Contractual Provisions to Mitigate Holdup: Evidence from Information Technology Outsourcing

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1080.0204

References

  • Anderson D. EDS has solid win with GM outsourcing deal. Gartner Res. (2006) Google Scholar
  • Anderson S. W., Dekker H. C. Management control for market transactions: The relation between transaction characteristics, incomplete contract design, and subsequent performance. Management Sci. (2005) 51(12):1734–1752LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ang S., Beath C. M. Hierarchical elements in software contracts. J. Organ. Comput. Electronic Commerce (1993) 3(3):329–362Google Scholar
  • Axelrod R.The Evolution of Cooperation (1984) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Bajari P. L., Tadelis S. Incentives vs. transaction costs: A theory of procurement contracts. RAND J. Econom. (2001) 32(3):287–307CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baker G., Gibbons R., Murphy K. J. Relational contracts and the theory of the firm. Quart. J. Econom. (2002) 117):39–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banerjee A. V., Duflo E. Reputation effects and the limits of contracting: A study of the Indian software industry. Quart. J. Econom. (2000) 115(3):989–1017CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 51:1173–1182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barry E., Mukhopadhyay T., Slaughter S. Software project duration and effort: An empirical study. Inform. Tech. Management (2002) 3(1–2):113–136CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernheim B. D., Whinston M. D. Incomplete contracts and strategic ambiguity. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1998) 88(4):902–932Google Scholar
  • Boehm B. W.Software Engineering Economics (1981) (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Brickley J. A. Incentive conflicts and contractual restraints: Evidence from franchising. J. Law Econom. (1999) 42:745–774CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Crocker K. J., Masten S. E. Mitigating contractual hazards: Unilateral options and contract length. RAND J. Econom. (1988) 19(3):327–343CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DataMonitor Global IT Services: Industry Profile, Reference Code: 0199-2313. (2007) Google Scholar
  • Deloitte Consulting Calling a change in the outsourcing market. (2005) AprilGoogle Scholar
  • DiRomualdo A., Gurbaxani V. Strategic intent for IT outsourcing. Sloan Management Rev. (1998) 39(4):67–80Google Scholar
  • Dyer J. H., Singh H. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(4):660–679CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edlin A. S., Hermalin B. E. Contract renegotiation and options in agency problems. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (2000) 16:395–423CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edlin A. S., Reichelstein S. Holdups, standard breach remedies, and optimal investment. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1996) 86(3):478–501Google Scholar
  • Elfenbein D. W., Lerner J. Ownership and control rights in Internet portal alliances, 1995–1999. RAND J. Econom. (2003) 32(2):356–369CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ethiraj S. K., Kale P., Krishnan M. S., Singh J. V. Where do capabilities come from and how do they matter? A study in the software services industry. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(1):25–45CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Evans W. N., Schwab R. M. Finishing high school and starting college: Do Catholic schools make a difference? Quart. J. Econom. (1995) 110(4):941–974CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fama E. F., Jensen M. C. Agency problems and residual claims. J. Law Econom. (1983) 26(2):327–349CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldberg V. P., Erickson J. R. Quantity and price adjustment in long-term contracts: A case study of petroleum coke. J. Law Econom. (1987) 30(2):369–398CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goo J., Kishore R., Rao H. R. Management of information technology outsourcing relationships: The role of service level agreements. Proc. Twenty-Fifth Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS) (2004) Washington, DC:325–338Google Scholar
  • Gopal A., Sivaramakrishnan K., Krishnan M. S., Mukhopadhyay T. Contracts in offshore software development: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. (2003) 49(12):1671–1683LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Greaver M. F.Strategic Outsourcing: A Structured Approach to Outsourcing Decisions and Initiatives (1999) (AMACOM, New York) Google Scholar
  • Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (2000) 4th ed.(Prentice Hall)Google Scholar
  • Gurbaxani V., Karmarkar U., Apte U. Information systems outsourcing contracts: Theory & evidence. Managing in the Information Economy (2005) (Current Research, Kluwer, New York) Google Scholar
  • Guriev S., Kvassov D. Contracting on time. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2005) 95(5):1369–1385CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hart O., Moore J. Incomplete contracts and renegotiation. Econometrica (1988) 56:755–785CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heide J. B., Wathne K. H., Rokkan A. I. Interfirm monitoring, social contracts and relationship outcomes. J. Marketing Res. (2007) 44(3):425–433CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H.Specific and General Knowledge and Organizational Structure. Contract Economics (1992) (Blackwell Publishers, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Joskow P. L. Contract duration and relationship-specific investments: Empirical evidence from coal markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1987) 77(1):168–185Google Scholar
