Contracting Efficiency and New Firm Survival in Markets Enabled by Information Technology

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0251

References

  • Aakvik A., Heckman J., Vytlacil E. J. Treatment effects for discrete outcomes when responses vary among observationally identical persons: An application to Norwegian vocational rehabilitation programs. J. Econometrics (2005) 125(1–2):331–341CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allen D., Lueck D. The role of risk in contract choices. J. Law Econom. Organ. (1998) 15(3):704–736CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson J. C., Narus J. A. A model of the distributor's firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. J. Marketing (1990) 54(1):42–58CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Angrist J., Krueger A. Does compulsory school attendance affect schooling and earnings? Quart. J. Econom. (1991) 106(4):979–1014CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyres N., Liebeskind J. P. Contractual commitments, bargaining power, and governance inseparability: Incorporating history into transaction cost theory. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(1):49–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Austin R. D. Jamcracker: Pivot path. (2002) . HBS Case 5-603-040, Harvard Business School Publishing, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Azoulay P., Shane S. Entrepreneurs, contracts, and the failure of young firms. Management Sci. (2001) 47(3):337–358LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Banerjee A., Duflo E. Reputation and the limits to contracting. Quart. J. Econom. (2000) 115(3):989–1017CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bower J. L., Darwall C. DoubleTwist, Inc. (2000) . Harvard Business School Case 301–023, Harvard Business School Publishing, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Kemerer C. Network externalities in microcomputer software: An econometric analysis of the spreadsheet market. Management Sci. (1996) 42:1627–47LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cameron S. V., Heckman J. J. Life cycle schooling and dynamic selection bias: Models and evidence for five cohorts. J. Political Econom. (1998) 106(2):262–233CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carroll G. R. Concentration and specialization: Dynamics of niche width in populations of organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 90(6):1262–1283CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clark D. Renting software online: Is it the next big idea? Wall Street Journal (2003) June 3):B1Google Scholar
  • Cottrell T., Nault B. R. Product variety and firm survival in the microcomputer software industry. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(10):1005–1025CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dehejia R., Wahba S. Propensity score matching methods for non-experimental causal studies. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2002) 84(1):151–161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Drummond M. The end of software as we know it. Fortune/CNET Tech Rev. (2002) Winter):52–66Google Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Schoonhoven C. B. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(2):136–150LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenmann T., Pothen S. Application service providers. (2001) . HBS Case 9-801-310, Harvard Business School Publishing, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Ericson R., Pakes A. Markov-perfect industry dynamics: A framework for empirical work. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1995) 62(1):53–82CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ethiraj S. K., Kale P., Krishnan M. S., Singh J. V. Where do capabilities come from and how do they matter? A study in the software services industry. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26(1):25–45CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geis G. S. Business outsourcing and the agency cost problem. Notre Dame L. Rev. (2007) 83(3):955–964Google Scholar
  • Gomolski B. Will your ASP bite the dust? Infoworld (2001) 23(7):78Google Scholar
  • Goth G. The next gold rush: Application service providers stake their claims in red-hot market. IEEE Software (2000) 17(2):96–99Google Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Freeman J.Organizational Ecology (1989) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heckman J. Varieties of selection bias. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80(2):313–318Google Scholar
  • Heide J. B., John G. Alliances in industrial purchasing: The determinants of joint action in buyer-supplier relationships. J. Marketing Res. (1990) 27(1):24–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B. Moral hazard and observability. Bell J. Econom. (1979) 10(1):74–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hopenhayn H. A. Entry, exit and firm dynamics in long run equilibrium. Econometrica (1992) 60(5):1127–1150CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Information Technology Association of America ASP outsourcing: The customer experience. (2003) . White paper, ITAA, Arlington, VA. http://www.itaa.orgGoogle Scholar
  • Janszen E. The next bubble: Priming the markets for tomorrow's big crash. Harpers Magazine (2008) . Accessed February 19, 2008, http://www.harpers.org/archive/2008/02/0081908Google Scholar
  • Jap S. D. The impact of online reverse auction design on buyer-supplier relationships. J. Marketing (2007) 71(1):146–150CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jap S. D., Anderson E. Safeguarding interorganizational performance and continuity under ex post opportunism. Management Sci. (2003) 49(12):1684–1701LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Joskow P. L. Contract duration and relationship-specific investments: Empirical evidence from coal markets. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1987) 77(1):168–185Google Scholar
  • Joskow P. L. The role of transaction cost economics in antitrust and public utility regulatory policies. J. Law Econom. Organ. (1991) 7:53–83CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jovanovic B. Selection and the evolution of industry. Econometrica (1982) 50(3):649–670CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koch C. Boy, that was fast. CIO Magazine (2000) . Accessed November 15, 2000, http://www.cio.com/archive/111500/boy.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Laffont J.-J., Tirole J.A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation (1993) (MIT Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Lancaster T.The Econometric Analysis of Transition Data (1990) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lee C., Lee K., Pennings J. M. Internal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology-based ventures. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(6/7):615–640CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Maddala G. S.Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics (1983) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Masten S. E. Transaction costs, mistakes, and performance: Assessing the importance of governance. Managerial Decision Econom. (1993) 14(2):119–129CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mayer K., Nickerson J. A. Antecedents and performance implications of contracting for knowledge workers: Evidence from information technology services. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(3):225–242LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mendelson H. Pricing computer services: Queueing effects. Comm. ACM (1985) 28(3):312–321CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson T. The persistence of founder influence: Management, ownership, and performance effects at initial public offering. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24(8):707–724CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Poppo L., Zenger T. Testing alternative theories of the firm: Transaction cost, knowledge-based, and measurement explanations for make-or-buy decisions in information services. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19(9):853–877CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Poppo L., Zenger T. Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements? Strategic Management J. (2002) 23(8):707–727CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Recktenwald J. Negotiating service level agreements with ASPs. (2000) . TechRepublic.com. http://articles.techrepublic.com/5100-10878_11-1061324.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenbaum P. R., Rubin D. B. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika (1983) 70(1):41–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenbaum P. R., Rubin D. B. Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1984) 79(387):516–524CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schumpeter J. A.The Theory of Economic Development (1934) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Shane S.A General Theory of Entrepreneurship (2003) (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shane S., Venkatraman S. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Acad. Management J. (2000) 25(1):217–226Google Scholar
  • Silverman B. S., Nickerson J. A., Freeman J. Profitability, transactional alignment and organizational mortality in the US trucking industry. Strategic Management J. (1997) 18:31–52CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H. C. A. Theories of decision making in economics and behavioural science. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1959) 49(1):253–283Google Scholar
  • Software and Information Industry AssociationSoftware as a Service: Changing the Paradigm in the Software Industry (2004) . Retrieved January 10, 2007, http://www.siia.net/estore/pubs/saas-04.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Stinchcombe A. L., March J. G. Social structure and organizations. Handbook of Organizations (1965) (Rand McNally & Company, Chicago) 142–193Google Scholar
  • Tiwana A., Bush A. A. A comparison of transaction cost, agency, and knowledge-based predictors of IT outsourcing decisions: A U.S.-Japan cross-cultural field study. J. Management Inform. Systems (2007) 24(1):259–300CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.Economic Institutions of Capitalism (1985) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1991) 36(2):269–296CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.The Mechanisms of Governance (1996) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wooldridge J. M.Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Yager T. Avoid ASP imprisonment. Infoworld (2000) 22(43):55–58Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.