Competitive Environment and the Relationship Between IT and Vertical Integration

References

• Aaker D. A., Day G. S. The perils of high-growth markets. Strategic Management J. (1986) 7(5):409–421Crossref, Google Scholar
• Afuah A. Dynamic boundaries of the firm: Are firms better off being vertically integrated in the face of a technological change? Acad. Management J. (2001) 44(6):1211–1228Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson M., Banker R. D., Hu N. Information technology spending and future earnings. Proc. 2003 Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS) (2003) Seattle:563–575Google Scholar
• Anderson P., Tushman M. L. Organizational environment and industry exit: The effects of uncertainty, munificence and complexity. Indust. Corporate Change (2001) 10(3):675–711Crossref, Google Scholar
• Antill N., Arnott R. Creating value in the oil industry. J. Appl. Corporate Finance (2004) 16(Winter):18–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan S., Wernerfelt B. Technical change, competition, and vertical integration strategies. Strategic Management J. (1986) 7:347–359Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C. Y., Clark K. B. Managing in an age of modularity. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1997) 75(5):84–93Google Scholar
• Barua A., Konana P., Whinston A. B., Yin F. An empirical investigation of net-enabled business value. Management Inform. Systems Quart. (2004) 28(4):585–620Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger P., Hann R. The impact of SFAS No. 131 on information and monitoring. J. Accounting Res. (2003) 41(2):163–223Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergh D. D. Product-market uncertainty, portfolio restructuring, and performance: An information-processing and resource-based view. J. Management (1998) 24(2):135–155Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergh D. D., Lawless M. W. Portfolio restructuring and limits to hierarchical governance: The effect of environmental uncertainty and diversification strategy. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(1):87–102Link, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj A. S. A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(1):169–196Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj A. S., Bharadwaj S. G., Konsynski B. R. Information technology effects on firm performance as measured by Tobin's Q. Management Sci. (1999) 45(7):1008–1024Link, Google Scholar
• Brews P. J., Tucci C. L. Exploring the structural effects of internetworking. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25:429–451Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E., Malone T. W., Gurbaxani V., Kambil A. Does information technology lead to smaller firms? Management Sci. (1994) 40(12):1628–1644Link, Google Scholar
• Castrogionanni G. J. Organization task environments: Have they changed fundamentally over time? J. Management (2002) 28(2):129–150Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chatterjee S., Lubatkin M., Schoenecker T. Vertical strategies and market structure: A systematic risk analysis. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(1):138–156Link, Google Scholar
• Chen P., Hitt L. Measuring switching costs and the determinants of customer retention in Internet-enabled businesses: A study of the online brokerage industry. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(3):255–275Link, Google Scholar
• Christiaanse E. Performance benefits through integration hubs. Comm. ACM (2005) 48(4):95–100Crossref, Google Scholar
• Choudhury V. Strategic choices in the development of interorganizational information systems. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(1):1–24Link, Google Scholar
• Clemons E., Row M. C. Information technology and industrial cooperation: The changing economics of coordination and ownership. J. Management Inform. Systems (1992) 9(2):9–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Clemons E., Reddi S. P., Row M. C. The impact of information technology on the organization of economic activity: The “move to the middle” hypothesis. J. Management Inform. Systems (1993) 10(2, Fall):9–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coase R. The nature of the firm. Economica (1937) 4(16):386–405Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J., Cohen P., West S. G., Aiken L. S.Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2003) 3rd ed.(Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ) Google Scholar
• Colvin J. Fortune 75: The executive. Fortune (2005) September 6Google Scholar
• D'Aveni R. A.Hypercompetition (1994) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• D'Aveni R., Ilinitch A. Y. Complex patters of vertical integration in the forest products industry: Systematic and bankruptcy risks. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35(3):596–625Crossref, Google Scholar
• D'Aveni R. A., Ravenscraft D. J. Economies of integration versus bureaucracy costs: Does vertical integration improve performance? Acad. Management J. (1994) 37(5):1167–1206Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dedrick J., Kraemer K. L. The impact of IT in firm and industry structure. California Management Rev. (2005) 47(3):122–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dess G. G., Beard D. W. Dimensions of organizational task environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29:52–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dess G. G., Ireland R. D., Hitt M. A. Industry effects and strategic management research. J. Management (1990) 16(1):7–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dewan S., Michael S., Min C. Firm characteristics and investments in information technology: Scale and scope effects. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(3):219–232Link, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(1):57–74Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Sull D. N. Strategy as simple rules. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2001) 79(1):106–116Google Scholar
• Fama E. F. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. J. Political Econom. (1980) 88:288–307Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan J. P. H., Goyal V. K. On the patterns and wealth effects of vertical mergers. J. Bus. (2006) 79(2):877–902Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan J. P. H., Lang L. H. P. The measurement of relatedness: An application to corporate diversification. J. Bus. (2000) 73(4):629–660Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fisher M. What is the right supply chain for your product. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1997) 75(2):105–116Google Scholar
• Fronmueller M. P., Reed R. The competitive advantage potential of vertical integration. Internat. J. Management Sci. (1996) 24(6):715–726Google Scholar
• Gosain S., Malhotra A., El Sawy O. Coordinating for flexibility in e-business supply chains. J. Management Inform. Systems (2004) 21(3):7–45Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gurbaxani V., Whang S. The impact of information systems on organizations and markets. Comm. ACM (1991) 34(1e):59–75Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrigan K. R. Vertical integration and corporate strategy. Acad. Management J. (1985) 28(2):397–425Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harrigan K. R. Matching vertical integration strategies to competitive conditions. Strategic Management J. (1986) 7:535–555Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt L. Information technology and firm boundaries: Evidence from panel data. Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(2):134–149Link, Google Scholar
