Willingness to Pay in an Open Source Software Environment

References

• Alberini A. Optimal designs for discrete choice contingent valuation surveys: Single bound, double bound, and bivariate models. J. Environ. Econom. Management (1995) 28:287–306Crossref, Google Scholar
• Altinkemer K., Guan J. Analyzing protection strategies for online software distribution. J. Electronic Commerce Res. (2003) 4(1):34–48Google Scholar
• Bakos Y., Brynjolfsson E., Lichtman D. Shared information goods. J. Law Econom. (1999) 42:117–155Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee D. S. Software piracy: A strategic analysis and policy instruments. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2003) 21:97–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baumol W. J., Blinder A. S.Economics: Principles and Policy (2003) (South-Western, Thompson Learning Division, Mason, OH) Google Scholar
• Besen S. M., Kirby S. N. Private copying, appropriability, and optimal copyright royalties. J. Law Econom. (1989) 32:255Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee A., Mishra B. K., Prasad A., Raghunathan S.Open Source Versus Closed Source Software Quality in Monopoly and Competitive Markets (2000) (School of Management, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson) Google Scholar
• Bitzer J., Schrettl W., Schroder P. J. H.Intrinsic Motivation in Open Source Software Development (2004) (Free University, Berlin) Google Scholar
• Brooks J. Office 2003 vs. OpenOffice.org. eWeek (2004) April 26). http://www.eweek.com/print_article2/0,1217,a=124918,00.aspGoogle Scholar
• Burke D. Transborder intellectual property issues on the electronic frontier. Stanford Law Policy Rev. (1994) 6(1):9–16Google Scholar
• Business Software AllianceThird Annual BSA and IDC Global Software Piracy Study (2006) . Retrieved August 31, http://www.bsa.org/globalstudy/upload/2005%20Piracy%20Study%20-%20Official%20Version.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Cabral L. M. B., Salant D. J., Woroch G. A. Monopoly pricing with network externalities. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (1999) 17:199–214Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cameron T., Quiggin J. Estimation using contingent valuation data from a “dichotomous choice with follow-up” questionnaire. J. Environ. Econom. Management (1994) 24:218–234Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carson R. T. Contingent valuation: A user's guide. Environ. Sci. Tech. (2000) 34:1413–1418Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carson R. T., Groves T. Incentive and informational properties of preference questions. Environ. Resource Econom. (2007) 37(1):181–210Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chellappa R. K., Shivendu S. Managing piracy: Pricing and sampling strategies for digital experience goods in vertically segmented markets. Inform. Systems Res. (2005) 16(4):400–417Link, Google Scholar
• Christensen K. D. Fighting software piracy in cyberspace: Legal and technological solutions. Law Policy Internat. Bus. (1997) 28:435–475Google Scholar
• Cochran J. K., Chamlin M. B., Wood P. B., Sellers C. S. Shame, embarrassment, and formal sanction threats: Extending the deterrence/rational choice model to academic dishonesty. Sociol. Inquiry (1999) 69(1):91–105Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen E., Cornwell L. College students believe piracy is acceptable. CIS Educator Forum: Quart. J. (1989) 1(3):2–5Google Scholar
• Conner K. R., Rumelt R. P. Software piracy: An analysis of protection strategies. Management Sci. (1991) 37:125–139Link, Google Scholar
• Cronin G. A taxonomy of methods for software piracy prevention. (2004) . Working paper, University of Auckland, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
• Davis F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(3):319–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deckmyn D. Report: Linux won't beat Windows. Computerworld (2000) 14Google Scholar
• Depoorter B., Vanneste S. Norms and enforcement: The case against copyright litigation. Oregon Law Rev. (2005) 84(4):1127–1180Google Scholar
• Depoorter B., Parisi F., Vanneste S. Problems with the enforcement of copyright law: Is there a social norm Backlash? Internat. J. Econom. Bus. (2005) 12(3):361–369Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duff A., Garland D., Duff A., Garland D. Preface: E. Rotman's beyond punishment. A Reader on Punishment (1994) (Oxford University Press, New York) 281–283Google Scholar
• Fagan J., Meares T. L. Punishment, deterrence, and social control: The paradox of punishment in minority communities. (2000) . Public Law Working Paper No. 010, Columbia Law School, New York. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=223148Google Scholar
• Galli P. Users swarm to Star Office 6 Beta. eWeek (2001) . http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Past-News/Users-Swarm-to-StarOffice-6-Beta/Google Scholar
• Givon M., Mahajan V., Muller E. Software piracy: Estimation of lost sales and the impact on software diffusion. J. Marketing (1995) 59:29–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Glass R. S., Wood W. A. Situational determinants of software piracy: An equity theory perspective. J. Bus. Ethics (1996) 15:1189–1198Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gopal R. D., Sanders G. L. Preventive and deterrent controls for software piracy. J. Management Inform. Systems (1997) 13(4):29–47Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gopal R. D., Sanders G. L. International software piracy: Analysis of key issues and impacts. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(4):380–397Link, Google Scholar
