Research Note—Mapping the Field of Virtual Work: A Cocitation Analysis

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1080.0227

References

  • Bailey D. E., Kurland N. B. A review of telework research: Findings, new directions, and lessons for the study of modern work. J. Organ. Behav. (2002) 23:383–400CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banker R. D., Bardhan I., Asdemir O. Understanding the impact of collaboration software on product design and development. Inform. Systems Res. (2006) 17(4):352–373LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baruch Y. The status of research on teleworking and an agenda for future research. Internat. J. Management Rev. (2001) 3(2):113–129CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bell B. S., Kozlowski S. W. J. A typology of virtual teams—Implications for effective leadership. Group Organ. Management (2002) 27(1):14–49CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bianconi G., Barabasi A.-L. Bose-Einstein condensation in complex networks. Physical Rev. Lett. (2001) 86:5632–5635CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Braam R. R., Moed H. F., van Raan A. F. J. Mapping of science by combined cocitation and word analysis. I. Structural aspects. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. (1991) 42(4):233–251CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Briggs R. O., Nunamaker J. F., Sprague R. H. Crossing boundaries in information systems. J. Management Inform. Systems (2006) 22(4):7–11CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cascio W. F. Managing a virtual workplace. Acad. Management Executive (2000) 14(3):81–90Google Scholar
  • Chen C. Citespace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. Tech. (2006) 57(3):359–377CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chidambaram L. Relational development in computer-supported groups. MIS Quart. (1996) 20(2):143–165CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cooper H. Editorial. Psych. Bull. (2003) 129:3–9CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cramton C. D. The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(3):346–371LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Crane D. Social structure in a group of scientists: A test of the “invisible college” hypothesis. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1969) 34:335–352CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Daft R. L., Lengel R. H. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Sci. (1986) 32(5):554–571LinkGoogle Scholar
  • DeSanctis G. Attitudes toward telecommuting: Implications for work-at-home programs. Inform. Management (1984) 7(3):133–139CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DeSanctis G., Poole M. S. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(2):121–147LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fiol C. M., O'Connor E. J. Identification in face-to-face, hybrid, and pure virtual teams: Untangling the contradictions. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(1):19–32LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fjermestad J., Hiltz S. R. Group support systems: A descriptive evaluation of case and field studies. J. Management Inform. Systems (2000) 17(3):115–159CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gajendran R. S., Harrison D. A. The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. J. Appl. Psych. (2007) 92(6):1524–1541CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garfield E., Welljams D. Citation data: Their use as quantitative indicators for science and technology evaluation and policy-making. Sci. Public Policy (1992) 19(5):321–327Google Scholar
  • Garfield E., Malin M. V., Small H. Citation data as science indicators. Essays Inform. Scientist (1983) 6:580–608Google Scholar
  • Glaser B. G., Strauss A. L.The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research (1967) (Aldine de Gruyter, Hawthorne, New York) Google Scholar
  • Gmür M. Cocitation analysis and the search for invisible colleges: A methodological evaluation. Scientometrics (2003) 57(1):27–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Golden T. D. The role of relationships in understanding telecommuter satisfaction. J. Organ. Behav. (2006) 27(3):319–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hackman J. R., Oldham G. R. Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organ. Behav. Human Performance (1976) 16:250–279CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Handy C. Trust and the virtual organization. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1995) 73(3):40–49Google Scholar
  • Handy S., Mokhtarian P. L. Planning for telecommuting: Measurement and policy issues. J. Amer. Planning Assoc. (1995) 61(1):99–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarvenpaa S. L., Leidner D. E. Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(6):791–815LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jarvenpaa S. L., Knoll K., Leidner D. E. Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. J. Management Inform. Systems (1998) 14(4):29–64CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karuga G. G., Lowry P. B., Richardson V. J. Assessing the impact of premier information systems research over time. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2007) 19:115–131Google Scholar
  • Kraut R. E. Telecommuting: The trade-offs of home work. J. Comm. (1989) 39(3):19–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kurland N. B., Egan T. B. Telecommuting: Justice and control in the virtual organization. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(4):500–513LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Latour B., Woolgar S.Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts (1979) (Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA) Google Scholar
  • Leydesdorff L. Top-down decomposition of the journal citation report of the Social Science Citation Index: Graph- and factor-analytical approaches. Scientometrics (2004) 60(2):159–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lipnack J., Stamps J.Virtual Teams: Reaching Across Space, Time and Organizations with Technology (1997) (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York) Google Scholar
  • Mahmassani H. S., Yen J.-R., Herman R., Sullivan M. Employee attitudes and stated preferences towards telecommuting: An exploratory analysis. Transportation Res. Record (1993) 1413:31–41Google Scholar
  • Majchrzak A., Malhotra A., John R. Perceived individual collaboration know-how development through information technology-enabled contextualization: Evidence from distributed teams. Inform. Systems Res. (2005) 16(1):9–27LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mane K. K., Börner K. Mapping topics and topic bursts in PNAS. Proc. National Acad. Sci. (2004) 10(1):5287–5290CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Markus M. L. Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(4):502–527LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Maznevski M. L., Chudoba K. M. Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organ. Sci. (2000) 2000(11):5Google Scholar