• Hitt L., Wu D. J., Zhou X. Investment in enterprise resource planning: Business impact and productivity measures. J. Management Inform. Systems (2002) 19(1):77–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hitt M. A., Hoskisson R. E., Kim H. International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Acad. Management J. (1997) 40(4):767–798Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman W., Keedy J., Karl R. The unexpected return of B2B. McKinsey Quart. (2002) August):96–105Google Scholar
• Hoyt D., Lee H. Solectron: From contract manufacturer to global supply chain integrator. (2001) . Stanford University Case GS-24, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CAGoogle Scholar
• Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. (1976) 3:303–360Crossref, Google Scholar
• John G., Weitz B. A. Forward integration and distribution: An empirical test of transaction cost analysis. J. Law Econom. Organ. (1988) 4(2):337–355Google Scholar
• Jones G. R., Hill C. Transaction cost analysis of strategy-structure choice. Strategic Management J. (1988) 9(2):159–172Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kasra F., Lewis M., Machua J. A. D. Rapid-fire fulfillment. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2004) 82(11):104–110Google Scholar
• Keats B. W., Hitt M. A. A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance. Acad. Management J. (1988) 31(3):570–598Crossref, Google Scholar
• Konana P., Ray G. Physical product re-engineering with embedded information technology. Comm. ACM (2007) 50(10):72–78Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krickx G. A. Vertical integration in the computer mainframe industry: A transaction cost interpretation. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1995) 26:75–91Crossref, Google Scholar
• Langer E. J., Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A. The illusion of control. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1982) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee H. L. Aligning supply chain strategies with product uncertainties. California Management Rev. (2002) 44(3):105–119Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee H. L., Billington C. Managing supply chain inventory—Pitfalls and opportunities. Sloan Management Rev. (1992) 33(3):65–73Google Scholar
• Lee H. G., Clark T., Tam K. Y. Research Report. Can EDI benefit adopters? Inform. Systems Res. (1999) 10(2):186–195Link, Google Scholar
• Lee H. L., Padmanabhan V., Whang S. J. Information distortion in a supply chain: The bullwhip effect. Management Sci. (1997) 43(4):546–558Link, Google Scholar
• Levy R. The pharmaceutical industry: A discussion of competitive advantage and antitrust issues in an environment of change. (1999) . Report, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
• Mahoney J. T. The choice of organizational form: Vertical financial ownership versus other methods of vertical integration. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:559–584Crossref, Google Scholar
• Majumdar S. K., Ramaswamy V. Going direct to market: The Influence of exchange conditions. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16(5):353–372Crossref, Google Scholar
• Malone T. W., Yates J., Benjamin R. I. Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Comm. ACM (1987) 30(6):484–497Crossref, Google Scholar
• McMillion C. W. Merger madness. Internat. Econom. (1999) 13(4):36–39Google Scholar
• Miller D. The structural and environmental correlates of business strategy. Strategic Management J. (1987) 8:55–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D., Frisen P. H. Strategy-making and environment: The third link. Strategic Management J. (1983) 4:221–235Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mitra S., Chaya A. K. Analyzing cost-effectiveness of organizations: The impact of 44 information technology spending. J. MIS (1996) 13(2):29–57Google Scholar
• Osegowitsch T., Madhok A. Vertical integration is dead, or is it? Bus. Horizons (2003) 46(2):25–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter M. E.Competitive Strategy (1980) (The Free Press, NY) Google Scholar
• Richardson J. Vertical integration and rapid response in fashion apparel. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(4):400–412Link, Google Scholar
• Reinhardt F., Casadesus-Masanell R., Hanson D. BP and the consolidation of the oil industry, 1998–2002. (2003) . HBS Case, 9-702-012, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
• Robertson T. S., Gatignon H. Technology development mode: Transaction cost conceptualization. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:515–531Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V., Bharadwaj A., Grover V. Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firm. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):237–263Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santos F. M., Eisendardt K. M. Organizational boundaries and theories of organization. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(5):491–508Link, Google Scholar
• Scherer F. M. Industrial market structure and economic performance. (1980) (Houghtom Miffin Company, Boston) Google Scholar
• Singer E. M.Antitrust Economics: Selected Legal Cases and Economic Models (1968) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Stigler G. J.The Organization of Industry (1968) (Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL) Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe K. M., Zaheer A. Uncertainty in the transaction environment: An empirical test. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19(1):1–23Crossref, Google Scholar
• Teece D. Capturing value from technological innovation: Integration, strategic planning, and licensing decisions. Interfaces (1988) 18(3):46–61Link, Google Scholar
• Thomas L. G. The two faces of competition: Dynamic resourcefulness and the hypercompetitive shift. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(3):221–242Link, Google Scholar
• Tushman M. L., Anderson P. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31:439–465Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walker G., Weber D. Supplier competition, uncertainty and make-buy decisions. Acad. Management J. (1987) 30:589–596Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B., Montgomery C. A. Tobin's Q and the importance of focus in firm performance. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1988) 78(1):246–250Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E.Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (1975) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36:269–296Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge J.Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (2002) (South-Western College Pub)Google Scholar
• Worthen B. Drilling for every drop of value. CIO (2002) June 1, 2002). http://www.aspentech.com/publication_files/CI06-1-02.pdfGoogle Scholar