Profiting from Knowledge Management: The Impact of Time and Experience

References

• Ackerman P. L. Determinants of individual differences during skill acquisition: Cognitive abilities and information processing. J. Experiment. Psych. General (1988) 117(3):288–318Crossref, Google Scholar
• Adelson B., Soloway E., Chi M. T. H., Glaser R., Farr M. J. A model of software design. The Nature of Expertise. (1988) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London) 185–208Google Scholar
• Ahearne M., Srinivasan N., Weinstein L. Effects of technology on sales performance: Progressing from technology acceptance to technology usage and consequences. J. Personal Selling Sales Management (2004) 24(4):297–310Google Scholar
• Alavi M., Leidner D. E. Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quart. (2001) 25(1):107–136Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ang S., Slaughter S., Ng K. Y. Human capital and institutional determinants of information technology compensation: Modeling multilevel and cross-level interactions. Management Sci. (2002) 48(11):1427–1445Link, Google Scholar
• Argote L.Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge (1999) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) Google Scholar
• Arnold V., Collier P. A., Leech S. A., Sutton S. G. Impact of intelligent decision aids on expert and novice decision makers' judgments. Accounting Finance (2004) 44(1):1–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Attewell P., Rule J. Computing and organizations: What we know and what we don't know. Comm. ACM (1984) 27(12):1184–1192Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bell B. S., Kozlowski S. W. J. Goal orientation and ability: Interactive effects on self-efficacy, performance, and knowledge. J. Appl. Psych. (2002) 87(3):497–505Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bereiter C., Scardamalia M.Surpassing Ourselves: An Inquiry into the Nature and Implications of Expertise (1993) (Open Court, Chicago) Google Scholar
• Blessing S. B., Anderson J. R. How people learn to skip steps. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition (1996) 22(3):576–598Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bonner B. L., Baumann M. R., Dalal R. S. The effects of member expertise on group decision making and performance. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (2002) 88(2):719–736Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brewer W. F., Morris P. Schemas versus mental models in human memory. Modelling Cognition (1987) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Brown J. S., Duguid P. Balancing act: How to capture knowledge without killing it. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2000) 78(3):73–80Google Scholar
• Brown J. S., Duguid P. Knowledge and organization: A social practice perspective. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(2):198–213Link, Google Scholar
• Brown S. P., Peterson R. A. Antecedents and consequences of salesperson job satisfaction: Meta-analysis and assessment of causal effects. J. Marketing Res. (1993) 30(1):63–77Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brucks M. The effects of product class knowledge on information search behavior. J. Consumer Res. (1985) 12(1):1–16Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chi M. T. H., Glaser R., Farr M. J.The Nature of Expertise (1988) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London) Google Scholar
• Chi M. T. H., Glaser R., Rees E., Sternberg R. J. Expertise in problem solving. Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence (1982) (Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ) 7–75Google Scholar
• Choudhury V., Sampler J. L. Information specificity and environmental scanning: An economic perspective. MIS Quart. (1997) 21(1):25–53Crossref, Google Scholar
• Churchill G. A., Ford N. M., Hartley S. W., Walker O. C. The determinants of salesperson performance: A meta-analysis. J. Marketing Res. (1985) 22(2):103–108Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen J.Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (1988) 2nd ed.(Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) Google Scholar
• Cohen W., Levinthal D. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):128–152Crossref, Google Scholar
• Craft R. C., Leake C. The pareto principle in organizational decision making. Management Decision (2002) 40(7/8):729–733Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davenport T. H., Glaser J. Just-in-time delivery comes to knowledge management. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2002) 80(7):107–111Google Scholar
• Davis F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quart. (1989) 13(3):319–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• DeLone W. H., McLean E. R. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Inform. Systems Res. (1992) 3(1):60–95Link, Google Scholar
