From Peer Production to Productization: A Study of Socially Enabled Business Exchanges in Open Source Service Networks

References

• Alter C., Hage J.Organizations Working Together (1993) (Sage Publications, London) Google Scholar
• Benbasat I., Goldstein D. K., Mead M. The case study research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quart. (1987) 11(3):369–386Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benkler Y. Coase's Penguin, or Linux and the nature of the firm. Yale Law J. (2002) 112(3):369–446Crossref, Google Scholar
• Benkler Y.The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom (2006) (Yale University Press, New Haven, CT) Google Scholar
• Bergquist M., Ljungberg J. The power of gifts: Organising social relationships in open source communities. Inform. Systems J. (2001) 11(4):305–320Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bronder C., Pritzl R. Developing strategic alliances: A conceptual framework for successful co-operation. Eur. Management J. (1992) 10(4):412–421Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bunting B., Adamson G., Mulhall P. K. A Monte Carlo examination of an MTMM model with planned incomplete data structures. Structural Equation Model. (2002) 9:369–389Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cash J. I., Konsynski B. R. IS redraws competitive boundaries. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1985) 63(2):131–142Google Scholar
• Charmaz K., Denzin N. K., Lincoln Y. S. Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. Handbook of Qualitative Research (2000) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Chesbrough H.Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology (2003) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Clemons E., Row M. Information technology and industrial co-operation: The changing economics of coordination and ownership. J. Management Inform. Systems (1992) 9(2):9–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coase R. The nature of the firm. Economica (1937) 4(16):386–405Crossref, Google Scholar
• Corbin J., Strauss A. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Soc. (1990) 13(1):3–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crowston K., Scozzi B. Open source software projects as virtual organizations: Competency rallying for software development. IEE Proc. - Software (2002) 149(1):3–17Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahlander L., Magnusson M. G. Relationships between open source software companies and communities: Observations from Nordic firms. Res. Policy (2005) 34(4):481–493Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Wever S., Martens R., Vandenbempt K. The impact of trust on strategic resource acquisition through interorganizational networks: Towards a conceptual model. Human Relations (2005) 58(12):1523–1543Google Scholar
• Dempster A., Laird N., Rubin D. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B (Methodological) (1977) 39(1):1–38Crossref, Google Scholar
• Denzin N. K., Lincoln Y. S., Denzin N. K., Lincoln Y. S. The discipline and practice of qualitative research. Handbook of Qualitative Research (2000) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Dubin R.Theory Building (1969) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Egyedi T. M., van Wendel de Joode R. Standardization and other coordination mechanisms in open source software. Internat. J. IT Standards & Standardization Res. (2004) 2(2):1–17Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisendardt K. M. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(4):532–550Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fan X., Thompson B., Wang L. The effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on SEM fit indices. Structural Equation Model. (1999) 6:56–83Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feller J., Fitzgerald B.Understanding Open Source Software Development (2001) (Addison-Wesley, London) Google Scholar
• Feller J., Finnegan P., Hayes J. Delivering the “whole product:” Business model impacts and agility challenges in a network of open source firms. J. Database Management (2008) 12(2):95–108Crossref, Google Scholar
• Finnegan P., Galliers R. D., Powell P. Applying triple loop learning to planning electronic trading systems. Inform. Tech. People (2003) 16(4):461–483Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald B. The transformation of open source software. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(3):587–598Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forrester J. W.Industrial Dynamics (1961) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz J. Interorganisational relations. Ann. Rev. Soc. (1985) 11:281–304Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallivan M. J. Striking a balance between trust and control in a virtual organisation: A content analysis of open source software case studies. Inform. Systems J. (2001) 11(4):277–304Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gay L. R., Mills G. E., Airasian P.Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications (2006) (Pearson Merrill, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• German D. The GNOME project: A case study of open source, global software development. Software Process Improvement Practice (2003) 8(4):201–215Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ghiselli E., Campbell J., Zedeck S.Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences (1981) (W. H. Freeman, San Francisco) Google Scholar
• Glaser B., Strauss A.The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (1967) (Aldine Publishing Company, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Goetz J. P., LeCompte M. D.Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research (1984) (Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York) Google Scholar
• Granovetter M., Nohria N., Eccles R. G. Problems of explanation in economic sociology. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action (1992) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) 25–56Google Scholar
• Guba E. G., Guba E. G. The alternative paradigm dialog. The Paradigm Dialog (1990) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Hannerz U.Cultural Complexity: Studies in the Social Organization of Meaning (1992) (Columbia University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Hars A., Ou S. Working for free? Motivations for participating in open-source projects. Internat. J. Electron. Commerce (2002) 6(3):25–39Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayek F. A. The use of knowledge in society. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1945) 35(4):519–530Google Scholar
• Henderson J. C. Plugging into strategic partnerships: The critical IS connection. Sloan Management Rev. (1990) 30(3):7–18Google Scholar
