Research Note—The Role of Organizational Controls and Boundary Spanning in Software Development Outsourcing: Implications for Project Performance

References

• Allen D., Lueck D. The role of risk in contract choice. J. Law, Econom. Organ. (1999) 15(3):704–736Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee A. V., Duflo E. Reputation effects and the limits of contracting: A study of the Indian software industry. Quart. J. Econom. (2000) 115(3):989–1017Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlile P. R. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(4):442–455Link, Google Scholar
• Carlile P. R. Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(5):555–568Link, Google Scholar
• Carte T. A., Russell C. J. In pursuit of moderation: Nine common errors and their solutions. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(3):479–501Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chin W. W., Marcolin B. L., Newsted P. R. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and voice mail emotion/adoption study. Proc. Seventeenth ICIS (1996) Cleveland, OH:21–41Google Scholar
• Choudhury V., Sabherwal R. Portfolios of control in outsourced software development projects. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(3):291–314Link, Google Scholar
• Covaleski M. A., Dirsmith M. W., Heian J. B., Samuel S. The calculated and the avowed: Techniques of discipline and struggles over identity in Big Six public accounting firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1998) 43:293–327Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M. Control: Organization and economic approaches. Management Sci. (1985) 31(2):134–149Link, Google Scholar
• Ethiraj S. K., Kale P., Krishnan M. S., Singh J. V. Where do capabilities come from and how do they matter? A study in the software services industry. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(1):25–45Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ford J. K., MacCallum R. C., Tait M. The application of exploratory factor analysis in applied psychology: A critical review and analysis. Personnel Psych. (1986) 39:291–314Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fornell C., Bookstein F. L. Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. J. Marketing Res. (1982) 19:440–452Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gefen D., Straub D. W., Boudreau M.-C. Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2000) 4(7):2–77Google Scholar
• Gopal A., Mukhopadhyay T., Krishnan M. S. The role of software processes and communication in offshore software development. Comm. ACM (2002a) 45(4):193–200Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gopal A., Mukhopadhyay T., Krishnan M. S., Goldenson D. R. Measurement programs in software development: Determinants of success. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. (2002b) 28(9):863–875Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gopal A., Sivaramakrishnan K., Krishnan M. S., Mukhopadhyay T. Contracts in offshore software development: An empirical analysis. Management Sci. (2003) 49(12):1671–1683Link, Google Scholar
• Grant R. M. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(4):375–387Link, Google Scholar
• Guzzo R. A., Dickson M. W. Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Rev. Psych. (1996) 47:307–338Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harter D. E., Krishnan M. S., Slaughter S. A. Effects of process maturity on quality, cycle time, and effort in software product development. Management Sci. (2000) 46(4):451–467Link, Google Scholar
• Henderson J. C., Lee S. Managing IS design teams: A control theories perspective. Management Sci. (1992) 38(6):757–777Link, Google Scholar
• Herbsleb J. D., Mockus A. An empirical study of speed and communication in globally distributed software development. IEEE Trans. Software Engrg. (2003) 29(6):481–494Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoegl M., Gemuenden H. G. Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(4):435–449Link, Google Scholar
• Hurley R. F., Hult G. T. M. Innovation, market orientation and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. J. Marketing (1998) 62(3):42–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jaworski B. J. Toward a theory of marketing control: Environmental context, control types, and consequences. J. Marketing (1988) 52:23–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. (1976) 3:305–360Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirsch L. J. The management of complex tasks in organizations: Controlling the systems development process. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(1):1–21Link, Google Scholar
• Kirsch L. J. Portfolios of control modes and IS project management. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(3):215–239Link, Google Scholar
• Kirsch L. J. Deploying common systems globally: The dynamics of control. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(4):374–395Link, Google Scholar
• Kirsch L. J., Sambamurthy V., Ko D.-G., Purvis R. L. Controlling information systems development projects: The view from the client. Management Sci. (2002) 48(4):484–498Link, Google Scholar
• Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):383–397Link, Google Scholar
• Krishnan M. S., Kriebel C. H., Kekre S., Mukhopadhyay T. An empirical analysis of productivity and quality in software products. Management Sci. (2000) 46(6):745–759Link, Google Scholar
• Levina N. Collaborating on multiparty information systems development projects: A collective reflection-in-action view. Inform. Systems Res. (2005) 16(2):109–130Link, Google Scholar
• Levina N., Ross J. From the vendor's perspective: Exploring the value proposition in IT outsourcing. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(3):331–364Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levina N., Vaast E. The emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for implementation and use in information systems. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(2):335–363Crossref, Google Scholar
• March J. G., Shapira Z. Managerial perspectives on risk and risk taking. Management Sci. (1987) 33(11):1404–1418Link, Google Scholar
• Meyer B. The unspoken revolution in software engineering. IEEE Comput. (2006) 39(1):121–124Crossref, Google Scholar
• Narayanaswamy R. S., Henry R. M., Purvis R. L. Understanding the effect of control on information systems project performance via meta-analysis. (2007) Academy of Management Annual MeetingPhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
• Necco C. R., Gordon C. L., Tsai N. W. Systems analysis and design: Current practices. MIS Quart. (1987) 11(4):461–475Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ocasio W. Towards an attention-based view of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:187–206Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ouchi W. G. A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Sci. (1979) 25(9):833–848Link, Google Scholar
• Paulk M. C., Curtis B., Chrissis M. B., Weber C. V. Capability maturity model for software version 1.1. (1993) . Technical Report SEI-93-TR-24, Software Engineering Institute, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
• Pawlowski S. D., Robey D. Bridging user organizations: Knowledge brokering and the work of information technology professionals. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(4):645–672Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P. M., MacKenzie S. B., Lee J., Podsakoff N. P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(5):879–903Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pressman R. S.Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach (2001) Fifth ed.(McGraw Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Ravichandran T., Rai A. Quality management in systems development: An organizational system perspective. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(3):381–415Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sheremata W. A. Finding and solving problems in software new product development. J. Product Innovation Management (2002) 19:144–158Crossref, Google Scholar
• Star S. L., Huhn M., Gasser L. The structure of ill-structured solutions: Boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence (1989) (Morgan Kaufman, Menlo Park, CA) 37–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swink M. L., Calantone R. Design-manufacturing integration as a mediator of antecedents to new product design quality. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2004) 51(4):472–482Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szejko S. An exercise in evaluating the significance of software quality criteria. ACM SIGCSE Bull. (1999) 31(3):199Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thibodeau P. More IT jobs go offshore. Computerworld (2004) 38(14):13Google Scholar
• Thibodeau P., Rosencrance L. Users losing billions due to bugs. Computerworld (2002) 36(27):1–2Google Scholar
• Tiwana A. An empirical study of effect of knowledge integration on software development performance. Inform. Software Tech. (2004) 46(13):899–906Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wallace L., Keil M., Rai A. How software project risk affects project performance: An investigation of the dimensions of risk and an exploratory model. Decision Sci. (2004) 35(2):289–321Crossref, Google Scholar
• Westland J. C. The cost behavior of software defects. Decision Support Systems (2004) 37:229–238Crossref, Google Scholar