• DeLone W. H., McLean E. R. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A 10-year update. J. Management Inform. Systems (2003) 19(4):9–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Derr K. T. Managing knowledge the Chevron way. Knowledge Management World Summit (1999) (San Francisco)Google Scholar
• Devaraj S., Kohli R. Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link? Management Sci. (2003) 49(3):273–289Link, Google Scholar
• Doll W. J., Torkzadeh G. Developing a multidimensional measure of system-use in an organizational context. Inform. Management (1998) 33(4):171–185Crossref, Google Scholar
• Earl M. J. Knowledge management strategies: Toward a taxonomy. J. Management Inform. Systems (2001) 18(1):215–233Crossref, Google Scholar
• Enders C. K., Tofighi D. Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psych. Methods (2007) 12(2):121–138Crossref, Google Scholar
• Engle R. L., Barnes M. L. Sales force automation usage, effectiveness, and cost-benefit in Germany, England and the United States. J. Bus. Indust. Marketing (2000) 15(4):216–241Crossref, Google Scholar
• Faniel I. M., Majchrzak A. Designing IT for knowledge reuse in a complex uncertain environment. MISRC Sympos. Knowledge Management (2003) (Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis) Google Scholar
• Farrell J. N., McDaniel M. A. The stability of validity coefficients over time: Ackerman's (1988) model and the general aptitude test battery. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86(1):60–79Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fedorowicz J., Oz E., Berger P. D. A learning curve analysis of expert system use. Decision Sci. (1992) 23(4):797–818Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gallivan M. J., Eynon J., Rai A. The challenge of knowledge management systems: Analyzing the dynamic processes underlying performance improvement initiatives. Inform. Tech. People (2003) 16(3):326–352Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodhue D. L., Thompson R. L. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quart. (1995) 19(2):213–233Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gray P. H., Meister D. B. Knowledge sourcing methods. Inform. Management (2006) 43(2):142–156Crossref, Google Scholar
• Griffith T. L., Northcraft G. B. Distinguishing between the forest and the trees: Media, features, and methodology in electronic communication research. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(2):272–285Link, Google Scholar
• Grover V., Davenport T. General perspectives on knowledge management: Fostering a research agenda. J. Management Inform. Systems (2001) 18(1):5–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haas M. R., Hansen M. T. When using knowledge can hurt performance: The value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting company. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(1):1–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T., Nohria N., Tierney T. What's your strategy for managing knowledge. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1999) March–April):106–116Google Scholar
• Heine M. L., Grover V., Malhotra M. K. The relationship between technology and performance: A meta-analysis of technology models. Omega (2003) 31(3):189–204Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hinds P. J., Patterson M., Pfeffer J. Bothered by abstraction: The effect of expertise on knowledge transfer and subsequent novice performance. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86(6):1232–1243Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman D. A. An overview of the logic and rationale of hierarchical linear models. J. Management (1997) 23(6):723–744Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hoffman D. A., Gavin M. B. Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. J. Management (1998) 24(5):623–641Google Scholar
• Jacoby J., Morrin M., Johar G., Gurhan Z., Kuss A., Mazursky D. Training novices to become more expert: The role of information accessing strategy. J. Psych. Financial Markets (2001) 2(2):69–79Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson E. J., Chi M. T. H., Glaser R., Farr M. J. Expertise and decision under uncertainty: Performance and process. The Nature of Expertise (1988) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London) 209–228Google Scholar
• Kanfer R., Ackerman P. L. Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. J. Appl. Psych. (1989) 74(4):657–690Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ko D., Dennis A. R. Sales force automation and sales performance: Do experience and expertise matter? J. Personal Selling Sales Management (2004) 24(4):311–322Google Scholar
