Competing “Creatively” in Sponsored Search Markets: The Effect of Rank, Differentiation Strategy, and Competition on Performance

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0254

References

  • Agarwal A., Hosanagar K., Smith M. D. Location, location, and location: An analysis of profitability and position in online advertising. (2008) Presentation, INFORMS Annual MeetingWashington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • Aggarwal G., Goel A., Motwani R. Truthful auctions for pricing search keywords. Proc. 7th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (2006) Ann Arbor, MI:1–7CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aiken L. S., West S. G.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1991) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Ainslie A., Rossi P. E. Similarities in choice behavior across product categories. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(2):91–106LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Alba J., Lynch J., Weitz B., Janiszewski C., Lutz R., Sawyer A., Wood S. Interactive home shopping: Incentives for consumers, retailers, and manufacturers to participate in electronic marketplaces. J. Marketing (1997) 61(7):38–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Andrews R. L., Currim I. S. Identifying segments with identical choice behaviors across product categories: An intercategory logit mixture model. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2002) 19(1):65–79CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Animesh A., Ramachandran V., Viswanathan S. Quality uncertainty and the performance of online sponsored search markets: An empirical investigation. Inform. Systems Res. (2010) 21(1):190–201LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Arbatskaya M. N. Ordered search. RAND J. Econom. (2007) 38(1):119–126CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bailey J. P., Yao Y., Faraj S. Price dispersion among Internet retailers. Proc. Workshop Inform. Systems Econom. (1999) Charlotte, NCGoogle Scholar
  • Bakos J. Y. Reducing buyer search costs: Implications for electronic marketplaces. Management Sci. (1997) 43(12):1676–1708LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bakos Y., Lucas H. C., Oh W., Simon G., Viswanathan S., Weber B. W. The impact of e-commerce on competition in the retail brokerage industry. Inform. Systems Res. (2005) 16(4):352–371LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bell D. R., Lattin J. M. Shopping behavior and consumer preference for store price format: Why “large basket” shoppers prefer EDLP. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(1):66–88LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Borgs C., Chayes J., Etesami O., Immorlica N., Jain K., Mahdian M. Bid optimization in online advertisement auctions. Proc. 2nd Workshop Sponsored Search Auctions (2006) Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
  • Brynjolfsson E., Dick A. A., Smith M. D. Search and product differentiation at an Internet shopbot. (2004) . Working paper, Carnegie Mellon University, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  • Cancian M., Bills A., Bergstrom T. Hotelling location problems with directional constraints: An application to television news scheduling. J. Indust. Econom. (1995) 43(1):121–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deephouse D. L. To be different, or to be the same? It's a question (and theory) of strategic balance. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20(2):147–166CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Desai P. S. Quality segmentation in spatial markets: When does cannibalization affect product line design? Marketing Sci. (2001) 20(3):265–283LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Diehl K., Kornish L. J., Lynch J. G. Smart agents: When lower search costs for quality information increase price sensitivity. J. Consumer Res. (2003) 30(1):56–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Economides N. Minimal and maximal product differentiation in hotelling's duopoly. Econom. Lett. (1986) 21(1):67–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edelman B., Ostrovsky M. Strategic bidder behavior in sponsored search auctions. Decision Support Systems (2007) 43(1):192–198CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edelman B., Ostrovsky M., Schwarz M. Internet advertising and the generalized second price auction: Selling billions of dollars worth of keywords. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2007) 97(1):242–259CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ellison G. D., Ellison S. F. Search, obfuscation, and price elasticities on the Internet. (2004) . Working paper, MIT Department of Economics, 04–27, Cambridge, MACrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • eMarketer US online advertising spending by format—2006–2011. (2007) . Accessed December 12, 2007, http://www.webcitation.org/5cF4prbDUGoogle Scholar
  • Feng J., Bhargava H. K., Pennock D. M. Implementing sponsored search in Web search engines: Computational evaluation of alternative mechanisms. INFORMS J. Comput. (2007) 19(1):137–148LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hofacker C. F., Murphy J., Krishnamurthy S. Using server log files and online experiments to enhance Internet marketing. Contemporary Research in E-Marketing (2005) (Idea Group, Hershey, PA) 226–249CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hughes M. A., Garrett D. E. Intercoder reliability estimation approaches in marketing: A generalizability theory framework for quantitative data. J. Marketing Res. (1990) 27:85–195CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • iCrossing How America searches: Online Shopping Report. (2005) Google Scholar
  • Jansen B. J., Resnick M. Examining searcher perceptions of and interactions with sponsored results. Proc. 1st Workshop Sponsored Search Auctions (2005) Vancouver, British Columbia, CanadaAsscessed December 3, 2005, http://www.icrossing.com/research/how-america-searches-online-shopping.phpGoogle Scholar
