The Impact of Information Diffusion on Bidding Behavior in Secret Reserve Price Auctions

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1080.0190

References

  • Avery C., Resnick P., Zeckhauser R. The market for evaluations. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1999) 89(3):564–584CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bajari P., Hortaçsu A. Economic insights from Internet auctions. J. Econom. Literature (2004) 42(2):457–486CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bapna R., Goes P., Gupta A. Replicating online Yankee auctions to analyze auctioneers' and bidders' strategies. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(3):244–268LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bapna R., Goes P., Gupta A., Jin Y. User heterogeneity and its impact on electronic auction market design: An empirical exploration. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(1):21–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barabasi A.-L., Bonabeau E. Scale-free networks. Sci. Amer. (2003) 288(5):50–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bichler M., Kalagnanam J. A non-parametric estimator for reserve prices in procurement auctions. Inform. Tech. Management (2006) 7(3):157–169CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. Amer. J. Sociol. (1987) 92(6):1257–1335CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R., Nohria N., Eccles R. Social structure of competition. Networks and Organizations: Structure Form, and Action (1992) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) 57–91Google Scholar
  • Butler B. Membership size, communication activity, and sustainability: A resource-based model of online social structures. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 13(4):346–365LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chatterjee R., Eliashberg J. The innovation diffusion process in a heterogeneous population: A micromodeling approach. Management Sci. (1990) 36(9):1057–1079LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chernev A. Reverse pricing and online price elicitation strategies in consumer choice. J. Consumer Psych. (2003) 13(1/2):51–62CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chevalier J., Mayzlin D. The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. (2006) 43(3):345–354CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chwe M. S.-Y. Communication and coordination in social networks. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2000) 67(230):1–16CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Constant D., Kiesler S., Sproull L. What's mine is ours, or is it? A study of attitudes about information sharing. Inform. Systems Res. (1994) 5(4):400–421LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dellarocas C. The digitization of word-of-mouth: Promise and challenges of online reputation systems. Management Sci. (2003) 49(10):1407–1424LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dellarocas C. Strategic manipulation of Internet opinion forums: Implications for consumers and firms. Management Sci. (2006) 52(10):1577–1593LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio P., Powell W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1983) 48(2):147–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ding M., Eliashberg J,, Huber J., Saini R. Emotional bidders—An analytical and experimental examination of consumers' behavior in a priceline-like reverse auction. Management Sci. (2005) 51(3):352–364LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fay S. Partial repeat bidding in the name-your-own-price channel. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(3):407–418LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman L. C. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry (1977) 40(1):35–41CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman L. C. Centrality in social networks: I. Conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks (1979) 1(3):215–239CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Godes D., Mayzlin D. Using online conversations to study word of mouth communication. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):545–560LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Granitz N., Ward J. Virtual community: A sociocognitive analysis. Adv. Consumer Res. (1996) 23(1):161–166Google Scholar
  • Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. (1973) 78(6):1360–1380CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M.Getting a Job (1974) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91(3):481–510CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hann I.-H., Terwiesch C. Measuring the frictional costs of online transactions: The case of a name-your-own-price channel. Management Sci. (2003) 49(11):1563–1579LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Harmon A. Amazon glitch unmasks war of reviewers. The New York Times (2004) February 14(New York)Google Scholar
  • Hayek F. A. v. The use of knowledge in society. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1945) 35(4):519–530Google Scholar
  • Isaac R. M., Walker J. M. Information and conspiracy in sealed bid auctions. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1985) 6(2):139–159CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jones Q., Ravid G., Rafaeli S. Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: A theoretical model and empirical exploration. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(2):194–210LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kannan P. K., Kopalle P. K. Dynamic pricing on the Internet: Importance and implications for consumer behavior. Internat. J. Electronic Commerce (2001) 5(3):63–83CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klemperer P. What really matters in auction design. J. Econom. Perspectives (2002) 16(1):169–189CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kwasnica A. M. The choice of cooperative strategies in sealed bid auctions. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2000) 42(3):323–346CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laumann E. O., Marsden P. V., Prensky D., Freeman L. C., White D. R., Rommey A. K. The boundary specification problem in network analysis. Research Methods in Social Network Analysis (1989) (Mason University Press, Fairfax, VA) 61–87Google Scholar
  • Marsden P. V. Network data and measurement. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1990) 16:435–463CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayzlin D. Promotional chat on the Internet. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(2):155–163LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McCall J. J. Economics of information and job search. Quart. J. Econom. (1970) 84(1):113–126CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P. R., Weber R. J. A theory of auctions and competitive bidding. Econometrica (1982) 50(5):1089–1122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Phillips O. R., Menkhaus D. J., Coatney K. T. Collusive practices in repeated english auctions: Experimental evidence on bidding rings. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2003) 93(3):965–979CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pinker E. J., Seidmann A., Vakrakt A. Y. Managing online auctions: Current business and research issues. Management Sci. (2003) 49(11):1457–1484LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Putsis W., Balasubramanian S., Kaplan E., Sen S. Mixing behavior in cross-country diffusion. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(4):354–369LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reiley D. H. Field experiments on the effects of reserve prices in auctions: More magic on the Internet. RAND J. Econom. (2006) 37(1):195–211CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scott J.Social Network Analysis: A Handbook (2000) 2nd ed.(Sage Publications, London) Google Scholar
  • Smith V. L. Experimental economics: Induced value theory. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1976) 66(2):274–279Google Scholar
  • Spann M., Tellis G. J. Does the Internet promote better consumer decisions? The case of name-your-own-price auctions. J. Marketing (2006) 70(1):65–78CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spann M., Skiera B., Schäfers B. Measuring individual frictional costs and willingness-to-pay via name-your-own-price mechanisms. J. Interactive Marketing (2004) 18(4):22–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stigler G. J. The economics of information. J. Political Econom. (1961) 69(3):213–225CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stigler G. J. Information in the labor market. J. Political Econom. (1962) 70(5):94–105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Terwiesch C., Savin S., Hann I.-H. Online haggling and price-discrimination in a name-your-own-price channel. Management Sci. (2005) 51(3):339–351LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment and uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (1974) 185(4157):1124–1131CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watts D. J., Strogartz S. H. Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Nature (1998) 393(6684):440–442CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.