How Incorporating Feedback Mechanisms in a DSS Affects DSS Evaluations

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1080.0198

References

  • Agresti A.Categorical Data Analysis (2002) 2nd ed.(John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson T. W.An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis (1984) 2nd ed.(John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
  • Ashton R. Pressure and performance in accounting decision settings: Paradoxical effects of incentives, feedback, and justification. J. Accounting Res. (1991) 28:148–186CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Atkins P. W. B., Wood R. E., Rutgers P. J. The effects of feedback format on dynamic decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2002) 88(2):587–604CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Balzer W. K., Sulsky L. M., Hammer L. B., Sumner K. E. Task information, cognitive information, or functional validity information: Which components of cognitive feedback affect performance? Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1992) 53(1):35–54CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandura A.Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control (1997) (W. H. Freeman, New York) Google Scholar
  • Banker R., Kauffman R. J. The evolution of research on information systems: A fiftieth-year survey of the literature in Management Science. Management Sci. (2004) 50(3):289–298Google Scholar
  • Benbasat I., Dexter A. S. An empirical evaluation of graphical and color-enhanced information presentation. Management Sci. (1985) 31(11):1348–1364LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chenoweth T., Dowling K. L., St. Louis R. D. Convincing DSS users that complex models are worth the effort. Decision Support Systems (2004) 37(1):71–82CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(3):319–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • D. Shephard AssociatesThe New Direct Marketing (1999) 3rd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • DeLone W. H., McLean E. R. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Inform. Systems Res. (1992) 3(1):60–95LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DeSanctis G. Expectancy theory as an explanation of voluntary use of a decision support system. Psych. Rep. (1983) 52:247–260CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Earley C. P., Northcraft G. B., Lee C., Lituchy T. R. Impact of process and outcome feedback on the relation of goal setting to task performance. Acad. Management J. (1990) 33(1):87–105CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Einhorn H. J., Hogarth R. M. Ambiguity and uncertainty in probabilistic inference. Psych. Rev. (1985) 92(4):433–461CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gentner D., Stevens A. L.Mental Models (1983) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Gonul M. S., Onkal D., Lawrence M. The effects of structural characteristics of explanations on use of a DSS. Decision Support Systems (2006) 42(3):1481–1493CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodman J. S. The interactive effects of task and external feedback on practice performance and learning. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1998) 76(3):223–252CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goodman J. S., Wood R. E., Hendrickx M. Feedback specificity, exploration, and learning. J. Appl. Psych. (2004) 89(2):248–262CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoch S. J., Schkade D. A. A psychological approach to decision support systems. Management Sci. (1996) 42(1):51–64LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hughes C. T., Gibson M. L. Students as surrogates for managers in a decision-making environment: An experimental study. J. Management Inform. Sys. (1991) 8(2):153–166CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hunt D. L., Haynes R. B., Hanna S. E., Smith K. Effects of computer-based clinical decision support systems on physician performance and patient outcomes. J Amer. Med. Assoc. (1998) 280(15):1339–1346CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • IDC The financial impact of business analytics. (2002) . Report, Interactive Data Corporation, Framingham, MA. www.idc.comGoogle Scholar
  • Kale S. H. CRM failure and the seven deadly sins. Marketing Management (2004) 13(5):42–46Google Scholar
  • Keeney R. L., Raiffa H.Decision Making with Multiple Objectives: Preference and Value Tradeoffs (1976) (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
  • Kim S. S., Malhotra N. K. A longitudinal model of continued IS use: An integrative view of four mechanisms underlying post-adoption phenomena. Management Sci. (2005) 51(5):741–755LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kluger A. N., Denisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psych. Bull. (1996) 119:254–284CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kunreuther H. Extensions of Bowman's theory on managerial decision-making. Management Sci. (1969) 15(8):415–439LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lai F., Macmillan J., Daudelin D. H., Kent D. M. The potential of training to increase acceptance and use of computerized decision support systems for medical diagnosis. Human Factors (2006) 48(1):95–108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonard-Barton D., Deschamps I. Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology. Management Sci. (1988) 34(10):1252–1265LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lilien G. L., Rangaswamy A., Van Bruggen G. H., Starke K. DSS effectiveness in marketing resource allocation decisions: Reality vs. perception. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(3):216–235LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lim K. H., Benbasat I. The effect of multimedia on perceived equivocality and perceived usefulness of information systems. MIS Quarterly (2000) 24(3):449–471CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lim K. H., Ward L. M., Benbasat I. An empirical study of computer system learning: Comparison of co-discovery and self-discovery methods. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(3):254–268LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Limayem M., DeSanctis G. Providing decisional guidance for multicriteria decision making in groups. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(4):386–401LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lister G. J.Building Your Direct Mail Program (2001) (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco) Google Scholar
