Editorial Overview—The Interplay Between Digital and Social Networks

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1080.0200

References

  • Backstrom L., Huttenlocher D., Kleinberg J., Lan X. Group formation in large social networks: Membership, growth, and evolution. Proc. of the 12th ACM SIGKDD Internat. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2006) (ACM Press)44–54CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barabási A. L., Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science (1999) 286(5439):509–512CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Butler B., Joyce E., Pike J. Don't look now, but we've created a bureaucracy: The nature and roles of policies and rules in Wikipedia. CHI 2008: Proc. of the ACM Conf. on Human Factors in Comput. Systems. (2008) (PreEdit PDF ACM Press, New York) 1102–1110CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chevalier J., Mayzlin D. The effect of word-of-mouth on sales: Online book reviews. (2003) . Working paper, Yale School of Management, New Haven, CTCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coleman J., Katz E., Menzel H. The diffusion of an innovation among physicians. Sociometry (1957) 20(4):253–270CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dodds P. S., Muhamad R., Watts D. J. An experimental study of search in global social networks. Science (2003) 301(5634):827–829CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ducheneaut N., Moore R. J. The social side of gaming: A study of interaction patterns in a massively multiplayer online game. CSCW'04: Proc. of the ACM Conf. on Comp. Supported Cooperative Work (2004) (ACM Press, New York) 360–369CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elfrink W. Virtualizing the Corporation. (2008) . Executive Perspective in Thoughtleaders, Cisco Systems, Quarter 1Google Scholar
  • Foot K. A., Schneider S. M. Online action in campaign 2000: An exploratory analysis of the US political Web sphere. J. Broadcasting Electronic Media (2002) 46(2):222–244CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Godes D., Mayzlin D. Using online conversations to measure word of mouth communication. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):545–560LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Karau S., Williams K. Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. J. Personality and Soc. Psych. (1993) 65(4):681–706CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelman H. C. Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. J. Conflict Resolution (1958) 2(1):51–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kittur A., Kraut R. E. Harnessing the wisdom of crowds in wikipedia: Quality through coordination. CSCW'08: Proc. of the ACM Conf. on Comp. Supported Cooperative Work (2008) (ACM Press, New York) . in pressCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lakhani K. R., von Hippel E. How open source software works: “Free” user to user assistance. Res. Policy (2003) 32:923–943CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ma M., Agarwal R. Through a glass darkly: Information technology design, identity verification, and knowledge contribution in technology-mediated communities. Inform. Systems Res. (2007) 18(1):42–67LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mockus A., Fielding R. T., Herbsleb J. D. Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla. ACM Trans. Software Engrg. Methodology (2002) 11(3):309–346CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olson G. M., Olson J. S. Distance matters. Human-Comp. Interaction (2000) 15(2/3):139–178CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ren Y., Kraut R. E., Kiesler S. Applying common identity and bond theory to the design of online communities. Organ. Stud. (2007) 28(3):379–410Google Scholar
  • Stasser G., Titus W. Pooling of unshared information in group decision making. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1985) 48(6):1467–1478CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williams D., Ducheneaut N., Xiong L., Zhang Y., Yee N., Nickell E. From tree house to barracks: The social life of guilds in World of Warcraft. Games Culture (2006) 1(4):338–361CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.