  • Kitts B., Leblanc B. Optimal bidding on keyword auctions. Electronic Markets (2004) 14(3):186–201CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klein L. R., Ford G. Consumer search for information in the digital age: An empirical study of prepurchase search for automobiles. J. Interactive Marketing (2003) 17(3):29–49CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuksov D. Buyer search costs and endogenous product design. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):490–499LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lahaie S. An analysis of alternative slot auction designs for sponsored search. Proc. 7th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (2006) Ann Arbor, MI:218–227 http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1134731CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lai F.-C. Sequential locations in directional markets. Regional Sci. Urban Econom. (2001) 31(5):535–546CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lal R., Sarvary M. When and how is the Internet likely to decrease price competition? Marketing Sci. (1999) 18(4):485–503LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Landis J. R., Koch G. G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics (1977) 22:79–94Google Scholar
  • Levin I. P., Johnson R. D. Estimating price-quality tradeoffs using comparative judgments. J. Consumer Res. (1984) 11(1):593–600CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lynch J. G., Ariely D. Wine online: Search costs affect competition on price, quality, and distribution. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(1):83–103LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Markoff J., Ives N. Web search sites see clicks add up to big ad dollars. (2005) . Accessed February 16, 2005, http://www.webcitation.org/5FmwsRaq9Google Scholar
  • Michael R. W., Peter T. A new twist on an old method: A guide to the applicability and use of Web experiments in information systems research. SIGMIS Database (2005) 36(3):69–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murphy J., Hofacker C., Mizerski R. Primacy and recency effects on clicking behavior. J. Computer-Mediated Comm. (2006) 11(2):522–535CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson P. Information and consumer behaviour. J. Political Econom. (1970) 78(2):311–329CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Netz J. S., Taylor B. A. Maximum or minimum differentiation? Location patterns of retail outlets. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2002) 84(10):162–175CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nilssen T. Sequential location when transportation costs are asymmetric. Econom. Lett. (1997) 54(2):191–201CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Otlacan O. Forbes survey examines effectiveness of digital marketing campaigns. (2009) . Ad Ops Online. June 8. Accessed August 4, 2009, http://www.adoperationsonline.com/2009/06/08/forbes-survey-examines-effectiveness-of-digital-marketing-campaigns/#more-4353#ixzz0bburBKtVGoogle Scholar
  • Perry M., Wigderson A. Search in a known pattern. J. Political Econom. (1986) 94(1):225–230CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ratchford B. T. Cost benefit models for explaining consumer choice and information seeking behavior. Management Sci. (1982) 28(2):197–212LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ratchford B. T., Srinivasan N. An empirical investigation of returns to search. Marketing Sci. (1993) 12(1):73–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rusmevichientong P., Williamson D. P. An adaptive algorithm for selecting profitable keywords for search-based advertising services. Proc. 7th ACM Conf. Electronic Commerce (2006) Ann Arbor, MI:260–269CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Salop S., Stiglitz J. Bargains and ripoffs: A model of monopolistically competitive price dispersion. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1977) 44(3):493–510CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schaninger C. M. Social class versus income revisited: An empirical investigation. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18(2):192–208CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schmidt J., Spreng R. A proposed model of external consumer information search. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1996) 24(3):246–256CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Search Engine Marketing Professional Organization The State of Search Engine Marketing 2005. (2006) . Accessed December 12, 2007, http://www.sempo.org/learning_center/research/sempo_research/state_of_sem_2005/SEMPO-Market-2005-final-all.pptGoogle Scholar
  • Sherman C. A new F-word for Google search results. (2005) . Accessed July 23, 2005, http://www.webcitation.org/5FmwyPgDvGoogle Scholar
  • Smith M. D. The law of one price? The impact of IT-enabled markets on consumer search and retailer pricing. (2001) . Working paper, H. John Heinz III School of Public Policy and Management, Carnegie Mellon University, PittsburghGoogle Scholar
  • Smith M. D., Brynjolfsson E. Consumer decision making at an Internet shopbot: Brand still matters. J. Indust. Econom. (2001) 49(4):541–558CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stahl K. Differentiated products, consumer search, and locational oligopoly. J. Indust. Econom. (1982) 31(1):97–113CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stigler G. J. The economics of information. J. Political Econom. (1961) 69(3):213–225CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Varian H. R. Position auctions. Internat. J. Indust. Organ. (2007) 25(6):1163–1178CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wolinsky A. Prices as signals of product quality. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1983) 50(4):647–658CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wu J., Cook V. J., Strong E. C. A two-stage model of the promotional performance of pure online firms. Inform. Systems Res. (2005) 16(4):334–351LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.