Exploring Agility in Distributed Information Systems Development Teams: An Interpretive Study in an Offshoring Context

References

• Astley W. G., Zammuto R. F. Organization science, managers, and language games. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(4):443–460Link, Google Scholar
• Balasubramaniam R., Cao L., Mohan K., Xu P. Can distributed software development be agile? Comm. ACM (2006) 49(10):41–46Crossref, Google Scholar
• Börjesson A., Mathiassen L. Improving software organizations: The agility challenge. Inform. Tech. People (2005) 18(4):359–382Crossref, Google Scholar
• Breu K., Hemingway C. J. Making organizations virtual: The hidden cost of distributed teams. J. Inform. Tech. (2004) 19:191–202Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bryant A., Charmaz K.The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory (2007) (Sage Publications, London) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carmel E.Global Software Teams: Collaborating Across Borders and Time Zones (1999) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Carmel E., Agarwal R. The maturation of offshore sourcing of information technology work. MIS Quart. Executive (2002) 1(2):65–86Google Scholar
• Charmaz K., Denzin N. K., Lincoln Y. S. Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. Handbook of Qualitative Research (2000) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) 509–535Google Scholar
• Christopher M. The agile supply chain: Competing in volatile markets. Indust. Marketing Management (2000) 29:37–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Conboy K. Agility from first principles: Reconstructing the concept of agility in information systems development. Inform. Systems Res. (2009) 20(3):329–354Link, Google Scholar
• Conboy K., Fitzgerald B., DeSouza K. C. Agile drivers, capabilities, and value: An over-arching assessment framework for systems development. Agile Information Systems: Conceptualization, Construction, and Management (2007) (Elsevier, Burlington, MA) 207–221Google Scholar
• Donaldson L.Contingency Theory (1995) (Dartmouth Publishing, Brookfield, VT) Google Scholar
• Fink L., Neumann S. Gaining agility through IT personnel capabilities: The mediating role of IT infrastructure capabilities. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2007) 8(8):440–462Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald B., Hartnett G., Conboy K. Customising agile methods to software practices. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (2006) 15(2):200–213Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flick U.An Introduction to Qualitative Research (1998) (Sage Publications, London) Google Scholar
• Flor N. V. Globally distributed software development and pair programming. Comm. ACM (2006) 49(10):57–58Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gregor S. The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quart. (2006) 30(3):611–642Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grewal R., Johnson J., Sarker S. Crises in business markets: Implications for interfirm linkages. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2007) 35(3):398–416Crossref, Google Scholar
• Harris M., Collins R., Hevner A. Control of flexible software development under uncertainty. Inform. Systems Res. (2009) 20(3):400–419Link, Google Scholar
• Holmstrom H., Fitzgerald B., Agerfalk P. J., Conchuir E. O. Agile practices reduce distance in global software development. Inform. Systems Management (2006) 23(3):7–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holton J. A., Bryant A., Charmaz K. The coding process and its challenge. The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory (2007) (Sage Publications, London) 265–290Crossref, Google Scholar
• Humphrey W. Pathways to process maturity: The personal software process and team software process. (1999) 1–17SEI Interactive (June 1999). http://www.sei.cmu.edu/news-at-sei/features/1999/ju/background.jun99.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Kotlarsky J., Oshri I., van Hillegersberg J., Kumar K. Globally distributed component-based software development: An exploratory study of knowledge management and work division. J. Inform. Tech. (2007) 22(2):161–173Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein H. K., Myers M. D. A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quart. (1999) 23(1):67–93Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee A. S. Electronic mail as a medium for rich communication: An empirical investigation using hermeneutic interpretation. MIS Quart. (1994) 18(2):143–157Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lee O. K., Banerjee P., Lim K. H., Kumar K., van Hillegersberg J., Wei K. K. Aligning IT components to achieve agility in globally distributed system development. Comm. ACM (2006) 49(10):49–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu J. S., Sycara K. P. Coordination of multiple agents for production management. Ann. Oper. Res. (1997) 75:235–289Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lui T. W., Piccoli G., DeSouza K. C. Degrees of agility: Implications for information system design and firm strategy. Agile Information Systems: Conceptualization, Construction, and Management (2007) (Elsevier, Burlington, MA) 122–133Google Scholar
• Meredith S., Francis D. Journey towards agility: The agile wheel explored. TQM Magazine (2000) 12(2):137Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D. Configurations revisited. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(7):505–512Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miller D., Friesen P. H.Organizations: A Quantum View (1984) (Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NH) Google Scholar
• Mistry D., Navelkar S. Best practices in global agile development for product innovation. Agile J. (2006) June). http://www.agilejournal.comGoogle Scholar
• Mohan K., Xu P., Balasubramaniam R. Supporting dynamic group decision and negotiation processes: A traceability augmented peer-to-peer network approach. Inform. Management (2006) 43(5):650–662Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murphy C. Adaptive project management using scrum. Methods Tools (2004) 12(4):10–22Google Scholar
• Myers M. D., Newman M. The qualitative interview in IS research: Examining the craft. Inform. Organ. (2007) 17(1):2–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ohno T.The Toyota Production System Beyond Large Scale Production (1988) (Productivity Press, Portland, OR) Google Scholar
• Overby E., Bharadwaj A., Sambamurthy V. Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (2006) 15(2):120–131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Patton M. Q.Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (1990) 2nd ed.(Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
• Robinson M., Kalakota R.Offshore Outsourcing: Business Models, ROI and Best Practices (2004) (Mivar Press, Alpharetta, GA) Google Scholar
• Sambamurthy V., Bharadwaj A., Grover V. Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(2):237–263Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarker S., Sahay S. Understanding virtual team development: An interpretive study. J. Assoc. Inform. Systems (2003) 4(1):1–38Google Scholar
• Sarker S., Sahay S. Implications of space and time for distributed work: An interpretive study of Norwegian systems development teams. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (2004) 13(1):3–20Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sarker S., Sarker S., Sidorova A. Actor-networks and business process change failure: An interpretive case study. J. Management Inform. Systems (2006) 23(1):51–86Crossref, Google Scholar
• Simons M. Global software development: A hard problem requiring a host of solutions. Comm. ACM (2006) 49(10):32–33Google Scholar
• Smith A. M. Fundamentals of the capability maturity model. Data Admin. Newsletter (2004) JulyGoogle Scholar
• Sutton R. I., Staw B. M. What theory is not. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(3):371–384Crossref, Google Scholar
• van Oosterhout M., Waarts E., van Hillegersberg J. Change factors requiring agility and implications for IT. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (2006) 15(2):132–145Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsham G. Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (1995) 4:74–81Crossref, Google Scholar
• Walsham G. Doing interpretive research. Eur. J. Inform. Systems (2006) 15:320–330Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weick K. E. What theory is not, theorizing is. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(3):385–390Crossref, Google Scholar
• Xu T., Desrochers A. A., Graves R. J. Performance modelling of dynamic network-based decision systems for distributed manufacturing. Internat. J. Comput. Integrated Manufacturing (2005) 18(2/3):179–198Crossref, Google Scholar
• Yusuf Y. Y., Sarhadi M., Gunasekaran A. Agile manufacturing: The drivers, concepts, and attributes. Internat. J. Production Econom. (1999) 62:33–43Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhou L., Nagi R. Design of distributed information systems for agile manufacturing virtual enterprises using CORBA and STEP standards. J. Manufacturing Systems (2002) 21(1):14–31Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zuboff S.In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power (1988) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar