Vendor and Client Interaction for Requirements Assessment in Software Development: Implications for Feedback Process

References

• Ackoff R. L. Management misinformation systems. Management Sci. (1967) 14(4):147–156Link, Google Scholar
• Aranda J., Easterbrook S. Anchoring and adjustment in software estimation. Proc. 10th Eur. Software Engrg. Conf. (2005) (ACM Press, New York) 346–355Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arya A., Glover J., Radhakrishnan S.The Controllability Principle in Responsibility Accounting: Another Look, Essays in Accounting Theory in Honour of Joel S. Demski (2007) (Springer, New York) 183–198Crossref, Google Scholar
• Arya A., Glover J., Shivaramakrishnan K. The intereffort between decision and control problems and the value of information. Accounting Rev. (1997) 72:561–574Google Scholar
• Arya A., Glover J., Sunder S. Earnings management and the revelation principle. Rev. Accounting Stud. (1998) 3(1-2):7–34Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baiman S., Fischer P. E., Rajan M. V. Information, contracting and quality costs. Management Sci. (2000) 46(6):776–789Link, Google Scholar
• Balachandran K. R., Radhakrishnan S. Quality implications of warranties in a supply chain. Management Sci. (2005) 51(8):1266–1277Link, Google Scholar
• Benbasat I., Schroeder R. G. An experimental investigation into some MIS design variables. MIS Quart. (1977) 1(1):37–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berinato S. How to buy and not get sold. (2001) . Retrieved January 10, 2006, http://www.darwinmag.com/read/120101/sold.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Berrisford T. R., Wetherbe J. C. Heuristic development: A redesign of system design. MIS Quart. (1979) 3:11–19Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davidson E. J. Joint application design (JAD) in practice. J. Systems Software (1999) 45(3):215–223Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis G. B. Strategies for information requirements determination. IBM Systems J. (1982) 21(1):4–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Demski J. S., Sappington D. E. M. Sourcing and unverifiable performance information. J. Accounting Res. (1993) 31(1):1–20Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis A., Wixom B. H., Tegarden D.System Analysis and Design: An Object Oriented Approach with UML (2002) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Elssamadisy A., Schalliol G. Recognizing and responding to “bad smells” in extreme programming. Proc. 24th Internat. Conf. Software Engineering (2002) (ACM Press, New York) 617–622Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galloway R. L., White G. The internal information systems function as a service operation. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management (1989) 9(4):19–27Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodrich V., Olfman L. An experimental evaluation of task and methodology variables for requirements definition phase success. Proc. Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii Internat. Conf. Systems Sci. (1990) (IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington, DC) 201–209Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grudin J. Systematic sources of suboptimal interface design in large product development organizations. Human-Comput. Interaction (1991) 6(2):147–196Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hunton J. E., Beeler J. D. Effects of user participation in systems development: A longitudinal field experiment. MIS Quart. (1997) 21(4):359–388Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hwang I., Radhakrishnan S., Su N. Vendor certification and appraisal: Implications for supplier quality. Management Sci. (2006) 52(10):1472–1482Link, Google Scholar
• I.T. Cortex Statistics over I.T. failure. (2004) . Retrieved January 9, 2006, http://www.it-cortex.com/Stat_Failure_Rate.htmGoogle Scholar
• Joyce E. J., Biddle G. C. Anchoring and adjustment in probabilistic inference in auditing. J. Accounting Res. (1979) 19(1):120–145Crossref, Google Scholar
• Key P. SAP America hit with a 500M suit. (1998) . Retrieved February 20, 2006, http://www.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/stories/1998/11/02/story2.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Kohli R., Devaraj S. Realizing the business value of information technology investments: An organizational process. MIS Quart. Executive (2004) 3(1):53–68Google Scholar
• Lyytinen K., Hirschheim R. Information systems failures: A survey and classification of the empirical literature. Oxford Surveys in Information Technology (1987) (Oxford University Press, New York) 257–309Google Scholar
• Martin A., Biddle R., Noble J. The XP customer role in practice: Three studies. Proc. Agile Development Conf. (2004) (IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC) 42–54Crossref, Google Scholar
• Milgrom P., Roberts J.Economics, Organization and Management (1992) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
• Neumann J. D., Jenkins A. M. Prototyping: The new paradigm for systems development. MIS Quart. (1982) 6(3):29–44Crossref, Google Scholar
• Northcraft G. B., Neale M. A. Experts, amateurs, and real estate: An anchoring and adjustment perspective on property pricing decisions. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1987) 39(1):84–97Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephens M., Rosenberg D.Extreme Programming Refactored: The Case Against XP (2003) (APress, Berkeley, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• The Standish Group (1994) . The chaos report. Accessed November 22, 2009, http://www.standishgroup.com/public.phpGoogle Scholar
• Tirole J. Incomplete contracts. Where do we stand? Econometrica (1999) 67(4):741–781Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (1974) 185:1124–1131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Valusek J. R., Fryback D. G. Information requirements determination: Obstacles within, among, and between participants. Proc. Twenty-First Annual Conf. Comput. Personnel Res. (1985) (ACM Press, New York) 103–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Whyte G., Bytheway A. Factors affecting information systems success. Internat. J. Service Indust. Management (1996) 7(1):74–93Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wilson S., Bekker M., Johnson P., Johnson H., Pemberton S. Helping and hindering user involvement—A tale of everyday design. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Comput. Systems, CHI '97 (1997) (ACM Press, New York) 178–185Crossref, Google Scholar