Research Note—Towards Dynamic Visualization for Understanding Evolution of Digital Communication Networks

References

• Batagelj V., Mrvar A. Pajek—Program for large network analysis. Connections (1998) 21(2):47–57Google Scholar
• Berge Z. L., Collins M. P. Perceptions of e-moderators about their roles and functions in moderating electronic mailing lists. Distance Ed.: An Internat. J. (2000) 21(1):81–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertin J.Semiology of Graphics (1967) (The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI) Google Scholar
• Bikson T. K., Eveland J. D., Galagher J., Kraut R., Egido C. The interplay of workgroup structures and computer support. Intellectual Teamwork Norwood (1990) (Laurence Erlbaum, NJ) 243–290Google Scholar
• Borgatti S., Everett M., Freeman L. C. UCINET IV network analysis software. Connections (1992) 15:12–15Google Scholar
• Brass D. J. Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29(4):518–539Crossref, Google Scholar
• Card S. K., Mackinlay J. D., Shneiderman B.Information Visualization, Using Vision to Think (1999) (Morgan Kaufmann Publisher, San Francisco) Google Scholar
• Carley K. M., Breiger R., Carley K. M., Pattison P. Dynamic network analysis. Dynamic Social Network Modelling and Analysis: Workshop Summary and Papers (2003) 133–145Google Scholar
• Cho H.-K., Trier M., Kim E. The use of instant messaging in working relationship development: A case study. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. (2005) 10(4). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue4/cho.html. Retrieved June 1, 2007Crossref, Google Scholar
• Doreian P., Stokman F. N., Doreian P., Stokman F. N. The dynamics and evolution of social networks. Evolution of Social Networks (1997) (Gordon & Breach, New York) 1–17Google Scholar
• Ellson J., Gansner E. R., Koutsofios E., North S. C., Woodhull G.Graphviz and Dynagraph—Static and Dynamic Graph Drawing Tools. Graph Drawing Software (2004) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Google Scholar
• Emirbayer M. Manifesto for a relational sociology. Amer. J. Sociol. (1997) 103(2):281–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erickson T., Kellogg W. A. Social translucence: An approach to designing systems that mesh with social processes. Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (2000) 7(1)(ACM Press, New York) 59–83 http://www.research.ibm.com/SocialComputing/Papers/st_TOCHI.htm. Retrieved January 20, 2001Google Scholar
• Fallows D. Email at work—Few feel overwhelmed and most are pleased with the way email helps them do their jobs. PEW Internet and American Life Project. (2002) . http://207.21.232.103/pdfs/PIP_Work_Email_Report.pdf. Retrieved January 28, 2007Google Scholar
• Freeman L. C. The impact of computer based communication on the social structure of an emerging scientific speciality. Soc. Networks (1984) 6(3):201–221Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman L. C. Visualizing social networks. J. Soc. Structure (2000) 1(1). http://www.cmu.edu/joss/content/articles/volume1/Freeman.html. Retrieved October 20, 2006Google Scholar
• Fruchterman T. M. J., Reingold E. M. Graph drawing by force-directed placement. Software—Practice & Experience (1991) 21(11):1129–1164Crossref, Google Scholar
• Garton L., Haythornthwaite C., Wellman B. Studying online social networks. J. Comput. Mediated Comm. (1997) 3(1). http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue1/gartonCrossref, Google Scholar
• Gloor P., Laubacher R., Zhao Y., Dynes S.Temporal Visualization and Anal. Soc. Networks, NAACSOS Conf. (2004) June 27–29(North American Association for Computational Social and Organizational Science, Pittsburgh) Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. S. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. (1973) 78(6):1360–1380Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D., Nohira N., Eccles R. The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. Organizations and Networks: Theory and Practice (1991) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA) 216–239Google Scholar
• Kraut R., Kiesler S., Boneva B., Cummings J. N., Helgeson V., Crawford A. M. Internet paradox revisited. J. Soc. Issues (2002) 58(1):49–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee A., Girgensohn A., Zhang J. Browsers to support awareness and social interaction. IEEE Comput. Graphics Appl. (2004) 24(5):66–75Crossref, Google Scholar
• Monge P. R., Contractor N., Breiger R. L., Carley K. M., Pattison P. Using multi-theoretical multi-level (MTML) models to study adversarial networks. Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis. Proc. Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis Workshop, U. S. National Research Council, Committee on Human Factors (2003) 325–344Google Scholar
• Moody J., McFarland D., Bender-DeMoll S. Dynamic network visualization. Amer. J. Soc. AJS (2005) 110(4):1206–1241Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moreno J. L.Who Shall Survive? (1934) (Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing Company, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
• Perer A., Shneiderman B. Balancing systematic and flexible exploration of social networks. IEEE Trans. Visualization Comput. Graphics (2006) 12(5):693–700Crossref, Google Scholar
• Preece J.Online Communities: Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability (2000) (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, New York) Google Scholar
• Shetty J., Adibi J. The Enron data set database schema and brief statistical report. (2004) . http://www.isi.edu/∼adibi/Enron/Enron_Dataset_Report.pdf. Retrieved June 1, 2006Google Scholar
• Smith M. A., Fiore A. T. Visualization components for persistent conversations. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (2001) 136–143Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snijders T. A. B., Sobel M., Becker M. The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. Sociological Methodology Dynamics (2001) (Basil Blackwell, Boston and London) 361–395Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trier M. IT-supported monitoring and analysis of social networks in virtual knowledge communities. Proc. Sunbelt XXIV Conf. (2004) Portoroz, SloveneGoogle Scholar
• Trier M. IT-supported visualization of knowledge community structures. Proc. 38th IEEE Hawaii Internat. Conf. Systems Sci. (2005) HawaiiCrossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S., Faust K.Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (1994) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wellman B., Wortley S. Different strokes from different folks: Community ties and social support. Amer. J. Sociol. (1990) 96:558–588Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wellman B., Potter S., Wellman B. The elements of personal community. Networks in the Global Village: Life in Contemporary Communities (1999) (Westview Press, Boulder, CO) 49–81Google Scholar
• Wellman B., Salaff J., Dimitrova D., Garton L., Gulia M., Haythornthwaite C. Computer networks as social networks: Collaborative work, telework, and virtual community. Annual Rev. Sociol. (1996) 22:213–238 http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/loi/soc?open=1990sCrossref, Google Scholar
• White H. C., Boorman S. A., Brieger R. L. Social structure from multiple networks: I. Blockmodels of roles and positions. Amer. J. Sociol. (1976) 81(4):730–780Crossref, Google Scholar