• Hu L., Bentler P. M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Eq. Model. (1999) 6:1–55Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones C., Hesterly W., Borgatti S. A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Acad. Management Rev. (1997) 22(4):911–944Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones C., Hesterly W., Fladmoe-Lindquist K., Borgatti S. Professional service constellations: How strategies and capabilities influence collaborative stability and change. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(3):396–410Link, Google Scholar
• Jöreskog K. G., Sörbom D.Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language (1993) (Scientific Software, Inc., Chicago) Google Scholar
• Jorgensen N. Putting it all in the trunk: Incremental software development in the FreeBSD open source project. Inform. Systems J. (2001) 11(4):321–336Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kaufman F. Data systems that cross company boundaries. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1966) 44(1):141–155Google Scholar
• Koch S., Schneider G. Effort, cooperation and coordination in an open source software project: GNOME. Inform. Systems J. (2002) 12(1):27–42Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthy S., Feller J., Fitzgerald B., Hissam S. A., Lakhani K. R. An analysis of open source business models. Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software. (2005) (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 279–296Google Scholar
• Madill A., Jordan A., Shirley C. Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: Realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies. British J. Psych. (2000) 91(1):1–20Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus M. L., Manville B., Agres C. E. What makes a virtual organization work? Sloan Management Rev. (2000) 42(1):13–26Google Scholar
• Mockus A., Fielding R. T., Herbsleb J. D. Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla. ACM Trans. Software Engrg. Methodology (2002) 11(3):309–364Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver C. Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Integration and future directions. Acad. Management Rev. (1990) 15(2):241–265Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Mahony S. Guarding the commons: How community managed software projects protect their work. Res. Policy (2003) 32(7):1179–1198Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J. CASE tools as organizational change: Investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Quart. (1993) 17(3):309–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patton M. Q.Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (1980) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Petter S., Straub D., Rai A. Specifying formative constructs in IS research. MIS Quart. (2007) 31(4):623–656Crossref, Google Scholar
• Raymond E. S.The Cathedral & the Bazaar (2001) 2nd ed.(O'Reilly, Sebastapol, CA) Google Scholar
• Robbins J., Feller J., Fitzgerald B., Hissam S. A., Lackhani K. R. Adopting open source software engineering (OSSE) practice by adopting OSSE tools. Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software (2005) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 245–264Google Scholar
• Rossiter J. The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2002) 19:305–335Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sagers G., Agarwal R., Kirsch L. The influence of network governance factors on success in open source software development projects. Proc. Twenty-Fifth Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (2004) Washington, D.C.:427–438Google Scholar
• Sarker S., Lau F., Sahay S. Building an inductive theory of collaboration in virtual teams: An adapted grounded theory approach. Proc. 33rd Hawaii Internat. Conf. System Sci. (2000) Maui, HICrossref, Google Scholar
• Schumacker R., Smith R., Smith E. Rasch measurement: The dichotomous model. Introduction to Rasch Measurement (2004) (JAM Press, Maple Grove, MN) . Chapter 10Google Scholar
• Steiger J. H. Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioural Res. (1990) 25:173–180Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stewart D. Social status in an open source community. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2005) 70(5):823–842Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strauss A., Corbin J.Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques (1990) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Szczepanska A. M., Bergquist M., Ljunberg J., Feller J., Fitzgerald B., Hissam S. A., Lakhani K. R. High noon at os corral: Duals and shootouts in open source. Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software (2005) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 431–446Google Scholar
• Ticoll D., Lowy A., Kalakota R., Tapscott D. Joined at the bit: The emergence of the e-business community. Blueprint to the Digital Economy: Creating Wealth in the Era of e-Business (1998) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
• Timmers P.Electronic Commerce: Strategies and Models for Business-to-Business Trading (1999) (John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., Chichester, UK) Google Scholar
• Urquhart C., Lee A. S., Liebenau J., Degross J. I. Exploring analyst-client communication: Using grounded theory techniques to investigate interaction in informal requirements gathering. Information Systems and Qualitative Research (1997) (Chapman and Hall, London) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A. H. On the nature, formation and maintenance of relations among organizations. Acad. Management Rev. (1976) 1(4):24–36Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van de Ven A. H., Walker G. The dynamics of interorganizational coordination. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29(4):598–621Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wallace R., Mellor C. Non-response bias in mail accounting surveys: A pedagogical note. British Accounting Rev. (1988) 20(2):131–139Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watson R. T., Wynn D., Boudreau M. JBoss: The evolution of professional open source software. MIS Quart. Executive (2005) 4(3):329–341Google Scholar
• West J. How open is open enough? Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies. Res. Policy (2003) 32:1259–1285Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wheeler B. C. NEBIC: A dynamic capabilities theory for assessing net-enablement. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(2):125–146Link, Google Scholar
• Whetten D. A. What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(4):490–495Crossref, Google Scholar
• Woods D., Guliani G.Open Source for the Enterprise (2005) (O'Reilly Media, Sebastopol, CA) Google Scholar
• Yin R. K.Case Study Research, Design and Methods (1994) (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar