacich J. S. Rethinking media richness: Towards a theory of media synchronicity. Proc. 32nd Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (1999) (Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA) 1–10CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dennis A. R., Wixom B. H., Vandenberg R. J. Understanding fit and appropriation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis. MIS Quart. (2001) 25:167–193CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dennis A. R., Tyran C. K., Vogel D. R., Nunamaker J. F. An evaluation of group support systems for strategic planning. J. Management Inform. Systems (1997) 14(1):155–184CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeSanctis G., Poole M. S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use—Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(2):121–147LinkGoogle Scholar
  • George J. M., Jones G. R. The role of time in theory and theory building. J. Management (2000) 26(4):657–684Google Scholar
  • Gersick C. J. G. Revolutionary change theories: A multilevel exploration of the punctuated equilibrium paradigm. Acad. Management Rev. (1991) 16(1):10–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gersick C. J. G., Hackman J. R. Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1990) 47(1):65–97CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodhue D. L. Understanding user evaluations of information systems. Management Sci. (1995) 41(12):1827–1844LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Goodhue D. L. Development and measurement validity of a task-technology fit instrument for user evaluations of information systems. Decision Sci. (1998) 29(1):105–138CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodhue D., Thompson R. Task-technology fit and individual-performance. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(2):213–236CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonard-Barton D. Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization. Res. Policy (1988) 17:251–267CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lipnack J., Stamps J.Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time, and Organizations with Technology (1997) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • Majchrzak A., Rice R. E., Malhotra A., King N., Ba S. Technology adaptation: The case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(4):569–600CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J., Simon H. A.Organizations (1958) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Maruping L., Agarwal R. Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: A task-technology fit perspective. J. Appl. Psych. (2004) 89(6):975–990CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Massey A. P., Montoya-Weiss M., Hung C., Ramesh V. Cultural perceptions of task-technology fit. Comm. ACM (2001) 44(12):83–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maznevski M. L., Chudoba K. M. Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(5):473–492LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McGrath J. E.Groups: Interaction, and Performance (1984) (Prentice Hall, Englewood, NJ) Google Scholar
  • McGrath J. E. Time, interaction, and performance (TIP)—A theory of groups. Small Group Res. (1991) 22(2):147–174CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGrath J. E., Hollingshead A. B.Groups Interacting with Technology (1994) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J. Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(1):63–92LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Orlikowski W. J. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(4):404–428LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Poole M. S., Siebold D. R., McPhee R. D. Group decision making as a structurational process. Quart. J. Speech (1985) 71(1):74–102CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Postmes T., Spears R., Lea M. The formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication. Human Comm. Res. (2000) 26(3):341–371CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Straus S. G. Testing a typology of tasks—An empirical validation of McGrath's (1984) group task circumplex. Small Group Res. (1999) 30(2):166–187CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tesluk P. E., Mathieu J. E. Overcoming roadblocks to effectiveness: Incorporating management of performance barriers into models of work group effectiveness. J. Appl. Psych. (1999) 84(2):200–217CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trevino L., Daft R. L., Lengel R. H., Fulk J., Steinfield C. Understanding managers' media choices: A symbolic interactionist perspective. Organizations and Communication Technology (1990) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) 71–95CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tyre M. J., Orlikowski W. J. Windows of opportunity—Temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(1):98–118LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Walczuch R. M., Watson R. T. Analyzing group data in MIS research: Including the effect of the group. Group Decisionand Negotiation (2001) 10:83–94CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wheeler B. C., Valacich J. S. Facilitation, GSS and training as sources of process restrictiveness and guidance for structured group decision making: An empirical assessment. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(4):429–450LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Yates J., Orlikowski W. J. Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media. Acad. Management Rev. (1992) 17:299–326CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zigurs I., Buckland B. K. A theory of task/technology fit and group support systems effectiveness. MIS Quart. (1998) 22(3):313–334CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.