  • McCain K. W. Mapping authors in intellectual space—A technical overview. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. (1990) 41(6):433–443CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mokhtarian P. L. Telecommuting and travel: State of the practice, state of the art. Transportation (1991a) 18(4):319–342CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mokhtarian P. L. Defining telecommuting. Transportation Res. Record (1991b) 1305:273–281Google Scholar
  • Mokhtarian P. L. A synthetic approach to estimating the impacts of telecommuting on travel. Urban Stud. (1998) 35(2):215–241CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mokhtarian P. L., Salomon I. Modeling the choice of telecommuting—Setting the context. Environment Planning A (1994) 26(5):749–766CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newman M. E. J. Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks. Physical Rev. E (2001) 64:025102CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nilles J. M. Telecommuting and urban sprawl—Mitigator or inciter. Transportation (1991) 18(4):411–432CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oh W., Choi J. N., Kim K. Coauthorship dynamics and knowledge capital: The patterns of cross-disciplinary collaboration in information systems research. J. Management Inform. Systems (2006) 22(3):266–292CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Olson M. H., Primps S. B. Working at home with computers: Work and nonwork issues. J. Soc. Issues (1984) 40(3):97–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Osareh F. Bibliometrics, citation analysis and cocitation analysis: A review of literature I. Libri (1996) 46:149–158Google Scholar
  • Pendyala R. M., Goulias K., Kitamura R. Impact of telecommuting on spatial and temporal patterns of household travel. Transportation (1991) 18(4):383–409CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Peters H. P. F., Braam R. R., van Raan A. F. J. Cognitive resemblance and citation relations in chemical engineering publications. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. (1995) 46(1):9–21CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Poggie G. A main theme of contemporary sociological analysis: Its achievements and limitations. British J. Sociol. (1965) 16:283–294CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raghuram S., Garud R., Wiesenfeld B., Gupta V. Factors contributing to virtual work adjustment. J. Management (2001) 27(3):383–405CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salomon I., Salomon M. Telecommuting: The employees' perspective. Tech. Forecasting Soc. Change (1984) 25:15–28CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schildt H. A.Sitkis—A Bibliometric Software Tool (2005) (TKK, Espoo, Finland) Google Scholar
  • Schildt H. A., Mattsson J. T. A dense network sub-grouping algorithm for cocitation analysis and its implementation in the software tool Sitkis. Scientometrics (2006) 67(1):143–163CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schildt H. A., Zahra S. A., Sillanpää A. Scholarly communities in entrepreneurship research: A cocitation analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory Practice (2006) 30(3):399–415CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schneider J. W. Concept symbols revisited: Naming clusters by parsing and filtering of noun phrases from citation contexts of concept symbols. Scientometrics (2006) 68(3):573–593CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shamir B., Salomon I. Work-at-home and the quality of working life. Acad. Management Rev. (1985) 10(3):455–464CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shumate M., Pike J. Trouble in a geographically distributed virtual network organization: Organizing tensions in continental direct action network. J. Comput.-Mediated Comm. (2006) 11(3):802–824CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Small H. Cocitation in the scientific literatures: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. J. Amer. Soc. Inform. Sci. (1973) 24(4):265–269CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Small H., Greenlee E. Cocitation context analysis of a cocitation cluster: Recombinant-DNA. Scientometrics (1980) 2(4):277–301CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Small H., Griffith B. C. The structure of scientific literatures I: Identifying and graphing specialties. Sci. Stud. (1974) 4(1):17–40CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sproull L., Kiesler S. Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Sci. (1986) 32(11):1492–1512LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stanek D. M., Mokhtarian P. L. Developing models of preference for home-based and center-based telecommuting: Findings and forecasts. Tech. Forecasting Soc. Change (1998) 57:53–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Star S. L., Griesemer J. R. Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Soc. Stud. Sci. (1989) 19(3):387–420CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stokols D., Harvey R., Gress J., Fuqua J., Phillips K. In vivo studies of transdisciplinary scientific collaboration—Lessons learned and implications for active living research. Amer. J. Preventive Medicine (2005) 28(2):202–213CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thatcher S. M. B., Zhu X. Changing identities in a changing workplace: Identification, identity enactment, self-verification, and telecommuting. Acad. Management Rev. (2006) 31(4):1076–1088CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • The Telework Advisory GroupTelework Trendlines for 2006 (2007) (WorldatWork, Scottsdale, AZ) Google Scholar
  • Townsend A. M., DeMarie S. M., Hendrickson A. P. Virtual teams: Technology and workplace of the future. Acad. Management Executive (1998) 12(3):17–29Google Scholar
  • Venkatesh A., Vitalari N. P. An emerging distributed work arrangement: An investigation of computer-based supplemental work at home. Management Sci. (1992) 38(12):1687–1706LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Walther J. B. Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction. Comm. Res. (1992) 19(1):52–90CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Walther J. B. Relational aspects of computer-mediated communication: Experimental observations over time. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6(2):186–203LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Watts D. J., Strogatz S. H. Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature (1998) 393(6684):440–442CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Whorf B. L.Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (1956) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Wiesenfeld B. M., Raghuram S., Garud R. Communication patterns as determinants of organizational identification in a virtual organization. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(6):777–790LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.