From Association to Causation via a Potential Outcomes Approach

References

• Achen C. Let's put garbage-can regressions and garbage-can probits where they belong. Conflict Management Peace Sci. (2005) 22(4):327–339Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ang S., Slaughter S. A., Ng K. Y. Human capital and institutional determinants of information technology compensation: Modeling multilevel and cross-level interactions. Management Sci. (2002) 48(11):1427–1445Link, Google Scholar
• Angrist J. D., Krueger A. B., Ashenfelter O., Card D. Empirical strategies in labor economics. Handbook of Labor Economics (1999) (Elsevier, Amsterdam) 1277–1366Crossref, Google Scholar
• Angrist J. D., Imbens G. W., Rubin D. B. Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1996) 91(434):444–455Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aral S., Brynjolfsson E., Wu D. J. Which came first, IT or productivity? The virtuous cycle of investment & use in enterprise systems. Proc. 27th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (2006) AIS, Milwaukee, WI:1819–1840Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banker R., Kauffman R., Morey R. Measuring gains in operational efficiency from information technology: A case study of the positran deployment at Hardee's Inc. J. Management Inform. Systems (1990) 7(2):29–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J. B.Gaining and Sustaining Competitive Advantage (2002) 2nd ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey) Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj A. A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(1):169–196Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boulding W., Staelin R., Ehret M., Johnston W. J. A customer relationship management roadmap: What is known, potential pitfalls, and where to go. J. Marketing (2005) 69(4):155–166Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bound J., Jaeger D. A., Baker R. M. Problems with instrumental variables estimation when the correlation between the instruments and endogenous explanatory variables is weak. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1995) 90(430):443–450Google Scholar
• Briggs D. C. Causal inference and the Heckman model. J. Educational Behavioral Statist. (2004) 29(4):397–420Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell D. T. Reforms as experiments. Amer. Psych. (1969) 24(4):409–429Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cascio E. U., Lewis E. G. Schooling and the armed forces qualifying test: Evidence from school-entry laws. J. Human Resources (2006) 41(2):294–318Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dehejia R. Practical propensity score matching: A reply to smith and Todd. J. Econometrics (2005) 125(1–2):355–364Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dehejia R. H., Wahba S. Causal effects in nonexperimental studies: Reevaluating the evaluation of training programs. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1999) 94(448):1053–1062Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dehejia R. H., Wahba S. Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2002) 84(1):151–161Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiNardo J. E., Lee D. S. Economic impacts of new unionization on private sector employers: 1984–2001. Quart. J. Econom. (2004) 119(4):1383–1441Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiNardo J. E., Pischke J. S. The returns to computer use revisited: Have pencils changed the wage structure too? Quart. J. Econom. (1997) 112(1):291–303Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferratt T. W., Agarwal R., Brown C. V., Moore J. E. IT human resource management configurations and IT turnover: Theoretical synthesis and empirical analysis. Inform. Systems Res. (2005) 16(3):237–255Link, Google Scholar
• Gerhart B., Rynes S. L.Compensation: Theory, Evidence, and Strategic Implications (2003) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Glymour C. Comment: Statistics and metaphysics. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1986) 81(396):964–966Google Scholar
• Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (2000) 4th ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Gregor S. The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(3):611–642Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hahn J., Klauww W. v. d., Todd P. Identification of treatment effects by regression discontinuity design. Econometrica (2001) 69(1):201–209Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J. J. Dummy endogenous variables in a simultaneous equation system. Econometrica (1978) 46(4):931–961Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J. J. Instrumental variables: A study of implicit behavioral assumptions used in making program evaluations. J. Human Resources (1997) 32(3):441–462Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J. Causal parameters and policy analysis in economics: A twentieth century retrospective. Quart. J. Econom. (2000) 115(1):45–97Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J. J. The scientific model of causality. Sociol. Methodology (2005) 35(1):1–150Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J. J., Robb R., Wainer H. Alternative methods for solving the problem of selection bias in evaluating the impact of treatments on outcomes. Drawing Inferences from Self-Selected Samples (1986) (Springer-Verlag, New York) 63–113Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J. J., Robb R., Duncan G., Kalton G. The value of longitudinal data for solving the problem of selection bias in evaluating the impact of treatment on outcomes. Panel Surveys (1988) (John Wiley, New York) 512–538Google Scholar
• Heckman J. J., Ichimura H., Todd P. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1997) 64(4):605–654Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J. J., Ichimura H., Smith J., Todd P. Characterizing selection bias using experimental data. Econometrica (1998a) 66(5):1017–1098Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J. J., Ichimura H., Todd P. Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1998b) 65(2):261–294Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirano K., Imbens G. W., Ridder G. Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score. Econometrica (2003) 71(4):1161–1189Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt L. M., Wu D. J., Zhou X. Investments in enterprise resource planning: Business impact and productivity measures. J. Management Inform. Systems (2002) 19(1):71–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holland P. W. Statistics and causal inference (with discussion). J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1986) 81(396):945–970Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holland P. W. Causal inference, path analysis, and recursive structural equation models. Sociol. Methodology (1988) 18(1):449–484Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holland P. W., Galavotti M. C., Suppes P., Costantini D. The causal interpretation of regression coefficients. Stochastic Causality (2001) (CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA) 173–187Google Scholar
• Imai K., van Dyk D. A. Causal inference with generalized treatment regimes: Generalizing the propensity score. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (2004) 99(467):854–866Crossref, Google Scholar
• Josefek R. A. J., Kauffman R. J. Nearing the threshold: An economics approach to presure on information systems professionals to separate from their employer. J. Management Inform. Systems (2003) 20(1):87–122Crossref, Google Scholar
