Examining the Relationship Between Reviews and Sales: The Role of Reviewer Identity Disclosure in Electronic Markets

References

• Abrams D., Wetherall M., Cochrane S., Hogg M. A. A., Turner J. C. Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British J. Psych. (1990) 29:97–119Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aiken L. S., West S. G.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1991) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Akerlof G. A., Kranton R. E. Economics and identity. Quart. J. Econom. (2000) 115(3):715–754Crossref, Google Scholar
• Athey S., Stern S. The impact of information technology on emergency health care outcomes. RAND J. Econom. (2002) 33(3):399–432Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bartel C. A. Negotiating membership status in organizational groups. (2006) . Working paperGoogle Scholar
• Bartel C. A., Dutton J. E., Hogg M. A., Terry D. Ambiguous organizational memberships: Constructing social identities in interactions with others. Social Identity Processes In Organizational Contexts (2001) (Psychology Press, Philadelphia) 115–130Google Scholar
• Baumeister R. F., Leary M. R. The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachment as a fundamental human motivation. Psych. Bull. (1995) 117(3):497Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer M. The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1991) 17(5):475–482Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown J., Reingen P. H. Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. J. Consumer Res. (1987) 14(12):350–362Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown J., Broderick A., Lee N. Word of mouth communication within online communities: Conceptualizing the online social network. J. Interactive Marketing (2007) 21(3):2–20Crossref, Google Scholar
• Byrne D.The Attraction Paradigm (1971) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Chaiken S. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1980) 39(5):752–766Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chaiken S., Zanna M., Olson J., Herman C. The heuristic model of persuasion. Social Influence: The Ontario Symposium (1987) 5(Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, Hillsdale, NJ) 3–39Google Scholar
• Chaiken S., Maheswaran D. Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1994) 66(3):460–473Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chang C. C. Country of origin as a heuristic cue: The effects of message ambiguity and product involvement. Media Psych. (2004) 6(2):169–192Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chevalier J., Mayzlin D. The effect of word of mouth online: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. (2006) 43(3):345–354Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen G. Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2003) 85(5):808–822Crossref, Google Scholar
• Das S. R., Chen M. Yahoo! for Amazon: Sentiment extraction from small talk on the web. Management Sci. (2007) 53(9):1375–1388Link, Google Scholar
• David B., Turner J. C. Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion: Is being a member of the out-group an advantage? British J. Soc. Psych. (1996) 35(1):179–199Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C., Awad N., Zhang M. Using online ratings as a proxy of word-of-mouth in motion picture revenue forecasting. (2005) . Working paperGoogle Scholar
• Dhar V., Chang E. Does chatter matter? The impact of user-generated content on music sales. (2007) . CeDER Working Paper 07-06, New York UniversityGoogle Scholar
• Donath J., Smith M. A., Kollock P. Identity and deception in the virtual community. Communities in Cyberspace (1999) (Routledge Publishers, London) 29–59Google Scholar
• Duan W., Gu B., Whinston A. B. The dynamics of online word-of-mouth and product sales—An empirical investigation of the movie industry. J. Retailing. (2008) . ForthcomingCrossref, Google Scholar
• Dutton J. E., Dukerich J. M., Harquail C. V. Organizational images and member identification. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39(2):239–264Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ehrens S., Markus A. Amazon.Com: There's an “R” in E-Tailing. (2000) . Epoch Partners Internet Company Report, November 13, 4Google Scholar
• Festinger L., Schacter S., Back K.Social Pressures in Informal Groups: A Study of Human Factors in Housing (1950) (Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forman C., Ghose A., Goldfarb A. Competition between local and electronic markets: How the benefit of buying online depends on where you live. Management Sci. (2008) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Ghose A., Ipeirotis P., Sundararajan A. The dimensions of reputation in electronic markets. (2005) . Working paper, New York UniversityGoogle Scholar
• Ghose A., Smith M., Telang R. Internet exchanges for used books: An empirical analysis of product cannibalization and welfare impact. Inform. Systems Res. (2006) 17(1):3–19Link, Google Scholar
• Gilly M. C. A dyadic study of interpersonal information search. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1998) 26(2):83–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grohol J. Anonymity and online community identity matters. (2006) . http://www.Alistapart.Com/Articles/IdentitymattersGoogle Scholar
• Hansen M., Haas M. Competing for attention in knowledge markets: Electronic document dissemination in a management consulting company. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46(1):1–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hass R. G., Petty R. E., Ostrom T. M., Brock T. C. Effects of source characteristics on cognitive responses and persuasion. Cognitive Responses in Persuasion (1981) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) 141–172Google Scholar
• Hornsey M. J., Jetten J. The individual within the group: Balancing the need to belong with the need to be different. Personality Soc. Psych. Rev. (2004) 8(3):248–264Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsiao C.Analysis of Panel Data (2003) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa S. L., Leidner D. E. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(6):791Link, Google Scholar
• Jeppesen L. B., Fredricksen L. Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments. Organ. Sci. (2006) 17(1):45–63Link, Google Scholar
• Jones E. E., Pittman T. S., Suls J. Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. Psychological Perspectives on the Self (1982) 1(Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) 231–262Google Scholar
