Research Note—Awareness Displays and Social Motivation for Coordinating Communication

References

• Abel M. J., Egido C. Experiences in an exploratory distributed organization. Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Group Work (1990) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 489–510Google Scholar
• Adamczyk P. D., Bailey B. P. If not now when?: The effects of interruption at different moments within task execution. Proc. Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (CHI 2004) (2004) (ACM Press, New York) 271–278Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barua A., Lee C. H. S., Whinston A. B. Incentives and computing systems for team-based organizations. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(4):487–504Link, Google Scholar
• Begole B., Tang J., Hill R. Rhythm modeling, visualizations, and applications. Proc. Annual Sympos. User Inter. Software Tech. (UIST 2003) (2003) (ACM Press, New York) 11–20Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benbasat B., Zmud R. The identity crisis within the IS discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline's core properties. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):183–194Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cadiz J. J., Venolia G., Jancke G., Gupta A. Designing and deploying an information awareness interface. Proc. Conf. Comput. Supp. Coop. Work (CSCW 2002) (2002) (ACM Press, New York) 314–323Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cramton C. The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for distributed collaboration. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(3):346–371Link, Google Scholar
• Davenport T. H., Prusak L. Knowledge management projects in practice. Working Knowledge (2000) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) 144–161Google Scholar
• Davis F. D., Bagozzi R. P., Warshaw P. R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Sci. (1989) 35(8):982–1003Link, Google Scholar
• Dawes R. The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. Amer. Psych. (1979) 34:571–582Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeMatteo J. S., Eby L. T., Sundstrom E., Staw B. M., Cummings L. L. Team-based rewards: Current empirical evidence and directions for future research. Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews (1998) 20(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 141–183Google Scholar
• DeSanctis G., Poole M. S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(2):121–147Link, Google Scholar
• Dourish P., Bly S. Portholes: Supporting awareness in a distributed work group. Proc. Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (CHI 1992) (1992) (ACM Press, New York) 541–547Crossref, Google Scholar
• Endsley M. R. Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors (1995) 37(1):32–64Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fish R. S., Kraut R. E., Root R. W., Rice R. Evaluating video as a technology for informal communication. Comm. ACM (1993) 36(1):48–61Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fogarty J., Lai J., Christensen J. Presence versus availability: The design and evaluation of a context-aware communication client. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Stud. (2004) 61(3):299–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fogarty J., Ko A., Aung H. H., Golden E., Tang K., Hudson S. Examining task engagement in sensor-based statistical models of human interruptibility. Proc. Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (CHI 2005) (2005) (ACM Press, New York) 331–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gillie T., Broadbent D. What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity, and complexity. Psych. Res. (1989) 50(4):243–250Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grudin J. Groupware and social dynamics: Eight challenges for developers. Comm. ACM (1994) 37(1):92–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heath C., Jirotka M., Luff P., Hindmarsh J. Unpacking collaboration: The interactional organization of trading in a city dealing room. Comput. Supp. Coop. Work (1995) 3(2):147–165Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henry K. B., Arrow H., Carini B. A tripartite model of group identification: Theory and measurement. Small Group Res. (1999) 30(5):558–581Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinds P., Bailey D. Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(6):615–632Link, Google Scholar