• LaLonde R. J. Evaluating the econometric evaluations of training programs with experimental data. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76(4):604–620Google Scholar
• Lee B., Barua A., Whinston A. B. Discovery and representation of causal relationships in MIS research: A methodological framework. MIS Quart. (1997) 21(1):109–136Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levina N., Xin M. Comparing IT worker's compensation across country contexts: Demographic, human capital, and institutional factors. Inform. System Res. (2007) 18(2):193–210Link, Google Scholar
• Little R. J., Rubin D. Causal effects in clinical and epidemiological studies via potential outcomes: Concepts and analytical approaches. Ann. Rev. Public Health (2000) 21:121–145Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lucas H. C., Banker R. D., Kauffman R. J., Mahmood M. A. The business value of information technology: A historical perspective and thoughts for future research. Strategic Information Technology Management: Perspectives on Organizational Growth and Competitive Advantage (1993) (Idea Group Publishing, Harrisburg, PA) 359–374Google Scholar
• Mithas S. Are emerging markets different from developed markets? Human capital, sorting and segmentation in compensation of information technology professionals. Proc. 29th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (2008) Association for Inforamtion Systems, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
• Mithas S., Krishnan M. S. Human capital and institutional effects in the compensation of information technology professionals in the United States. Management Sci. (2008) 54(3):415–428Link, Google Scholar
• Mithas S., Lucas H. C. Does high-skill immigration make everyone better off? United States' visa policies and compensation of American and foreign information technology professionals. (2008) . Working paper, Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College ParkGoogle Scholar
• Mithas S., Almirall D., Krishnan M. S. Do CRM systems cause one-to-one marketing effectiveness? Statist. Sci. (2006) 21(2):223–233Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S., Jones J. L., Mitchell W. Buyer intention to use Internet-enabled reverse auctions? The role of asset specificity, product specialization, and non-contractibility. MIS Quart. (2008) 32(4):705–724Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S., Krishnan M. S., Fornell C. Why do customer relationship management applications affect customer satisfaction? J. Marketing (2005) 69(4):201–209Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S., Ramasubbu N., Krishnan M. S., Fornell C. Designing websites for customer loyalty: A multilevel analysis. J. Management Inform. Systems (2006–07) 23(3):97–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mithas S., Tafti A. R., Bardhan I. R., Goh J. M. Resolving the profitability paradox of information technology: Mechanisms and empirical evidence. (2007) . Working paper, Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1000732Google Scholar
• Neyman J. S., Dabrowska D. M., Speed T. P. On the application of probability theory to agricultural experiments. Essay on principles. Statist. Sci. (1990) 5(4):465–472Section 9Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pearl J.Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference (2000) (Cambride University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Porter M. E. From competitive advantage to corporate strategy. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1987) May–June):43–59Google Scholar
• Pratt J. W., Schlaifer R. On the interpretation and observation of laws. J. Econometrics (1988) 39(1–2):23–52Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramasubbu N., Mithas S., Krishnan M. S., Kemerer C. F. Work dispersion, process-based learning, and offshore software development performance. MIS Quart. (2008) 32(2):437–458Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ray G., Barney J. B., Muhanna W. A. Capabilities, business processes, and competitive advantage: Choosing the dependent variable in empirical tests of the resource-based view. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(1):23–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ray G., Muhanna W. A., Barney J. B. Information technology and the performance of the customer service process: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(4):625–652Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robins J. M., Hernan M. A., Brumback B. Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology (2000) 11:550–560Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum P. Choice as an alternative to control in observational studies. Statist. Sci. (1999) 14(3):259–304Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum P.Observational Studies (2002) 2nd ed.(Springer, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum P. R. Sensitivity analysis for certain permutation inferences in matched observational studies. Biometrika (1987) 74(1):13–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum P. R., Rubin D. B. Assessing sensitivity to an unobserved binary covariate in an observational study with binary outcome. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B (1983a) 45(2):212–218Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum P. R., Rubin D. B. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika (1983b) 70(1):41–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum P. R., Rubin D. B. Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1984) 79(387):516–524Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubin D. B. Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Ann. Internal Medicine (1997) 127(8, Part 2):757–763Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubin D. B. Direct and indirect causal effects via potential outcomes. Scandinavian J. Statist. (2004) 31(2):161–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rubin D. B. Causal inference using potential outcomes: Design, modeling, decisions. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (2005) 100(469):322–331Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V., Bharadwaj A., Grover V. Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):237–263Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smaltz D., Sambamurthy V., Agarwal R. The antecedents of CIO role effectiveness in organizations: An empirical study in the healthcare sector. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2006) 53(2):207–222Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith J. A., Todd P. E. Does matching overcome LaLonde's critique of nonexperimental estimators? J. Econometrics (2005a) 125(1–2):305–353Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith J. A., Todd P. E. Rejoinder. J. Econometrics (2005b) 125(1–2):365–375Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whitaker J., Mithas S., Krishnan M. S. A field study of RFID deployment and return expectations. Production Oper. Management (2007) 16(5):599–612Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winship C., Mare R. Models for sample selection bias. Ann. Rev. Sociol. (1992) 18:327–350Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winship C., Morgan S. L. The estimation of causal effects from observational data. Ann. Rev. Sociol. (1999) 25:659–706Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winship C., Sobel M., Hardy M., Bryman A. Causal inference in sociological studies. Handbook of Data Analysis (2004) (Sage, London) 481–503Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xie Y., Wu X. Market premium, social process, and statisticism. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2005) 70(5):865–870Crossref, Google Scholar