• Kang Y. S., Herr P. M. Beauty and the beholder: Toward an integrative model of communication source effects. J. Consumer Res. (2006) 33(1):123–130Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kelman H. C. Processes of attitude change. Public Opinion Quart. (1961) 25:57–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kruglanski A. W., Chen X. Y., Pierro A., Mannetti L., Erb H. P., Spiegel S. Persuasion according to the unimodel: Implications for cancer communication. J. Comm. (2006) 56(1):S105–S122Crossref, Google Scholar
• Latane B. The psychology of social impact. Amer. Psychologist (1981) 36:343–356Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lea M., Spears R., Degroot D. Knowing me, knowing you: Anonymity effects on social identity processes within groups. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (2001) 27(5):526–537Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lecky P.Self-Consistency: A Theory of Personality (1945) (Island Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Liu Y. Word-of-mouth for movies: Its dynamics and impact on box office receipts? J. Marketing (2006) 70(3):74–89Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ma M., Agarwal R. Through a glass darkly: Information technology design, identity verification, and knowledge contribution in online communities. Inform. Systems Res. (2007) 18(1):42–67Link, Google Scholar
• Mackie D., Worth L., Asuncion A. Processing of persuasive in-group messages. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1990) 58(5):812–822Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKenna K. Y., Bargh J. A. Causes and consequences of social interaction on the internet: A conceptual framework. Media Psych. (1999) 1:249–270Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menon T., Blount S. The messenger bias: A relational model of knowledge valuation. Res. Organ. Behav. (2003) 25:137–186Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moon J. Y., Sproull L. The role of feedback in managing an Internet-based volunteer workforce. Inform. Systems Res. (2008) 19(4Link, Google Scholar
• Pavlou P., Gefen D. Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(1):37–59Link, Google Scholar
• Petty R. E., Wegener D. T., White P. H. Flexible correction processes in social judgment: Implications for persuasion. Soc. Cognition (1998) 16(1):93–113Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pornpitakpan C. The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades' evidence. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (2004) 34(2):243–281Crossref, Google Scholar
• Postmes T., Spears R., Lea M. The formation of group norms in computer-mediated communication. Human Comm. Res. (2000) 26(3):341–371Crossref, Google Scholar
• Postmes T., Spears R., Lee A. T., Novak R. J. Individuality and social influence in groups: Inductive and deductive routes to group identity. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2005) 89(5):747–763Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prentice D. A., Miller D. T., Lightdale J. R. Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groups. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1994) 20(5):484–493Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reinstein D., Snyder C. The influence of expert reviews on consumer demand for experience goods: A case study of movie critics. J. Indust. Econom. (2005) 53(1):27–51Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ren Y., Kraut R. E., Kiesler S. Applying common identity and bond theory to design of online communities. Organ. Stud. (2007) 28(3):377–408Crossref, Google Scholar
• Resnick P., Zeckhauser R., Friedman E., Kuwabara K. Reputation systems. Comm. ACM (2000) 43(12):45–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sassenberg K. Common bond and common identity groups on the Internet: Attachment and normative behavior in on-topic and off-topic chats. Group Dynam. (2002) 6(1):27–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Senecal S., Nantel J. The influence of online product recommendations on consumers' online choices. J. Retailing (2004) 80(2):159–169Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simpson E., Snuggs T., Christiansen T., Simples K. E. Race, homophily, and purchase intentions and the black consumer. Psych. Marketing (2000) 17(10):877–889Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spears R., Lea M., Lea M. Social influence and the influence of the “social” in computer-mediated communication. Contexts of Computer-Mediated Communication (1992) (Harvester-Wheatsheaf, London) 30–65Google Scholar
• Sproull L., Bidgoli H.Online Communities. The Internet Encyclopedia (2003) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Swann W. B., Suls J., Greenwald A. G. Self-verification: Bringing social reality into harmony with the self. Social Psychological Perspectives on the Self (1983) 2(Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) 33–66Google Scholar
• Tajfel H., Turner J. C., Austin W. G., Worchel S. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (1979) (Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA) 33–47Google Scholar
• Turkle S. Our virtual selves. Boston (1996) 88(11):78–81Google Scholar
• Turner J.Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory (1987) (Blackwell, Oxford) Google Scholar
• Tyler T. T., Degoey P., Smith H. Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: A test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1996) 70(5):913–930Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walther J. B. Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A relational perspective. Comm. Res. (1992) 19(1):52–90Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walther J. B. Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(2):186–203Link, Google Scholar
• Walther J. B. Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal and hyperpersonal interaction. Comm. Res. (1996) 23(1):1–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walther J. B., Burgoon J. K. Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Comm. Res. (1992) 19(1):50–88Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wetzer I. M., Zeelenberg M., Pieters R. Never eat in that restaurant, I did!: Exploring why people engage in negative word-of-mouth communication. Psych. Marketing (2007) 24(8):661–680Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wiesenfeld B. M., Raghuram S., Garud R. Communication patterns as determinants of organizational identification in a virtual organization. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10:777–790Link, Google Scholar
• Wood W. Attitude change: Persuasion and social influence. Annual Rev. Psych. (2000) 51:539–570Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Xia L., Bechwati N. Positive word of mouse: The role of personalization. Proc. Amer. Marketing Assoc. (2006) 17:107Google Scholar