  • Locke E. A., Shaw K. N., Saari L. M., Latham G. P. Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. Psych. Bull. (1981) 90(1):125–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mawhinney C. H., Lederer A. L. A study of personal computer utilization by managers. Inform. Management (1990) 18(5):243–253CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McIntyre S. H. An experimental study of the impact of judgment-based marketing models. Management Sci. (1982) 28(1):17–33LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Montgomery A. The implementation challenge of pricing decision support systems for retail managers. Appl. Stochastic Models Bus. Indust. (2005) 27(4–5):367–378CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nicolaou A. L., McKnight D. H. Perceived information quality in data exchanges: Effects on risk, trust, and intention to use. Inform. Systems Res. (2006) 17(4):332–351LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Norman D. A., Gentner D., Stevens A. L. Some observations on mental models. Mental Models (1983) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Parasuraman A., Zeithaml V. A., Berry L. L. A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. J. Marketing (1985) 49(4):41–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Petouhoff N. The scientific basis for CRM failures. Customer Relationship Management Magazine (2006) 10(3):48Google Scholar
  • Ramaprasad A. Cognitive process as a basis for MIS and DSS design. Management Sci. (1987) 33(2):139–148LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Reda S. Despite early positive results, retailers haven't jumped on analytics bandwagon. Stores (2003) 85(3):34Google Scholar
  • Remus W. Will behavioral research on managerial decision making generalize to managers? Managerial Dec. Econom. (1996) 17(1):93–101CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rigby D. Management tools and techniques: A survey. California Management. Rev. (2001) 43(2):139–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sanders N., Manrodt K. B. Forecasting software in practice: Use, satisfaction, and performance. Interfaces (2003) 33(5):90–93LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schlegelmilch B., Diamantopoulos A., Love A. Characteristics affecting charitable donations: Empirical evidence from Britain. J. Marketing Practice: Appl. Marketing Sci. (1997) 3(1):14–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sengupta K., Te'eni D. Cognitive feedback in GDSS: Improving control and convergence. MIS Quart. (1993) 17(1):87–113CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shim J. P., Warkentin M., Courtney J. F., Power D. J., Sharda R., Carlsson C. Past, present, and future of decision support technology. Decision Support Systems (2002) 33(2):111–126CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sieck W. R., Arkes H. R. The recalcitrance of overconfidence and its contribution to decision aid neglect. J. Behavioral Decision Making (2005) 18(1):29–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Silver M. S. Decision support systems: Directed and nondirected change. Inform. Systems Res. (1990) 1(1):47–70LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Silver M. S. Decision guidance for computer based decision support. MIS Quart. (1991) 15(1):105–122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singh D. T., Singh P. P. Aiding DSS users in the use of complex OR models. Ann. Oper. Res. (1997) 72:5–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sintchenko V., Coiera E., Iredeli J., Gilbert G. Comparative impact of guidelines, clinical data, and decision support on prescribing decisions: An interactive Web experiment with simulated cases. J. Amer. Med. Inform. Assoc. (2004) 11(1):71–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sullivan L. Fine-tuned pricing. Inform. Week (2005) August). www.informationweek.comGoogle Scholar
  • Todd P., Benbasat I. Evaluating the impact of DSS, cognitive effort, and incentives on strategy selection. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(4):356–374LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A., Kahneman D., Hogarth R. M., Reder M. W. Rational choice and the framing of decisions. Rational Choice (1987) (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago) 251–278Google Scholar
  • Udo J. G., Davis S. J. A comparative analysis of DSS user-friendliness and performance. Internat. J. Inform. Management (1992) 12(3):209–223CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Umanath N. S., Vessey I. Multiattribute data presentation and human judgment: A cognitive fit perspective. Dec. Sci. (1995) 25(5):795–824Google Scholar
  • Van Bruggen G. H., Smidts A., Wierenga B. The impact of the quality of a marketing decision support system: An experimental study. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (1996) 13(4):331–343CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vessey I., Galletta D. Cognitive fit: An empirical study of information acquisition. Inform. Systems Res. (1991) 2(1):63–84LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vroom V. H.Work and Motivation (1964) (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
  • Wilson J. R., Rutherford A. Mental models: Theory and application in human factors. Human Factors (1989) 31(6):617–634CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wood R. E., Bandura A., Bailey T. Mechanisms governing organizational performance in complex decision-making environments. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1990) 46(2):181–201CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.