  • Kaplan S. N., Strömberg P. Financial contracting theory meets the real world: An empirical analysis of venture capital contracts. Rev. Econom. Stud. (2003) 70:281–315CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klein B. Why hold-ups occur: The self-enforcing range of contractual relationships. Econom. Inquiry (1996) 34(3):444–463CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klein B., Crawford R. A., Alchian A. A. Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. J. Law Econom. (1978) 21(2):297–326CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knapp L. G., Seaks T. G. A Hausman test for a dummy variable in probit. Appl. Econom. Lett. (1998) 5:321–323CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koh C., Ang S., Straub D. W. IT outsourcing success: A psychological contract perspective. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(4):356–373LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lacity M., Willcocks L. Practices in information technology outsourcing: Lessons from experience. MIS Quart. (1998) 22(3, September):363–408CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Latham G., Yuki G. A review of research on the application of goal-setting in organizations. Acad. Management J. (1975) 18:824–845CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee J. N., Miranda S. M., Kim Y. G. IT outsourcing strategies: Universalistic, contingency, and configurational explanations of success. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(2):110–131LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Linder J. C. Transformational outsourcing. Sloan Management Rev. (2004) 45(2):52–58Google Scholar
  • Lyon T. P., Rasmusen E. Buyer-option contracts restored: Renegotiation, inefficient threats, and the hold-up problem. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (2004) 20(1):148–169CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G., Simon H.Organizations (1958) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Masten S., Saussier S., Brousseau E., Glachant J. M. Econometrics of contracts: An assessment of developments in the empirical literature on contracting. The Economics of Contracts. (2002) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 273–292CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Noldeke G., Schmidt K. Option contracts and renegotiations: A solution to the hold-up problem. RAND J. Econom. (1995) 26(2):163–179CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ouchi W. G. A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Sci. (1979) 25:833–848LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Oxley J., Sampson R. C. The scope and governance of international R&D alliances. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(8–9):723–749CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pohlmann T., McNeill R., Roehrig P., Powers L., Ester O.The Forrester Wave: Integrated Desktop and Service Desk Outsourcing (2006) March 9Google Scholar
  • Poppo L., Zenger T. Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management J. (2002) 23(8):707–725CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter M.Competitive Strategy (1980) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Rogerson W. P. Contractual solutions to the hold-up problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1992) 59(4):777–793CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Segal I. A theory of incomplete contracts. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1999) 66:57–82CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stinchcombe A. L.Information and Organizations (1990) (University of California Press, Berkeley) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tirole J. A theory of collective reputations (with applications to the persistence of corruption and to firm quality). Rev. Econom. Stud. (1996) 63(1):1–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • von Hippel E. Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Sci. (1994) 40(4):429–439LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Whang S. Contracting for software development. Management Sci. (1992) 38(3):307–325LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Whinston M. D. Assessing the property rights and transaction-cost theories of firm scope. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2001) 91(2):184–188CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.Markets and Hierarchies (1975) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. Credible commitments: Using hostages to support exchange. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1983) 73(4):519–540Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. J. Law Econom. (1993) 36:453–486CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Xia W., Lee G. Grasping the complexity of IS development projects. Comm. ACM (2004) 47(5):69–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Young A. Outsourcing market view: What the future holds. (2004) Presentation, Gartner IT Services and Sourcing SummitMayLas Vegas, NVGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.