Social Capital and Knowledge Integration in Digitally Enabled Teams

References

• Abrams D., Hogg M. A. Social identification, self-categorization, and social influence. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psych. (1990) 1:195–228Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adler P. S., Kwon S.-W. Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 27(1):17–40Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ahuja M., Carley K. Network structure in virtual organizations. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(6):741–747Link, Google Scholar
• Ahuja M., Galletta D. F., Carley K. Individual centrality and performance in virtual R&D groups: An empirical study. Management Sci. (2003) 41(9):21–38Link, Google Scholar
• Alavi M., Tiwana A. Knowledge integration in virtual teams: The potential role of KMS. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. (2002) 53(12):1029–1037Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alexander P. M., Van Loggerenberg J. J. The repertory grid: Discovering a 50-year-old research technique. (2005) SAICSIT 2005, White River, Mpumalanga ProvinceSeptember, 20–22South Africa(South African Institute for Computer Scientists and Information Technologists, Republic of South Africa) Google Scholar
• Alge B. J., Wiethoff C., Klein H. J. When does the medium matter? Knowledge-building experiences and opportunities in decision-making teams. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2003) 91(1):26–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alles M., Datar S. Control implications of worker identification with firm sales success. Management Accounting Res. (2002) 13:173–190Crossref, Google Scholar
• Alon S., Tienda M. Diversity, opportunity, and the shifting meritocracy in higher education. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2007) 72(4):487–511Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andrews K., Delahaye B. L. Influences on knowledge processes in organizational learning: The psychosocial filter. J. Management Stud. (2000) 37(6):797–810Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin T. T., Bedell M. D., Johnson J. L. The social fabric of a team-based M.B.A. program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40(6):1369–1397Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baltes B. B., Dickson M. W., Sherman M. P., Bauer C. C., LaGanke J. S. Computer mediated communication and group decision making: A meta-analysis. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2002) 87(1):156–179Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barki H., Pinsonneault A. The construct of organizational integration: A research framework and its application to enterprise systems research. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(2):165–179Link, Google Scholar
• Bavelas A. Communication patterns in task oriented groups. J. Acoustical Soc. America (1950) 22:272–283Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau P. M.Exchange and Power in Social Life (1964) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Bliese P. D., Klein K. J., Kozlowski S. W. J. Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions (2000) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) 349–381Google Scholar
• Borgatti S. P., Cross R. A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):432–445Link, Google Scholar
• Bouty I. Interpersonal and interaction influences on informal resource exchanges between R&D researchers across organizational boundaries. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43(1):50–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brass D. J., Galaskiewicz J., Greve H. R., Tsai W. Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(6):795–817Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer M. B., Brewer M. B., Collins B. E. Ethnocentrism and its role in interpersonal trust. Scientific Inquiry and the Social Sciences (1981) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) 214–231Google Scholar
• Brown R. J., Condor F., Mathews A., Wade G., Williams J. A. Explaining intergroup differentiation in an industrial organization. J. Occupational Psych. (1986) 59(4):273–287Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burke K., Chidambaram L. How much media bandwidth is enough? A longitudinal examination of media characteristics and group performance. MIS Quart. (1999) 23(4):557–580Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R. S., Sutton R. I., Staw B. The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior (2000) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 345–423Crossref, Google Scholar
• Caldwell D. F., O'Reilly C. A. The determinants of team-based innovation in organizations: The role of social influence. Small Group Res. (2003) 34(4):497–517Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campion M. A., Medsker G. J., Higgs A. C. Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psych. (1993) 46:823–850Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cannon-Bowers J. A., Salas E., Converse S. A., Castellan N. J. Shared mental models in expert decision making teams. Current Issues in Individual and Group Decision Making (1993) (Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) 221–246Google Scholar
• Carley K. M. Extracting team mental models through textual analysis. J. Organ. Behav. (1997) 18(S1):533–558Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlson J. R., Zmud R. W. Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Acad. Management J. (1999) 42(2):153–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chidambaram L. Relational development in computer-supported groups. MIS Quart. (1996) 20(2):143–165Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin W. Y. W., Marcoulides G. A. The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research (1998) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 295–336Google Scholar
• Chin W. Y. W., Marcolin B. L., Newsted P. R. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic mail emotion/adoption study. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14:189–217Link, Google Scholar
• Choo C. W.The Knowing Organization: How Organizations Use Information to Construct Meaning, Create Knowledge, and Make Decisions (1998) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Ed. Psych. Measurement (1960) 20(1):37–46Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J.Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (1988) 2nd ed.(Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