• Ko D., Kirsch L., King W. Antecedents of knowledge transfer from consultants to clients in enterprise system implementations. MIS Quart. (2005) 29(1):59–85Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kolodner J. L. Towards an understanding of the role of experience in the evolution from novice to expert. Internat. J. Man-Machine Stud. (1983) 19(November):497–518Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lapre M. A., van Wassenhove L. N. Creating and transferring knowledge for productivity in factories. Management Sci. (2001) 47(10):1311–1325Link, Google Scholar
• LeBlanc L., Kozar K. An empirical investigation of the relationship between DSS usage and system performance: A case study of a navigation support system. MIS Quart. (1990) 14(3):263–277Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leigh T. W. Cognitive selling scripts and sales training. J. Personal Selling Sales Management (1987) 7(2):39–48Google Scholar
• Lucas H. C. Performance and the use of an information system. Management Sci. (1975) 21(8):908–919Link, Google Scholar
• Lucas H. C., Spitler V. K. Technology use and performance: A field study of broker workstations. Decision Sci. (1999) 30(2):291–311Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus M. L. Finding a happy medium: Explaining the negative effects of electronic mail on social life at work. ACM Trans. Inform. Systems (1994) 12(2):119–149Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus M. L. Toward a theory of knowledge reuse: Types of knowledge reuse situations and factors in reuse success. J. Management Inform. Systems (2001) 18(1):57–93Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDaniel M. A., Schmidt F., Hunter J. Job experience correlates of job performance. J. Appl. Psych. (1988) 73(2):327–330Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDermott R. Why information technology inspired but cannot deliver knowledge management. California Management Rev. (1999) 41(4):103–117Crossref, Google Scholar
• McEnrue M. P. Length of experience and the performance of managers in the establishment phase of their careers. Acad. Management J. (1988) 31(1):175–184Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKeithen K., Reitman J., Rueter H., Hirtle S. Knowledge organization and skill differences in computer programmers. Cognitive Psych. (1981) 13(3):307–325Crossref, Google Scholar
• Miles G., Miles R. E., Perrone V., Edvinsson L. Some conceptual and research barriers to the utilization of knowledge. California Management Rev. (1998) 40(3):281–288Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morris M. G., Speier C., Hoffer J. A. An examination of procedural and object-oriented systems analysis methods: Does prior experience help or hinder performance? Decision Sci. (1999) 30(1):107–136Crossref, Google Scholar
• Naumann E., Widmier S. M., Jackson D. W. Examining the relationship between work attitudes and propensity to leave among expatriate salespeople. J. Personal Selling and Sales Management (2000) 20(4):227–41Google Scholar
• Nelson K. M., Nadkarni S., Narayanan V. K., Ghods M. Understanding software operations support expertise: A revealed causal mapping approach. MIS Quart. (2000) 24(3):475–507Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neter J., Wasserman W., Kutner M. H.Applied Linear Statistical Models (1985) 2nd ed.(Irwin, Homewood, IL) Google Scholar
• Nidumolu S. R., Subramani M., Aldrich A. Situated learning and the situated knowledge web: Exploring the ground beneath knowledge management. J. Management Inform. Systems (2001) 18(1):115–150Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Hara B. S., Boles J. S., Johnston M. W. The influence of personal variables on salesperson selling orientation. J. Personal Selling Sales Management (1991) 11(1):61–67Google Scholar
• Orlikowski W. J. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(4):404–428Link, Google Scholar
• Pennington N. Stimulus structures and mental representations in expert comprehension of computer programs. Cognitive Psych. (1987) 19(3):295–341Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pentland B. T. Use and productivity in personal computing: An empirical test. Proc. 10th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1989) Boston, MA:211–222Google Scholar
• Pfeffer J., Sutton R. I.The Knowing-Doing Gap (2000) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Pinsonneault A., Rivard S. Information technology and the nature of managerial work: From the productivity paradox to the Icarus paradox? MIS Quart. (1998) 22(3):287–311Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pisano G. P., Bohmer R. M. J., Edmonson A. C. Organizational differences in the rates of learning: Evidence from the adoption of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Management Sci. (2001) 47(6):752–768Link, Google Scholar
