Research Note—Information Technology in Supply Chains: The Value of IT-Enabled Resources Under Competition

References

• Armstrong C., Sambamurthy V. Information technology assimilation in firms: The influence of senior leadership and IT infrastructures. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(4):304–327Link, Google Scholar
• Banker R., Bardhan I., Chang H., Liu S. Plant information systems, manufacturing capabilities, and plant performance. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(2):315–337Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J. B. Types of competition and the theory of strategy: Toward an integrative framework. Acad. Management Rev. (1986) 11(4):791–800Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J. B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management (1991) 17(1):99–120Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barney J. B. Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. J. Management (2001) 27(6):643–650Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barua A., Kriebel C., Mukhopadhyay T. Information technologies and business value: An analytic and empirical investigation. Inform. Systems Res. (1995) 6(1):3–23Link, Google Scholar
• Barua A., Konana P., Whinston A. B., Yin F. An empirical investigation of net-enabled business value: An exploratory investigation. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(4):585–620Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bensaou M. Interorganizational cooperation: The role of information technology an empirical comparison of US and Japanese supplier relations. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(2):107–124Link, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj A. A resource-based perspective on IT capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(1):169–196Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L., Yang S. Intangible assets: Computers and organizational capital. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity (2002) 2002(1):137–181Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin W. W., Marcoulides G. A. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research (1998) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) 295–336Google Scholar
• Clark T., Hammond J. Reengineering channel reordering processes to improve total supply-chain performance. Production Oper. Management (1997) 6(3):248–265Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conner K. A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: Do we have a new theory of the firm? J. Management (1991) 17(1):121–154Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dedrick J., Kraemer K. The impacts of IT on firm and industry structure: The personal computer industry. California Management Rev. (2005) 47(3):122–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferrier W. Navigating the competitive landscape: The drivers and consequences of competitive aggressiveness. Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(4):858–877Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt L., Brynjolfsson E. Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: Three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quart. (1996) 20(2):121–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jacobson R. The “Austrian” school of strategy. Acad. Management Rev. (1992) 17(4):782–807Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kopczak L. Logistics partnership and supply chain restructuration: Survey results from the U.S. computer industry. Production Oper. Management (1997) 6(3):226–247Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kraemer K., Dedrick J., Melville N., Zhu K.Global E-Commerce: Impacts of National Environments and Policy (2006) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee H. L. Creating value through supply chain integration. Supply Chain Management Rev. (2000) 4(5):30–36Google Scholar
• Lee H. L. Aligning supply chain strategies with product uncertainties. California Management Rev. (2002) 44(3):105–115Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee H. L. The triple-A supply chain. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2004) 82(10):102–112Google Scholar
• Lee H. L., Padmanabhan V., Whang S. Information distortion in supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Sci. (1997) 43(4):546–558Link, Google Scholar
• Lee H. L., So K. C., Tang C. S. The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain. Management Sci. (2000) 46(5):626–643Link, Google Scholar
• Levin D. Z., Cross R. The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Sci. (2004) 50(11):1477–1490Link, Google Scholar
• Lindell M., Whitney D. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86(1):114–121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Melville N., Kraemer K., Gurbaxani V. Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(2):283–322Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P., Roberts J. Communication and inventory as substitutes in organizing production. Scandinavian J. Econom. (1988) 90(3):275–289Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D., Shamsie J. The resource-based view of the firm in two environments: The Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965. Acad. Management J. (1996) 39(3):519–543Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay T., Kekre S. Strategic and operational benefits of electronic integration in B2B procurement processes. Management Sci. (2002) 48(10):1301–1313Link, Google Scholar
• Peteraf M. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(3):179–191Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P., Mackenzie S., Lee J.-Y., Podsakoff N. Common method biases in behavior research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(5):879–903Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M. Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12(1):95–117Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M. Strategy and the Internet. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2001) 79(3):63–78Google Scholar
• Rai A., Patnayakuni R., Patnayakuni N. Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(2):225–246Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramamurthy K., Premkumar G., Crum M. Organizational and inter-organizational determinants of the EDI diffusion: A causal model. J. Organ. Comput. E-Commerce (1999) 9(4):253–285Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ray G., Barney J., Muhanna W. Capabilities, business processes, and competitive advantage: Choosing the dependent variable in empirical tests of the resource-based view. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(1):23–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogers E. M.Diffusion of Innovations (1995) 4th ed.(Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V., Bharadwaj A., Grover V. Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):237–263Crossref, Google Scholar
• Subramani M. How do suppliers benefit from IT use in supply chain relationships? MIS Quart. (2004) 28(1):45–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wade M., Hulland J. The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(1):107–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (1985) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Zhu K. Information transparency of business-to-business electronic markets: A game-theoretic analysis. Management Sci. (2004) 50(5):670–685Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu K., Kraemer K. E-commerce metrics for net-enhanced organizations: Assessing the value of e-commerce to firm performance in the manufacturing sector. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(3):275–295Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu K., Kraemer K. Post-adoption variations in usage and value of e-business by organizations: Cross-country evidence from the retail industry. Inform. Systems Res. (2005) 16(1):61–84Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu K., Kraemer K., Xu S. The process of innovation assimilation by firms in different countries: A technology diffusion Perspective on e-business. Management Sci. (2006) 52(10):1557–1576Link, Google Scholar
• Zhu K., Kraemer K., Xu S., Dedrick J. Information technology payoff in e-business environments: An international perspective on value creation of e-business in the financial services industry. J. Management Inform. Systems (2004) 21(1):17–54Crossref, Google Scholar