• Cohen S. G., Ledford G. E., Spreitzer G. M. A predictive model of self-managing work team effectiveness. Human Relations (1996) 49(5):643–676Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman J. S.Foundations of Social Theory (1990) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Daft R. L., Lengel R. H., Cummings L. L., Staw B. M. Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. Research in Organizational Behavior (1984) 6(JAI Press, Homewood, IL) 191–233Google Scholar
• Daft R. L., Lengel R. H. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Sci. (1986) 32(5):554–571Link, Google Scholar
• Davenport T. H., Prusak L.Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• De Dreu C. K. W., West M. A. Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86(6):1191–1201Crossref, Google Scholar
• Deeter-Schmelz D. R., Ramsey R. P. An investigation of team information processing in service teams: Exploring the link between teams and customers. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2003) 31(4):409–424Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis A. R. Information exchange and use in group decision making: You can lead a group to information but you can't make it think. MIS Quart. (1996) 20(4):433–455Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis A. R., Kinney S. T. Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(3):256–274Link, Google Scholar
• Dennis A. R., Valacich J. S. Group, sub-group, and nominal group brainstorming: New rules for a new media? J. Management (1994) 20(4):723–736Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis A. R., Wixom B. H. Investigating the moderators of the group support systems use with meta-analysis. J. Management Inform. Systems (2002) 18(3):235–257Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis A. R., Hilmer K. M., Taylor N. J. Information exchange and use in GSS and verbal group decision making: Effects of minority influence. J. Management Inform. Systems (1998) 14(3):61–88Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis A. R., Wixon B. H., Vandenberg R. J. Understanding fit and appropriation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(2):167–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dirks K. T., Ferrin D. L. Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. J. Appl. Psych. (2002) 87(4):611–628Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edwards B. D., Day E. A., Arthur W., Bell S. T. Relationships among team ability composition, team mental models, and team performance. J. Appl. Psych. (2006) 91(3):727–736Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Jeffrey M. A. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:1105–1121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ellis A. P. J. System breakdown: The role of mental models and transactive memory in the relationship between acute stress and team performance. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(3):576–589Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman D. C. The development and enforcement of group norms. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9(1):47–53Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornell C., Larcker D. F. Evaluating structural equations models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18(1):39–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman L. C. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks (1979) 1:215–239Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galegher J., Kraut R. Computer-mediated communication for intellectual teamwork: An experiment in group writing. Inform. Systems Res. (1994) 5(2):110–138Link, Google Scholar
• Goodman P. S., Darr E. D. Computer-aided systems and communities: Mechanisms for organizational learning in distributed environments. MIS Quart. (1998) 22(4):417–440Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graetz K. A., Boyle E. S., Kimble C. E., Thompson P., Garloch J. L. Information sharing in face-to-face, teleconferencing, and electronic chat groups. Small Group Res. (1998) 29(6):714–743Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant R. M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996a) 17:109–122Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grant R. M. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organ. Sci. (1996b) 7(4):375–387Link, Google Scholar
• Gruenfeld D. H., Hollingshead A. B. Sociocognition in work groups: The integrative complexity of individual and group conceptualization. Small Group Res. (1993) 24(3):362–382Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T., Nohria N., Tierney T. What's your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Bus. Rev. (1999) 77(March–April):106–116Google Scholar
• Heninger W. G., Dennis A. R., Hilmer K. M. Individual cognition and dual-task interference in group support systems. Inform. Systems Res. (2006) 17(4):415–424Link, Google Scholar
• Hilmer K. M., Dennis A. R. Stimulating thinking in decision making: Cultivating better decisions with groupware one individual at a time. J. Management Inform. Systems (2001) 17(3):93–114Google Scholar
• Hiltz R. S., Johnson K. User satisfaction with computer-mediated communication systems. Management Sci. (1990) 36(6):739–765Link, Google Scholar
• Hogg M. A., Abrams D., Otten S., Hinkle S. The social identity perspective intergroup relations, self-conception, and small groups. Small Group Res. (2004) 35(3):246–276Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead A. B. The rank-order effect in group decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1996) 68(3):181–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hollingshead A. B., McGrath J. E., O'Connor K. M. Group task performance and communication technology: A longitudinal study of computer-mediated versus face-to-face work groups. Small Group Res. (1993) 24:307–333Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu J. Instant messaging corporate software vie for workplace. (2003) . Retrieved March 25, 2007, CNET.com, http://news.cnet.com/Message+in+a+bottleneck/2009-1033_3-992348.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Huang J. C., Newell S. Knowledge integration process and dynamics within the context of cross-functional projects. Internat. J. Project Management (2003) 21(3):167–176Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H. Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Acad. Management Rev. (1993) 18(1):56–87Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ickes W., Gonzalez R. Social cognition and social cognition: From the subjective to the intersubjective. Small Group Res. (1994) 25(2):294–315Crossref, Google Scholar