• Horvitz E., Kadie C., Paek T., Hovel D. Models of attention in computing and communication: From principles to applications. Comm. ACM (2003) 46(3):52–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hudson S., Smith I. Techniques for addressing fundamental privacy and disruption tradeoffs in awareness support. Proc. Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (CHI 1996) (1996) (ACM Press, New York) 248–257Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacob R. J. K., Karn K. S., Hyona J., Radach R., Deubel H. Eye tracking in human-computer interaction and usability research. The Mind's Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research (2003) (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam) 573–605Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jang C., Steinfield C., Pfaff B. Virtual team awareness and groupware support: An evaluation of the TeamSCOPE system. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Stud. (2002) 56(1):109–126Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kane A. A., Argote L., Levine J. Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2005) 96(1):56–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraut R. E., Attewell P., Kiesler S. Media use in a global corporation: Electronic mail and organizational knowledge. Culture of the Internet (1997) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ) 323–342Google Scholar
• Kraut R. E., Fish R., Root R., Chalfonte B., Oskamp S., Spacapan S. Informal communication in organizations: Form, function, and technology. Human Reactions to Technology: Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology (1990) (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA) 145–199Google Scholar
• Kraut R. E., Morris J., Telang R., Filer D., Cronin M., Sunder S. Markets for attention: Will postage for email help? Proc. Conf. Comput. Supp. Coop. Work (CSCW 2002) (2002) (ACM Press, New York) 206–215Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lamb R., Kling R. Reconceptualizing users as social actors in information systems research. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):197–235Crossref, Google Scholar
• Matthews T., Rattenbury T., Carter S. Defining, designing, and evaluating peripheral displays: An analysis using activity theory. Human-Comput. Inter. (2007) 22(1):221–261Google Scholar
• McFarlane D. Comparison of four primary methods for coordinating the interruption of people in human-computer interaction. Human-Comput. Inter. (2002) 17(1):63–139Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olson G. M., Olson J. S. Distance matters. Human-Comput. Inter. (2000) 15(2):139–178Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. Learning from notes: Organizational issues in groupware implementation. Proc. Conf. Comput. Supp. Coop. Work (CSCW 1992) (1992) (ACM Press, New York) 362–369Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J., Iacono C. S. Research commentary: Desperately seeking the “it” in it research—A call to theorizing the it artifact. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(2):121–134Link, Google Scholar
• Palen L., Grudin J. Discretionary adoption of group support software: Lessons from calendar applications. Implementing Collaboration Technologies in Industry: Case Examples and Lessons Learned (2003) (Springer-Verlag, London) 159–179Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pashler H., Johnston J., Ruthruff E. Attention and performance. Annual Rev. Psych. (2001) 52:629–651Crossref, Google Scholar
• Perlow L. A. The time famine: Toward a sociology of work time. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1):57–81Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell A., Piccoli G., Ives B. Virtual teams: A review of current literature and directions for future research. Database for Adv. Inform. Systems (2004) 35(1):6–36Crossref, Google Scholar
• Real VNC (2002) . http://www.realvnc.com/what.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Rosenthal R., Rosnow R. L.Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis (1991) 2nd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Speier C., Vessey I., Valacich J. S. The effects of interruptions, task complexity, and information presentation on computer-supported decision-making performance. Decision Sci. (2003) 34(4):771–797Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sproull L., Sproull L., Larkey J. The nature of managerial attention. Advances in Information Processing in Organizations (1984) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 9–27Google Scholar
• Tang J. C., Isaacs E. A., Rua M. Supporting distributed groups with a montage of lightweight interactions. Proc. Conf. Comput. Supp. Coop. Work (CSCW 1994) (1994) (ACM Press, New York) 23–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van der Vegt G., Emans B., Van de Bliert E. Motivating effects of task and outcome interdependence in work teams. Group Organ. Management (1998) 23(2):124–143Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V., Morris M. G., Davis G. B., Davis F. D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(3):425–478Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walther J. B., Slovacek C., Tidwell L. C. Is a picture worth a thousand words? Photographic images in long term and short term virtual teams. Comm. Res. (2001) 28(1):105–134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wickens C. D., Gordon S. E., Liu Y.An Introduction to Human Factors Engineering (1998) (Addison-Wesley, New York) Google Scholar
• Zheng J., Veinott E., Bos N., Olson J. S., Olson G. Trust without touch: Jumpstarting long-distance trust with initial social activities. Proc. Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (CHI 2002) (2002) (ACM Press, New York) 141–146Crossref, Google Scholar