• Rai A., Lang S. S., Welker R. B. Assessing the validity of IS success models: An empirical test and theoretical analysis. Inform. Systems Res. (2002) 13(1):50–69Link, Google Scholar
• Raudenbush S. W., Bryk A. S.Hierarchical Linear Models: Application and Data Analysis Methods (2002) 2nd ed.(Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Repenning N. P. A simulation-based approach to understanding the dynamics of innovation implementation. Organization Sci. (2002) 13(2):109–127Link, Google Scholar
• Repenning N. P., Sterman J. D. Nobody gets credit for fixing problems that never happened: Creating and sustaining process improvement. California Management Rev. (2001) 43(4):64–88Crossref, Google Scholar
• Repenning N. P., Sterman J. D. Capability traps and self-confirming attribution errors in the dynamics of process improvement. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47(2):265–295Crossref, Google Scholar
• Santhanam R., Hartono E. Issues in linking information technology capability to firm performance. MIS Quart. (2003) 27(1):125–153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saxe R., Weitz B. A. The SOCO scale: A measure of the customer orientation of salespeople. J. Marketing Res. (1982) 19(3):343–351Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling M., Vidal P., Ployhart R., Marangoni A. Learning by doing something else: Variation, relatedness, and the learning curve. Management Sci. (2003) 49(1):39–56Link, Google Scholar
• Schmidt F., Hunter J., Outerbridge A. Impact of job experience and ability on job knowledge, work sample performance, and supervisory ratings of performance. J. Appl. Psych. (1986) 71(3):432–439Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seddon P. B. A response location and extension of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Inform. Systems Res. (1997) 8(3):240–253Link, Google Scholar
• Shanteau J. Psychological characteristics and strategies of expert decision makers. Acta Psych. (1988) 68(1–3):203–215Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shanteau J. How much information does an expert use? Is it relevant? Acta Psych. (1992a) 81:75–86Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shanteau J. Competence in experts: The role of task characteristics. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1992b) 53(2):252–266Crossref, Google Scholar
• Snijders T. A. B., Bosker R. J.Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling (1999) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
• Sonnentag S., Lange I. The relationship between high performance and knowledge about how to master cooperation situations. Appl. Cognitive Psych. (2002) 16(5):491–508Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spiro R. L., Weitz B. A. Adaptive selling: Conceptualization, measurement, and nomological validity. J. Marketing Res. (1990) 27(1):61–69Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sternberg R. J., Feltovich P. J., Ford K. M. Cognitive conceptions of expertise. Expertise in Context: Human and Machine (1997) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 149–162Google Scholar
• Straub D., Limayem M., Karahanna-Evaristo E. Measuring system usage: Implications for IS theory testing. Management Sci. (1995) 41(8):1328–1342Link, Google Scholar
• Szajna B. Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Management Sci. (1996) 42(1):85–92Link, Google Scholar
• Teece D. J. Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. California Management Rev. (1998) 40(3):55–79Crossref, Google Scholar
• Trice A. W., Treacy M. E. Utilization as a dependent variable in MIS research. Proc. 7th Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (1986) San Diego:227–239Google Scholar
• Van de Walle D., Brown S. P., Cron W. L., Slocum J. W. The influence of goal orientation and self-regulation tactics on sales performance: A longitudinal field test. J. Appl. Psych. (1999) 84(2):249–259Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Overschelde J. P., Healy A. F. Learning of nondomain facts in high- and low-knowledge domains. J. Experiment. Psych.: Learn., Memory, Cognition (2001) 27(5):1160–1171Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vandenbosch B., Higgins C. Information acquisition and mental models: An investigation into the relationship between behaviour and learning. Inform. Systems Res. (1996) 7(2):198–214Link, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(4):342–365Link, Google Scholar
• Vinokur A., Trope Y., Burnstein E. A decision-making analysis of persuasive argumentation and the choice-shift phenomenon. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1975) 11(2):127–148Crossref, Google Scholar