Understanding Willingness-to-Pay Formation of Repeat Bidders in Sequential Online Auctions

References

• Ausubel L. M., Crampton P. Demand reduction and inefficiencies of multi-unit auctions. (2002) . Working paper, University of Maryland, College Park. http://www.cramton.umd.edu/papers1995-1999/98wp-demand-reduction.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Ba S., Pavlou P. A. Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quart. (2002) 26(3):243–268Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bajari P., Hortaçsu A., Jones D. Cyberspace auctions and pricing issues: A review of empirical findings. The New Economy Handbook (2002) (Academic Press, San Diego) Google Scholar
• Bajari P., Hortaçsu A. The winner's curse, reserve prices, and endogenous entry: Empirical insights from eBay auctions. RAND J. Econom. (2003) 34(2):329–355Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna R., Goes P., Gupta A. Insights and analysis of online auctions. Comm. ACM (2001) 44(11):42–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna R., Goes P., Gupta A. Replicating online Yankee auctions to analyze auctioneers' and bidders' strategies. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(3):244–268Link, Google Scholar
• Bapna R., Goes P., Gupta A., Jin Y. User heterogeneity and its impact on electronic auction market design: An empirical exploration. MIS Quart. (2004) 28(1):21–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bapna R., Goes P., Gupta A., Karuga G. Predicting bidders' willingness to pay in online multi-unit ascending auctions: Analytical and empirical insights. Informs J. Comput. (2008) 20(3):345–355Link, Google Scholar
• Beggs A., Graddy K. Declining values and the afternoon effect: Evidence from art auctions. RAND J. Econom. (1997) 28(3):544–565Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernhardt D., Scoones D. A note on sequential auctions. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1994) 84(3):653–657Google Scholar
• Chakraborty I., Kosmopoulou G. Auctions with endogenous entry. Econom. Lett. (2001) 72(2):195–200Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cheema A., Leszczyc P. T. L. P., Bagchi R., Bagozzi R. P., Cox J. C., Dholakia U. M., Greenleaf E. A., et al. Economics, psychology, and social dynamics of consumer bidding in auctions. Marketing Lett. (2005) 16:3–4Crossref, Google Scholar
• Diekmann K. A., Tenbrunsel A. E., Shah P. P., Schroth H. A., Bazerman M. H. The descriptive and prescriptive use of previous purchase price in negotiations. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1996) 66(2):179–191Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frees E. W.Longitudinal and Panel Data: Analysis and Applications in the Social Sciences (2006) (Cambridge University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Gandal N. Sequential auctions of Israeli cable television licenses: The morning effect. J. Indust. Econom. (1997) 45(4):227–244Google Scholar
• Ginsburgh V. A., van Ours J. C. On organizing sequential auctions: Results of a natural experiment by Christie's. Oxford Econom. Papers (2007) 59(1):1–15Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gopal R. D., Pathak B., Tripathi A. K., Yin F. From Fatwallet to eBay: An investigation of the impact of virtual communities on sales promotion. J. Retailing (2006) 82(2):155–164Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jeitschko T. D. Learning in sequential auctions. Southern Econom. J. (1998) 65(1):98–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kauffman R. J., Wood C. A. Doing their bidding: An empirical examination of factors that affect a buyer's utility in Internet auctions. Inform. Tech. Management (2006) 7:171–190Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishnamurthi L., Mazumdar T., Raj S. P. Asymmetric response to price in consumer choice and purchase quantity decisions. J. Consumer Res. (1992) 19(December):387–400Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leornard K. A new era of digital window shopping: From shopping cart abandonment to purchase. (2005) . Research report, ScanAlert, Inc. http://www.webhostgear.com/shopping_habits.pdfGoogle Scholar
• List J. A., Lucking-Reiley D. Demand reductions in multiunit auctions: Evidence from a sportscard field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2000) 90(4):961–972Crossref, Google Scholar
• List J. A., Lucking-Reiley D. Bidding behavior and decision costs in field experiments. Econom. Inquiry (2000) 40(4):611–619Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lohse G. L., Bellman S., Johnson E. J. Consumer buying behavior on the Internet: Findings from panel data. J. Interactive Marketing (2000) 14(1):15–29Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAfee R. P., Vincent D. The declining price anomaly. J. Econom. Theory (1993) 60(1):191–212Crossref, Google Scholar
• Menezes F. M., Monteiro P. K. Existence of equilibrium in a discriminatory price auction. Math. Soc. Sci. (1995) 30(3):285–292Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P., Weber R. J. A theory of auctions and competitive bidding. Econometrica (1982) 50(5):1089–1122Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neugebauer T. Bidding strategies of sequential first price auctions programmed by experienced bidders. Cuadernos Economica (2004) 27:153–184Google Scholar
• Neugebauer T., Pezanis-Christou P. Bidding at sequential first-price auctions with(out) supply uncertainty: A laboratory analysis. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2007) 63(1):55–72Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pinker E. J., Seidmann A., Vakrat Y. Managing online auctions: Current business and research issues. Management Sci. (2003) 49(11):1457–1484Link, Google Scholar
• Reiley D., Bryan D., Prasad N., Reeves D. Pennies from eBay: The determinants of price in online auctions. J. Indust. Econom. (2007) 55(2):223–233Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogosa D. R., Willett J. B. Understanding correlates of change by modeling individual differences in growth. Psychometrika (1985) 50:203–228Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roth A. E., Ockenfels A. Last minute bidding and rules for ending second-price auctions: Evidence from eBay and Amazon auctions on Internet. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2002) 92(4):1093–1103Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singer J. D. Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. J. Educational Behavioral Statist. (1998) 24(4):323–355Crossref, Google Scholar
• Singer J. D., Willett J.Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence (2003) (Oxford University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Telser L. G. Searching for the lowest price. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1973) 63(2):40–49Google Scholar
• Tenorio R. Multiple unit auctions with strategic price-quantity decisions. Econom. Theory (1999) 13(1):247–260Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tripathi A. K., Nair S. K., Karuga G. G. Optimal lot sizing policies for sequential online auctions. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engrg. (2008) 21(4):554–567Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vincent S., Chanel O. Retailers and consumers in sequential auctions of collectibles. Canadian J. Econom. (2007) 40(1):278–295Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wang J. T.-Y. Is last minute bidding bad? (2006) . Working paper, Department of Economics, UCLA, Los Angeles. http://homepage.ntu.edu.tw/∼josephw/LMB10.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Wang X., Montgomery A. L. The effects of advertising on customer retention and the profitability of auctions. (2003) . Working paper, GSIA, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PAGoogle Scholar
• Weber R. J., Engelbrecht-Wiggans R., Shubik M., Stark R. M. Multiple object auctions. Auctions, Bidding and Contracting: Uses and Theory (1983) (New York University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Wilcox R. T. Experts and amateurs: The role of experience in Internet auctions. Marketing Lett. (2000) 11(4):363–374Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeithammer R.Sequential Auctions for Substitutes: A Theory of Bargain-Hunting on eBay (2002) (MIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Zhao J., Kling C. L. Willingness to pay, compensation variation, and the cost of commitment. Econom. Inquiry (2004) 22(3):503–517Crossref, Google Scholar