• Inkpen A. C., Tsang E. W. Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Acad. Management Rev. (2005) 30(1):146–165Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa S. L., Knoll K., Leidner D. E. Is anybody out there? The implications of trust in global virtual teams. J. Management Inform. Systems (1998) 14(4):29–64Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvis C. B., Mackenzie S. B., Podsakoff P. M. Critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. J. Consumer Res. (2003) 30:199–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Katz N., Lazer D., Arrow H., Contractor N. Network theory and small groups. Small Group Res. (2004) 35(3):307–332Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kiesler S., Siegel J., McGuire T. W. Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. Amer. Psychologist (1984) 39:1123–1134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kiesler S., Zubrow D., Moses A. M. Affect in computer-mediated communication: An experiment in synchronous terminal-to-terminal discussion. Human-Comput. Interaction (1985) 1(1):77–104Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein K. J., Kozlowski S. W. J. From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organ. Res. Methods (2000) 3:211–236Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kostova T., Roth K. Social capital in multinational corporations and a micro-macro model of its formation. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28(2):297–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kramer R. M., Goldman L., Schroeder D. A. Helping the group or helping yourself? Social motives and group identity in resource dilemmas. Social Dilemmas (1995) (Praeger, Westport, CT) 49–67Google Scholar
• Kramer R. M., Brewer M., Hanna B., Kramer R. M., Tyler T. R. Collective trust and collective action: The decision to trust as a social decision. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (1996) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) 357–389Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kwok R., Ma J., Vogel D. R. Effects of group support systems and content facilitation on knowledge acquisition. J. Management Inform. Systems. (2002) 19(3):185–229Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee A. S. Electronic mail as a medium for rich communication: An empirical investigation using hermeneutic interpretation. MIS Quart. (1994) 18:143–157Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton D.Well-Springs of Knowledge (1995) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Li L. The effects of trust and shared vision on inward knowledge transfer in subsidiaries' intra- and inter-organizational relationships. Internat. Bus. Rev. (2005) 14(1):77–95Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lim B. C., Klein K. J. Team mental models and team performance: A field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy. J. Organ. Behavior (2006) 27:403–418Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin B., Chen C. Fostering product innovation in industry network: The mediating role of knowledge integration. Internat. J. Human Resources Management (2006) 17(1):155–173Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lin N.Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action (2001) 19(Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Madhavan R., Grover R. From embedded knowledge to embodied knowledge: New product development as knowledge management. J. Marketing (1998) 62(4):1–12Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marks M. A., Sabella M. J., Burke C. S., Zaccaro S. J. The impact of cross-trainng on team effectiveness. J. Appl. Psych. (2002) 87(1):3–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathieu J., Goodwin G. F., Heffner T. S., Salas E., Cannon-Bowers J. A. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. J. Appl. Psych. (2000) 85(2):273–283Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathieu J. E., Heffner T. S., Goodwin G. F., Cannon-Bowers J. A., Salas E. Scaling the quality of teammates' mental models: Equifinality and normative comparisons. J. Organ. Behav. (2005) 26(1):37–56Crossref, Google Scholar
• Maznevski M., Chuboda K. Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(5):473–492Link, Google Scholar
• McAllister D. J. Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(1):24–59Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGrath J. E.Groups: Interaction and Performance (1984) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• McGrath J. E., Hollingshead A. B., Jessup L. M., Valacich J. E. Putting the “group” back in group support systems: Some theoretical issues about dynamic processes in groups with technological enhancements. Group Support Systems: New Perspectives. (1993) (McMillan, New York) 78–96Google Scholar
• McLeod P. L., Baron R. S., Marti M. W., Yoon K. The eye have it: Minority influence in face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussion. J. Appl. Psych. (1997) 82(5):706–718Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mennecke B. E., Valacich J. S. Information is what you make of it: The influence of group history and computer support on information sharing, decision quality, and member perceptions. J. Management Inform. Systems (1998) 15(2):173–197Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(2):242–266Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neter J., Kutner M. H., Nachtsheim C. J., Wasserman W.Applied Linear Statistical Models (1996) 4th ed.(Irwin, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Nunnally J.Psychometric Theory (1978) 2nd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Oh H., Chung M., Labianca G. Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Acad. Management J. (2006) 47(6):860–875Crossref, Google Scholar
• Okhuysen G. A., Eisenhardt K. M. Integrating knowledge in groups: How formal interventions enable flexibility. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(4):370–386Link, Google Scholar
• Olsen S. IM giants told to work it out. (2002) . Retrieved March 20, 2007, http://news.cnet.com/2100-1023-957787.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Patrashkova-Volzdoska R. R., McComb S. A., Green S. G., Compton W. D. Examining a curvilinear relationship between communication frequency and team performance in cross-functional projects teams. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2003) 50(3):262–269Crossref, Google Scholar
