On Evaluating Information Revelation Policies in Procurement Auctions: A Markov Decision Process Approach

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1080.0168

References

  • Arora A., Greenwald A., Kannan K. N., Krishnan R. Effects of information revelation policies under market structure uncertainty. Management Sci. (2007) 53(8):1234–1248LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bagnell J. A., Schneider J. Autonomous helicopter control using reinforcement learning policy search methods. Proc. Internat. Conf. Robotics and Automation (2001) Seoul, Korea:1615–1620CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bakos Y., Nault B. Ownership and investment in electronic networks. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(4):321–341LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bloomfield R., O'Hara M. Market transparency: Who wins and who loses? Rev. Financial Stud. (1999) 12(1):5–35CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boehmer E., Saar G., Yu L. Lifting the veil: Analysis of pre-trade transparency. J. Finance (2005) 60(2):783–815CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bowling M. H., Veloso M. M. Rational and convergent learning in stochastic games. Seventh Internat. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) (2001) Seattle:1021–1026Google Scholar
  • Carr S. Note on online auctions with costly bid evaluations. Management Sci. (2003) 49(11):1521–1528LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cox J., Smith V., Walker J. Auction market theory of heterogeneous bidders. Econom. Lett. (1982) 9(4):319–325CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeGroot M. H.Probability and Statistics (1991) (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Dekel E., Fudenberg D., Levine D. Learning to play Bayesian games. Games Econom. Behav. (2004) 46(2):282–303CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Engelbrecht-Wiggans R. On a possible benefit to bid takers from using multi-stage auctions. Management Sci. (2001) 34(9):1109–1121LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Geoffrion A. M., Krishnan R. Prospects for operations research in the e-business era. Interfaces (2002) 31(2):6–36LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Granados N., Gupta A., Kauffman R. J., Tomak K. Transparency strategy in Internet-based selling. Advances in the Economics of Information Systems (2005) (Idea Group Publishing, Harrisburg, PA) 80–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenwald A. R., Hall K. Correlated Q-learning. Proc. Twentieth Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (ICML) (2003) Washington, DC:242–249Google Scholar
  • Gupta A., Stahl D., Whinston A., Kalakota R., Whinston A. Economic issues in electronic commerce. Readings in Electronic Commerce (1996) (Addison Wesley, MA) 197–227Google Scholar
  • Hausch D. Multi-object auctions: Sequential vs. simultaneous sales. Management Sci. (1986) 32(12):1599–1610LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Howard R. A.Dynamic Programming and Markov Processes (1960) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Hu J., Wellman M. P. Multiagent reinforcement learning: Theoretical framework and an algorithm. Proc. Fifteenth Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (ICML) (1998) Madison, WI:242–250Google Scholar
  • Jap S. D. Online reverse auctions: Issues, themes, and prospects for the future. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2002) 30(4):506–525CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jap S. D. An exploratory study of the introduction of online reverse auctions. J. Marketing (2003) 67(3):96–107CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kannan K. N., Krishnan R. Effect of information revelation policies on cost-structure uncertainty. (2003) . Report 2003-10, Heinz School, Carnegie Mellon University, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  • Kephart J. O., Greenwald A. R., Etzioni O., Müller J. P., Bradshaw J. M. Shopbot economics. Proc. Third Internat. Conf. Autonomous Agents (Agents'99) (1999) Seattle(ACM Press)378–379CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kleindorfer P., Wu D. J. Integrating long- and short-term contracting via business-to-business exchanges for capital-intensive industries. Management Sci. (2003) 49(11):1597–1615LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Koppius O. R. Information architecture and electronic market performance. (2002) . Unpublished doctoral dissertaion, ICIS Best Dissertation Award, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  • Littman M. L. Markov games as a framework for multi-agent reinforcement learning. Proc. 11th Internat. Conf. Machine Learn. (ML-94) (1994) Morgan KaufmannNew Brunswick, NJ:157–163CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Littman M. L., Stone P. Implicit negotiation in repeated games. Pre-Proc. Eighth Internat. Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL-2001) (2001) SeattleGoogle Scholar
  • Madhavan A., Porter D., Weaver D. Should securities markets be transparent? J. Financial Markets (2005) 8(3):265–287CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malone T., Crowston K. The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Comput. Surveys (1994) 26(1):87–119CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McAfee P., McMillan J.Incentives in Government Procurements (1988) (University of Toronto Press, Toronto) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P. R., Weber R. J. A theory of auctions and competitive bidding. Econometrica (1982) 50(5):1089–1122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Narasimhan C. Competitive promotional strategies. J. Bus. (1988) 61(4):427–449CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Purao S., Storey V., Han T. Improving reuse-based design: Augmenting analysis patterns reuse with learning. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(1):269–291LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Puterman M. L.Markov Decision Processes (1994) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rassenti S., Smith V., Bulfin R. A combinatorial auction mechanism for airport time slot allocation. Bell J. Econom. (1982) 13(2):402–417CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sikora R., Shaw M. J. A computational study of distributed rule learning. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(2):189–198LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sikora R., Shaw M. J. A multi-agent framework for the coordination and integration of information systems. Management Sci. (1998) 44(11):65–78LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Silver E., Meal H. A heuristic for selecting lot size quantities for the case of a deterministic time-varying demand rate and discrete opportunities for replenishment. Production Inventory Management (1973) 14(2):64–74Google Scholar
  • Simon H. Prediction and prescription in systems modeling. Oper. Res. (1990) 38(1):7–14LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Snir E., Hitt L. The emerging knowledge economy: Exchange in Internet spot markets for IT services. Management Sci. (2003) 49(11):1504–1520LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Snir H., Monderer D., Sela A. A learning approach to auctions. J. Econom. Theory (1998) 82(1):65–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sutton R., Barto A.Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction (1998) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Thomas C. Market structure and the flow of information in repeated auctions. (1996) . Working Paper 213, Federal Trade Commission, http://www.ftc.gov/be/workpapers/wp213.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • White D. J. A survey of applications of Markov decision processes. J. Oper. Res. Soc. (1993) 44(11):1073–1096CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu D. J., Kleindorfer P. Competitive options, supply contracting and electronic markets. Management Sci. (2005) 51(3):452–466LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu K. Information transparency of business-to-business electronic markets. Management Sci. (2004) 50(5):670–685LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.