• Grasmick H. G., Bursik R. J. Conscience, significant others, and rational choice: Extending the deterrence model. Law & Society Rev. (1990) 24:837–861Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haab T. C., McConnell K. E.Valuing Environmental and Natural Resources: The Econometrics of Non-Market Valuation (2002) (Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanemann W. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete choices. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. (1984) 66:332–341Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanemann W. M. Some issues in continuous- and discrete-response contingent valuation studies. Northeastern J. Agriculture Resource Econom. (1985) 14(1):5–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hanemann W. M., Loomis J., Kanninen B. Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. (1991) 73 :1255–1262Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrington S. J. Why people copy software and create computer viruses: Individual characteristics or situational factors. Inform. Resource Management J. (1989) 2(3):28–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrington S. J. The effect of codes of ethics and personal denial of responsibility on computer abuse judgments and intentions. MIS Quart. (1996) 20(3):257–278Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haruvy E., Mahajan V., Prasad A. The effect of piracy on the market penetration of subscription software. J. Bus. (2004) 77(2):81–107Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen C. The more things change the more they stay the same: Copyright, digital technology, and social norms. Stanford Law Rev. (2003) 56:531–569Google Scholar
• Kahan D. Gentle nudges vs. hard shoves: Solving the sticky norms problem. Univ. Chicago Law Rev. (2000) 67(3):607–645Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kanninen B. Bias in discrete response contingent valuation. J. Environ. Econom. Management (1995) 28:114–125Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katyal S. Privacy vs. piracy. Internat. J. Comm. Law & Policy (published in cooperation with the Yale Journal of Law & Technology) (2004) 7:222–348Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=722441Google Scholar
• Kohlberg L.The Philosophy of Moral Development: Moral Stages and the Idea of Justice (Essays on Moral Development, Vol. 1) (1981) (Harper & Row Publishers, San Francisco) Google Scholar
• Landes W., Posner R. An economic analysis of copyright law. J. Legal Stud. (1989) 18(2):325–363Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liebowitz S. J. Copying and indirect appropriability: Photocopying of journals. J. Political Econom. (1985) 93:945–956Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maskin E., Riley J. Monopoly with incomplete information. RAND J. Econom. (1984) 15(2):171–196Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mishra B. K., Raghu T. S., Prasad A. Strategic analysis of corporate software piracy prevention and deterrence. J. Organ. Comput. Electronic Commerce (2005) 15(3):223–252Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mustonen M. Copyleft—The economics of Linux and other open source software. Inform. Econom. Policy (2003) 15:99–121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nascimento F., VanHonacker W. R. Optimal strategic pricing of reproducible consumer products. Management Sci. (1988) 34(8):921–937Link, Google Scholar
• O'Leary T., O'Leary L.O'Leary Series Microsoft Office Word 2003 Introductory (2003) (McGraw-Hill/Irwin, Columbus, OH) Google Scholar
• O'Reilly T. Lessons from open source software development. Comm. ACM (1999) 42(4):32–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Osorio C. A. A contribution to the understanding of illegal copying of software: Empirical and analytical evidence against conventional wisdom. (2002) . Working paper, University of California, Los Angeles, http://levine.sscnet.ucla.edu/archive/mitpiracy.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Oz E.Ethics for the Information Age (1994) (McGraw-Hill, Columbus, OH) Google Scholar
• Schultz M. F. Fear and norms and rock & roll: What jam bands can teach us about persuading people to obey copyright law. Berkeley Tech. L.J. (2006) 21:651–728Google Scholar
• Siponen M., Vartiainen T. Unauthorized copying of software and levels of moral development: A literature analysis and its implications for research and practice. Inform. Systems J. (2004) 14(4):387–407Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slive J., Bernhardt D. Pirated for profit. Canadian J. Econom. (1998) 31(4):886–899Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sundararajan A. Managing digital piracy: Pricing and protection. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(3):287–308Link, Google Scholar
• Takeyama L. N. The welfare implications of unauthorized reproduction of intellectual property in the presence of demand network externalities. J. Indust. Econom. (1994) 42(2):115–166Crossref, Google Scholar
• Taylor G. S., Shim J. P. A. Comparative examination of attitudes towards piracy among business professors and executives. Human Relations (1993) 46:419–433Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tibbetts S. G. Shame and rational choice in offending decisions. Criminal Justice Behav. (1997) 24:234–255Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushnet M. Everything old is new again: Early reflections on the New Chicago school. Wisconsin Law Rev. (1998) 1998:579–590Google Scholar
• Varian H. R. Buying, sharing and renting information goods. J. Indust. Econom. (2000) 48(4):473–487Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wagner S. C., Sanders C. L. Considerations in ethical decision-making and software piracy. J. Bus. Ethics (2001) 29:161–167Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walker N.Why Punish? (1991) (Oxford University Press, Oxford) Google Scholar
• Wertenbroch K., Skiera B. Measuring consumers' willingness to pay at the point of purchase. J. Marketing Res. (2002) 39(May):228–241Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wheeler D. A. Why open source software/free software (OSS/FS)? Look at the numbers. (2005) . http://www.dwheeler.com/oss_fs_why.htmlGoogle Scholar