Complementarities in the Diffusion of Personal Computers and the Internet: Implications for the Global Digital Divide

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1080.0219

References

  • Balakrishnan N. Information and communication technologies and the digital divide in the third world countries. Current Sci. (2001) 81(8):966–976Google Scholar
  • Bass F. M. A new-product growth model for consumer durables. Management Sci. (1969) 15(1):215–227LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bayus B. L. Forecasting sales of new contingent products: An application to the compact disc market. J. Product Innovation Management (1987) 4(4):243–255CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bayus B. L., Kim N., Shocker A. D., Mahajan V., Muller E., Wind J. Growth models for multi-product interactions: Current status and new directions. New Product Diffusion Models (2000) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) 141–164Google Scholar
  • Beilock R., Dimitrova D. V. An exploratory model of inter-country Internet diffusion. Telecomm. Policy (2003) 27(3–4):237–252CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Best M., Wilson E. J. The velocity of rebirth. Inform. Tech. Internat. Development (2006) 3(4):iii–vCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bucklin L. P., Sengupta S. The co-diffusion of complementary innovations: Supermarket scanners and UPC symbols. J. Product Innovation Management (1993) 10:148–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Caselli F., Coleman W. J. Cross-country technology diffusion: The case of computers. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2001) 91(2):328–335CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chandrasekaran D., Tellis G., Malhotra N. New product growth models in marketing: A critical review of models and findings. Review of Marketing Research (2006) (M. E. Sharpe, Inc., Armonk, NY) 39–80Google Scholar
  • Chinn M. D., Fairlie R. W. The determinants of the global digital divide: A cross-country analysis of computer and Internet penetration. Oxford Econom. Papers (2006) 59:16–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chopra A. Bridging India's digital divide: Some policy and technological options. (2005) . Working paper, Department of Economics, University of Hohenheim, Hohenheim, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  • Corrocher N., Ordanini A. Measuring the digital divide: A framework for the analysis of cross-country differences. J. Inform. Tech. (2002) 17(1):9–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Danaher P. J., Hardie B. G. S., Putsis W. P. Marketing-mix variables and the diffusion of successive generations of a technological innovation. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38(4):501–514CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dekimpe M. G., Parker P. M., Sarvary M. Global diffusion of technological innovations: A coupled-hazard approach. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37(2):47–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Desiraju R., Nair H., Chintagunta P. Diffusion of new pharmaceutical drugs in developed and developing nations. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2004) 21(4):341–357CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dewan S., Kraemer K. L. Information technology and productivity: Evidence from country-level data. Management Sci. (2000) 46(4):548–562LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dewan S., Riggins F. J. The digital divide: Current and future research directions. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2005) 6(12):298–337Google Scholar
  • Dewan S., Ganley D., Kraemer K. L. A country-level analysis of the digital divide: Measurements and determinants. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2005) 6(12):409–432Google Scholar
  • Fuller V., Upton D. The ITC eChoupal initiative. (2004) . Harvard Business School N9-604-016, BostonGoogle Scholar
  • Ganesh J., Kumar V., Subramaniam V. Learning effect in multinational diffusion of consumer durables: An exploratory investigation. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1997) 25(3):214–228CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gatignon H., Robertson T. S. A propositional inventory for new diffusion research. J. Consumer Res. (1985) 11(4):849–867CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hargittai E. Hurdles to information seeking: Spelling and typographical mistakes during users' online behavior. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2006) 7(1):52–67Google Scholar
  • Helsen K., Jedidi K., DeSarbo W. S. A new approach to country segmentation utilizing multinational diffusion patterns. J. Marketing (1993) 57(4):60–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • International Telecommunications Union (ITU) World telecommunication indicators database. (2005) . Research report, ITU, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  • Islam T., Meade N. The diffusion of successive generations of a technology: A more general model. Tech. Forecasting Soc. Change (1997) 56:49–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • James J. Low-cost information technology in developing countries: Current opportunities and emerging possibilities. Habitat Internat. (2002) 26:21–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kiiski S., Pohjola P. M. Cross-country diffusion of the Internet. Inform. Econom. Policy (2002) 14(2):297–310CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim N., Chang D. R., Shocker A. D. Modeling intercategory and generational dynamics for a growing information technology industry. Management Sci. (2000) 46(4):496–512LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kumar R., Best M. Social impact and diffusion of telecenter use: A study from the sustainable access in rural India project. J. Community Informatics (2006) 2(3):116–136Google Scholar
  • Kumar V., Ganesh J., Echambadi R. Cross-national diffusion research: What do we know and how certain are we? J. Product Innovation Management (1998) 15:255–268CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mahajan V., Muller E. Timing, diffusion, and substitution of successive generations of technological innovations: The IBM mainframe case. Tech. Forecasting Soc. Change (1996) 51:109–132CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mahajan V., Peterson R. A. Innovation diffusion in a dynamic potential adopter population. Management Sci. (1978) 24(15):1589–1597LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mahajan V., Muller E., Bass F. M. New product diffusion models in marketing: A review and directions for research. J. Marketing (1990) 54(1):1–26CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meade N., Islam T. Modeling and forecasting the diffusion of innovations—A 25-year review. Internat. J. Forecasting (2006) 22:519–545CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mohiuddin S., Hutto J.Connecting the Poor (2006) (Progressive Policy Institute, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Norton J. A., Bass F. M. A diffusion theory model of adoption and substitution for successive generations of high-technology products. Management Sci. (1987) 33(9):1069–1086LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Oxley J. E., Yeung B. E-Commerce readiness: Institutional environment and international competitiveness. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2001) 32(4):705–723CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parker G., Van Alstyne M. Two-sided network effects: A theory of information product design. Management Sci. (2005) 51(10):1494–1504LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Peterson R. A., Mahajan V. Multi-product growth models. Research in Marketing (1978) 1(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 201–231Google Scholar
  • Quibria M. G., Ahmed S. N., Tschang T., Reyes-Macasaquit M. Digital divide: Determinants and policies with special reference to Asia. J. Asian Econom. (2003) 13:811–825CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rai A., Ravichandran T., Samaddar S. How to anticipate the Internet's global diffusion. Comm. ACM (1998) 41(10):97–106CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson B., Lakhani C. Dynamic price models for new-product planning. Management Sci. (1975) 21(10):1113–1122LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rochet J. C., Tirole J. Platform competition in two-sided markets. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. (2003) 1(4):990–1029CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers E. M.Diffusion of Innovations (2003) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Sharma P., Kraemer K. L. The $100 PC project. (2008) . Working paper, Personal Computing Industry Center, University of California, Irvine, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Takada H., Jain D. Cross-national analysis of diffusion of consumer durable goods in Pacific Rim countries. J. Marketing (1991) 55(2):48–54CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teng J. T. C., Grover V., Guttler W. Information technology innovations: General diffusion patterns and its relationships to innovation characteristics. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2002) 49(1):13–27CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van den Bulte C. New product diffusion acceleration: Measurement and analysis. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(4):366–380LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Van den Bulte C., Lilien G. L. Bias and systematic change in the parameter estimates of macro-level diffusion models. Management Sci. (1997) 16(4):338–353AbstractGoogle Scholar
  • Wooldridge J. M.Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • World Bank World development indicators on CD-ROM. (2006) (World Bank, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.