• Piccoli G., Ives B. Trust and the unintended effects of behavior control in virtual teams. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(3):365–395Crossref, Google Scholar
• Putnam R. D. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. (2000) (Simon and Schuster, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reagans R. E., Zuckerman E. W. Networks, diversity, and performance: The social capital of corporate R&D units. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(4):502–517Link, Google Scholar
• Reus T., Liu Y. Rhyme and reason: Emotional capability and the performance of knowledge-intensive work groups. Human Performance (2004) 17(2):245–266Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robert L. P., Dennis A. R. The paradox of richness: A cognitive model of media choice. IEEE Trans. Professional Comm. (2005) 48(1):10–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rulke D. L., Galaskiewicz J. Distribution of knowledge, group network structure, and group performance. Management Sci. (2000) 46(5):612–626Link, Google Scholar
• Scott C. R. Identification with multiple targets in a geographically dispersed organization. Management Comm. Quart. (1997) 10(4):491–522Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaw M., Berkowitz L. Communication networks. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1964) (Academic Press, New York) 111–147Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shaw M. L. G. Interactive knowledge elicitation. (2007) . Retrieved March 22, 2007, http://pages.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/∼gaines/reports/KBS/CIPS84M/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Shaw M. L. G., McKnight C.Think Again: Personal Decision Making and Problem Solving (1981) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.) Google Scholar
• Shiu E., Lenhart A. How Americans use instant messaging, Pew Internet & American Life Project. (2004) . www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Instantmessage_Report.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Shore L. M., Barksdale K. Examining degree of balance and level of obligation in the employment relationship: A social exchange approach. J. Organ. Behav. (1998) 19:731–744Crossref, Google Scholar
• Siegel J., Dubrovsky V., Kiesler S., McGuire T. W. Group processes in computer mediated communication. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1986) 37:157–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simons T. L., Peterson R. S. Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. J. Appl. Psych. (2000) 85:102–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sparrowe R. T., Liden R. C., Wayne S. J., Kraimer M. L. Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(2):316–325Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sproull L., Kiesler S. Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Sci. (1986) 32:1492–1512Link, Google Scholar
• Stasser G., Stewart D. D. The discovery of hidden profiles by decision making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1992) 63:426–434Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stasser G., Titus W. Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1985) 48(6):1467–1478Crossref, Google Scholar
• Straus S. G. Getting a clue: The effects of communication media and information distribution on participation and performance in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Res. (1996) 27(1):115–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Straus S. G., McGrath J. E. Does the medium matter: The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. J. Appl. Psych. (1994) 79(1):87–97Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strømsø H. I., Grøttum P., Lycke K. H. Content and processes in problem-based learning: A comparison of computer-mediated and face-to-face communication. J. Comput. Assisted Learn. (2007) 23(3):271–282Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szulanski G., Cappetta R., Jensen R. J. When and how trustworthiness matters: Knowledge transfer and the moderating effect of causal ambiguity. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(5):600–613Link, Google Scholar
• Takahashi N. The emergence of generalized exchange. Amer. J. Sociol. (2000) 105(4):1105–1134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A. Beyond the black box: Knowledge overlaps in software outsourcing. IEEE Software (2004) 21(5):51–58Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tiwana A., McLean E. R. Expertise integration and creativity in information systems development. J. Management Inform. Systems (2005) 22(1):13–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Towry K. L. Control in a teamwork environment—The impact of social ties on the effectiveness of mutual monitoring contracts. Accounting Rev. (2003) 78(4):1069–1095Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tsai W., Ghoshal G. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Acad. Management J. (1998) 41(4):464–476Crossref, Google Scholar
• van der Kleij R., Paashuis R., Schraagen J. M. On the passage of time: Temporal differences in video-mediated and face-to-face interaction international. Internat. J. Human-Comput. Stud. (2005) 62(4):521–542Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vroom V. H., Yetton P. W.Leadership and Decision-Making (1973) (University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasko M. M., Faraj S. Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(1):35–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wichman H. Effects of isolation and communication on cooperation in a two-person game. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1970) 16:114–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wittenbaum G. M., Hollingshead A. B., Paulus P. B., Hirokawa R. Y., Ancona D. G., Peterson R. S., Jehn K. A., Yoon K. The functional perspective as a lens for understanding groups. Small Group Res. (2004) 35(1):17–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yamagishi T., Cook K. S. Generalized exchange and social dilemmas. Soc. Psych. Quart. (1993) 56(4):235–248Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zack M. H., McKenney J. L. Social context and interaction in ongoing computer-supported management groups. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(4):394–422Link, Google Scholar