Control of Flexible Software Development Under Uncertainty

References

• Auerback C., Silverstein L.Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis (2003) (New York University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Austin R., Devin L.Artful Making: What Managers Need to Know About How Artists Work (2003) (FT Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Barney J. The resource-based theory of the firm. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(5):469Link, Google Scholar
• Baskerville R., Stage J. Controlling prototype development through risk analysis. MIS Quart. (1996) 20(4):481–504Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baskerville R., Levine L., Pries-Heje J., Ramesh B., Slaughter S. How Internet software companies negotiate quality. IEEE Comput. (2001) 34(5):51–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya S., Krishnan V., Mahajan V. Managing new product definition in highly dynamic environments. Management Sci. (1998) 44(11):50–64Link, Google Scholar
• Beck K., Andres C.Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change (2004) 2nd ed.(Addison-Wesley, Boston) Google Scholar
• Beck K., Beedle M., Bennekum A., Cockburn A., Cunningham W., Fowler M., Grenning J., Highsmith J., Hunt A., Jeffries R., Kern J., Marick B. The agile manifesto. (2001) . Retrieved February 2005, http://www.agilemanifesto.orgGoogle Scholar
• Boehm B., Turner R.Balancing Agility and Discipline: A Guide for the Perplexed (2004) (Addison-Wesley, Boston) Google Scholar
• Bourgeois L., Eisenhardt K. Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: Four cases in the microcomputer industry. Management Sci. (1988) 34(7):816–835Link, Google Scholar
• Bowman J. Performance art. (2008) . Retrieved January 2008, http://www.bright.net/∼dapoets/performa.htmGoogle Scholar
• Brown S., Eisenhardt K. The art of continuous change: Linking complexity theory and time-paced evolution in relentlessly shifting organizations. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(1):1–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cardinal L., Sitkin S., Long C. Balancing and rebalancing in the creation and evolution of organizational control. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(4):411–431Link, Google Scholar
• Choudhury V., Sabherwal R. Portfolios of control in outsourced software development projects. Inform. Systems Res. (2003) 14(3):291–314Link, Google Scholar
• Conboy K. Agility from first principles: Reconstructing the concept of agility in information systems development. Inform. Systems Res. (2009) 20(3):329–354Link, Google Scholar
• Cummings J., Espinosa J., Pickering C. Crossing spatial and temporal boundaries in globally distributed projects: A relational model of coordination delay. Inform. Systems Res. (2009) 20(3):420–439Link, Google Scholar
• Cusumano M., Yoffie D. Software development on Internet time. IEEE Comput. (1999) 32(10):60–69Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahan E., Mendelson H. An extreme-value model of concept testing. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):102–116Link, Google Scholar
• Dubé L., Paré G. Rigor in information systems positivist case research: Current practices, trends, and recommendations. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(4):597–636Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. Making fast strategic decisions in high velocity environments. Acad. Management J. (1989a) 32(3):543–576Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. (1989b) 14(4):532–550Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K., Martin J. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(10–11):1105–1121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K., Tabrizi B. Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(1):84–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Sull D. N. Strategy as simple rules. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2001) 79(1):106–116Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald B., Hartnett G., Conboy K. Customizing agile methods to software practices at Intel Shannon. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (2006) 15(2):200–213Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald B., Russo N., O'Kane T. Software development tailoring at Motorola. Comm. ACM (2003) 46(4):65–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris M., Aebischer K., Klaus T. The whitewater process: Software product development in small IT businesses. Comm. ACM (2007) 50(5):89–93Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris M., Hevner A., Collins R. Controls in flexible software development. Comm. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2009) 24Article 43Google Scholar
• Henderson J., Soonchul L. Managing I/S design teams: A control theories perspective. Management Sci. (1992) 38(6):757–777Link, Google Scholar
• Huber G., Van de Ven A.Longitudinal Field Research Methods: Studying Processes in Organizational Change (1995) (Sage, London) Google Scholar
• Iansiti M. Shooting the rapids: Managing product development in turbulent environments. California Management Rev. (1995) 38(1):37–58Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jap S. D. Perspectives on joint competitive advantage in buyer-supplier relationships. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2001) 18(1):19–35Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karagozoglu N., Brown W. B. Time-based management of the new product development process. J. Product Innovation Management (1993) 10(3):204–215Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirsch L. Portfolios of control modes and IS project management? Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(3):215–239Link, Google Scholar
• Kirsch L. Deploying common systems globally: The dynamics of control. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(4):374–395Link, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V., Ulrich K. Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):1–21Link, Google Scholar
• Kruchten P.The Rational Unified Process: An Introduction (2000) 2nd ed.(Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
• Lyytinen K., Rose G. Information system development agility as organizational learning. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (2006) 15(2):183–199Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lyytinen K., Mathiassen L., Ropponen J. Attention shaping and software risk—A categorical analysis of four classical risk management approaches. Inform. Systems Res. (1998) 9(3):233–255Link, Google Scholar
• MacCormack A., Verganti R. Managing the sources of uncertainty: Matching process and context in software development. J. Product Innovation Management (2003) 20(3):217–232Crossref, Google Scholar
• McConnell S.Rapid Development (1996) (Microsoft Press, Redmond, WA) Google Scholar
• Mintzberg H., McHugh A. Strategy formation in an adhocracy. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1985) 30:160–197Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorman C., Miner A. Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23(4):698–723Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nambisan S. Information systems as a reference discipline for new product development. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(1):1–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nambisan S., Wilemon D. Software development and new product development: Potentials for cross-domain knowledge sharing. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2000) 47(2):211–220Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nidumolu S., Subramani M. The matrix of control: Combining process and structure approaches to managing software development. J. Management Inform. Systems (2003–2004) 20(3):159–196Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Reilly C. A., Tushman M. L. Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Res. Organ. Behav. (2008) 28:185–206Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. Integrated information environment or matrix of control? The contradictory implications of information technology. Accounting Management Inform. Tech. (1991) 1(1):9–42Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ouchi W. The relationship between organizational structure and organizational control. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1977) 22(1):95–113Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ouchi W. A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Sci. (1979) 25(9):833–848Link, Google Scholar
• Ouchi W. Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1980) 25(1):129–141Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ouchi W., Johnson J. Types of organizational control and their relationship to emotional well being. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1978) 23(2):293–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pavlou P. A., El Sawy O. A. From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Inform. Systems Res. (2006) 17(3):198–227Link, Google Scholar
• Peters T., Waterman R.In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America's Best-Run Companies (1982) 1st ed.(Harper & Row, New York) Google Scholar
• Robey D.Designing Organizations (1996) (Irwin, Homewood, IL) Google Scholar
• Sarker S., Sarker S. Exploring agility in distributed information systems development (ISD) teams: An interpretive study in an offshoring context. Inform. Systems Res. (2009) 20(3):440–461Link, Google Scholar
• Schwaber K., Beedle M.Agile Software Development with Scrum (2002) (Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Teece D., Pasano G., Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18(7):509–533Crossref, Google Scholar
• Takeuchi H., Nonaka I. The new new product development game. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1986) 64(1):137–146Google Scholar
• Tripsas M., Gavetti G. Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(10/11):1147–1161Crossref, Google Scholar
• Verona G., Ravasi D. Unbundling dynamic capabilities: An exploratory study of continuous product innovation. Indust. Corporate Change (2003) 12(3):577–606Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick K. Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9(5):543–555Link, Google Scholar
• Wheeler B. NEBIC: A dynamic capabilities theory for assessing net-enablement. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(2):125–146Link, Google Scholar
• Yin R.Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1994) 2nd ed.(Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar